AzTrials
AzTrials

HyperglycemiaPhase 2/3NCT00419497

Paleolithic Diet in the Treatment of Glucose Intolerance

A Phase 2/3 study testing Paleolithic diet vs Mediterranean diet in people with Hyperglycemia and Coronary Heart Disease, run by Lund University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a paleolithic diet improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in people with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, men only
Conditions the study is for
Hyperglycemia, Coronary Heart Disease
What is being tested?
Paleolithic diet vs Mediterranean diet
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
29 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Jan 2003to Jun 2007
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hyperglycemia
  • Coronary Heart Disease
  • Increased waist circumference

Who cannot join

  • Body mass index <20 kg/m2
  • Serum creatinine >130 µmol/L
  • Poor general condition
  • Dementia
  • Unwillingness/inability to prepare food at home (by study participant or partner)
  • Participation in another medical trial
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Chronic inflammatory bowel disease
  • Drug treatment with hypoglycemic agents
  • Drug treatment with warfarin
  • Drug treatment with oral steroid

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Lund University Hospital

    Lund, 22185

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a paleolithic diet improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in people with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance.

Read the detailed description

There is uncertainty about the optimal diet in the prevention and treatment of glucose intolerance and diabetes type 2, disorders which are very common in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Earlier studies have generally focused on intakes of fat, carbohydrate, fiber, fruit and vegetables. Another approach compares foods that were available during human evolution with more recently introduced ones. Twenty-nine CHD patients with glucose intolerance or diabetes have been randomized to 1) a Paleolithic ("Old Stone Age") diet (n=14) based on lean meat, fish, fruit, vegetables, root vegetables, eggs, and nuts, or 2) a Consensus (Mediterranean-like) diet (n=15) based on whole grains, low-fat dairy products, vegetables, fruit, fish, and oils and margarines generally assumed to be healthy. Primary outcome variables are changes during 12 weeks in weight, waist circumference, and area under the curve for glucose (AUC Glucose0-120) and insulin (AUC Insulin0-120) at the oral glucose tolerance test.

Being tested
Paleolithic diet vs Mediterranean diet
Keywords
Paleolithic diet, Mediterranean-style diet, Glucose tolerance, Diabetes type 2, Weight loss, Waist
Medical subject headings
Hyperglycemia, Coronary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Weight Loss

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Paleolithic diet vs Mediterranean dietBehavioural

    Prudent diets with or without grains and dairy

Study groups in NCT00419497
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paleolithic diet vs Mediterranean dietActive comparatorPrudent diets with or without grains and dairy
Receives: Behavioral: Paleolithic diet vs Mediterranean diet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change in weight and waist circumference

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. area under the curve for glucose (AUC Glucose0-120) at the oral glucose tolerance test

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. area under the curve for insulin (AUC Insulin0-120) at the oral glucose tolerance test

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. fasting plasma glucose

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. 30-min plasma glucose

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. 120-min plasma glucose

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. fasting plasma insulin

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. 30-min plasma insulin

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. 120-min plasma insulin

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2003
  3. Primary completionJun 2007
  4. Study completionJun 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00419497
Sponsor's protocol ID
LU 665-02
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
4 Jan 2007
Last updated
20 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lindeberg S, Jonsson T, Granfeldt Y, Borgstrand E, Soffman J, Sjostrom K, Ahren B. A Palaeolithic diet improves glucose tolerance more than a Mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischaemic heart disease. Diabetologia. 2007 Sep;50(9):1795-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0716-y. Epub 2007 Jun 22.

    PubMed 17583796
  • Jonsson T, Granfeldt Y, Erlanson-Albertsson C, Ahren B, Lindeberg S. A paleolithic diet is more satiating per calorie than a mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischemic heart disease. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Nov 30;7:85. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-7-85.

    PubMed 21118562

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Paleolithic diet vs Mediterranean diet in people with Hyperglycemia and Coronary Heart Disease, run by Lund University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change in weight and waist circumference (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00419497, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in