Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3NCT00410410
A Study of Abatacept in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 3 study testing abatacept (ABA) and abatacept in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 143 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept can improve signs and symptoms of active ulcerative colitis in patients who have not had an adequate response to other therapies. The safety of this treatment will also be studied Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- abatacept (ABA) and abatacept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 591 participants
- Where
- 143 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2006to Nov 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women 18 years or older
- Ulcerative colitis for at lease 3 months
- Moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis
- Inadequate response or intolerance to standard ulcerative colitis treatment
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
143 sites in 19 countries.
143 sites in 19 countries
United States50 sites
Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Austin Gastroenterology, Pa
Austin, Texas, 78705
University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Gastroenterology Specialists, Inc.
Canton, Ohio, 44718
University Of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University Of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Charlotte Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pllc
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University Of Chicago Hospitals
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Consultants For Clinical Research, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Gastrointestinal & Liver Diseases Consultants
Dayton, Ohio, 45415
Aga Clinical Research Associates, Llc
Egg Harbor Twp, New Jersey, 08234
Hudson Valley Medical Research Llc
Fishkill, New York, 12524
University Of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Gastroenterology Center Of The Midsouth, P.C.
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Memphis Gastroenterology Group
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Long Island Clinical Research
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Borland-Groover Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Kansas City Gastroenterology And Hepatology
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
Gulf Coast Research
Lafayette, Louisiana, 70503
University Of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University Of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Center For Digestive & Liver Diseases, Inc.
Mexico, Missouri, 65265
Miami Research Associates
Miami, Florida, 33143
Nashville Medical Research
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Mount Sinai School Of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029
Oklahoma Foundation For Digestive Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Hospital Of The University Of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Allegheny Center For Digestive Health
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Minnesota Gastroenterology, P.A.
Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446
Health Science Center
Pratt, Kansas, 67124
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University Of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
Good, Larry I.
Rockville Centre, New York, 11570
The Permanente Medical Group, Inc
Sacramento, California, 95825
Alamo Medical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Gastroenterology Clinic Of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Gastrointestinal Resrch Assoc.
Setauket, New York, 11733
Tacoma Digestive Disease Research Ctr.
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Litchfield County Gastroenterology Assoc.
Torrington, Connecticut, 06790
Options Health Research, Llc
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Healthcare Research Consultants
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Western States Clinical Research Inc.
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Hanover Medical Specialists, P.A.
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Piedmont Medical Research Associates
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Shafran Gasteroenterology Center
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610
Mexico13 sites
Local Institution
Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, 31238
Local Institution
Culiacán, Sinaloa, 80230
Local Institution
Df, Mexico City, 11560
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44200
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44340
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 45050
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 45200
Local Institution
Hermosillo, Sonora, 83280
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080
Local Institution
Mexico, D. F., Mexico City, 06726
Local Institution
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Local Institution
Torreón, Coahuila, 27250
India12 sites
Local Institution
Bangalore, 560017
Local Institution
Bangalore, 560034
Local Institution
Delhi, 110076
Local Institution
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500082
Local Institution
Hyderabad, 500058
Local Institution
Kochi, Kerala, 682304
Local Institution
Mangalore, 575001
Local Institution
Manipal, 576104
