InfectionPhase 4NCT00407147
Procalcitonin Level to Discontinue Antibiotics on ICU Patients With no Obvious Site of Infection
A Phase 4 study testing Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive Kryptor in people with Infection and Bacterial Infection, run by Brahms AG at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test whether a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved laboratory test (PCT Kryptor) can help doctors make better decisions on the need for antibiotic therapy in ICU patients with suspected infections. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Infection, Bacterial Infection, Sepsis
- What is being tested?
- Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive Kryptor
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2008to Jun 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suspected infection (no clear-cut source of infection) as defined by the treating physician
- Empiric antibiotic treatment
- No clear-cut source of infection by clinical or microbiological criteria
- ICU patient
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Pregnancy
- Hemodynamic instability defined as persistent hypotension, need for on-going aggressive resuscitation and/or vasopressor support to maintain an adequate mean arterial blood pressure
- Need for antibiotic prophylaxis
- Patient withdrawn from empiric antibiotic treatment before Day 4
- Severely immuno-compromised patient (liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class C), immunosuppressive drugs after transplantation, neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1000 counts/L), CD-4 count less than 200)
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patient with suspected bacterial or fungal endocarditis
- Patient with suspected meningitis
- Cardiopulmonary bypass within the last 7 days1)
- Major surgery within the last 7 days (surgery that induces a major inflammatory response such as heart or aortic surgery or major abdominal surgery (i.e. duodenopancreatectomy) or any surgery requiring massive blood transfusion.)
- Multiple trauma within the last 7 days
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) within the last 7 days
- Burns >20% body surface area
- Patient in terminal status referred for palliative care
- Patient with advanced directives or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders
- Patient who is already enrolled in another therapeutic clinical study
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Saint Louis University - medical intensive care unit
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: ProBac - Use of Procalcitonin Level as Part of a Decision Tree to Discontinue Antibiotics When Started Empirically in the ICU in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With no Site of Infection Identified
The purpose of this study is to test whether a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved laboratory test (PCT Kryptor) can help doctors make better decisions on the need for antibiotic therapy in ICU patients with suspected infections.
Read the detailed description
The study is undertaken as prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. The study population, ICU patients with empiric antibiotic treatment due to suspected but unproven infection, is randomly assigned to either a Standard Care Group or a Procalcitonin (PCT) Guided Group. In the standard care group, antibiotic treatment would be based totally on clinical decision making with "traditional thought processes" (i.e., cultures, response to antibiotics, risk of untreated infection, other laboratory findings, etc.). The PCT guided group will use the same "traditional thought processes" and in addition the physician will be given access to a PCT value for Day 1 and Day 4 along with the recommended thresholds for likelihood of infection. In conjunction with other laboratory findings and clinical assessments the threshold of PCT is used to continue or discontinue empiric antibiotic treatment.
- Conditions
- Infection, Bacterial Infection, Sepsis
- Being tested
- Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive Kryptor
- Keywords
- bacterial infection, empiric antibiotic treatment, duration antibiotic treatment, reduce antibiotic treatment, procalcitonin, PCT Kryptor, sepsis, Intensive Care Unit, antibiotic treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Infections, Bacterial Infections, Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive KryptorDevice
Also called B.R.A.H.M.S, Kryptor, Procalcitonin
antibiotic treatment based on clinical decision making with "traditional thought processes" used in both groups. In addition the physician will be given access to Procalcitonin values with recommended thresholds for likelihood of infection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Standard treatment |
| PCT | Experimental | PCT guided arm Receives: Device: Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive Kryptor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Days on antibiotics beginning with day 4 until the first day without antibiotics (up to max. 28 days follow up)
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Days on antibiotics during ICU stay
Measured: up to 28 days
Sepsis classification
Measured: up to 28 days
SOFA score (modified)
Measured: up to 28 days
ICU or hospital mortality up to 28 days
Measured: up to 28 days
Frequency of infections
Measured: up to 28 days
ICU and hospital length of stay
Measured: up to 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2008
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionJun 2009
Why it stopped: termination due to futility (very slow patient enrollment)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brahms AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Phil Dellinger, M.D., Study chair, Cooper Norcross Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00407147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ProBac
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2006
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, Wolff M, Spencer RC, Hemmer M. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23-30;274(8):639-44.
PubMed 7637145Garnacho-Montero J, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Barrero-Almodovar A, Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Perez-Paredes C, Ortiz-Leyba C. Impact of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;31(12):2742-51. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098031.24329.10.
PubMed 14668610Christ-Crain M, Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, Gencay MM, Huber PR, Tamm M, Muller B. Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial. Lancet. 2004 Feb 21;363(9409):600-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15591-8.
PubMed 14987884Rau B, Steinbach G, Gansauge F, Mayer JM, Grunert A, Beger HG. The potential role of procalcitonin and interleukin 8 in the prediction of infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1997 Dec;41(6):832-40. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.6.832.
PubMed 9462219Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Palmaers T, Schmidt J. Comparison of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma concentrations at different SOFA scores during the course of sepsis and MODS. Crit Care. 1999;3(1):45-50. doi: 10.1186/cc306.
PubMed 11056723Bergmans DC, Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, van Tiel FH, van der Geest S, de Leeuw PW, Stobberingh EE. Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Apr;39(4):527-35. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.4.527.
