Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4OPTIMANCT00420927
Study of the Optimal Protocol for Methotrexate and Adalimumab Combination Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 4 study testing adalimumab and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Abbott at 170 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
This study compared the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) to that of MTX monotherapy (i.e., placebo plus MTX) in subjects with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- adalimumab and methotrexate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,032 participants
- Where
- 170 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2006to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject must be 18 or older and in good health
- Subject must meet the definition of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria and had disease duration of less than 1 year from diagnosis
- Subject must have a Disease Activity Score (DAS28, based on C-reactive protein) greater than 3.2, at least 6 swollen joints out of the 66 assessed, and at least 8 tender joints out of the 68 assessed
- Subject must fulfill at least one of the following three criteria:
- Rheumatoid factor positive
- Greater than 1 joint erosion
- Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody positive.
Who cannot join
- Subject has previously received systemic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy
- Subject has received any biologic or investigational therapy within 6 weeks prior to Baseline
- Subject has been previously treated with more than 2 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or MTX, had been treated with intra-articular or parenteral administration of corticosteroids in preceding 4 weeks, or had undergone joint surgery within the preceding 2 months at joints to be assessed during the study.
Trial locations and contacts
170 sites in 21 countries.
170 sites in 21 countries
United States49 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4544
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6229
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6227
Bend, Oregon, 97701
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4560
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4547
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-7201
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4533
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4548
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4536
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4559
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4561
Dover, New Hampshire, 03820
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4546
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6417
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 11222
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4545
Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7482
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9323
Hemet, California, 92543
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4538
Houston, Texas, 77074
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6222
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 10743
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4568
La Jolla, California, 92037-0943
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 10603
Lake Mary, Florida, 32746
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4549
Mayfield Village, Ohio, 44143
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 10745
Meridian, Idaho, 83642
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4537
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4562
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4572
Oak Creek, Wisconsin, 53154
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9325
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4534
Orchard Park, New York, 14127
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4535
Palm Desert, California, 92260
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4550
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6228
Passaic, New Jersey, 07055
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9324
Plainview, New York, 11803
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6899
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4571
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4570
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 10744
Seattle, Washington, 98133
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4600
Smithtown, New York, 11787
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4557
Springfield, Illinois, 62704
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4601
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 12821
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 9271
Torrance, California, 90505
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6758
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6381
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4552
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 10746
Victorville, California, 92395
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4564
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611-1124
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4558
Wexford, Pennsylvania, 15090
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 10741
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4605
Wichita, Kansas, 67203
Canada17 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6701
Burlington, L7R 1E2
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6834
Edmonton, T5M 0H4
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7197
Halifax, B3H 4K4
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3883
Hamilton, L8N 1Y2
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3884
Hamilton, L8N 2B6
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3907
Montreal, H2L 1S6
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3903
Montreal, H3Z 2Z3
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5178
Ottawa, K2G 6E2
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3904
Richmond, V7C 5L9
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3912
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3901
Sarnia, N7T 5W6
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3906
St. John's, A1A 5E8
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6542
Toronto, M9B 1B1
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3882
Victoria, V8V 3P9
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5616
Windsor, N8X 5A6
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5847
Winnipeg, R3A 1M3
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3905
Winnipeg, R3A 1M4
Germany14 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3926
Bad Nauheim, D-61231
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3928
Buch, 13125
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3978
Damp, 24351
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3924
Düsseldorf, 40225
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3965
Frankfurt, 60590
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3927
Frankfurt am Main, 60596
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3925
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4291
Halle, 06120
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8489
Hofheim, D-65719
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3923
Munich, 80336
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8483
Osnabrück, D-49074
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8486
Ratingen, 40882
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3919
Vogelsang-Gommern, 39245
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6637
Zerbst, 39261
Spain10 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3955
A Coruña, 15006
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 13661
Bilbao, 48013
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3930
Elche (Alicante), 03203
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8524
Madrid, 28006
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3956
Madrid, 28007
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3943
Madrid, 28034
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3931
Madrid, 28046
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3957
Oviedo, 33006
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3954
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3932
Zaragoza, 50009
United Kingdom8 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4012
Bath, BA1 1RL
