StrokePhase 1SIRROWSNCT00428480
Walking Study for Stroke Rehabilitation
A Phase 1 study testing Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS) and No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS) in people with Stroke, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 24 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effects of reinforcement of walking speed on recovery of walking speed over the course of inpatient rehabilitation for people after stroke. The study will also examine the relationship between short distance walking speed and walking distance over a fixed time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS) and No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- May 2007to Mar 2009
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 35 years or older
- suffered a stroke from any cause that is unlikely to progress or recur within 2 years of onset (thrombotic infarct, cardioembolus, intracerebral hemorrhage)
- unilateral hemiparesis with strength of the proximal leg muscles ≤4/5
- able to follow simple instructions and understand verbal reinforcement about walking speed
- able to take 5 steps with not more than the assistance of one person
Who cannot join
- premorbid walking difficulty in the community, such as a prior stroke with residual impairment, arthritis with pain on stepping, dyspnea or angina on modest exertion, limited walking endurance due to cardiopulmonary or other disease
- history of dementia
- current medical disease that will limit physical therapy at the time of randomization, such as critical illness myopathy/neuropathy, serious infection, thrombophlebitis, orthostatic hypertension, decubitus ulcer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, organ transplantation, recent surgery (including coronary bypass), or pain with weigh bearing
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 10 countries.
24 sites in 10 countries
United States11 sites
Kernan Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland
St. Luke's Hospital
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
St. Luke's and Whiteside Institute for Clinical Research
Duluth, Minnesota
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital
Nashville, Tennessee
Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island
North Smithfield, Rhode Island, 02896
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota
Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation
West Orange, New Jersey
Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
White Plains, New York, 10605
Italy3 sites
Fondazione Instituto San Raffaele-Giglio
Cefalù, 90015
University of Salute, San Raffaele Hospital
Milan
I.R.C.C.S San Camillo
Venezia
India2 sites
Father Muller Medical College
Mangalore, Karnataka
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Dehli
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Ankara University Faculty of Medicine
Ankara
Gazi University Faculty of Medicine
Ankara
About this study
Official title: Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation Reinforcement of Walking Speed
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effects of reinforcement of walking speed on recovery of walking speed over the course of inpatient rehabilitation for people after stroke. The study will also examine the relationship between short distance walking speed and walking distance over a fixed time.
Read the detailed description
This study is a single-blind, randomized, multi-center trial design. People who are admitted post-stroke for inpatient rehabilitation will be examined for eligibility by the treating physician. Subjects who satisfy the selection criteria and who agree to participate will be randomized to either the experimental group or the control group.
Intervention
All subjects will receive usual therapy during their inpatient rehabilitation stay.
Subjects in the experimental group (Daily Reinforcement of Speed or DRS group) will receive encouragement to walk faster with feedback on their performance every day for the duration of their inpatient stay. During one of the daily therapy sessions (preferably morning), the experimental subjects will be encouraged by their physical therapist to walk at least 10 m (25 feet) along a straight hallway. Subjects in the experimental group will be timed with a stopwatch by their treating physical therapist each day during the 10-meter walking task. If a subject is not able to walk 10 meters, then a shorter distance is used until the 10-meter distance can be achieved (if possible). Before starting the timed walk, the therapist will remind the subject to "walk as fast as safely possible" and to try to walk the distance "a few seconds faster than what you were able to do in the past few days". The therapist can provide the assistance of another person and use aids, and whatever is needed for safety. The timed test should be stopped or not performed on any one day if this is best for patient care. The subject's safety must not be compromised. At the end of the timed walk, the therapist will provide the results for that day in a positive tone, such as "Very good! You walked that in xx seconds". Then, (a) 'This is better by x seconds', or (b) 'This shows you are holding your own', or (c) 'I believe that you will soon be able to walk a bit faster with a better walking pattern'."
Subjects who are randomized to the control group (No Reinforcement of Speed or NRS group) will not be timed during a daily 10-meter walk, nor specifically encouraged to walk faster each day.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome measure is walking speed, measured with a stopwatch over 15.2 m (50 feet).3 A blinded evaluator (i.e. a physical therapist or other trained person who is not involved in the subject's treatment and does not work on the inpatient unit) will conduct all assessments. The treating physical therapist will assist the subject during the gait speed assessments as necessary. The subject will employ his or her usual assistive devices for that stage of recovery.
The gait speed assessment will be conducted on a flat tiled surface along a walkway that is not within sight of other patients. A chair will be placed at either end of the 15 m straight walkway. The subject starts approximately 3 steps behind the start line to allow for acceleration. The blinded assessor instructs the subject to "walk as fast as you safely can until I tell you to stop. If you have to sit or rest, tell me." When the subject's lead toe crosses the line, timing begins. When the lead toe crosses the 15.2-meter (finish) line, timing stop. The subject is told to stop walking once both feet cross the line. This ensures that the subject does not decelerate until he or she has traversed the full 15.2 meters. Data is recorded as time in seconds.
