DiabetesPhase 4NCT00410436
Resistance Exercise in Already-active Diabetic Individuals (READI) Trial
A Phase 4 study testing Resistance Exercise in people with Diabetes, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 3 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of the READI tiral is to examine the effects of resistance training (weight training) on the blood sugar control of aerobically active individuals with Type 1 Diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Resistance Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 131 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2006to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus as defined by the 2003 CDA guidelines with duration \≥1 year, requiring insulin therapy starting within one year of diagnosis and continuously thereafter.
- Male or female, age \≥16 years, HbA1c 0.066-0.099 (normal non-diabetic range 0.040-0.060).
- Habitual performance during the previous 4 months of exercise \≥3 times per week, including at least 90 minutes per week of vigourous aerobic exercise (of sufficient intensity to cause sweating; e.g. jogging, soccer, basketball, racquet sports), and/or \≥150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise of at least moderate intensity (e.g. brisk walking, moderate-paced bicycling) but no resistance training. Subjects must agree to maintain their habitual volume and intensity of aerobic activity during run-in and intervention periods, minimizing variation due to seasons, but they will be permitted to vary specific exercises chosen.
- Willingness and ability to work closely with the study physicians, nurse and dietitian and follow their recommendations for insulin therapy and adjustments of diet.
Who cannot join
- Participation during the previous 4 months in any resistance training.
- Hypoglycemia unawareness, or severe hypoglycemia requiring assistance from another person within the previous 3 months
- "Brittle" diabetes, characterized by frequent and unpredictable hypoglycemia (even if not requiring assistance from others) and hyperglycemia.
- Restrictions in physical activity due to disease: intermittent claudication, severe peripheral neuropathy or active proliferative retinopathy, unstable cardiac or pulmonary disease, disabling stroke, severe arthritis.
- Known or suspected clinically significant gastroparesis.
- Body mass index \>35 kg/m2, or weight \>147 kg (exceeding capacity of DEXA or CT scanners)
Show all 19Show fewer
- Fasting serum c-peptide \0.2 nmol/l.
- Increase or decrease of \5% of body weight during the previous two months.
- An expected requirement within the subsequent 6 months for medications (other than insulin) that will affect glucose metabolism (e.g. corticosteroids).
- If age\<18 yr, linear growth of \1cm during the previous year.
- Significant renal disease: serum creatinine \200 mEq/l. or proteinuria \>1 g/24 hours.
- Uncontrolled hypertension: BP \>150 mm Hg systolic or \>95 mm Hg diastolic in a sitting position.
- Other illness, judged by the patient or investigators to make participation in this study inadvisable.
- Cognitive deficit resulting in inability to understand or comply with instructions.
- Pregnancy at the start of the study, or intention to become pregnant in the next year.
- Inability to communicate in English or French.
- Ischemic ECG changes during baseline maximal cardiopulmonary stress test, unless subsequently cleared for participation by a cardiologist after appropriate investigation.
- Low aerobic fitness: Aerobic fitness more than 15% below the mean for age and gender, based on baseline maximal treadmill exercise test. This criterion is included in order to reduce likelihood of candidates entering the trial by exaggerating their habitual activity. Very few people engaging in regular aerobic activity would have such low treadmill performance.
- Unwillingness to sign informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Canada3 sites
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T3R 0X7
Ottawa Health Research Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 7W9
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
About this study
The purpose of the READI tiral is to examine the effects of resistance training (weight training) on the blood sugar control of aerobically active individuals with Type 1 Diabetes.
