Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT00409838
A Phase III Study of Abatacept in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
A Phase 3 study testing Abatacept and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 7 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of abatacept (body-weight tiered dose approximating 10 mg/kg) compared with placebo on a background of methotrexate after 6 months (Day 169) of treatment in Korean patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate clinical response to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Abatacept and Methotrexate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 113 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Apr 2007to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for longer than 1 year from the time of the initial diagnosis of RA
- Patients must have been taking methotrexate for at least 3 months with at least a weekly dose of 15 mg, and a stable dose for 28 days prior to treatment (Day 1)
- Methotrexate weekly dose as low as 10 mg is permitted for patients who cannot tolerate higher doses
Who cannot join
- Evidence (as assessed by the Investigator) of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
South Korea7 sites
Local Institution
Anyang, 431-070
Local Institution
Daegu, 705-718
Local Institution
Daejeon, 302-799
Local Institution
Seoul, Sungdong-Gu, 133-792
Local Institution
Seoul, 110-744
Local Institution
Seoul, 137-040
Local Institution
Seoul, 138-736
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Administered Intravenously in Korean Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis While Receiving Methotrexate
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of abatacept (body-weight tiered dose approximating 10 mg/kg) compared with placebo on a background of methotrexate after 6 months (Day 169) of treatment in Korean patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Abatacept, Methotrexate, Placebo
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, with inadequate response to methotrexate
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
Intravenous (IV) solution, - weight tiered (500 mg <60 kg); (750 mg 60-100 kg); (1 gram > 100 kg), Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 6 months
MethotrexateDrug
Tablets, Oral, ≥ 15 mg, weekly, 6 months
PlaceboDrug
IV solution, Intravenous, D5W, Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 6 months
AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
Solution, intravenous, 10 mg/kg, every 28 days
MethotrexateDrug
Tablets, oral, 15 mg weekly to be adjusted according to patient condition
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept and Methotrexate | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Abatacept; Drug: Methotrexate |
| Placebo and Methotrexate | Placebo comparator | (standard of care) Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: Placebo |
| Abatacept - Open Label | Experimental | Open-label extension phase Receives: Drug: Abatacept; Drug: Methotrexate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for 20% Improvement (ACR20)
The ACR 20 is based on 20% improvement (compared with baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and on 20% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function) and 1 acute phase reactant value.
Measured: At Day 169
Long-term Extension (LTE) (Open-Label) Period: Number of Participants With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related SAEs, Discontinuatons Due to SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Measured: Day 169 to up to 56 days post the last dose (Day 1485) in the LTE period
Secondary outcomes (25)
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR50 and ACR70 Response at Day 169
The ACR defines ACR 50 and ACR70 response as a 50% or 70% improvement (compared with baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% or 70% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (patient global assessment of pain, patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function) and 1 acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Measured: At Day 169
Percentage of Participants With at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% Improvement From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Components
The ACR defines improvement in core components as 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and 3 of the remaining core components: patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of pain, patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI]), and levels of 1 acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein levels or erythrocyte sedimentation rate.) The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning; scale=0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. The higher the score, the greater the disability.
Measured: From Baseline to Day 169
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scores (DAS) Based on C-reactive Protein (DAS 28 [CRP]) Levels or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS 28[ESR])
Adjusted mean change from baseline. The DAS28 provides a score on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of rheumatoid arthritis (>5.1=high disease activity; <3.2=low disease activity; <2.6=remission). CRP or ESR give estimations of DAS28 values on a group level. Change from Baseline=Postbaseline - Baseline value.
Measured: From Baseline to Days 169 and 1485
Change From Baseline to Day 169 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Adjusted mean change from baseline. The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning. Patients respond on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. Higher score indicates greater disability. Change from baseline= postbaseline - baseline value.
Measured: From Baseline to Day 169
Change From Baseline to Day 169 in Analysis of Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire Domains
Adjusted mean change from baseline. The SF-36 is a 36-item self-administered questionnaire developed to assess health-related quality of life and comprised of 8 domains( including 4 physical and 4 mental subscales) used to derive the physical and mental component summary scores. All subscales were scored using norm-based methods that standardized the scores to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general population. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Change from baseline=postbaseline - baseline value.
Measured: From Baseline to Day 169
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs and AEs, and Discontinuations Due to SAEs and AEs During the Double-Blind Period
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Measured: Throughout double-blind study period (up to Day 169); table includes data up to 56 days past double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) and Half-Life of Elimination (T-Half)
Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg. Tmax = the time after administration of a drug when the maximum plasma concentration is reached; when the rate of absorption equals the rate of elimination. T-Half = the biological half-life or elimination half life of a substance is the time it takes for a substance to lose half of its pharmacologic, physiologic, or radiologic activity.
