Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2NCT00424294
A Study Of CP-195543 And Celecoxib Dual Therapy In Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2 study testing CP-195,543, celecoxib and Methotrexate in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 39 sites in United States.
Trial summary
To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of CP-195543 and celecoxib dual therapy in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- CP-195,543, celecoxib and Methotrexate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2006to Feb 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of RA based upon the American college of Rheumatology 1987 revised criteria
- Active disease at Screening
- Stable dose of methotrexate between 10-25 mg/week oral or parenteral
Who cannot join
- A diagnosis of any other inflammatory or secondary, noninflammatory arthritis that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with disease activity assessments
- A history of hypersensitivity or allergic type reactions to cyclooxygenase inhibitors, opiates, aspirin or sulfonamides
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 1 country.
39 sites in 1 country
United States39 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Pfizer Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Pfizer Investigational Site
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dunedin, Florida, 34698
Pfizer Investigational Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
Pfizer Investigational Site
Frederick, Maryland, 21702
Pfizer Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77090
Pfizer Investigational Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Pfizer Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49009
Pfizer Investigational Site
Killeen, Texas, 76549
Pfizer Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909-1600
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lake Mary, Florida, 32746
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Pfizer Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miramar, Florida, 33025
Pfizer Investigational Site
Moline, Illinois, 61265
Pfizer Investigational Site
Munster, Indiana, 46321
Pfizer Investigational Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Pfizer Investigational Site
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ogden, Utah, 84403
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73139
Pfizer Investigational Site
Olean, New York, 14760
Pfizer Investigational Site
Orange City, Florida, 32763
Pfizer Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Pfizer Investigational Site
Philladelphia, Pennsylvania, 19118
Pfizer Investigational Site
Port Richey, Florida, 34668
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, 14618
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34233
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Pfizer Investigational Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
Pfizer Investigational Site
Springfield, Illinois, 62704
Pfizer Investigational Site
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614-7118
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Pfizer Investigational Site
Upland, California, 91786
Pfizer Investigational Site
Venice, Florida, 34292
Pfizer Investigational Site
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Of CP-195543 And Celecoxib Dual Therapy In The Treatment Of The Signs And Symptoms Of Rheumatoid Arthritis In Subjects Who Are Inadequately Controlled On Methotrexate
To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of CP-195543 and celecoxib dual therapy in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis
Read the detailed description
Trial enrollment was prematurely discontinued on December 3, 2007. The results of an interim efficacy and safety analysis demonstrated an overall poor tolerability profile and high discontinuation rate when dual therapy with CP-195543 and Celecoxib was administered. The decision to discontinue further enrollment in the trial was not based on any efficacy or serious safety concerns. Previously enrolled study participants continued in the study and the trial completed on February 27, 2008.
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- CP-195,543, celecoxib, Methotrexate
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CP-195,543Drug
CP-195543 is a potent and specific antagonist of the leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor.
celecoxibDrug
Celecoxib is a nonsteroidal anit-inflammatory drug (NSAID) marketed worldwide (in the United States [US] as Celeberex) and approved for the relief of signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis.