Read the detailed description
Background: Juvenile-onset type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes is associated with a 15 year reduction in life expectancy, primarily due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Poor blood glucose (glycemic) control, reflected in elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a major risk factor for diabetes complications; each 1% absolute reduction in HbA1c leads to a 15-20% reduction in risk of a major cardiovascular event, and a 25-37% reduction in risk of microvascular disease. Exercise is appealing as a potential non-pharmacological intervention to improve glycemic control. However, while aerobic exercise (e.g. walking, running) improves insulin sensitivity, most published studies found that aerobic exercise did not improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. This paradoxical finding is likely due to the tendency of type 1 diabetic individuals to decrease their insulin doses and/or increase carbohydrate intake more than necessary in order to avoid exercise-induced hypoglycemia. In comparison to aerobic exercise, the smaller acute rise in glucose uptake associated with resistance exercise may offer the metabolic benefits of exercise while minimizing risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia. Only two small published studies (n=8 and 10; men only) evaluated resistance exercise (weight lifting or exercises with weight machines) in type 1 diabetes, but their results were promising. In a crossover trial, glycemic control was significantly better during resistance training than during non-exercise control (HbA1c 5.8% versus 6.9%; absolute difference 1.1%). In a before-after study, combined aerobic and resistance exercise reduced absolute HbA1c by 0.96%. People with type 1 diabetes who already do regular aerobic exercise would likely be open to starting an additional form of exercise if it were proven to improve glycemic control. We therefore wish to evaluate the incremental effect of resistance training on HbA1c in already-aerobically-active type 1 diabetic individuals in a randomized, controlled trial.
Primary research question: In type 1 diabetic individuals who already engage in regular aerobic exercise, does adding a 6-month resistance training program result in improved glycemic control as reflected in reduced HbA1c compared to aerobic training alone?
Secondary research questions: In type 1 diabetic individuals who already do regular aerobic exercise, does adding a 6-month resistance training program have favourable effects on body composition, non-traditional and traditional CVD risk factors, and quality of life vs. aerobic exercise alone?
Exploratory research questions: What is the incremental effect of resistance training on insulin requirements and frequency of hypoglycemia? Do changes in glycemic control, body composition, or quality of life during the resistance training intervention predict exercise participation during the subsequent 6 months? How cost-effective is it to add the resistance training program?
Methods: Type 1 diabetic subjects aged \≥16 yr who perform aerobic exercise \≥3 times per week but not resistance exercise, will be recruited at three centres (Ottawa, Toronto and Calgary). They will first enter a 5-week run-in period, including 3X/week supervised low-intensity resistance exercise training in weeks 2-5. During run-in, in addition to verifying adherence to the exercise program, intense efforts will be made to optimize diabetes care including frequent interaction with the study diabetes nurse/educator and dietitian, intensification and adjustment of insulin therapy. Subjects attending \≥80% of the exercise sessions and demonstrating good compliance with diabetes care during run-in will then be randomized to either resistance training or waiting list control for weeks 6-26; in either case they will continue aerobic exercise at their usual volume and intensity with support from an Exercise Specialist, use pedometers and report exercise in activity logs. Resistance exercise training in the intervention group will progress to 3 sets of 8 reps of 8 exercises at 8RM (maximum weight that can be lifted 8 times while maintaining proper form). Background diabetes care will be provided throughout, in a protocolized manner for both exercise and control subjects, with all insulin adjustments done by study research staff.
Significance: Reduced risk of long-term complications of type 1diabetes is tightly linked to better glycemic control, which is often difficult to achieve. This study will provide valuable information regarding the extent to which resistance exercise can improve glycemic control and other important risk factors for complications in people with type 1 diabetes who are already aerobically active.
