Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Early Phase 1NCT00417924
Eye on Diabetes: A Multidisciplinary Patient Education Intervention
A Early Phase 1 study testing Patient education in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Nova Southeastern University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Vision loss from diabetes is often preventable with timely detection and treatment. Patients with diabetes may not understand the importance of annual dilated eye examinations or recognize the benefits of early detection of diabetic eye disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Patient education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2004to Oct 2005
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients with Type I or Type II Diabetes
- English speaking
Who cannot join
- Visual acuity worse than 20/60
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Sanford L. Ziff Health Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33328
About this study
Official title: Eye Health and Vision Care for Patients With Diabetes: Comparing Usual Care to a Targeted Intervention in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Vision loss from diabetes is often preventable with timely detection and treatment. Patients with diabetes may not understand the importance of annual dilated eye examinations or recognize the benefits of early detection of diabetic eye disease. The proposed research project compares usual eye care to eye care emphasizing patient education for adult patients with diabetes.
Read the detailed description
Patients with diabetes may not understand the importance of annual dilated eye examinations or recognize the benefits of early detection of diabetic eye disease. The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of usual care to an intervention emphasizing patient education targeted at a multicultural adult patient population with diabetes seeking eye care in an academic health center. The specific aims of this study are to evaluate patient knowledge of preventive health strategies for diabetes as they pertain to eye health and vision care, to assess patient satisfaction with eye and vision care, and to promote interdisciplinary collaboration in the care of patients with diabetes.
Ninety patients were randomized to two arms representing usual care and an intervention emphasizing patient education targeted at English-speaking adults with diabetes seeking eye care in an academic health center. The project was developed within the Health Professions Division at Nova Southeastern University.
Participation was comprised of a comprehensive eye health and vision examination, patient education, and completion of study instruments described below. A demographic survey documenting patient age, sex, physician-reported HbA1C, education, and birthplace was administered to all patients at baseline. Race and ethnicity were self reported using categories in current use by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD).
Patients assigned to the intervention were provided with a written report at the conclusion of the examination. The triplicate form included a report of eye examination findings with a copy designated for the medical record, the primary care physician, and the patient. The back side of the patient's copy included educational materials targeted at a layperson while the physician's copy included information directed at a primary health care provider.
Patients assigned to usual care received patient education at the discretion of the eye care provider. Following the initial examination, all medical records were reviewed with attention to communication with other health care providers, as well as other issues related to continuity and coordination of care. Patients assigned to usual care were mailed additional written educational materials at the conclusion of the study, after all study instruments had been completed.
Patients assigned to the intervention were invited to participate in a supplementary seminar that reinforced the educational message delivered at the time of the initial examination. A multidisciplinary (optometry, pharmacy, endocrinology) patient education curriculum incorporating materials from the National Eye Health Education Program (NEHEP) Diabetic Eye Disease Public Education Program, the "ABC's of diabetes", an interactive activity, and a question and answer session was developed for patients randomized to the intervention.
- Being tested
- Patient education
- Keywords
- Patient education, Patient satisfaction, Eye health
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Patient Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient educationBehavioural
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient knowledge (pre-test, post-test, and 3 month post-test)
Patient satisfaction post-examination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2004
- Study completionOct 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Early clinical test
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 90 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Southeastern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Heidi Wagner, OD, MPH, Principal investigator, Nova Southeastern University, Health Professions Division
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00417924
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OPT06170409X
- Status last verified
- Dec 2006
- First submitted
- 2 Jan 2007
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2007
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Eye Health and Vision Care for Patients With Diabetes: Comparing Usual Care to a Targeted Intervention in a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00417924
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPT06170409X
- Keywords
- Patient education, Patient satisfaction, Eye health
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Southeastern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2004
- Study completion
- Oct 2005
- First posted
- 4 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Vision loss from diabetes is often preventable with timely detection and treatment. Patients with diabetes may not understand the importance of annual dilated eye examinations or recognize the benefits of early detection of diabetic eye disease. The proposed research project compares usual eye care to eye care emphasizing patient education for adult patients with diabetes.
Detailed description
Patients with diabetes may not understand the importance of annual dilated eye examinations or recognize the benefits of early detection of diabetic eye disease. The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of usual care to an intervention emphasizing patient education targeted at a multicultural adult patient population with diabetes seeking eye care in an academic health center. The specific aims of this study are to evaluate patient knowledge of preventive health strategies for diabetes as they pertain to eye health and vision care, to assess patient satisfaction with eye and vision care, and to promote interdisciplinary collaboration in the care of patients with diabetes.
Ninety patients were randomized to two arms representing usual care and an intervention emphasizing patient education targeted at English-speaking adults with diabetes seeking eye care in an academic health center. The project was developed within the Health Professions Division at Nova Southeastern University.
Participation was comprised of a comprehensive eye health and vision examination, patient education, and completion of study instruments described below. A demographic survey documenting patient age, sex, physician-reported HbA1C, education, and birthplace was administered to all patients at baseline. Race and ethnicity were self reported using categories in current use by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD).
Patients assigned to the intervention were provided with a written report at the conclusion of the examination. The triplicate form included a report of eye examination findings with a copy designated for the medical record, the primary care physician, and the patient. The back side of the patient's copy included educational materials targeted at a layperson while the physician's copy included information directed at a primary health care provider.
Patients assigned to usual care received patient education at the discretion of the eye care provider. Following the initial examination, all medical records were reviewed with attention to communication with other health care providers, as well as other issues related to continuity and coordination of care. Patients assigned to usual care were mailed additional written educational materials at the conclusion of the study, after all study instruments had been completed.
Patients assigned to the intervention were invited to participate in a supplementary seminar that reinforced the educational message delivered at the time of the initial examination. A multidisciplinary (optometry, pharmacy, endocrinology) patient education curriculum incorporating materials from the National Eye Health Education Program (NEHEP) Diabetic Eye Disease Public Education Program, the "ABC's of diabetes", an interactive activity, and a question and answer session was developed for patients randomized to the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Early clinical test
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult patients with Type I or Type II Diabetes
- English speaking
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Visual acuity worse than 20/60
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient education | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Patient knowledge (pre-test, post-test, and 3 month post-test)
Patient satisfaction post-examination
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2007.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Impact of the Accu-Chek SmartGuide CGM Solution on the Mean Change in Time in Range Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Participants With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Islet Cell Transplant for Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
T1CARE: A Trial of a Novel Intervention to Address Social Determinants of Health in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Diabetes in African Youth
type1diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Washed Microbiota Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 1 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heidi Wagner, OD, MPH principal investigator
Nova Southeastern University, Health Professions Division
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Patient education in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Nova Southeastern University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient knowledge (pre-test, post-test, and 3 month post-test). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2007.