MethotrexateDrug
Methotrexate is a folate analogue that, based on it efficacy and safety in RA, is commonly used as frontline DMARD treatment in patients with moderate to severe disease who do not respond to NSAIDs alone.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Celecoxib | Active comparator | Celecoxib with placebo therapy. Receives: Drug: celecoxib |
| Methotrexate | Other | Background Methotrexate taken in both CP-195,543/Celecoxib and Celecoxib only arms. Receives: Drug: Methotrexate |
| CP-195,543 | Experimental | CP-195,543 and Celecoxib dual therapy. Receives: Drug: CP-195,543 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; >=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (15)
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1, 2, 4 and 8
ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in tender joint count; >=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Week 1, 2, 4, 8
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Measured: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Participants were assessed for tender/painful joints using a 28-joint count comprised of left and right shoulders, elbows, wrists, proximal interphalangeal joints, metacarpophalangeal joints and knees. Artificial joints were not assessed.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Participants were assessed for swollen joints using a 28-joint count comprised of left and right shoulders, elbows, wrists, proximal interphalangeal joints, metacarpophalangeal joints and knees. Artificial joints were not assessed.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Patient's assessment of arthritis pain was assessed using a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) with range: 0 = no pain to 100 = worst possible pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Patient's global assessment of arthritic condition assessed all the ways participants' illness and health conditions affect them at the time of assessment. The response was scored on a 5-point scale: 1 = Very Good (Asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = Good (Mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = Fair (Moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and 5 = Very Poor (Very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Investigator assessed overall appearance of arthritis at the time of the visit. The response was scored on a 5-point scale: 1 = Very Good (Asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = Good (Mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = Fair (Moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = Poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and 5 = Very Poor (Very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3, where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP. It was calculated as DAS28-3 (CRP) = 1.15 + 1.10 * ([0.56 * square root of TJC] + [0.28 * square root of SJC] + [0.36 * natural logarithm of {CRP+1}]). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) <= 3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) <2.6 = remission.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed between the time participant woke up and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in hours (duration was recorded in hours to the nearest quarter. For those participants with unrelenting stiffness, duration was recorded as 24 hours).
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Number of Participants Who Withdrew From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
Time to Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes); liver function (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, total protein); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, phosphate, bicarbonate); clinical chemistry (glucose, creatine kinase); immunology (CRP); urinalysis (dipstick [urine specific gravity, decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity {pH} of urine, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, bilirubin], microscopy [urine RBC, WBC, urate crystals, calcium, oxalate, miscellaneous [urine mucus and leucocytes]).
Measured: Baseline up to Week 13
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2006
- Primary completionDec 2007
- Study completionFeb 2008
Why it stopped: See Detailed Description field
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00424294
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A7701005
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2007
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Of CP-195543 And Celecoxib Dual Therapy In The Treatment Of The Signs And Symptoms Of Rheumatoid Arthritis In Subjects Who Are Inadequately Controlled On Methotrexate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00424294
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A7701005
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See Detailed Description field
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of CP-195543 and celecoxib dual therapy in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis
Detailed description
Trial enrollment was prematurely discontinued on December 3, 2007. The results of an interim efficacy and safety analysis demonstrated an overall poor tolerability profile and high discontinuation rate when dual therapy with CP-195543 and Celecoxib was administered. The decision to discontinue further enrollment in the trial was not based on any efficacy or serious safety concerns. Previously enrolled study participants continued in the study and the trial completed on February 27, 2008.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Celecoxib | Active comparator | Drug: celecoxibCelecoxib with placebo therapy. |
| Methotrexate | Other | Drug: MethotrexateBackground Methotrexate taken in both CP-195,543/Celecoxib and Celecoxib only arms. |
| CP-195,543 | Experimental | Drug: CP-195,543CP-195,543 and Celecoxib dual therapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- A diagnosis of RA based upon the American college of Rheumatology 1987 revised criteria
- Active disease at Screening
- Stable dose of methotrexate between 10-25 mg/week oral or parenteral
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- A diagnosis of any other inflammatory or secondary, noninflammatory arthritis that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with disease activity assessments
- A history of hypersensitivity or allergic type reactions to cyclooxygenase inhibitors, opiates, aspirin or sulfonamides
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CP-195,543CP-195543 is a potent and specific antagonist of the leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor. | Drug | CP-195,543 |
| celecoxibCelecoxib is a nonsteroidal anit-inflammatory drug (NSAID) marketed worldwide (in the United States [US] as Celeberex) and approved for the relief of signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis. | Drug | Celecoxib |
| MethotrexateMethotrexate is a folate analogue that, based on it efficacy and safety in RA, is commonly used as frontline DMARD treatment in patients with moderate to severe disease who do not respond to NSAIDs alone. | Drug | Methotrexate |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; >=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
15 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 1, 2, 4 and 8
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Number of Participants Who Withdrew From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Time to Withdrawal Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 13
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
39 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing CP-195,543, celecoxib and Methotrexate in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Pfizer at 39 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2014.