Local Institution
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400020
Local Institution
Mumbai, 400 022
Local Institution
Mumbai, 400 029
Local Institution
Mysore, 570004
Australia10 sites
Local Institution
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Local Institution
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Local Institution
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
Local Institution
Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065 VIC
Local Institution
Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160
Local Institution
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, 2605
Local Institution
Herston, Queensland, 4029
Local Institution
Launceston, Tasmania, 7250
Local Institution
South Ballarat, Victoria, 3350
Local Institution
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Brazil10 sites
Local Institution
Campinas, São Paulo, 13070
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060
Local Institution
Goiânia, Goiás, 74535
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941
Local Institution
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 42700
Local Institution
Santo Andre - Sp, São Paulo, 09060
Local Institution
Santos, São Paulo, 11075
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246
Canada10 sites
Local Institution
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5G2
Local Institution
Lévis, Quebec, G6V 3Z1
Local Institution
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Local Institution
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Local Institution
Québec, Quebec, G1L 3L5
Local Institution
Toronto, Ontario, M3N 2V7
Local Institution
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
Local Institution
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1H2
Local Institution
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5
France7 sites
Local Institution
Amiens, 80054
Local Institution
Clichy, 92110
Local Institution
Lille, 59037
Local Institution
Nice, 06200
Local Institution
Paris, 75475
Local Institution
Pessac, 33604
Local Institution
Toulouse, 31059
Italy5 sites
Local Institution
Naples, 80138
Local Institution
Padova, 35128
Local Institution
Roma, 00133
Local Institution
Roma, 00152
Local Institution
San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013
South Africa5 sites
Local Institution
Belville, Western Cape, 7350
Local Institution
Overport, KwaZulu-Natal, 4091
Local Institution
Panorama, Western Cape, 7506
Local Institution
Parktown West, Gauteng, 2193
Local Institution
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0048
Germany3 sites
Local Institution
Kiel, 24105
Local Institution
Münster, 48129
Local Institution
Münster, 48159
Netherlands3 sites
Local Institution
Amersfoort, 3816 CP
Local Institution
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Local Institution
Groningen, 9700 RB
Poland3 sites
Local Institution
Katowice, 40-752
Local Institution
Warsaw, 02-781
Local Institution
Wroclaw, 50-326
United Kingdom3 sites
Local Institution
London, Greater London, E1 1BB
Local Institution
London, Greater London, WC1E 6DB
Local Institution
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX 39DU
Czechia2 sites
Local Institution
Brno-Bohunice, 625 00
Local Institution
České Budějovice, 370 87
Switzerland2 sites
Local Institution
Bern, 3010
Local Institution
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Induction and Maintenance Therapy With Abatacept in Subjects With Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Who Have Had an Inadequate Clinical Response and/or Intolerance to Medical Therapy
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept can improve signs and symptoms of active ulcerative colitis in patients who have not had an adequate response to other therapies. The safety of this treatment will also be studied
Read the detailed description
The Induction Period First Cohort (IP1C) arms (30/10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were placebo-controlled arms that were used for the primary endpoint and its analysis. The Induction Period Second Cohort arms (IP2C 30/10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were not placebo-controlled, their sole purpose being to provide sufficient numbers of participants for the maintenance phase. The first cohort (IP1C) was randomized to receive placebo or 1 of 3 doses of abatacept. Following completion of the IP1C randomization, a second cohort (IP2C) was randomized to receive 1 of 2 doses of abatacept. After all participants in the IP1C completed or discontinued, the data was locked and the formal analysis for the Induction Period primary endpoint was performed. Summary tables for the second cohort (IP2C) and the Maintenance and Open-label phases were generated from a second, subsequent data lock.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- abatacept (ABA), placebo, abatacept
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
abatacept (ABA)Drug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
Dextrose 5% in water, IV. Placebo on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 3 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 10 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; or 30 mg/kg on days IP-1,IP-15 and ~10 mg/kg on days IP-29, IP-57 (ABA 30/~10 mg/kg Group).
Induction Period 3 months
Maintenance Period 12 months
placeboDrug
Normal saline, IV, 0 mg/kg, every 28 days.