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8495
Huddersfield, HD3 3EA
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4048
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4013
London, SE1 9RT
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4046
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4047
Oxford, OX3 7LD
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3985
Southampton, S016 6YD
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7977
York, YO31 8HE
Belgium7 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3914
Brussels, 1200
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3909
Genk, 3600
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3881
Gilly, 6060
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3376
Liège, 4000
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6720
Mechelen, 2800
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6718
Sint-Niklaas, 9100
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3910
Yvoir, 5530
Mexico7 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3824
Aguascallentes, 20230
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3822
León, 37000
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3825
Mexico City, 10700
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3951
Mexico City, 10700
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3890
Mexico City, 14389
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3823
Mexico City, CP 1300
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3891
Mexico City, CP 14050
Austria6 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3915
Graz, 8036
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3911
Graz, A-8020
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3880
Vienna, 1090
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3885
Vienna, 1100
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3916
Vienna, 1130
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7792
Vienna, 1160
South Africa6 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7177
Berea, Durban, 4001
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7175
Cape Town, 7405
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7178
Cape Town, 7500
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7176
Port Elizabeth, 6045
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7172
Pretoria, 0028
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7174
Soweto, 2013
Argentina5 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3886
Buenos Aires, 1426AAL
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3888
Buenos Aires, C1015ABO
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6346
Buenos Aires, C1055AAF
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3887
Quilmes
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3889
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL
Czechia5 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3968
Brno, 65691
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3971
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5559
Ostrava, 72200
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3969
Prague, 128 50
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5548
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
Norway5 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7607
Ålesund, N-6026
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7935
Kristiansand, 4615
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7506
Levanger, 7600
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7511
Lillehammer, N-2609
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 7500
Trondheim, N-7006
Sweden5 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4015
Eskilstuna, SE-631 88
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3984
Falun, SE-79182
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4016
Malmö, 20502
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4014
Stockholm, 171 76
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4017
Uppsala, 75185
France4 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3982
Amiens, 80054
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3979
Le Mans, 72037
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3983
Paris, 75679
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3918
Strasbourg, 67098
New Zealand4 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8485
Auckland
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8488
Hamilton
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8496
Timaru
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8511
Wellington
Poland4 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3963
Bydgoszcz, 85168
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3962
Katowice, 40635
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5560
Lublin, 20954
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3961
Wroclaw, 53-342
Puerto Rico4 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3944
Caguas, 00725
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3937
Ponce, 00716
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3934
San Juan, 00918
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3935
San Juan, 00936-5067
Australia3 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 8380
Campsie, Sydney, 2194
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6954
Clayton, 3168
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6940
Malvern East, 3145
Hungary3 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3921
Budapest, 1023
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3922
Budapest, 1277
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3920
Debrecen, 4012
Netherlands2 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3947
Arnhem, 6815 AD
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3948
Hilversum, 1213XZ
Slovakia2 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3959
Piešťany, 92112
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3960
Piešťany, 92112
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Period, Double - Blind Study to Determine the Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation With Methotrexate and Adalimumab Combination Therapy in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (OPTIMA)
This study compared the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) to that of MTX monotherapy (i.e., placebo plus MTX) in subjects with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Read the detailed description
This was a 78-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-treatment period study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of adalimumab and MTX with placebo and MTX in subjects with early RA. Subjects were randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) or placebo subcutaneous injections in combination with orally administered MTX for 26 weeks (Period 1). All subjects in all arms received open-label MTX weekly throughout the study (both Period 1 and Period 2).
At Weeks 22 and 26, subjects were assessed for achievement of low disease activity, defined as a DAS28 score below 3.2. DAS28 is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of a total of 28), C-reactive protein level (CRP, a blood marker of inflammation), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity (indicated by marking a 10 cm line between very good and very bad). Subjects who achieved low disease activity at Week 22 and 26 in the adalimumab arm at the end of Period 1 were randomized to receive MTX monotherapy (placebo and MTX) or combination therapy (adalimumab and MTX) in a 1:1 ratio for the duration of Period 2 (52 weeks, i.e., to Week 78 of the study). Subjects achieving low disease activity at Week 22 and 26 in the placebo arm (MTX monotherapy) at the end of Period 1 continued to receive MTX monotherapy (and placebo injections in a blinded fashion) for the duration of Period 2. Subjects failing to achieve low disease activity at Week 22 and 26 at the end of Period 1 received open-label combination therapy during Period 2 regardless of treatment assignment in Period 1.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- adalimumab, methotrexate, placebo
- Keywords
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Tumor Necrosis Factor Optimization
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
adalimumabBiological
Also called Humira, D2E7
Adalimumab 40 mg/0.8 mL prefilled syringe injected subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow)
methotrexateDrug
Methotrexate 2.5 mg tablets administered orally once a week starting at 7.5 mg/week with dose escalation (weekly or every other week) by 2.5 mg intervals to 20 mg/week.