PubMed 9145828Roder BL, Nielsen SL, Magnussen P, Engquist A, Frimodt-Moller N. Antibiotic usage in an intensive care unit in a Danish university hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Oct;32(4):633-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.4.633.
PubMed 8288506Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
PubMed 3928249
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ProBac - Use of Procalcitonin Level as Part of a Decision Tree to Discontinue Antibiotics When Started Empirically in the ICU in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With no Site of Infection Identified
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00407147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ProBac
- Conditions
- Infection, Bacterial Infection, Sepsis
- Keywords
- bacterial infection, empiric antibiotic treatment, duration antibiotic treatment, reduce antibiotic treatment, procalcitonin, PCT Kryptor, sepsis, Intensive Care Unit
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: termination due to futility (very slow patient enrollment)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brahms AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2008
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test whether a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved laboratory test (PCT Kryptor) can help doctors make better decisions on the need for antibiotic therapy in ICU patients with suspected infections.
Detailed description
The study is undertaken as prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. The study population, ICU patients with empiric antibiotic treatment due to suspected but unproven infection, is randomly assigned to either a Standard Care Group or a Procalcitonin (PCT) Guided Group. In the standard care group, antibiotic treatment would be based totally on clinical decision making with "traditional thought processes" (i.e., cultures, response to antibiotics, risk of untreated infection, other laboratory findings, etc.). The PCT guided group will use the same "traditional thought processes" and in addition the physician will be given access to a PCT value for Day 1 and Day 4 along with the recommended thresholds for likelihood of infection. In conjunction with other laboratory findings and clinical assessments the threshold of PCT is used to continue or discontinue empiric antibiotic treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Standard treatment |
| PCT | Experimental | Device: Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive KryptorPCT guided arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Suspected infection (no clear-cut source of infection) as defined by the treating physician
- Empiric antibiotic treatment
- No clear-cut source of infection by clinical or microbiological criteria
- ICU patient
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Pregnancy
- Hemodynamic instability defined as persistent hypotension, need for on-going aggressive resuscitation and/or vasopressor support to maintain an adequate mean arterial blood pressure
- Need for antibiotic prophylaxis
- Patient withdrawn from empiric antibiotic treatment before Day 4
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive KryptorAlso: B.R.A.H.M.S, Kryptor, Procalcitoninantibiotic treatment based on clinical decision making with "traditional thought processes" used in both groups. In addition the physician will be given access to Procalcitonin values with recommended thresholds for likelihood of infection. | Device | PCT |
Primary outcome
Days on antibiotics beginning with day 4 until the first day without antibiotics (up to max. 28 days follow up)
Time frame: 28 days
6 secondary outcomes
Days on antibiotics during ICU stay
Time frame: up to 28 days
Sepsis classification
Time frame: up to 28 days
SOFA score (modified)
Time frame: up to 28 days
ICU or hospital mortality up to 28 days
Time frame: up to 28 days
Frequency of infections
Time frame: up to 28 days
ICU and hospital length of stay
Time frame: up to 28 days
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: termination due to futility (very slow patient enrollment)). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2012.
- Background: PubMed 7637145Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, Wolff M, Spencer RC, Hemmer M. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23-30;274(8):639-44.
- Background: PubMed 14668610Garnacho-Montero J, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Barrero-Almodovar A, Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Perez-Paredes C, Ortiz-Leyba C. Impact of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;31(12):2742-51. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098031.24329.10.
- Background: PubMed 14987884Christ-Crain M, Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, Gencay MM, Huber PR, Tamm M, Muller B. Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial. Lancet. 2004 Feb 21;363(9409):600-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15591-8.
- Background: PubMed 9462219Rau B, Steinbach G, Gansauge F, Mayer JM, Grunert A, Beger HG. The potential role of procalcitonin and interleukin 8 in the prediction of infected necrosis in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1997 Dec;41(6):832-40. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.6.832.
- Background: PubMed 11056723Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Palmaers T, Schmidt J. Comparison of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma concentrations at different SOFA scores during the course of sepsis and MODS. Crit Care. 1999;3(1):45-50. doi: 10.1186/cc306.
- Background: PubMed 9145828Bergmans DC, Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, van Tiel FH, van der Geest S, de Leeuw PW, Stobberingh EE. Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Apr;39(4):527-35. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.4.527.
- Background: PubMed 8288506Roder BL, Nielsen SL, Magnussen P, Engquist A, Frimodt-Moller N. Antibiotic usage in an intensive care unit in a Danish university hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Oct;32(4):633-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.4.633.
- Background: PubMed 3928249Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
Related trials for Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Long-term Bulevirtide Monotherapy in Patients With HDV-related Compensated Cirrhosis
Hepatitis D
RecruitingObservational study
VIRal Pulmonary Infections in Older AGE
Viral Pulmonary Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Phil Dellinger, M.D. study chair
Cooper Norcross Health
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Procalcitonin assay - B.R.A.H.M.S PCT sensitive Kryptor in people with Infection and Bacterial Infection, run by Brahms AG at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: termination due to futility (very slow patient enrollment)). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Days on antibiotics beginning with day 4 until the first day without antibiotics (up to max. 28 days follow up) (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00407147, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2012.