Induction Period 3 months
Maintenance Period 12 months
abataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
~10 mg/kg, once monthly
Open- Label Extension Period until the drug is marketed for UC or the UC development program for abatacept is discontinued
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept (ABA) | Experimental | Induction Period; 3 arms for Cohort 1: ABA 30/~10 mg/kg (ABA administered at 30 mg/kg followed by ABA at ~10 mg/kg), ABA ~10 mg/kg, ABA 3 mg/kg
Induction Period; 2 arms for Cohort 2: ABA 30/~10 mg/kg and Second Cohort ABA ~10 mg/kg
1 arm for maintenance period (ABA ~10 mg/kg) Receives: Drug: abatacept (ABA) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | 1 arm for induction period
1 arm for maintenance period Receives: Drug: placebo |
| abatacept | Other | 1 arm for open-label extension phase (ABA ~10 mg/kg) Receives: Drug: abatacept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Maintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 12
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Measured: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Measured: Day OL-1 through the end of the OL
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
OL; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): >3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: <0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: <0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): <0.67 x LLN/>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: <0.75 x LLN/ >1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: <1.0 x 10^3 c/uL; eosinophils: >0.750 x 10^3 c/uL; monocytes: >2000 mm3; lymphocytes: <0.750 x 10^3 c/uL/ >7.50 x 10^3 c/uL.
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): >2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): >2 x ULN; Bilirubin: >2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >2 x BL; creatinine: >4 x BL; potassium (K): <0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): <0.8 x LLN/>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): <0.75 x LLN/ >1.2 5 x ULN
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): <65 mg/dL/ >220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: <0.8 x LLN/ >1.5 x ULN; total protein: < 0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; albumin:<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: >1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells [RBCs], White Blood Cells [WBCs]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Secondary outcomes (47)
IP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Measured: Baseline
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline
IP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (Day IP-1), Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Measured: Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Measured: Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Measured: Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance
=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Measured: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings: IP1C + IP2C
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): >3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: <0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: <0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): <0.67 x LLN/>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: <0.75 x LLN/ >1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: <1.0 x 10^3 c/uL; eosinophils: >0.750 x 10^3 c/uL; monocytes: >2000 mm3; lymphocytes: <0.750 x 10^3 c/uL/ >7.50 x 10^3 c/uL.
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): >2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): >2 x ULN; Bilirubin: >2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >2 x BL; creatinine: >4 x BL; Sodium (Na): <0.95 x LLN/ >1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): <0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): <0.8 x LLN/>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): <0.75 x LLN/ >1.2 5 x ULN
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): <65 mg/dL/ >220 mg/dL; total protein: < 0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; albumin:<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: >1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells [RBCs], White Blood Cells [WBCs]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): >3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: <0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: <0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): <0.67 x LLN/>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: <0.75 x LLN/ >1.25 x ULN; eosinophils: >0.750 x 10^3 c/uL; monocytes: >2000 mm3; lymphocytes: <0.750 x 10^3 c/uL/ >7.50 x 10^3 c/uL; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >2 x BL; creatinine: >4 x BL; Sodium (Na): <0.95 x LLN/ >1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): <0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; phosphorous (P): <0.75 x LLN/ >1.2 5 x ULN;
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): <65 mg/dL/ >220 mg/dL; total protein: < 0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; albumin:<0.9 x LLN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells [RBCs], White Blood Cells [WBCs]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Measured: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Measured: For participants treated in MP: Day IP-1 (Baseline) to Day MP-1 (Day IP-85). For participants treated in OL directly after IP: Day IP-1 to Day OL-1. For participants treated only in IP: All measurements after Day IP-1 (including follow-up visits)
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 12
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Measured: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 12
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
Measured: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Both Month 6 and Month 12
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Measured: Month 6 (Day MP-169), Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Measured: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in IBDQ
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Measured: Day MP-365
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36)
The SF-36 is a validated instrument to measure health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. Individual subscale scores and 2 summary scores are calculated: (1) physical component summary (PCS) which includes physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary (MCS) which includes vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight, with values ranging from worse health (0) to best health (100).
Measured: Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids for 90 Consecutive Days and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of ≤30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Measured: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Measured: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Measured: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo PGA Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of ≤1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Measured: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Measured: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Measured: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Mucosal Healing at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for ≥8 weeks.