placeboBiological
Placebo for adalimumab 0.8 mL prefilled syringe injected subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ADA+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 1) | Experimental | Combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and blinded adalimumab (ADA) during Period 1, MTX monotherapy plus blinded placebo (PBO) during Period 2 Receives: Biological: adalimumab; Drug: methotrexate; Biological: placebo |
| ADA+MTX/ADA+MTX (Arm2) | Experimental | Combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and blinded adalimumab (ADA) during Period 1 and Period 2 Receives: Biological: adalimumab; Drug: methotrexate |
| ADA+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 3) | Experimental | Combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and blinded adalimumab (ADA) during Period 1, open-label combination therapy with ADA + MTX during Period 2 Receives: Biological: adalimumab; Drug: methotrexate |
| PBO+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 4) | Experimental | Methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy plus blinded placebo (PBO) during Period 1 and Period 2 Receives: Drug: methotrexate; Biological: placebo |
| PBO+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 5) | Experimental | Methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy plus blinded placebo (PBO) during Period 1, open-label combination therapy with adalimumab (ADA) and MTX during Period 2. Receives: Biological: adalimumab; Drug: methotrexate; Biological: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects With Low Disease Activity (DAS28 Less Than 3.2) and No Radiographic Progression From Baseline (Change in mTSS Less Than or Equal to 0.5) at Week 78, Arm 2 vs. Arm 4
The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07, with scores below 3.2 indicating low disease activity. For the modified Total Sharp score (mTSS), x-rays of hand/wrist and feet joints are scored for erosions (0 to 5) and joint space narrowing (0 to 4). The erosion score and the narrowing score are added to determine the total score, which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 448.
Measured: Week 78
Secondary outcomes (18)
Number of Subjects With Low Disease Activity (DAS28 Less Than 3.2) and No Radiographic Progression From Baseline (Change in mTSS Less Than or Equal to 0.5) at Week 78, Arm 2 vs. Arm 1
The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07, with scores below 3.2 indicating low disease activity. For the modified Total Sharp score (mTSS), x-rays of hand/wrist and feet joints are scored for erosions (0 to 5) and joint space narrowing (0 to 4). The erosion score and the narrowing score are added to determine the total score, which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 448.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With DAS28 Low Disease Activity (DAS28 Less Than 3.2) at Week 78
The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07. A DAS28 less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, DAS28 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and DAS28 of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With DAS28 Remission (DAS28 Less Than 2.6) at Week 78
The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07. A DAS28 less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, DAS28 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and DAS28 of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS Less Than or Equal to 0.5) at Week 78
For the modified Total Sharp score (mTSS), x-rays of hand/wrist and feet joints are scored for erosions (0 to 5) and joint space narrowing (0 to 4). The erosion score and the narrowing score are added to determine the total score, which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 448. An increase in mTSS from baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria at Week 78
Subjects were responders if they had greater than or equal to 20% improvement in tender joint count; greater than or equal to 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and greater than or equal to 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein).
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 78
Subjects were responders if they had: greater than or equal to 50% improvement in tender joint count; greater than or equal to 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and greater than or equal to 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein).
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria at Week 78
Subjects were responders if they had: greater than or equal to 70% improvement in tender joint count; greater than or equal to 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and greater than or equal to 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein).
Measured: Week 78
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Score at Week 78
The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07. A DAS28 less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission, DAS28 2.6 to 3.2 indicates low disease activity, DAS28 3.2 to less than 5.1 indicates moderate disease activity, and DAS28 of 5.1 or greater indicates high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline to Week 78
Number of Subjects With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Low Disease Activity (CDAI Less Than or Equal to 10) at Week 78
The CDAI is calculated using number of swollen joints (28 joints assessed), number of tender joints (28 joints assessed), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and physician's global assessment of disease activity. Scores range from 0 to 76.0, with a higher score reflecting worsening disease.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Low Disease Activity (SDAI Less Than or Equal to 11) at Week 78
The SDAI is calculated using number of swollen joints (28 joints assessed), number of tender joints (28 joints assessed), patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, and acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein). Scores range from 0.1 to 86.0, with a higher score reflecting worsening disease.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission (CDAI Less Than or Equal to 2.8) at Week 78
The CDAI is calculated using number of swollen joints (28 joints assessed), number of tender joints (28 joints assessed), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and physician's global assessment of disease activity. Scores range from 0 to 76.0, with a higher score reflecting worsening disease.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission (SDAI Less Than or Equal to 3.3) at Week 78
The SDAI is calculated using number of swollen joints (28 joints assessed), number of tender joints (28 joints assessed), patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, and acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein). Scores range from 0.1 to 86.0, with a higher score reflecting worsening disease.