At entry to the study, it is anticipated that some subjects may not be able to walk continuously for 15 meters. In these cases, a timed 5-meter walk can be substituted at study entry and designated so on the data entry form, and if still necessary, at discharge. If a subject at study entry cannot walk 5 meters without stopping to rest or needs maximal assistance, the test is marked "unable" on the data recording sheet.
Gait speed measurements will be collected by the blinded evaluator at study entry (if possible), at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after entry if still an inpatient, within one day of inpatient discharge, and, if possible, 3 months and 6 months after study entry. The Functional Ambulation Classification Index will be completed by the blinded evaluator after each gait speed assessment. Thus, a FAC score will be recorded at the same time points as each gait speed evaluation.
The secondary outcome measure is distance walked in 3 minutes. The subject will be instructed by the blinded assessor to walk as many laps of the walkway as possible in 3 minutes. A straight 25-meter walkway will be used. The patient turns at each end and continues walking for the 3 minutes. The distance covered in 3 minutes is measured in meters. The subject may halt to rest at any time and continue walking when ready. If the subject must sit down to rest, the test is discontinued and the time and distance are recorded. The 3-minute walking test will be conducted at up to 4 time points: 4 weeks after entry if still an inpatient, within 2 days of inpatient discharge, 3 months post study entry, and 6 months post study entry. If the evaluator believes that the test was not an accurate reflection of the walking distance (some interruption occurred or the subject stopped when distracted), the test can be repeated and the best distance recorded.
The blinded observer should find an isolated and convenient place to perform the tests. Before the trial begins, the observer should practice the timed walking speed and distance test with 3 hemiparetic inpatients and their therapists for 4 repeated tests within 1-2 days to try to obtain reproducible data. The walking speeds and distances should not differ by more than 10%.
Descriptive data and further assessments
Each subject will have data recorded by site and randomization number, not by name, birth date or other identifying characteristics. In addition to the results from the gait speed and walking distance assessments (collected and entered by the blinded evaluator), basic descriptive information for each subject will also be collected in order to adequately characterize the study population. This information will be obtained by the study physician or designated person from the medical record and from interview with the subject or family. The following information will be collected for each subject: age, gender, handedness; dates of stroke onset, admission for rehabilitation, entry into the trial, and discharge from in patient care; and (selected from a list) type of stroke, general location of stroke, and side of hemiparesis. Severity of stroke at the time of entry into the study will be characterized using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,4-5 the modified Rankin Scale, and the Functional Ambulation Classification Index, which are well accepted measures. The investigators will also ask subjects to record the number of falls they had from discharge to 3 months and from 3 months to 6 months after entry using a calendar that they will bring with them to each follow-up.
Data entry
All data entry will be via a web-based system. The blinded observer will enter all walking-related data and will be given a password to access the data entry site that differs from the password and access by the study physician.
Data analysis
For an anticipated effect size of 0.4, a conservative estimate using a two-tailed alpha of 0.01 and power of 0.9, we will need a sample size of 150 subjects in each group. An ideal sample size for this varied population and for the primary and secondary outcomes will be 250 subjects in each arm to allow for dropouts and to gather enough subjects who are also tested at 3 and 6 months study entry. This would make the trial the largest prospective neurorehabilitation study ever attempted.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS), No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS)Behavioural
Also called DRS
Inpatients are encouraged to walk faster and given feedback on their walking speed during a daily 10-meter walk as part of their usual physical therapy.
