AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 4NCT00410046

Extension Study Evaluating Etanercept in Ankylosing Spondylitis

A Phase 4 study testing Enbrel (etanercept) in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 16 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the health care resource utilization and work status of patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing treatment with etanercept by comparing study evaluations with the baseline evaluations in the ASCEND (0881A3-402)(NCT00247962) study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ankylosing Spondylitis
What is being tested?
Enbrel (etanercept)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
16 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Dec 2006to Oct 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who completed 16 weeks of treatment and have completed the baseline health care resource utilization questionnaire at screening in the ASCEND study 0881A3-402-WW from participating countries.

Who cannot join

  • Withdrawal from the ASCEND study for safety or any other reason.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 4 countries.

16 sites in 4 countries

United Kingdom7 sites
  • Study site

    Basingstoke, RG249NA

  • Study site

    Bath, BA11RL

  • Study site

    Cambridge, CB22QQ

  • Study site

    Cannock, WS112XY

  • Study site

    Liverpool, L97AL

  • Study site

    Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH495PE

  • Study site

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE77DN

Other trials in United Kingdom

Denmark4 sites
  • Study site

    Fredriksberg, DK-2000

  • Study site

    Odense, DK-5000

  • Study site

    Svendborg, DK-5700

  • Study site

    Vejle, DK-7100

Other trials in Denmark

Finland4 sites
  • Study site

    Helsinki, FIN-130

  • Study site

    Hyvinkää, FIN-05800

  • Study site

    Kuopio, FIN-70211

  • Study site

    Tampere, FIN-33100

Other trials in Finland

Sweden1 site
  • Study site

    Stockholm, SE-17176

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: An Open-label, Multicentre, Supplementary Extension Study of Etanercept in Subjects With Ankylosing Spondylitis

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the health care resource utilization and work status of patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing treatment with etanercept by comparing study evaluations with the baseline evaluations in the ASCEND (0881A3-402)(NCT00247962) study.

Being tested
Enbrel (etanercept)
Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enbrel (etanercept)Drug

    Also called Enbrel

    Etanercept 50 mg SC injection once weekly

Study groups in NCT00410046
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Etanercept (ETN)ExperimentalPatients received ETN dose 50 mg once weekly or Sulphasalazine dose 3 g daily in study 402 for 16 weeks. Upon enrollment into study 405, all received subcutaneous injections of etanercept 50 mg once weekly for 36 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Enbrel (etanercept)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Patients Using Healthcare Resources in the 48 Weeks Before and During Treatment

    Healthcare resources were defined as hospital admissions, therapeutic warm baths, physiotherapist visits, and outpatient physician visits. Healthcare resource utilization was evaluated using a questionnaire asking patients whether or not they had used the healthcare resource during the 48 weeks preceding enrollment in study 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) and during the 48 weeks of treatment in this extension study (0881A3-405).

    Measured: 96 weeks

  2. Number of Patients Taking Sick Leave in the 48 Weeks Before and During Treatment

    Patients were asked whether or not they had taken sick leave during the 48 weeks preceding enrollment in study 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) and during the 48 weeks of treatment in this extension study (0881A3-405).

    Measured: 96 weeks

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Number of Patients Utilizing Healthcare Resources During 48 Weeks of Treatment

    Healthcare resources were defined as hospital admissions, therapeutic warm baths, physiotherapist visits, and outpatient physician visits. Healthcare resource utilization was evaluated using a questionnaire asking patients whether or not they had used the healthcare resource during the 48 weeks of treatment.

    Measured: 48 weeks

  2. Number of Times Healthcare Resources Were Used Per Patient During 48 Weeks of Treatment

    Healthcare resources were defined as hospital admissions, therapeutic warm baths, physiotherapist visits, and outpatient physician visits. Healthcare resource utilization was evaluated using a questionnaire asking all patients whether or not they had used the healthcare resource during the 48 weeks of treatment, and if so, how many times the resource was used. The mean number of times is based on those patients who responded to the questionnaire stating they had utilized healthcare resources (see outcome measure 3).

    Measured: 48 weeks

  3. Number of Patients With Sick Leave During 48 Weeks Treatment

    The impact of treatment on work productivity was assessed by sick leave. Patients were asked whether or not they had taken sick leave during the 48 weeks of treatment, and if so, how many days.

    Measured: 48 weeks

  4. Number of Sick Days Per Patient During the 48 Weeks of Treatment

    Patients were asked whether or not they had taken sick leave during the 48 weeks of treatment, and if so, how many days. The mean number of days is based on those patients who had sick leave during the treatment period.

    Measured: 48 weeks

  5. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity From Baseline to Week 38

    Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity. The 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) baseline score was used as the baseline for this analysis. Change = baseline - week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

  6. Change in Total Back Pain Score From Baseline to Week 38

    Total Back Pain was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm indicating no pain. The 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) baseline score was used as the baseline for this analysis. Change = baseline - week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

  7. Change in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score From Baseline to Week 38

    BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in Ankylosing Spodylitis (AS) patients. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10 (0=easy, 10=impossible), patients answered 10 questions assessing their ability in completing normal daily activities or physically demanding activities. The BASFI score is a mean score of the 10 questions, with a maximum score of 100 mm. The 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) baseline score was used as the baseline for this analysis. Change = baseline - week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

  8. Change in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score From Baseline to Week 38

    BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) patient's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. The 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) baseline score was used as the baseline for this analysis. Change = baseline - week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

  9. Change in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) Score From Baseline to Weeks 38

    BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. The 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) baseline score was used as the baseline for this analysis. Change = baseline - week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

  10. Change in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score for Fatigue From Baseline to Week 38

    BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) patient's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The fatigue-specific score is presented here. The 0881A3-402 (NCT00247962) baseline score was used as the baseline for this analysis. Change = baseline - week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

  11. Change in Baseline Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score From Baseline to Week 38

    ASQoL is a questionnaire that assesses disease-specific quality of life (QoL). It consists of 18 statements that are relevant to the physical and mental conditions for a patient with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS): mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each statement is answered by the patient as a 'Yes' (scored as 1) or 'No' (scored as 0). All item scores are summed to give a total score. Total score can range from 0 (good QoL) to 18 (poor QoL). The 0881A3-402 baseline score was used as the baseline for this analysis. Change = baseline - week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

  12. Change From Baseline Haywood Quality of Life Score From Baseline to Week 38

    Haywood quality of life instrument was utilized in the United Kingdom as the ASQoL measure. The ASQoL is an AS-specific measure of QoL, scores range from 0 (good QoL) to 80 (poor QoL). ASQoL is intended to measure the quality of life by means of questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Patient's 0881A3-402 baseline score was used in the analysis. Change=baseline-week 38.

    Measured: Baseline and 38 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2006
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00410046
Sponsor's protocol ID
0881A3-405
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
8 Dec 2006
Last updated
11 May 2012

Publications

  • Baraliakos X, Szumski AE, Kwok KK, Vlahos B, Borlenghi CE. Long-term Etanercept Response for Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Based on Achievement of Early, Intermediate, or Late Responses During Index Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Jun;11(3):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00656-3. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

    PubMed 38488976

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Enbrel (etanercept) in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer at 16 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in United Kingdom, Denmark, Finland, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 May 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Patients Using Healthcare Resources in the 48 Weeks Before and During Treatment (time frame: 96 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00410046, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2012.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in