Type I HypersensitivityPhase 3NCT00414141
Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Grass MATA MPL
A Phase 3 study testing Grass MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 94 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Grass MATA MPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd. to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting grass pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- What is being tested?
- Grass MATA MPL
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,028 participants
- Where
- 94 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to Nov 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Have given written informed consent;
- Are 18 to 59 years of age;
- Have a history of moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis ascribed to grass pollen exposure that required repeated use of antihistamines, nasal steroids, and/or leukotriene modifiers;
- Have a history of moderate to severe symptoms in the past grass pollen season as determined by a score of ≥ 5 on the Disease Severity Questionnaire;
- Have a positive skin prick test to grass pollen mix [wheal (longest diameter) ≥ 5 mm greater than the negative control] and a positive RAST or equivalent test (class ≥ 2) to grass pollen mix;
- Have a positive skin prick test to histamine [wheal (longest diameter) of ≥ 3 mm greater than the negative control];
Show all 11Show fewer
- Have a negative skin prick test to the negative control (redness with wheal ≤ 2 mm is acceptable);
- Have a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≥ 80% of predicted, with a FEV1/FVC ratio ≥ 70%;
- Women of childbearing potential must be using a medically acceptable method of birth control [i.e. double barrier method of contraception (e.g., intrauterine device and condom, spermicide and condom), stable hormonal contraceptive for ≥ 90 days prior to the study or if < 90 days additional use of a double barrier method until 90 days reached, sexual abstinence or have a vasectomized partner until study completion], and have a negative β-HCG pregnancy test result at Visits 1 and 2;
- Are able to understand and comply with study instructions;
- Demonstrate proper use of electronic diary with at least 85% compliance (i.e., correct entries for symptoms on 6 of 7 days) during the 1-week period between Visit 1 and Visit 2.
Who cannot join
- Are pregnant or lactating
- Have asthma requiring the daily use of controller medication;
- Had an emergency room visit or admission for asthma in the 12 months prior to Visit 1;
- Have the presence of secondary alteration at the affected organ (i.e., emphysema, bronchiectasis, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis);
- Have auto-immune disease (e.g., liver, kidney, thyroid, nervous system);
- Have acute or subacute (historic) atopic dermatitis, chronic dermatitis, urticaria factitia, and/or urticaria due to physical/chemical influence or any other skin conditions which might interfere with the interpretation of the skin prick test results;
Show all 42Show fewer
- Have a history or presence of diabetes (both insulin dependent and non-dependent), cancer or concomitant illness (e.g., cardiac, metabolic, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, hematologic, neurologic, or psychiatric diseases or disorders) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would pose a safety risk or compromise the interpretation of efficacy for this grass immunotherapy;
- Have a history of angioedema;
- Have manifest pulmonary or cardiac insufficiency;
- Have current malignant disease;
- Have disorders of tyrosine metabolism (i.e., alcaptonuria, tyrosinemia);
- Have an acute or chronic infection;
- Have any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value (as determined by the Investigator) at Visit 1;
- Perennial Allergens: Have a positive skin prick test [wheal (longest diameter) ≥ 3mm greater than the negative control] at Visit 1 to: house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae), molds (Cladosporium cladosporioides, Alternaria alternata, Penicillium chrysogenum, and Aspergillus fumigatus), or epithelia (cat, dog, and horse). In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate or severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens, the subject is to be excluded. Exception: the source of the allergen (cat, dog, horse) can be avoided for the entire study. Subjects with mild or no symptoms when exposed to the aforementioned allergens during the 3 years prior to Visit 1 will be allowed to enroll. Mild symptoms are defined as: sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated;