Measured: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Measured: For participants not entering OL: All measurements starting after Day MP-1 (including follow-up visits). For participants entering OL: From first measurement after Day MP-1 to Day MP-365 (Day OL-1).
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Measured: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Measured: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Measured: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
High=greater than ULN, Low=lower than LLN. LLN/ULN= HGB: >3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: <0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: <0.75 x BL; PLT: <0.67 x LLN/>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: <0.75 x LLN/ >1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: <1.0 x 10^3 c/uL; eosinophils: >0.750 x 10^3 c/uL; monocytes: >2000 mm3; lymphocytes: <0.750 x 10^3 c/uL/ >7.50 x 10^3 c/uL; GGT: >2 x ULN; Bilirubin: >2 x ULN; BUN: >2 x BL; Na: <0.95 x LLN/ >1.05 x ULN; K: <0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; Ca: <0.8 x LLN/>1.2 x ULN
Measured: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): <65 mg/dL/ >220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: <0.8 x LLN/ >1.5 x ULN; total protein: < 0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; albumin:<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: >1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells [RBCs], White Blood Cells [WBCs]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Measured: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over Time
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
OL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) During OL
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 point
Measured: Open-Label Period (Day OL-1 through Day OL-729)
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response or Clinical Remission Upon Retreatment With Abatacept Among Those Who Received Abatacept in the IP or MP Period
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point. Clinical remission = Mayo score of ≤ 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Measured: Last Study Visit (Day OL-729)
OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Measured: For participants receiving OL medication, all measurements starting after Day OL-1 (including follow-up visits and at 56 and 85 days after last dose)
OL; Number of Participants Using Corticosteroids During OL
Participants taking oral corticosteroids (equivalent of ≤ 30 mg prednisone daily) must have met minimum treatment duration at entry into IP and had stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to entry into the IP.
Measured: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2006
- Primary completionJun 2009
- Study completionNov 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 591 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00410410
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM101-108
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sandborn WJ, Colombel JF, Sands BE, Rutgeerts P, Targan SR, Panaccione R, Bressler B, Geboes K, Schreiber S, Aranda R, Gujrathi S, Luo A, Peng Y, Salter-Cid L, Hanauer SB. Abatacept for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012 Jul;143(1):62-69.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
PubMed 22504093
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Induction and Maintenance Therapy With Abatacept in Subjects With Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Who Have Had an Inadequate Clinical Response and/or Intolerance to Medical Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00410410
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM101-108
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 591 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2006
- Primary completion
- Jun 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Dec 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept can improve signs and symptoms of active ulcerative colitis in patients who have not had an adequate response to other therapies. The safety of this treatment will also be studied
Detailed description
The Induction Period First Cohort (IP1C) arms (30/10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were placebo-controlled arms that were used for the primary endpoint and its analysis. The Induction Period Second Cohort arms (IP2C 30/10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were not placebo-controlled, their sole purpose being to provide sufficient numbers of participants for the maintenance phase. The first cohort (IP1C) was randomized to receive placebo or 1 of 3 doses of abatacept. Following completion of the IP1C randomization, a second cohort (IP2C) was randomized to receive 1 of 2 doses of abatacept. After all participants in the IP1C completed or discontinued, the data was locked and the formal analysis for the Induction Period primary endpoint was performed. Summary tables for the second cohort (IP2C) and the Maintenance and Open-label phases were generated from a second, subsequent data lock.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept (ABA) | Experimental | Drug: abatacept (ABA)Induction Period; 3 arms for Cohort 1: ABA 30/~10 mg/kg (ABA administered at 30 mg/kg followed by ABA at ~10 mg/kg), ABA ~10 mg/kg, ABA 3 mg/kg Induction Period; 2 arms for Cohort 2: ABA 30/~10 mg/kg and Second Cohort ABA ~10 mg/kg 1 arm for maintenance period (ABA ~10 mg/kg) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo1 arm for induction period 1 arm for maintenance period |
| abatacept | Other | Drug: abatacept1 arm for open-label extension phase (ABA ~10 mg/kg) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Men or women 18 years or older
- Ulcerative colitis for at lease 3 months
- Moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis
- Inadequate response or intolerance to standard ulcerative colitis treatment
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| abatacept (ABA)Also: Orencia, BMS-188667Dextrose 5% in water, IV. Placebo on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 3 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 10 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; or 30 mg/kg on days IP-1,IP-15 and ~10 mg/kg on days IP-29, IP-57 (ABA 30/~10 mg/kg Group). Induction Period 3 months Maintenance Period 12 months | Drug | Abatacept (ABA) |
| placeboNormal saline, IV, 0 mg/kg, every 28 days. Induction Period 3 months Maintenance Period 12 months | Drug | Placebo |
| abataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667~10 mg/kg, once monthly Open- Label Extension Period until the drug is marketed for UC or the UC development program for abatacept is discontinued | Drug | abatacept |
Primary outcome
Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Maintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥ 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤ 1 point.