Measured: Week 78
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 78
The CDAI is calculated using number of swollen joints (28 joints assessed), number of tender joints (28 joints assessed), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and physician's global assessment of disease activity. Scores range from 0 to 76.0, with a higher score reflecting worsening disease.
Measured: Baseline to Week 78
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score at Week 78
The SDAI is calculated using number of swollen joints (28 joints assessed), number of tender joints (28 joints assessed), patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, and acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein). Scores range from 0.1 to 86.0, with a higher score reflecting worsening disease.
Measured: Baseline to Week 78
Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score According to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging (RA MRI) Scoring System (RAMRIS) at Week 78
Synovitis was assessed using high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hand and wrist. Images were read and scored according to the Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials' Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (OMERACT RAMRIS). Synovitis in the wrist and finger joints in the most affected hand was scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe), for a maximum total score of 21.
Measured: Baseline to Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS of Less Than or Equal to 0.5) and Normal Function (HAQ-DI Less Than 0.5) at Week 78
In the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), participants rated their ability to perform daily tasks on a scale of 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A mean score of 0-1 represents mild to moderate functional disability, 1-2 represents moderate to severe, 2-3 severe to very severe disability. For the modified Total Sharp score (mTSS), x-rays of hand/wrist and feet joints are scored for erosions (0 to 5) and joint space narrowing (0 to 4). The erosion score and the narrowing score are added to determine the total score, which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 448.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS of Less Than or Equal to 0.5), Normal Function (HAQ-DI Less Than or Equal to 0.5), and ACR70 Response at Week 78
In the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), a score of 0-1 represents mild to moderate, 1-2 moderate to severe, 2-3 severe to very severe disability. The modified Total Sharp score (mTSS) ranges from 0 (no joint damage) to 448 (worst joint damage). American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response indicates at least 70% improvement in tender and swollen joint counts and at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; HAQ-DI; and C-reactive protein.
Measured: Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS of Less Than or Equal to 0.5), Normal Function (HAQ-DI Less Than 0.5), and DAS28 Remission (DAS28 Less Than 2.6) at Week 78
In the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), a score of 0-1 represents mild to moderate, 1-2 moderate to severe, 2-3 severe to very severe disability. The modified Total Sharp score (mTSS) ranges from 0 (no joint damage) to 448 (severe joint damage). The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) ranges from 0.49 to 9.07, with scores less than 2.6 indicating clinical remission.
Measured: Week 78
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2006
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,032 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laura Redden, MD, PhD, Study director, Abbott
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00420927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M06-810
- Other IDs
- 2006-004139-31
- Acronym
- OPTIMA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2007
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Smolen J, Fleischmann R, Aletaha D, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sainsbury I, Galindo IL. Disease activity improvements with optimal discriminatory ability between treatment arms: applicability in early and established rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Nov 10;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2005-9.