- Only for the USA and Canada:Autumn/Winter Flowering Plant Allergens: Have a positive skin prick test [wheal (longest diameter) ≥ 3mm greater than the negative control] at Visit 1 to: ragweed (Ambrosia sp.) or mountain cedar/mountain juniper (Juniperus ashei). In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: one or both of the listed allergens must not be tested if they are not common to the Investigator's region or, if common to the region, the treatment phase of the study can be initiated at least 30 days after the end of the allergen(s) season. Subjects with mild or no symptoms when exposed to the aforementioned allergens during the 3 years prior to Visit 1 will be allowed to enroll. Mild symptoms are defined as: sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness, easily tolerated;
- Springtime Flowering Plant Allergens: Applies only to subjects living in geographic areas where springtime flowering plant season and grass season overlap and/or when treatment phase cannot be completed at least 30 days prior to the start of the springtime flowering plant season. Otherwise, no testing of the following allergens is necessary; Have a positive skin prick test [wheal (longest diameter) ≥ 3mm greater than the negative control] at Visit 1 to: birch (Betula sp.), oak (Quercus sp.), sycamore/plane (Platanus sp.), beech (Fagus sp.), ash (Fraxinus sp.), or poplar (Populus sp.). In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Subjects with mild or no symptoms when exposed to the aforementioned allergens during the 3 years prior to Visit 1 will be allowed to enroll. Mild symptoms are defined as: sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness, easily tolerated;
- Only for the USA and Canada:Summertime Flowering Plant Allergens: Have a positive skin prick test [wheal (longest diameter) ≥ 3mm greater than the negative control] at Visit 1 to: Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon). In these cases, a careful history is to be taken and if moderate to severe symptoms are reported when exposed to the aforementioned allergens the subject is to be excluded. Exception: the listed allergen must not be tested if it is not common to the Investigator's region. Subjects with mild or no symptoms when exposed to the aforementioned allergens during the 3 years prior to Visit 1 will be allowed to enroll. Mild symptoms are defined as: sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated;
- Have inadequate washout period prior to screening (Visit 1). The following washout periods prior to Visit 1 are acceptable:
- Oral or parenteral corticosteroids (1 month)
- Inhaled, ocular or intranasal corticosteroids (1 day)
- Mast cell stabilizers (7 days)
- Intranasal or systemic decongestants including cold preparations (1 day)
- Leukotriene modifiers (7 days)
- Afrin (oxymetazoline hydrochloride) (14 days)
- Antihistamines
- Once-daily or twice-daily antihistamines (7 days)
- Short-acting 3 or 4 times a day antihistamines (3 days)
- Hydroxyzine (14 days)
- H2-blockers (1 day)
- Other anti-inflammatory, anti-allergy, and any other medications (e.g., anticholinergic agents and tricyclic antidepressants) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with the study objectives should be considered on a case-by-case basis
- Topical skin medications on the forearms (14 days);
- Require use of beta blockers;
- Are unable to receive epinephrine therapy (i.e., use of epinephrine is contraindicated);
- Have a history of anaphylactic reactions to foods, insect venom, exercise, or drugs;
- Have been treated with a preparation containing MPL® within 6 months prior to Visit 1;
- Have diseases with a pathogenesis interfering with the immune response, and who have received medication which could interfere with the results of the study;
- Have a history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to the excipients of the study medication;
- Have a history of allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to study relief medication;
- Have already undergone hyposensitisation therapy with comparable allergen extracts; An exception will be allowed if prior immunotherapy with comparable allergen was successful, symptoms reappeared some time after stopping the immunotherapy, and the immunotherapy was completed ≥ 3 years before Visit 1;
- Have participated in a clinical research trial with a new chemical substance within 4 weeks of Visit 1;
- Are unable or unwilling to cooperate with the Investigator and to comply with the protocol requirements, or not likely to complete the observation periods sufficiently (e.g., 2 weeks holiday abroad during the time of diary recording);
- Have changed residence between geographical regions within the past 3 months
Trial locations and contacts
94 sites in 4 countries.