No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)Behavioural
Also called NRS
Inpatients complete a 10-meter walk as part of their daily physical therapy but are not given any encouragement to walk faster or feedback on their walking speed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Daily reinforcement of walking speed Receives: Behavioral: Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS) |
| 2 | Active comparator | No reinforcement of walking speed Receives: Behavioral: No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gait speed
Measured: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Distance walked in 3 minutes
Measured: 4 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months
Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)
Measured: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months
Number of falls post inpatient rehabilitation
Measured: 3 months, 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2007
- Primary completionMar 2009
- Study completionMar 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- WORLD FEDERATION FOR NEUROREHABILITATION, Mayo Clinic, The Foundation Institute San Raffaele G. Giglio of Cefalù, University of Vigo, Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Chonnam National University Hospital, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, Hacettepe University, Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Czech Republic, Federal Medical Center, Abeokuta, Nigeria, Ankara University, Institute for Clinical Research, University of Chicago, Helen Hayes Hospital, Gazi University, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, St. Luke's Hospital, Pennsylvania, Hochzirl Hospital, Father Muller Medical College, Kernan Hospital, Baltimore, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy, Kessler Foundation, Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital, TN, Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island, RI, St. Mauritius Therapieklinik, Dusseldort, Germany
- Investigators
- Bruce H Dobkin, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00428480
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UCLA-06-07-104-01
- Acronym
- SIRROWS
- Status last verified
- Jul 2009
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2007
- Last updated
- 11 Nov 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Nov 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation Reinforcement of Walking Speed
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00428480
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SIRROWS / UCLA-06-07-104-01
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- WORLD FEDERATION FOR NEUROREHABILITATION, Mayo Clinic, The Foundation Institute San Raffaele G. Giglio of Cefalù, University of Vigo, Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Chonnam National University Hospital, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg GmbH, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, Hacettepe University, Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Czech Republic, Federal Medical Center, Abeokuta, Nigeria, Ankara University, Institute for Clinical Research, University of Chicago, Helen Hayes Hospital, Gazi University, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, St. Luke's Hospital, Pennsylvania, Hochzirl Hospital, Father Muller Medical College, Kernan Hospital, Baltimore, IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy, Kessler Foundation, Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital, TN, Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island, RI, St. Mauritius Therapieklinik, Dusseldort, Germany
- Study start
- May 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jan 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effects of reinforcement of walking speed on recovery of walking speed over the course of inpatient rehabilitation for people after stroke. The study will also examine the relationship between short distance walking speed and walking distance over a fixed time.
Detailed description
This study is a single-blind, randomized, multi-center trial design. People who are admitted post-stroke for inpatient rehabilitation will be examined for eligibility by the treating physician. Subjects who satisfy the selection criteria and who agree to participate will be randomized to either the experimental group or the control group.
Intervention
All subjects will receive usual therapy during their inpatient rehabilitation stay.
Subjects in the experimental group (Daily Reinforcement of Speed or DRS group) will receive encouragement to walk faster with feedback on their performance every day for the duration of their inpatient stay. During one of the daily therapy sessions (preferably morning), the experimental subjects will be encouraged by their physical therapist to walk at least 10 m (25 feet) along a straight hallway. Subjects in the experimental group will be timed with a stopwatch by their treating physical therapist each day during the 10-meter walking task. If a subject is not able to walk 10 meters, then a shorter distance is used until the 10-meter distance can be achieved (if possible). Before starting the timed walk, the therapist will remind the subject to "walk as fast as safely possible" and to try to walk the distance "a few seconds faster than what you were able to do in the past few days". The therapist can provide the assistance of another person and use aids, and whatever is needed for safety. The timed test should be stopped or not performed on any one day if this is best for patient care. The subject's safety must not be compromised. At the end of the timed walk, the therapist will provide the results for that day in a positive tone, such as "Very good! You walked that in xx seconds". Then, (a) 'This is better by x seconds', or (b) 'This shows you are holding your own', or (c) 'I believe that you will soon be able to walk a bit faster with a better walking pattern'."
Subjects who are randomized to the control group (No Reinforcement of Speed or NRS group) will not be timed during a daily 10-meter walk, nor specifically encouraged to walk faster each day.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome measure is walking speed, measured with a stopwatch over 15.2 m (50 feet).3 A blinded evaluator (i.e. a physical therapist or other trained person who is not involved in the subject's treatment and does not work on the inpatient unit) will conduct all assessments. The treating physical therapist will assist the subject during the gait speed assessments as necessary. The subject will employ his or her usual assistive devices for that stage of recovery.
The gait speed assessment will be conducted on a flat tiled surface along a walkway that is not within sight of other patients. A chair will be placed at either end of the 15 m straight walkway. The subject starts approximately 3 steps behind the start line to allow for acceleration. The blinded assessor instructs the subject to "walk as fast as you safely can until I tell you to stop. If you have to sit or rest, tell me." When the subject's lead toe crosses the line, timing begins. When the lead toe crosses the 15.2-meter (finish) line, timing stop. The subject is told to stop walking once both feet cross the line. This ensures that the subject does not decelerate until he or she has traversed the full 15.2 meters. Data is recorded as time in seconds.
At entry to the study, it is anticipated that some subjects may not be able to walk continuously for 15 meters. In these cases, a timed 5-meter walk can be substituted at study entry and designated so on the data entry form, and if still necessary, at discharge. If a subject at study entry cannot walk 5 meters without stopping to rest or needs maximal assistance, the test is marked "unable" on the data recording sheet.
Gait speed measurements will be collected by the blinded evaluator at study entry (if possible), at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after entry if still an inpatient, within one day of inpatient discharge, and, if possible, 3 months and 6 months after study entry. The Functional Ambulation Classification Index will be completed by the blinded evaluator after each gait speed assessment. Thus, a FAC score will be recorded at the same time points as each gait speed evaluation.
