AzTrials
AzTrials

Purpura, Schoenlein-HenochPhase 4NCT00425724

HSP-glomerulonephritis Trial: MP vs CyA

A Phase 4 study testing Methylprednisolone pulses plus prednisone versus Cyclosporine A in people with Purpura, Schoenlein-Henoch, run by Oulu University Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

No curative treatment of severe HSP nephritis is known. Apart from corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine and cyclophosphamide, have been used to treat severe HSP nephritis.Limited patient series treated with these drugs have been described, but there are no reports of controlled trials. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Purpura, Schoenlein-Henoch
What is being tested?
Methylprednisolone pulses plus prednisone versus Cyclosporine A
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteFinland
Study dates
Jan 2000to Feb 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • On the basis of a renal biopsy, the patient has been diagnosed for crescentic HSP glomerulonephritis of ISKDC grade III or IV or HSP glomerulonephritis of ISKDC grade II + a definite nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria > 40 mg/m2/h).

Who cannot join

  • The child is on regular medication known to interact with cyclosporine. Such medication includes cisapride, phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, digoxin and anti-inflammatory pain medication.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Finland1 site
  • Dept. of Pediatrics, Oulu University Hospital

    Oulu, 90029 OYS

Other trials in Finland

About this study

No curative treatment of severe HSP nephritis is known.

Apart from corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine and cyclophosphamide, have been used to treat severe HSP nephritis.Limited patient series treated with these drugs have been described, but there are no reports of controlled trials.

Read more

Cyclosporine A have been used to treat corticosteroid-resistant or corticosteroid-dependent nephrosis. (11) Cyclosporine A has also been used to treat HSP nephritis, but as far as we know, there are no publications reporting such trials.

The aim of the study is to compare MP pulses and cyclosporine A for their efficacy in the treatment of HSP nephritis.

The efficacy of the two treatments will be assessed on the basis of the duration of nephrosis/nephritis, the maintenance of renal function and the renal biopsy findings.

Read the detailed description

Using a prospective, randomised, open-labelled design, MP pulse treatment and cyclosporine A treatment will be compared for their efficacy in the treatment of severe HSP glomerulonephritis.

The trial will be a national multi-centre trial that involves all Finnish university hospitals, a few Finnish central hospitals.

The HSP patients with crescent HSP glomerulonephritis (ISKDC class III or IV) diagnosed by renal biopsy or with a renal biopsy finding of ISKDC class II + a distinct nephrotic syndrome will be included. Most of the patients will be recruited from a series collected by the same authors to study the prevention of HSP nephritis (see Effect of prednisone treatment on the symptoms of HSP disease and the development of glomerulonephritis).

The patients will be randomised to receive either MP pulses i.v. or cyclosporine A p.o. The MP pulses will consist of three doses of methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg i.v. given over a period of one week in hospital. On the intermediate days and for a month after the MP pulses, the patients will be given prednisone 30 mg/m2/day p.o., after which the prednisone medication will be gradually tapered over 3 months. The patients randomised into the cyclosporine A group will receive an initial dose of 5 mg/kg/day, after which the dosage will be titrated to an optimal therapeutic level by monitoring the B-Cya concentration. The cyclosporine A treatment will be continued for 12 months.

Being tested
Methylprednisolone pulses plus prednisone versus Cyclosporine A
Keywords
proteinuria, nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, glomerulonephritis
Medical subject headings
IgA Vasculitis, Proteinuria, Nephritis, Nephrotic Syndrome, Glomerulonephritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Methylprednisolone pulses plus prednisone versus Cyclosporine ADrug

    The patients will be randomised to receive either MP pulses i.v. or cyclosporine A p.o. The MP pulses will consist of three doses of methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg i.v. given over a period of one week in hospital. On the intermediate days and for a month after the MP pulses, the patients will be given prednisone 30 mg/m2/day p.o., after which the prednisone medication will be gradually run down over 3 months. The patients randomised into the cyclosporine A group will receive an initial dose of 5 mg/kg/day, after which the dosage will be titrated to an optimal therapeutic level by monitoring the B-Cya concentration. The cyclosporine A treatment will be continued for 12 months.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disappearance of proteinuria/ hematuria

    Measured: 24 mo

  2. Renal function (measured by Cr-EDTA-Cl- GFR)

    Measured: 24 mo

  3. Renal biopsy findings

    Measured: 24 mo

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Need for additional medication

    Measured: 24 mo

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2000
  3. Primary completionFeb 2007
  4. Study completionFeb 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00425724
Sponsor's protocol ID
25600
Status last verified
Aug 2011
First submitted
22 Jan 2007
Last updated
8 Aug 2011
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Jauhola O, Ronkainen J, Autio-Harmainen H, Koskimies O, Ala-Houhala M, Arikoski P, Holtta T, Jahnukainen T, Rajantie J, Ormala T, Nuutinen M. Cyclosporine A vs. methylprednisolone for Henoch-Schonlein nephritis: a randomized trial. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011 Dec;26(12):2159-66. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1919-5. Epub 2011 May 28.

    PubMed 21626222
  • Hahn D, Hodson EM, Craig JC. Interventions for preventing and treating kidney disease in IgA vasculitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 28;2(2):CD005128. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005128.pub4.

    PubMed 36853224

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Methylprednisolone pulses plus prednisone versus Cyclosporine A in people with Purpura, Schoenlein-Henoch, run by Oulu University Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disappearance of proteinuria/ hematuria (time frame: 24 mo). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00425724, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2011; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in