94 sites in 4 countries
United States65 sites
MD Office and Research
Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16601
Bellingham Asthma And Allergy Associates
Bellingham, Washington, 98225
Montana Allergy and Asthma 2900 12th Avenue North Suite 302E
Billings, Montana, 59101
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Rheumatology & Immunology, Smith Building Rm 626
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Allergy and Respiratory Center
Canton, Ohio, 44718
Asthma Immunology & Allergy
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
Asthma & Allergy Research Assoc Presidents House
Chester, Pennsylvania, 19013
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
New Horizons Clinical Research
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Asthma & Allergy Associates, PC & Research Center
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
Asthma and Allergy Associates, PC
Cortland, New York, 13045
Colorado Allergy & Asthma Centers, PC
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Intermountain Clinical Research
Draper, Utah, 84020
Medical Associates Clinic
Dubuque, Iowa, 52002
Asthma and Allergy Associates, PC
Elmira, New York, 14901
Colorado Allergy and Asthma Clinic, PC
Englewood, Colorado, 80112
Allergy & Asthma Research Group
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Physicians Pharmaceutical Study Services
Everett, Washington, 98201
Allergy & Asthma Care Center
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Merit Care Health
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
The Allergy and Asthma Center
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804
"The Allergy & Arthritis Family Treatment Centers
Gardner, Massachusetts, 01440
Allergy Asthma and Sinus Center
Greenfield, Wisconsin, 53228
Penn State University Hershey Medical Center, Dept of Medicine
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Iowa Clinical Research Corporation
Iowa City, Iowa, 52240
Clinical Partners, LLC
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919
The Allergy, Asthma, and Sinus Center 801 Weisgarber Road
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Allergy, Asthma and Dermatology Research Center, L.L.C.
Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035
Dean Foundation for Health Research & Education, Inc.Med Reseach Dept.
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715
Allergy & Asthma Center
Marlboro, New Jersey, 07746
Clinical Research Institute of Southern
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Advanced Healthcare Clinical Research Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53209
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Clinical Research Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402
Montana Medical Research
Missoula, Montana, 59808
Allergy Associates of Utah
Murray, Utah, 84107
Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates
Normal, Illinois, 61761
Midwest Allegy and Asthma Clinic
Omaha, Nebraska, 68130
Creighton University - Allergy & Immunology
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Kansas City Allergy and Asthma Associates, PA
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Nebraska Medical Research Institute
Papillion, Nebraska, 68046
Clinical Research Source, Inc.
Perrysburg, Ohio, 43551
Allergy and Asthma Research of NJ
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19115
Allergy & Clinical Immunology Associates
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15241
Clinical Research Institute
Plymouth, Minnesota, 55441
Allergy Associates Research Center, LLC
Portland, Oregon, 97213
Allergy Asthma Immunology Clin RI,Ltd
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Aair Research Center
Rochester, New York, 14618
Island Medical Research, PC
Rockville Centre, New York, 11570
Princeton Center for Clinical Research Montgomery Professional Center
Skillman, New Jersey, 08558
Timber Lane Allergy & Asthma Research, LLC
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
Clinical Research Specialists of Utah
Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660
Marycliff Allergy Specialists
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Spokane Allergy & Asthma Clinical Research
Spokane, Washington, 99204
McGovern Allergy Associates, PC
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01103
Saint Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Toledo Center for Clinical Research
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
Pulmonary Consultants, P.L.L.C.
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
The Medical Center at Teaneck
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
Allergy Consultants, PA
Verona, New Jersey, 07044
Dr. Dreyfus
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708-3104
Allergic Diseases, SC
West Allis, Wisconsin, 53227
Respiratory Medicine Researdh Institute of Michigan, PLC
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
Canada17 sites
Hamilton Medical Research Group
Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1K7
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Kanata Allergy Services Ltd.
Kanata, Ontario, K2L 3C8
Kelowna Allergy and Respiratory Health Clinic
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 9L7
Omnispec Clinical Research
Mirabel, Quebec, J7J 2K8
Allied Research International
Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 1N2
Alpha Medical Research Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, L5B1N1
The McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
Niagara Clinical Research
Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2G 1J4
Northgate Medical Clinic
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 2H3
Allergy and Asthma Research Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4G2
Centre De Recherche Appliquée en Allergie De Québec
Québec, Quebec, GiV 4M6
Q&T Research
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H4J6
Filderman R.