- Conditions
- Diabetes
- Being tested
- Resistance Exercise
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes, Resistance Exercise, Aerobic Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Resistance ExerciseBehavioural
Also called non applicable
Subjects demonstrating adequate compliance during the run-in period will then be randomized in equal numbers to Resistance Training (R) 3X/week progressing to 3 sets, 8 repetitions of 8 exercises at the maximum load that can be lifted 8 times in a controlled manner, maintaining proper form (8RM), or waiting-list control (C).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance Training Group | Experimental | Resistance Training (R) 3X/week progressing to 3 sets, 8 repetitions of 8 exercises at the maximum load that can be lifted 8 times in a controlled manner, maintaining proper form (8RM). Receives: Behavioral: Resistance Exercise |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Subjects will not be performing resistance exercise but will continue performing aerobic exercise at the same volume, duration and intensity as they did at baseline. Receives: Behavioral: Resistance Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in HbA1c
Change in HbA1c from pre and post-intervention
Measured: 6-months
Secondary outcomes (3)
body composition,LDL particle diameter,apolipoprotein B (Apo-B)
measured pre and post exercise intervention
Measured: 6-months
apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1,Apo-B/Apo-A1 ratio,urinary albumin excretion
measured pre and post exercise intervention
Measured: 6-months
serum C-reactive protein,
measured pre and post intervention
Measured: 6-months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2006
- Primary completionDec 2011
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 131 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ron Sigal, MD, Study chair, OHRI
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00410436
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2005301-01H
- Other IDs
- 2005783
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Resistance Exercise in Already-active Diabetic Individuals (READI) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00410436
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2005301-01H
- Conditions
- Diabetes
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes, Resistance Exercise, Aerobic Exercise
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 131 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Oct 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the READI tiral is to examine the effects of resistance training (weight training) on the blood sugar control of aerobically active individuals with Type 1 Diabetes.
Detailed description
Background: Juvenile-onset type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes is associated with a 15 year reduction in life expectancy, primarily due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Poor blood glucose (glycemic) control, reflected in elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a major risk factor for diabetes complications; each 1% absolute reduction in HbA1c leads to a 15-20% reduction in risk of a major cardiovascular event, and a 25-37% reduction in risk of microvascular disease. Exercise is appealing as a potential non-pharmacological intervention to improve glycemic control. However, while aerobic exercise (e.g. walking, running) improves insulin sensitivity, most published studies found that aerobic exercise did not improve glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. This paradoxical finding is likely due to the tendency of type 1 diabetic individuals to decrease their insulin doses and/or increase carbohydrate intake more than necessary in order to avoid exercise-induced hypoglycemia. In comparison to aerobic exercise, the smaller acute rise in glucose uptake associated with resistance exercise may offer the metabolic benefits of exercise while minimizing risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia. Only two small published studies (n=8 and 10; men only) evaluated resistance exercise (weight lifting or exercises with weight machines) in type 1 diabetes, but their results were promising. In a crossover trial, glycemic control was significantly better during resistance training than during non-exercise control (HbA1c 5.8% versus 6.9%; absolute difference 1.1%). In a before-after study, combined aerobic and resistance exercise reduced absolute HbA1c by 0.96%. People with type 1 diabetes who already do regular aerobic exercise would likely be open to starting an additional form of exercise if it were proven to improve glycemic control. We therefore wish to evaluate the incremental effect of resistance training on HbA1c in already-aerobically-active type 1 diabetic individuals in a randomized, controlled trial.
Primary research question: In type 1 diabetic individuals who already engage in regular aerobic exercise, does adding a 6-month resistance training program result in improved glycemic control as reflected in reduced HbA1c compared to aerobic training alone?
Secondary research questions: In type 1 diabetic individuals who already do regular aerobic exercise, does adding a 6-month resistance training program have favourable effects on body composition, non-traditional and traditional CVD risk factors, and quality of life vs. aerobic exercise alone?
Exploratory research questions: What is the incremental effect of resistance training on insulin requirements and frequency of hypoglycemia? Do changes in glycemic control, body composition, or quality of life during the resistance training intervention predict exercise participation during the subsequent 6 months? How cost-effective is it to add the resistance training program?