PubMed 31707982Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven RF, Florentinus S, Chen S, Suboticki JL, Kavanaugh A. Predictors of disease activity and structural progression after treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate or continued methotrexate monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and suboptimal response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Nov;77(11):1566-1572. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213502. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PubMed 30076156Kavanaugh A, van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Emery P, Sainsbury I, Florentinus S, Chen S, Guerette B, Kupper H, Smolen JS. Testing treat-to-target outcomes with initial methotrexate monotherapy compared with initial tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (adalimumab) plus methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):289-292. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211871. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
PubMed 29146743Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Smolen JS, Sainsbury I, Florentinus S, Kupper H, Chen K, Kavanaugh A. Achieving comprehensive disease control in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone. RMD Open. 2017 Sep 26;3(2):e000445. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000445. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29018564Burmester GR, Landewe R, Genovese MC, Friedman AW, Pfeifer ND, Varothai NA, Lacerda AP. Adalimumab long-term safety: infections, vaccination response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):414-417. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209322. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
PubMed 27338778Smolen JS, Emery P, Fleischmann R, van Vollenhoven RF, Pavelka K, Durez P, Guerette B, Kupper H, Redden L, Arora V, Kavanaugh A. Adjustment of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis on the basis of achievement of stable low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone: the randomised controlled OPTIMA trial. Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):321-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61751-1. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
PubMed 24168956
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Period, Double - Blind Study to Determine the Optimal Protocol for Treatment Initiation With Methotrexate and Adalimumab Combination Therapy in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (OPTIMA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00420927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTIMA / M06-810
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Tumor Necrosis Factor Optimization
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,032 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbottIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2006
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Sep 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compared the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) to that of MTX monotherapy (i.e., placebo plus MTX) in subjects with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Detailed description
This was a 78-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-treatment period study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of adalimumab and MTX with placebo and MTX in subjects with early RA. Subjects were randomized to receive adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) or placebo subcutaneous injections in combination with orally administered MTX for 26 weeks (Period 1). All subjects in all arms received open-label MTX weekly throughout the study (both Period 1 and Period 2).
At Weeks 22 and 26, subjects were assessed for achievement of low disease activity, defined as a DAS28 score below 3.2. DAS28 is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of a total of 28), C-reactive protein level (CRP, a blood marker of inflammation), and the patient's global assessment of disease activity (indicated by marking a 10 cm line between very good and very bad). Subjects who achieved low disease activity at Week 22 and 26 in the adalimumab arm at the end of Period 1 were randomized to receive MTX monotherapy (placebo and MTX) or combination therapy (adalimumab and MTX) in a 1:1 ratio for the duration of Period 2 (52 weeks, i.e., to Week 78 of the study). Subjects achieving low disease activity at Week 22 and 26 in the placebo arm (MTX monotherapy) at the end of Period 1 continued to receive MTX monotherapy (and placebo injections in a blinded fashion) for the duration of Period 2. Subjects failing to achieve low disease activity at Week 22 and 26 at the end of Period 1 received open-label combination therapy during Period 2 regardless of treatment assignment in Period 1.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ADA+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 1) | Experimental | Biological: adalimumab, Drug: methotrexate, Biological: placeboCombination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and blinded adalimumab (ADA) during Period 1, MTX monotherapy plus blinded placebo (PBO) during Period 2 |
| ADA+MTX/ADA+MTX (Arm2) | Experimental | Biological: adalimumab, Drug: methotrexateCombination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and blinded adalimumab (ADA) during Period 1 and Period 2 |
| ADA+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 3) | Experimental | Biological: adalimumab, Drug: methotrexateCombination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and blinded adalimumab (ADA) during Period 1, open-label combination therapy with ADA + MTX during Period 2 |
| PBO+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 4) | Experimental | Drug: methotrexate, Biological: placeboMethotrexate (MTX) monotherapy plus blinded placebo (PBO) during Period 1 and Period 2 |
| PBO+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 5) | Experimental | Biological: adalimumab, Drug: methotrexate, Biological: placeboMethotrexate (MTX) monotherapy plus blinded placebo (PBO) during Period 1, open-label combination therapy with adalimumab (ADA) and MTX during Period 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject must be 18 or older and in good health
- Subject must meet the definition of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) defined by the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria and had disease duration of less than 1 year from diagnosis
- Subject must have a Disease Activity Score (DAS28, based on C-reactive protein) greater than 3.2, at least 6 swollen joints out of the 66 assessed, and at least 8 tender joints out of the 68 assessed
- Subject must fulfill at least one of the following three criteria:
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject has previously received systemic anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy
- Subject has received any biologic or investigational therapy within 6 weeks prior to Baseline
- Subject has been previously treated with more than 2 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or MTX, had been treated with intra-articular or parenteral administration of corticosteroids in preceding 4 weeks, or had undergone joint surgery within the preceding 2 months at joints to be assessed during the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| adalimumabAlso: Humira, D2E7Adalimumab 40 mg/0.8 mL prefilled syringe injected subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) | Biological | ADA+MTX/ADA+MTX (Arm2), ADA+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 3), ADA+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 1), PBO+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 5) |
| methotrexateMethotrexate 2.5 mg tablets administered orally once a week starting at 7.5 mg/week with dose escalation (weekly or every other week) by 2.5 mg intervals to 20 mg/week. | Drug | ADA+MTX/ADA+MTX (Arm2), ADA+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 3), ADA+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 1), PBO+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 5), PBO+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 4) |
| placeboPlacebo for adalimumab 0.8 mL prefilled syringe injected subcutaneously (SC) every other week (eow) | Biological | ADA+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 1), PBO+MTX/OL ADA+MTX (Arm 5), PBO+MTX/PBO+MTX (Arm 4) |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects With Low Disease Activity (DAS28 Less Than 3.2) and No Radiographic Progression From Baseline (Change in mTSS Less Than or Equal to 0.5) at Week 78, Arm 2 vs. Arm 4
Time frame: Week 78
The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) is calculated using the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28 counted), C-reactive protein level, and the patient's global assessment of disease activity. The calculated range of DAS28 is 0.49 to 9.07, with scores below 3.2 indicating low disease activity. For the modified Total Sharp score (mTSS), x-rays of hand/wrist and feet joints are scored for erosions (0 to 5) and joint space narrowing (0 to 4). The erosion score and the narrowing score are added to determine the total score, which ranges from 0 (no damage) to 448.