Toronto, Ontario, M3H3S3
Knight A.
Toronto, Ontario, M4P 1P2
Sussman G.
Toronto, Ontario, M4V 1R2
Manna Research
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 4L6
United Kingdom8 sites
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Brighton General Hospital Dept. Respiratory Medicine
Brighton, BN2 3EW
Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 2QQ
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
Dundee, DD1 4HN
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, LE3 9PQ
Guys Hospital
London, SE1 9RT
Lung Function - Northwest Lung Center
Manchester, M23 9LP
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, SO16 6Y
Austria4 sites
Universitätsklinik für Umweltdermatologie
Graz, 8036
Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie
Innsbruck, 6020
Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien - Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie
Vienna, 1090
Allergie-Zentrum Wien West
Vienna, 1150
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Grass MATA MPL, a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
Grass MATA MPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd. to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting grass pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Grass MATA MPL versus placebo in grass-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 grass pollen season.
Read the detailed description
Grass MATA MPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK9 Ltd.to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting grass pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. Grass MATA MPL is produced as a re-formulation of the Allergy Therapeutics product Pollinex Quattro, which has been used in Europe since 1999 on a 'named patient' basis (with approximately 65,000 treatment courses containing grass pollens).
Grass MATA MPL contains an extract of the 13 grass pollens. This extract is chemically modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. Such modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivity is not seen. The modified extract is adsorbed to L-tyrosine as a depot formulation. MPL®, a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell walls of Salmonella minnesota, is also included in the current product formulation. This excipient/adjuvant is included to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to TH1-like T cell profile.
The current formulation is designed to provide a product that will be efficacious with only 4 injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use with unmodified extracts. The product will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass of unmodified allergen extract as regards its ability to cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with IgE antibody. The modification is greater than 75%, so that only a small amount of unmodified allergen is remaining in the product.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Grass MATA MPL versus placebo in grass-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 grass pollen season.
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Being tested
- Grass MATA MPL, Placebo
- Keywords
- Allergy, Allergoid, Specific Immunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Grass MATA MPLBiological
4 subcutaneous injections
PlaceboBiological
Also called tyrosine solution
4 subcutaneous injections
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Grass MATA MPL Receives: Biological: Grass MATA MPL |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of Grass MATA MPL versus placebo measured by combined allergy symptom + medication scores during 4 peak weeks of grass season
Measured: 9 Months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Combined symptom + medication scores, Combined symptoms, Individual symptoms, Relief medication use, Specific immunological changes, quality of life, Health Assessments, Days absent from activities
Measured: 9 Months
Adverse events, adverse reactions, clinical labs, ECG, and vitals
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionAug 2007
- Study completionNov 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type I HypersensitivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,028 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy Therapeutics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Karl Jürgen Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg, MD, Study chair, Allergy Therapeutics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00414141
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GrassMATAMPL301
- Status last verified
- Sep 2009
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Frew AJ, DuBuske L, Keith PK, Corrigan CJ, Aberer W, Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg KJ. Assessment of specific immunotherapy efficacy using a novel placebo score-based method. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Nov;109(5):342-347.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.08.013.
PubMed 23062390
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Grass MATA MPL, a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00414141
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GrassMATAMPL301
- Conditions
- Type I Hypersensitivity
- Keywords
- Allergy, Allergoid, Specific Immunotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,028 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Allergy TherapeuticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- Aug 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Grass MATA MPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd. to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting grass pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Grass MATA MPL versus placebo in grass-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 grass pollen season.
Detailed description
Grass MATA MPL has been developed by Allergy Therapeutics (UK9 Ltd.to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with proven type I hypersensitivity to cross reacting grass pollens causing rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis with or without mild to moderate asthma bronchiale. Grass MATA MPL is produced as a re-formulation of the Allergy Therapeutics product Pollinex Quattro, which has been used in Europe since 1999 on a 'named patient' basis (with approximately 65,000 treatment courses containing grass pollens).