Measured: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, at anytime between Day 92 and 96, and pre-dose on Day 113
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters - Maximum Concentration (Cmax)
Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg. Maximum Concentration (Cmax)= the maximum plasma concentration of the drug.
Measured: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of the infusion on Day 85, at anytime between Day 92 and 96, and pre-dose on Day 113
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters - Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC), a measure of drug absorption, in a dosing interval of 28 days from Day 85 to Day 113. Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg.
Measured: At the end of infusion, 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, anytime between Day 92 and 96, and predose on Day 113
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Total Body Clearance (CLT)
Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg. Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes how quickly drugs are eliminated, metabolized or distributed throughout the body.
Measured: Day 29, every 28 days until Day 141
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Volume at Steady State (VSS)
The volume of distribution of drug at steady state (VSS). Steady-state PK parameters following administration of body-weight tiered doses approximating 10 mg/kg.
Measured: At the end of infusion, 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, anytime between Day 92 and 96, and predose on Day 113
Summary Statistics of Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) for Abatacept
Minimum concentration (Cmin) of Abatacept 500 mg and 750 mg at given time points
Measured: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of the infusion on Day 85
Immunogenicity of Abatacept- Number of Participants With Reactivity Toward CTLA4-IG and CTLA4-T at Day 169
Immunogenicity was determined by measuring adult subject sera for reactivity against the whole Abatacept molecule (CTLA4Ig) and CTLA4-T (CTLA4 without the Ig regions).
Measured: Day 169
Change From Baseline in Surrogate Marker Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Day 169
Mean change in surrogate marker mean ESR. A surrogate marker is an indirect measurement of effectiveness. Change from Baseline = postbaseline - baseline value.
Measured: From Baseline to Day 169
Change From Baseline in Surrogate Marker Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Day 169
Mean change in RF. A surrogate marker is an indirect measurement of effectiveness. Mean change from Baseline = postbaseline - baseline value.
Measured: Baseline, Day 169
LTE Period: Overall Number of Participants With Positive Results of Immunogenicity Samples
Positive antibody titers were identified by validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results. On-treatment samples were obtained during the LTE period, and posttreatment samples were following the last infusion of study medication.
Measured: Days 169, at 6-month intervals on-treatment, and at Days 28, 56, and 85 after the last infusion of study medication in the LTE period
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Over Time
The ACR 20, ACR50, and ACR70 are based on 20%, 50% and 70% improvement, respectively, (compared with baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and on 20%, 50% and 70%, respectively, improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function) and 1 acute phase reactant value.
Measured: Days 15 through 1569
Percentage of Participants With Physical Function Response as Assessed Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Improvement is measured by an improved response of at least 0.3 units from baseline on the HAQ-DI score. The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning. Patients respond on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. Higher score indicates greater disability. Change from baseline= postbaseline - baseline value.
Measured: At Day 1485
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
The HAQ-DI assesses a patient's level of functional ability via 20 questions in 8 categories of functioning. Patients respond on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); total possible score=24. Higher score indicates greater disability. Change from baseline= postbaseline - baseline value.
Measured: Day 1485
Changes From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health Summaries
The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire used to measure Quality of Life over 8 physically and emotionally based areas: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Answers to each question correspond to a precoded numeric value. An aggregate percentage score is reached for each of the 8 sections and is based on answers to questions. The mean average is worked out for each section. Scores range from 0% (lowest level of functioning) to 100% (highest level of functioning, with higher score indicated increasing levels of functioning.
Measured: At Day 1485
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-Defined Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) and With EULAR-defined Remission
EULAR defines LDAS as a disease activity score as measured by c-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) ≤3.2 and remission as DAS28-CRP <2.6
Measured: At Days 169 and 1485
Changes From Baseline in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores
The SDAI is the sum of 5 parameters: Tender joint (TJC) and swollen joint(SJC)counts, based on a 28-joint assessment; patient global (PtGA)and physician global assessments (PGA), assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), on which higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity DA); and C-reactive protein level. SDAI total score=0-86. SDAI <=3.3 indicates disease remission, >3.4 to 11=low DA, >11 to 26=moderate DA, and >26=high DA. SJC is assessed at each visit, with no swelling=0, swelling=1. TJC is assessed through identification of joints painful under pressure or to passive motion at each visit, with no tenderness=0, tenderness=1. Higher score=greater affection due to DA. CDAI is sum of 4 parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PGA (assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score=0-76. CDAI <=2.8 indicates disease remission, >2.8 to 10=low DA, >10 to 22=moderate DA, and >22=high DA.
Measured: At Days 169 and 1569
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) or Who Are in Remission
LDAS is defined as a Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) level <=3.2. Remission is defined as a DAS28-CRP level <2.6.
