AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT00409838

A Phase III Study of Abatacept in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

A Phase 3 study testing Abatacept and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 7 sites in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of abatacept (body-weight tiered dose approximating 10 mg/kg) compared with placebo on a background of methotrexate after 6 months (Day 169) of treatment in Korean patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate clinical response to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Abatacept and Methotrexate
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
113 participants
Where
7 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
Apr 2007to Dec 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for longer than 1 year from the time of the initial diagnosis of RA
  • Patients must have been taking methotrexate for at least 3 months with at least a weekly dose of 15 mg, and a stable dose for 28 days prior to treatment (Day 1)
  • Methotrexate weekly dose as low as 10 mg is permitted for patients who cannot tolerate higher doses

Who cannot join

  • Evidence (as assessed by the Investigator) of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

South Korea7 sites
  • Local Institution

    Anyang, 431-070

  • Local Institution

    Daegu, 705-718

  • Local Institution

    Daejeon, 302-799

  • Local Institution

    Seoul, Sungdong-Gu, 133-792

  • Local Institution

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Local Institution

    Seoul, 137-040

  • Local Institution

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Administered Intravenously in Korean Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis While Receiving Methotrexate

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of abatacept (body-weight tiered dose approximating 10 mg/kg) compared with placebo on a background of methotrexate after 6 months (Day 169) of treatment in Korean patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate

Being tested
Abatacept, Methotrexate, Placebo
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, with inadequate response to methotrexate
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AbataceptDrug

    Also called Orencia, BMS-188667

    Intravenous (IV) solution, - weight tiered (500 mg <60 kg); (750 mg 60-100 kg); (1 gram > 100 kg), Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 6 months

  • MethotrexateDrug

    Tablets, Oral, ≥ 15 mg, weekly, 6 months

  • PlaceboDrug

    IV solution, Intravenous, D5W, Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 6 months

  • AbataceptDrug

    Also called Orencia, BMS-188667

    Solution, intravenous, 10 mg/kg, every 28 days

  • MethotrexateDrug

    Tablets, oral, 15 mg weekly to be adjusted according to patient condition

Study groups in NCT00409838
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Abatacept and MethotrexateExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Abatacept; Drug: Methotrexate
Placebo and MethotrexatePlacebo comparator(standard of care)
Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: Placebo
Abatacept - Open LabelExperimentalOpen-label extension phase
Receives: Drug: Abatacept; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for 20% Improvement (ACR20)

    The ACR 20 is based on 20% improvement (compared with baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and on 20% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function) and 1 acute phase reactant value.

    Measured: At Day 169

  2. Long-term Extension (LTE) (Open-Label) Period: Number of Participants With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related SAEs, Discontinuatons Due to SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.

    Measured: Day 169 to up to 56 days post the last dose (Day 1485) in the LTE period

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR50 and ACR70 Response at Day 169

    The ACR defines ACR 50 and ACR70 response as a 50% or 70% improvement (compared with baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or 70% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (patient global assessment of pain, patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function) and 1 acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).

    Measured: At Day 169

  2. Percentage of Participants With at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% Improvement From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Components

    The ACR defines improvement in core components as 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 3 of the remaining core components: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of pain, patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]), and levels of 1 acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein levels or erythrocyte sedimentation rate.) The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning; scale=0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. The higher the score, the greater the disability.

    Measured: From Baseline to Day 169

  3. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scores (DAS) Based on C-reactive Protein (DAS 28 [CRP]) Levels or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS 28[ESR])

    Adjusted mean change from baseline. The DAS28 provides a score on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of rheumatoid arthritis (>5.1=high disease activity; <3.2=low disease activity; <2.6=remission). CRP or ESR give estimations of DAS28 values on a group level. Change from Baseline=Postbaseline - Baseline value.

    Measured: From Baseline to Days 169 and 1485

  4. Change From Baseline to Day 169 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

    Adjusted mean change from baseline. The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning. Patients respond on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. Higher score indicates greater disability. Change from baseline= postbaseline - baseline value.

    Measured: From Baseline to Day 169

  5. Change From Baseline to Day 169 in Analysis of Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire Domains

    Adjusted mean change from baseline. The SF-36 is a 36-item self-administered questionnaire developed to assess health-related quality of life and comprised of 8 domains( including 4 physical and 4 mental subscales) used to derive the physical and mental component summary scores. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Change from baseline=postbaseline - baseline value.

    Measured: From Baseline to Day 169

  6. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs and AEs, and Discontinuations Due to SAEs and AEs During the Double-Blind Period

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.

    Measured: Throughout double-blind study period (up to Day 169); table includes data up to 56 days past double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.

  7. Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) and Half-Life of Elimination (T-Half)

    Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg. Tmax = the time after administration of a drug when the maximum plasma concentration is reached; when the rate of absorption equals the rate of elimination. T-Half = the biological half-life or elimination half life of a substance is the time it takes for a substance to lose half of its pharmacologic, physiologic, or radiologic activity.

    Measured: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, at anytime between Day 92 and 96, and pre-dose on Day 113

  8. Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters - Maximum Concentration (Cmax)

    Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg. Maximum Concentration (Cmax)= the maximum plasma concentration of the drug.