Grass MATA MPL contains an extract of the 13 grass pollens. This extract is chemically modified with glutaraldehyde to produce the active ingredient, an allergoid. Such modification reduces the reactivity of the extract with IgE antibody. However, a simultaneous reduction in other important immunological properties, such as IgG and T cell reactivity is not seen. The modified extract is adsorbed to L-tyrosine as a depot formulation. MPL®, a purified, detoxified glycolipid derived from the cell walls of Salmonella minnesota, is also included in the current product formulation. This excipient/adjuvant is included to increase the immunogenic effect of the product and to enhance the switch from an allergen-specific TH2 to TH1-like T cell profile.
The current formulation is designed to provide a product that will be efficacious with only 4 injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use with unmodified extracts. The product will also be safer to use than a formulation containing a similar mass of unmodified allergen extract as regards its ability to cause severe local allergic reactions or anaphylaxis, because of its reduced reactivity with IgE antibody. The modification is greater than 75%, so that only a small amount of unmodified allergen is remaining in the product.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Grass MATA MPL versus placebo in grass-allergic subjects following 4 subcutaneous injections of study medication administered before the start of the 2007 grass pollen season.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Biological: Grass MATA MPLGrass MATA MPL |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Biological: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Have given written informed consent;
- Are 18 to 59 years of age;
- Have a history of moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis ascribed to grass pollen exposure that required repeated use of antihistamines, nasal steroids, and/or leukotriene modifiers;
- Have a history of moderate to severe symptoms in the past grass pollen season as determined by a score of ≥ 5 on the Disease Severity Questionnaire;
- Have a positive skin prick test to grass pollen mix [wheal (longest diameter) ≥ 5 mm greater than the negative control] and a positive RAST or equivalent test (class ≥ 2) to grass pollen mix;
Key exclusion criteria (42 listed)
- Are pregnant or lactating
- Have asthma requiring the daily use of controller medication;
- Had an emergency room visit or admission for asthma in the 12 months prior to Visit 1;
- Have the presence of secondary alteration at the affected organ (i.e., emphysema, bronchiectasis, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis);
- Have auto-immune disease (e.g., liver, kidney, thyroid, nervous system);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Grass MATA MPL4 subcutaneous injections | Biological | 1 |
| PlaceboAlso: tyrosine solution4 subcutaneous injections | Biological | 2 |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of Grass MATA MPL versus placebo measured by combined allergy symptom + medication scores during 4 peak weeks of grass season
Time frame: 9 Months
2 secondary outcomes
Combined symptom + medication scores, Combined symptoms, Individual symptoms, Relief medication use, Specific immunological changes, quality of life, Health Assessments, Days absent from activities
Time frame: 9 Months
Adverse events, adverse reactions, clinical labs, ECG, and vitals
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23062390Frew AJ, DuBuske L, Keith PK, Corrigan CJ, Aberer W, Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg KJ. Assessment of specific immunotherapy efficacy using a novel placebo score-based method. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Nov;109(5):342-347.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.08.013.
Related trials for Type I Hypersensitivity
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Rinatabart Sesutecan (Rina-S, PRO1184, GEN1184) for Advanced Solid Tumors (GCT1184-01/ PRO1184-001)
High Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Novel Biomarkers of Non-IgE Immediate Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions
Healthy Volunteer, Hypersensitivity Reactions
Active, not recruiting
The COCCOS Study: a Transition Program for Young Persons With Chronic Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Impaired Type I IFN Immunity Due to Autoantibodies or a Genetic Defect: a Prospective National Cohort
Immunology, Allergy
RecruitingPhase 3
STOP-HAE: A Phase 3 Study of ADX-324 in HAE
Hereditary Angioedema, HAE
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karl Jürgen Fischer von Weikersthal-Drachenberg, MD study chair
Allergy Therapeutics
94 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Grass MATA MPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 94 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 42 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 94 sites in United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of Grass MATA MPL versus placebo measured by combined allergy symptom + medication scores during 4 peak weeks of grass season (time frame: 9 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00414141, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2010.