Alzheimer's DiseasePhase 3NCT00423085
Efficacy and Safety of Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Rivastigmine transdermal patch in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to investigate the 5cm^2 and 10cm^2 doses of rivastigmine transdermal patch in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE [Mini Mental State Examination] 10-20). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Rivastigmine transdermal patch
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 859 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- Jan 2007to Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type according to the DSM-IV criteria
- A clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria
- An MMSE score of > or = 10 and < or = 20
- Patients who have completed the Double-blind Treatment Phase on study medication
Who cannot join
- A current DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression
- Taken rivastigmine in the past
- A score of > 5 on the Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS) Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
- Extension Phase Eligibility Criteria
- Patients who have any important protocol deviations until the completion of the Double-blind Treatment Phase
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A 24-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-finding Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Once-daily Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE 10-20)
The purpose of this study was to investigate the 5cm^2 and 10cm^2 doses of rivastigmine transdermal patch in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE [Mini Mental State Examination] 10-20). A 52-week extension phase evaluated the safety and tolerability of long-term treatment by rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
Read the detailed description
Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to one of the 3 treatment arms (placebo, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 and rivastigmine 10 cm^2) in a ratio of 1:1:1. During the Double-blind treatment phase, patients entered a 16-week Titration Period followed by an 8-week Maintenance Period. During the open-label extension phase, all patients started treatment with a 2.5 cm^2 patch and the dose was increased to 10 cm^2 over a 16-week titration period, followed by a maintenance period of 36 weeks.
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Being tested
- Rivastigmine transdermal patch, Placebo
- Keywords
- rivastigmine,Alzheimer's Disease, transdermal patch
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rivastigmine transdermal patchDrug
Rivastigmine transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes and doses:
2.5 cm^2 (4.5 mg), 5 cm^2 (9 mg), 7.5 cm^2 (13.5 mg), and 10 cm^2 (18 mg). The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes: 2.5 cm^2, 5 cm^2, 7.5 cm^2 and 10 cm^2. The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received daily matching placebo patch for the duration of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase of the study. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| rivastigmine 5 cm^2 | Experimental | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and thereafter daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. Receives: Drug: Rivastigmine transdermal patch |
| Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 | Experimental | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. Receives: Drug: Rivastigmine transdermal patch |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog)
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog) was used to measure change in cognitive function. The ADAS-J cog score ranges from 0-70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. A negative change score indicates improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Overall Clinical Rating of Change From Baseline to Week 24 Measured by the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus - Japan (CIBIC Plus-J)
The overall clinical rating of change from baseline to week 24 measured by the 7-point CIBIC plus-J scale. The Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input consists of 3 subscales: Disability Assessment of Dementia Scale, Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale and Mental Function Impairment Scale, as well as the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Participants are scored according to the following:
- Markedly improved
- Moderately improved
- Minimally improved
- Unchanged
- Minimally worse
- Moderately worse
- Markedly worse
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)
The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL). The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in ADL while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD)
BEHAVE-AD was used to assess patient behavior and psychiatric symptoms. It covers symptoms in seven categories: paranoid and delusional ideation, hallucinations, activity disturbances, diurnal rhythm disturbances, aggressiveness, affective disorders and anxieties, and phobias. Caregivers rate behavioral symptoms on a 0-3 scale. The total score can range from 0 to 66, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS)
MENFIS was used to assess patient cognitive and psychiatric function, and evaluates core symptoms of dementia including cognitive, motivational and emotional aspects. The total score ranges from 0 to 78. The higher the score, the greater the functional deficit. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement from baseline.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement. This outcome measured the change in MMSE from the beginning of the open-label extension phase through to Week 52 of the extension phase.
Measured: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase
Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)
The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living. The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in activities of daily living while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
Measured: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase
Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Modified Crichton Scale
The Modified Crichton Scale includes a total of seven items evaluated in eight grades that assess basic activities of daily living, communication functions, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life; the total score can range from 0 to 56, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline.
Measured: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2007
- Primary completionMar 2009
- Study completionApr 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Alzheimer's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 859 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00423085
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CENA713D1301
- Other IDs
- CENA713D1301E1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2007
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 24-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-finding Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Once-daily Rivastigmine Transdermal Patch in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE 10-20)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00423085
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CENA713D1301
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Keywords
- rivastigmine,Alzheimer's Disease, transdermal patch
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 859 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- Jan 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 May 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the 5cm^2 and 10cm^2 doses of rivastigmine transdermal patch in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE [Mini Mental State Examination] 10-20). A 52-week extension phase evaluated the safety and tolerability of long-term treatment by rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
Detailed description
Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to one of the 3 treatment arms (placebo, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 and rivastigmine 10 cm^2) in a ratio of 1:1:1. During the Double-blind treatment phase, patients entered a 16-week Titration Period followed by an 8-week Maintenance Period. During the open-label extension phase, all patients started treatment with a 2.5 cm^2 patch and the dose was increased to 10 cm^2 over a 16-week titration period, followed by a maintenance period of 36 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received daily matching placebo patch for the duration of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase of the study. |
| rivastigmine 5 cm^2 | Experimental | Drug: Rivastigmine transdermal patchDuring the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and thereafter daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
| Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 | Experimental | Drug: Rivastigmine transdermal patchDuring the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type according to the DSM-IV criteria
- A clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria
- An MMSE score of > or = 10 and < or = 20
- Patients who have completed the Double-blind Treatment Phase on study medication
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- A current DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression
- Taken rivastigmine in the past
- A score of > 5 on the Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS) Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
- Extension Phase Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine transdermal patchRivastigmine transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes and doses: 2.5 cm^2 (4.5 mg), 5 cm^2 (9 mg), 7.5 cm^2 (13.5 mg), and 10 cm^2 (18 mg). The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day. | Drug | Rivastigmine 10 cm^2, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 |
| PlaceboPlacebo transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes: 2.5 cm^2, 5 cm^2, 7.5 cm^2 and 10 cm^2. The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog) was used to measure change in cognitive function. The ADAS-J cog score ranges from 0-70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. A negative change score indicates improvement from baseline.
Overall Clinical Rating of Change From Baseline to Week 24 Measured by the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus - Japan (CIBIC Plus-J)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
The overall clinical rating of change from baseline to week 24 measured by the 7-point CIBIC plus-J scale. The Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input consists of 3 subscales: Disability Assessment of Dementia Scale, Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale and Mental Function Impairment Scale, as well as the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Participants are scored according to the following: 1. Markedly improved 2. Moderately improved 3. Minimally improved 4. Unchanged 5. Minimally worse 6. Moderately worse 7. Markedly worse
7 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time frame: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase
Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)
Time frame: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase
Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Modified Crichton Scale
Time frame: Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Trontinemab in Cognitively Unimpaired Individuals at Risk for Progression to Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Rivastigmine transdermal patch in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 May 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog) (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2014.