AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainNCT00413582

Pain Management for Pectus Excavatum Repair

A study testing Epidural Analgesia in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different management strategies for post-operative pain after pectus excavatum repair. The hypothesis is that pain management without an epidural decreases hospital stay without compromising comfort. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
Epidural Analgesia
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2006to Oct 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing a pectus excavatum repair with bar placement.

Who cannot join

  • Open repair
  • Re-Do operation
  • Known allergy to a pain medication in the protocol
  • Existing contraindications to epidural catheter placement
  • Requirement for 2 bars to be placed (rare)
  • Inadequate baseline cognitive function to understand/respond to VAS questionnaire

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Mercy Hospital

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64108

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prospective Randomized Trial: Pain Management Strategy After Pectus Excavatum Repair

The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different management strategies for post-operative pain after pectus excavatum repair.

The hypothesis is that pain management without an epidural decreases hospital stay without compromising comfort.

The primary outcome variable is length of hospitalization after the intervention.

Read the detailed description

This will be a single institution, prospective, randomized clinical trial involving patients who undergo the minimally invasive repair of a pectus excavatum deformity with bar placement. This is intended to be a definitive study.

Power calculations based on the known length of hospitalization listed above with α = 0.05 and power of 0.8 show the need for 55 patients in each arm. The primary end point will be reached during the hospital stay; therefore, we expect a very small amount of attrition and will intend to recruit 110. One group will undergo an attempt for epidural regional analgesia (epidural) for post-operative pain control. The other groups will receive patient controlled intravenous systemic analgesia (PCA).

Both groups will have the same management algorithm. All data will be analyzed on intention-to-treat basis.

Being tested
Epidural Analgesia, Patient-Controlled IV Analgesia
Keywords
Pectus Excavatum, Bar Repair, Pain Control, Pectus Excavatum Repair
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Funnel Chest, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epidural AnalgesiaDrug

    Upon arrival to the operating room, patients will have a thoracic epidural (T 6-9) placed while in the sitting position. All epidural catheters will be inserted 3-5 cm within the epidural space and will be placed by attending anesthesiologists. Patients will receive midazolam 0.025 - 0.05 mg/kg IV (max 5mg) and/or fentanyl 0.5 - 2 mcg/kg IV for comfort during the procedure. Once the epidural is placed, the patient will be positioned for surgery. The epidural catheter will be initially bolused with 0.3ml/kg of ropivacaine 0.10% (max 10 ml), fentanyl 1 - 1.2 mcg/kg and clonidine 1.8 - 2mcg/kg. An infusion of ropivacaine 0.10%, fentanyl 2mcg/ml and clonidine 1.5mcg/ml will be initiated immediately at the rate of 0.3ml/kg/hr (max 10ml/hr). Intraoperatively, patients will receive intravenous fentanyl if indicated.

  • Patient-Controlled IV AnalgesiaDrug

    In the PCA arm, patients will receive fentanyl (3-6 mcg/kg) at anesthesia induction. Additional fentanyl may be administered intraoperatively as indicated. Patients who are > 35 Kg. (in keeping with current FDA approved labeling) will receive a clonidine 0.1 mg/day transdermal patch to the deltoid immediately after induction of anesthesia. Subjects in the epidural arm also receive clonidine. Upon arrival to the post anesthesia care unit, patients will be placed on a patient controlled analgesic (PCA) pump (hydromorphone: loading dose if needed; 5-6 mcg/kg continuous infusion; 5-6 mcg/kg six minute demand dose). An additional hydromorphone dose (8mcg/kg) will be available every 2 hours for pain scores of > 4/10 throughout the duration of PCA use.

Study groups in NCT00413582
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorEpidural analgesia
Receives: Drug: Epidural Analgesia
2ExperimentalIV narcotic analgesia
Receives: Drug: Patient-Controlled IV Analgesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Length of Hospitalization

    Measured: 1 week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Time in the Operating Room

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2006 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2006
  3. Primary completionMay 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00413582
Sponsor's protocol ID
06 08 128
Status last verified
Dec 2011
First submitted
18 Dec 2006
Last updated
16 Jan 2012

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Epidural Analgesia in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jan 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Length of Hospitalization (time frame: 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in