    Measured: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of the infusion on Day 85, at anytime between Day 92 and 96, and pre-dose on Day 113

  9. Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters - Area Under the Curve (AUC)

    Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC), a measure of drug absorption, in a dosing interval of 28 days from Day 85 to Day 113. Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg.

    Measured: At the end of infusion, 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, anytime between Day 92 and 96, and predose on Day 113

  10. Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Total Body Clearance (CLT)

    Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg. Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes how quickly drugs are eliminated, metabolized or distributed throughout the body.

    Measured: Day 29, every 28 days until Day 141

  11. Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Volume at Steady State (VSS)

    The volume of distribution of drug at steady state (VSS). Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg.

    Measured: At the end of infusion, 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, anytime between Day 92 and 96, and predose on Day 113

  12. Summary Statistics of Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) for Abatacept

    Minimum concentration (Cmin) of Abatacept 500 mg and 750 mg at given time points

    Measured: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of the infusion on Day 85

  13. Immunogenicity of Abatacept- Number of Participants With Reactivity Toward CTLA4-IG and CTLA4-T at Day 169

    Immunogenicity was determined by measuring adult subject sera for reactivity against the whole Abatacept molecule (CTLA4Ig) and CTLA4-T (CTLA4 without the Ig regions).

    Measured: Day 169

  14. Change From Baseline in Surrogate Marker Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Day 169

    Mean change in surrogate marker mean ESR. A surrogate marker is an indirect measurement of effectiveness. Change from Baseline = postbaseline - baseline value.

    Measured: From Baseline to Day 169

  15. Change From Baseline in Surrogate Marker Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Day 169

    Mean change in RF. A surrogate marker is an indirect measurement of effectiveness. Mean change from Baseline = postbaseline - baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 169

  16. LTE Period: Overall Number of Participants With Positive Results of Immunogenicity Samples

    Positive antibody titers were identified by validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results. On-treatment samples were obtained during the LTE period, and posttreatment samples were following the last infusion of study medication.

    Measured: Days 169, at 6-month intervals on-treatment, and at Days 28, 56, and 85 after the last infusion of study medication in the LTE period

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Over Time

    The ACR 20, ACR50, and ACR70 are based on 20%, 50% and 70% improvement, respectively, (compared with baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and on 20%, 50% and 70%, respectively, improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function) and 1 acute phase reactant value.

    Measured: Days 15 through 1569

  18. Percentage of Participants With Physical Function Response as Assessed Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    Improvement is measured by an improved response of at least 0.3 units from baseline on the HAQ-DI score. The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning. Patients respond on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. Higher score indicates greater disability. Change from baseline= postbaseline - baseline value.

    Measured: At Day 1485

  19. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

    The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning. Patients respond on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. Higher score indicates greater disability. Change from baseline= postbaseline - baseline value.

    Measured: Day 1485

  20. Changes From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health Summaries

    The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire used to measure Quality of Life over 8 physically and emotionally based areas: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Answers to each question correspond to a precoded numeric value. An aggregate percentage score is reached for each of the 8 sections and is based on answers to questions. The mean average is worked out for each section. Scores range from 0% (lowest level of functioning) to 100% (highest level of functioning, with higher score indicated increasing levels of functioning.

    Measured: At Day 1485

  21. Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-Defined Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) and With EULAR-defined Remission

    EULAR defines LDAS as a disease activity score as measured by c-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) ≤3.2 and remission as DAS28-CRP <2.6

    Measured: At Days 169 and 1485

  22. Changes From Baseline in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores

    The SDAI is the sum of 5 parameters: Tender joint (TJC) and swollen joint(SJC)counts, based on a 28-joint assessment; patient global (PtGA)and physician global assessments (PGA), assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), on which higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity DA); and C-reactive protein level. SDAI total score=0-86. SDAI <=3.3 indicates disease remission, >3.4 to 11=low DA, >11 to 26=moderate DA, and >26=high DA. SJC is assessed at each visit, with no swelling=0, swelling=1. TJC is assessed through identification of joints painful under pressure or to passive motion at each visit, with no tenderness=0, tenderness=1. Higher score=greater affection due to DA. CDAI is sum of 4 parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PGA (assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score=0-76. CDAI <=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10=low DA, >10 to 22=moderate DA, and >22=high DA.

    Measured: At Days 169 and 1569

  23. Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) or Who Are in Remission

    LDAS is defined as a Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) level <=3.2. Remission is defined as a DAS28-CRP level <2.6.

    Measured: At Days 169, 337, 729, 1149, and 1485

  24. Change From Baseline in Levels of C-reactive Protein (CRP)

    Measured: Days 169 to 1569

  25. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

    Measured: Days 169 to 1569

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Dec 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2007
  3. Primary completionJul 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
113 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00409838
Sponsor's protocol ID
IM101-124
Status last verified
Aug 2013
First submitted
8 Dec 2006
Last updated
8 Aug 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Abatacept and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 7 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jan 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for 20% Improvement (ACR20) (time frame: At Day 169). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in