Measured: At Days 169, 337, 729, 1149, and 1485
Change From Baseline in Levels of C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Measured: Days 169 to 1569
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Measured: Days 169 to 1569
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2007
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00409838
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM101-124
- Status last verified
- Aug 2013
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 8 Aug 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Aug 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Administered Intravenously in Korean Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis While Receiving Methotrexate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00409838
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM101-124
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, with inadequate response to methotrexate
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jan 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of abatacept (body-weight tiered dose approximating 10 mg/kg) compared with placebo on a background of methotrexate after 6 months (Day 169) of treatment in Korean patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept and Methotrexate | Experimental | Drug: Abatacept, Drug: Methotrexate |
| Placebo and Methotrexate | Placebo comparator | Drug: Methotrexate, Drug: Placebo(standard of care) |
| Abatacept - Open Label | Experimental | Drug: Abatacept, Drug: MethotrexateOpen-label extension phase |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for longer than 1 year from the time of the initial diagnosis of RA
- Patients must have been taking methotrexate for at least 3 months with at least a weekly dose of 15 mg, and a stable dose for 28 days prior to treatment (Day 1)
- Methotrexate weekly dose as low as 10 mg is permitted for patients who cannot tolerate higher doses
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Evidence (as assessed by the Investigator) of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AbataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667Intravenous (IV) solution, - weight tiered (500 mg <60 kg); (750 mg 60-100 kg); (1 gram > 100 kg), Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 6 months | Drug | Abatacept and Methotrexate |
| MethotrexateTablets, Oral, ≥ 15 mg, weekly, 6 months | Drug | Abatacept and Methotrexate, Placebo and Methotrexate |
| PlaceboIV solution, Intravenous, D5W, Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 6 months | Drug | Placebo and Methotrexate |
| AbataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667Solution, intravenous, 10 mg/kg, every 28 days | Drug | Abatacept - Open Label |
| MethotrexateTablets, oral, 15 mg weekly to be adjusted according to patient condition | Drug | Abatacept - Open Label |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for 20% Improvement (ACR20)
Time frame: At Day 169
The ACR 20 is based on 20% improvement (compared with baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and on 20% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function) and 1 acute phase reactant value.
Long-term Extension (LTE) (Open-Label) Period: Number of Participants With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related SAEs, Discontinuatons Due to SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs
Time frame: Day 169 to up to 56 days post the last dose (Day 1485) in the LTE period
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in the development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
25 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR50 and ACR70 Response at Day 169
Time frame: At Day 169
Percentage of Participants With at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% Improvement From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Components
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Scores (DAS) Based on C-reactive Protein (DAS 28 [CRP]) Levels or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS 28[ESR])
Time frame: From Baseline to Days 169 and 1485
Change From Baseline to Day 169 in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Change From Baseline to Day 169 in Analysis of Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire Domains
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), Related SAEs and AEs, and Discontinuations Due to SAEs and AEs During the Double-Blind Period
Time frame: Throughout double-blind study period (up to Day 169); table includes data up to 56 days past double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) and Half-Life of Elimination (T-Half)
Time frame: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, at anytime between Day 92 and 96, and pre-dose on Day 113
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters - Maximum Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of the infusion on Day 85, at anytime between Day 92 and 96, and pre-dose on Day 113
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters - Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Time frame: At the end of infusion, 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, anytime between Day 92 and 96, and predose on Day 113
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Total Body Clearance (CLT)
Time frame: Day 29, every 28 days until Day 141
Abatacept Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Volume at Steady State (VSS)
Time frame: At the end of infusion, 2 to 4 hours after the start of infusion on Day 85, anytime between Day 92 and 96, and predose on Day 113
Summary Statistics of Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) for Abatacept
Time frame: At the end of infusion and 2 to 4 hours after the start of the infusion on Day 85
Immunogenicity of Abatacept- Number of Participants With Reactivity Toward CTLA4-IG and CTLA4-T at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Change From Baseline in Surrogate Marker Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Day 169
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 169
Change From Baseline in Surrogate Marker Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Day 169
Time frame: Baseline, Day 169
LTE Period: Overall Number of Participants With Positive Results of Immunogenicity Samples
Time frame: Days 169, at 6-month intervals on-treatment, and at Days 28, 56, and 85 after the last infusion of study medication in the LTE period
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Over Time
Time frame: Days 15 through 1569
Percentage of Participants With Physical Function Response as Assessed Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time frame: At Day 1485
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Time frame: Day 1485
Changes From Baseline in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health Summaries
Time frame: At Day 1485
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-Defined Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) and With EULAR-defined Remission
Time frame: At Days 169 and 1485
Changes From Baseline in the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores
Time frame: At Days 169 and 1569
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS) or Who Are in Remission
Time frame: At Days 169, 337, 729, 1149, and 1485
Change From Baseline in Levels of C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Days 169 to 1569
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time frame: Days 169 to 1569
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Aug 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Abatacept and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 7 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jan 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for 20% Improvement (ACR20) (time frame: At Day 169). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2013.