The secondary outcome measure is distance walked in 3 minutes. The subject will be instructed by the blinded assessor to walk as many laps of the walkway as possible in 3 minutes. A straight 25-meter walkway will be used. The patient turns at each end and continues walking for the 3 minutes. The distance covered in 3 minutes is measured in meters. The subject may halt to rest at any time and continue walking when ready. If the subject must sit down to rest, the test is discontinued and the time and distance are recorded. The 3-minute walking test will be conducted at up to 4 time points: 4 weeks after entry if still an inpatient, within 2 days of inpatient discharge, 3 months post study entry, and 6 months post study entry. If the evaluator believes that the test was not an accurate reflection of the walking distance (some interruption occurred or the subject stopped when distracted), the test can be repeated and the best distance recorded.
The blinded observer should find an isolated and convenient place to perform the tests. Before the trial begins, the observer should practice the timed walking speed and distance test with 3 hemiparetic inpatients and their therapists for 4 repeated tests within 1-2 days to try to obtain reproducible data. The walking speeds and distances should not differ by more than 10%.
Descriptive data and further assessments
Each subject will have data recorded by site and randomization number, not by name, birth date or other identifying characteristics. In addition to the results from the gait speed and walking distance assessments (collected and entered by the blinded evaluator), basic descriptive information for each subject will also be collected in order to adequately characterize the study population. This information will be obtained by the study physician or designated person from the medical record and from interview with the subject or family. The following information will be collected for each subject: age, gender, handedness; dates of stroke onset, admission for rehabilitation, entry into the trial, and discharge from in patient care; and (selected from a list) type of stroke, general location of stroke, and side of hemiparesis. Severity of stroke at the time of entry into the study will be characterized using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,4-5 the modified Rankin Scale, and the Functional Ambulation Classification Index, which are well accepted measures. The investigators will also ask subjects to record the number of falls they had from discharge to 3 months and from 3 months to 6 months after entry using a calendar that they will bring with them to each follow-up.
Data entry
All data entry will be via a web-based system. The blinded observer will enter all walking-related data and will be given a password to access the data entry site that differs from the password and access by the study physician.
Data analysis
For an anticipated effect size of 0.4, a conservative estimate using a two-tailed alpha of 0.01 and power of 0.9, we will need a sample size of 150 subjects in each group. An ideal sample size for this varied population and for the primary and secondary outcomes will be 250 subjects in each arm to allow for dropouts and to gather enough subjects who are also tested at 3 and 6 months study entry. This would make the trial the largest prospective neurorehabilitation study ever attempted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS)Daily reinforcement of walking speed |
| 2 | Active comparator | Behavioral: No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)No reinforcement of walking speed |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 35 years or older
- suffered a stroke from any cause that is unlikely to progress or recur within 2 years of onset (thrombotic infarct, cardioembolus, intracerebral hemorrhage)
- unilateral hemiparesis with strength of the proximal leg muscles ≤4/5
- able to follow simple instructions and understand verbal reinforcement about walking speed
- able to take 5 steps with not more than the assistance of one person
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- premorbid walking difficulty in the community, such as a prior stroke with residual impairment, arthritis with pain on stepping, dyspnea or angina on modest exertion, limited walking endurance due to cardiopulmonary or other disease
- history of dementia
- current medical disease that will limit physical therapy at the time of randomization, such as critical illness myopathy/neuropathy, serious infection, thrombophlebitis, orthostatic hypertension, decubitus ulcer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, organ transplantation, recent surgery (including coronary bypass), or pain with weigh bearing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS)Also: DRSInpatients are encouraged to walk faster and given feedback on their walking speed during a daily 10-meter walk as part of their usual physical therapy. | Behavioural | 1 |
| No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)Also: NRSInpatients complete a 10-meter walk as part of their daily physical therapy but are not given any encouragement to walk faster or feedback on their walking speed. | Behavioural | 2 |
Primary outcome
Gait speed
Time frame: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months
3 secondary outcomes
Distance walked in 3 minutes
Time frame: 4 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months
Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)
Time frame: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months
Number of falls post inpatient rehabilitation
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Nov 2011.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Brain-Machine Interface With Virtual Reality and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Understanding and Enhancing Human Health and Movement
Spinal Cord Injury, Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Detecting and Predicting Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Integrating Wearable Monitoring and Clinical Data for Stroke Early Warning
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: Ultrasound Findings and VAS (Cross-Sectional)
Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruce H Dobkin, MD principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
24 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS) and No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS) in people with Stroke, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 24 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States, Italy, India, Turkey (Türkiye), Austria and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gait speed (time frame: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2011.