Methods: Type 1 diabetic subjects aged \≥16 yr who perform aerobic exercise \≥3 times per week but not resistance exercise, will be recruited at three centres (Ottawa, Toronto and Calgary). They will first enter a 5-week run-in period, including 3X/week supervised low-intensity resistance exercise training in weeks 2-5. During run-in, in addition to verifying adherence to the exercise program, intense efforts will be made to optimize diabetes care including frequent interaction with the study diabetes nurse/educator and dietitian, intensification and adjustment of insulin therapy. Subjects attending \≥80% of the exercise sessions and demonstrating good compliance with diabetes care during run-in will then be randomized to either resistance training or waiting list control for weeks 6-26; in either case they will continue aerobic exercise at their usual volume and intensity with support from an Exercise Specialist, use pedometers and report exercise in activity logs. Resistance exercise training in the intervention group will progress to 3 sets of 8 reps of 8 exercises at 8RM (maximum weight that can be lifted 8 times while maintaining proper form). Background diabetes care will be provided throughout, in a protocolized manner for both exercise and control subjects, with all insulin adjustments done by study research staff.
Significance: Reduced risk of long-term complications of type 1diabetes is tightly linked to better glycemic control, which is often difficult to achieve. This study will provide valuable information regarding the extent to which resistance exercise can improve glycemic control and other important risk factors for complications in people with type 1 diabetes who are already aerobically active.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance Training Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Resistance ExerciseResistance Training (R) 3X/week progressing to 3 sets, 8 repetitions of 8 exercises at the maximum load that can be lifted 8 times in a controlled manner, maintaining proper form (8RM). |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Resistance ExerciseSubjects will not be performing resistance exercise but will continue performing aerobic exercise at the same volume, duration and intensity as they did at baseline. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus as defined by the 2003 CDA guidelines with duration \≥1 year, requiring insulin therapy starting within one year of diagnosis and continuously thereafter.
- Male or female, age \≥16 years, HbA1c 0.066-0.099 (normal non-diabetic range 0.040-0.060).
- Habitual performance during the previous 4 months of exercise \≥3 times per week, including at least 90 minutes per week of vigourous aerobic exercise (of sufficient intensity to cause sweating; e.g. jogging, soccer, basketball, racquet sports), and/or \≥150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise of at least moderate intensity (e.g. brisk walking, moderate-paced bicycling) but no resistance training. Subjects must agree to maintain their habitual volume and intensity of aerobic activity during run-in and intervention periods, minimizing variation due to seasons, but they will be permitted to vary specific exercises chosen.
- Willingness and ability to work closely with the study physicians, nurse and dietitian and follow their recommendations for insulin therapy and adjustments of diet.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Participation during the previous 4 months in any resistance training.
- Hypoglycemia unawareness, or severe hypoglycemia requiring assistance from another person within the previous 3 months
- "Brittle" diabetes, characterized by frequent and unpredictable hypoglycemia (even if not requiring assistance from others) and hyperglycemia.
- Restrictions in physical activity due to disease: intermittent claudication, severe peripheral neuropathy or active proliferative retinopathy, unstable cardiac or pulmonary disease, disabling stroke, severe arthritis.
- Known or suspected clinically significant gastroparesis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance ExerciseAlso: non applicableSubjects demonstrating adequate compliance during the run-in period will then be randomized in equal numbers to Resistance Training (R) 3X/week progressing to 3 sets, 8 repetitions of 8 exercises at the maximum load that can be lifted 8 times in a controlled manner, maintaining proper form (8RM), or waiting-list control (C). | Behavioural | Control Group, Resistance Training Group |
Primary outcome
Change in HbA1c
Time frame: 6-months
Change in HbA1c from pre and post-intervention
3 secondary outcomes
body composition,LDL particle diameter,apolipoprotein B (Apo-B)
Time frame: 6-months
apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1,Apo-B/Apo-A1 ratio,urinary albumin excretion
Time frame: 6-months
serum C-reactive protein,
Time frame: 6-months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2013.
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ron Sigal, MD study chair
OHRI
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Resistance Exercise in people with Diabetes, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 3 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in HbA1c (time frame: 6-months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2013.