18 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects With Low Disease Activity (DAS28 Less Than 3.2) and No Radiographic Progression From Baseline (Change in mTSS Less Than or Equal to 0.5) at Week 78, Arm 2 vs. Arm 1
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With DAS28 Low Disease Activity (DAS28 Less Than 3.2) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With DAS28 Remission (DAS28 Less Than 2.6) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS Less Than or Equal to 0.5) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Score at Week 78
Time frame: Baseline to Week 78
Number of Subjects With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Low Disease Activity (CDAI Less Than or Equal to 10) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Low Disease Activity (SDAI Less Than or Equal to 11) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission (CDAI Less Than or Equal to 2.8) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission (SDAI Less Than or Equal to 3.3) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 78
Time frame: Baseline to Week 78
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score at Week 78
Time frame: Baseline to Week 78
Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score According to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging (RA MRI) Scoring System (RAMRIS) at Week 78
Time frame: Baseline to Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS of Less Than or Equal to 0.5) and Normal Function (HAQ-DI Less Than 0.5) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS of Less Than or Equal to 0.5), Normal Function (HAQ-DI Less Than or Equal to 0.5), and ACR70 Response at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Number of Subjects With No Radiographic Progression (Change From Baseline in mTSS of Less Than or Equal to 0.5), Normal Function (HAQ-DI Less Than 0.5), and DAS28 Remission (DAS28 Less Than 2.6) at Week 78
Time frame: Week 78
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31707982Smolen J, Fleischmann R, Aletaha D, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sainsbury I, Galindo IL. Disease activity improvements with optimal discriminatory ability between treatment arms: applicability in early and established rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Nov 10;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2005-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30076156Smolen JS, van Vollenhoven RF, Florentinus S, Chen S, Suboticki JL, Kavanaugh A. Predictors of disease activity and structural progression after treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate or continued methotrexate monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and suboptimal response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Nov;77(11):1566-1572. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213502. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29146743Kavanaugh A, van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Emery P, Sainsbury I, Florentinus S, Chen S, Guerette B, Kupper H, Smolen JS. Testing treat-to-target outcomes with initial methotrexate monotherapy compared with initial tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (adalimumab) plus methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):289-292. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211871. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29018564Keystone EC, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven RF, Emery P, Smolen JS, Sainsbury I, Florentinus S, Kupper H, Chen K, Kavanaugh A. Achieving comprehensive disease control in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone. RMD Open. 2017 Sep 26;3(2):e000445. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000445. eCollection 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27338778Burmester GR, Landewe R, Genovese MC, Friedman AW, Pfeifer ND, Varothai NA, Lacerda AP. Adalimumab long-term safety: infections, vaccination response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):414-417. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209322. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24168956Smolen JS, Emery P, Fleischmann R, van Vollenhoven RF, Pavelka K, Durez P, Guerette B, Kupper H, Redden L, Arora V, Kavanaugh A. Adjustment of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis on the basis of achievement of stable low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone: the randomised controlled OPTIMA trial. Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):321-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61751-1. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Redden, MD, PhD study director
Abbott
170 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing adalimumab and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Abbott at 170 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 170 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Sep 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects With Low Disease Activity (DAS28 Less Than 3.2) and No Radiographic Progression From Baseline (Change in mTSS Less Than or Equal to 0.5) at Week 78, Arm 2 vs. Arm 4 (time frame: Week 78). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00420927, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2012.