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Time frame: Day OL-1 through the end of the OL
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
OL; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): >3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: <0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: <0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): <0.67 x LLN/>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: <0.75 x LLN/ >1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: <1.0 x 10^3 c/uL; eosinophils: >0.750 x 10^3 c/uL; monocytes: >2000 mm3; lymphocytes: <0.750 x 10^3 c/uL/ >7.50 x 10^3 c/uL.
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): >2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): >2 x ULN; Bilirubin: >2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >2 x BL; creatinine: >4 x BL; potassium (K): <0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): <0.8 x LLN/>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): <0.75 x LLN/ >1.2 5 x ULN
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): <65 mg/dL/ >220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: <0.8 x LLN/ >1.5 x ULN; total protein: < 0.9 x LLN/ >1.1 x ULN; albumin:<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: >1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells [RBCs], White Blood Cells [WBCs]): Use ≥2 when BL value missing or value ≥4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use ≥3 when pre-dose=1. Use ≥4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
47 secondary outcomes
IP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C
Time frame: Baseline
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C
Time frame: Baseline
IP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C
Time frame: Baseline (Day IP-1), Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Time frame: Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Time frame: Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Time frame: Day IP-85 (Week 12)
IP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
Time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings: IP1C + IP2C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Time frame: Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C
Time frame: For participants treated in MP: Day IP-1 (Baseline) to Day MP-1 (Day IP-85). For participants treated in OL directly after IP: Day IP-1 to Day OL-1. For participants treated only in IP: All measurements after Day IP-1 (including follow-up visits)
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (≤1 Point) at Month 12
Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Both Month 6 and Month 12
Time frame: Month 6 (Day MP-169), Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in IBDQ
Time frame: Day MP-365
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time frame: Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids for 90 Consecutive Days and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo PGA Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (≤1 Point) at Month 12
Time frame: Day MP-365 (Month 12)
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Mucosal Healing at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
Time frame: Month 12 (Day MP-365)
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
Time frame: For participants not entering OL: All measurements starting after Day MP-1 (including follow-up visits). For participants entering OL: From first measurement after Day MP-1 to Day MP-365 (Day OL-1).
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Time frame: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Time frame: Day MP-1 through Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
Time frame: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22504093Sandborn WJ, Colombel JF, Sands BE, Rutgeerts P, Targan SR, Panaccione R, Bressler B, Geboes K, Schreiber S, Aranda R, Gujrathi S, Luo A, Peng Y, Salter-Cid L, Hanauer SB. Abatacept for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012 Jul;143(1):62-69.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
143 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing abatacept (ABA) and abatacept in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 143 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 143 sites in United States, Mexico, India, Australia, Brazil and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C) (time frame: Week 12 (Day IP-85)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00410410, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2015.