AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokePhase 1SIRROWSNCT00428480

Walking Study for Stroke Rehabilitation

A Phase 1 study testing Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS) and No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS) in people with Stroke, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 24 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effects of reinforcement of walking speed on recovery of walking speed over the course of inpatient rehabilitation for people after stroke. The study will also examine the relationship between short distance walking speed and walking distance over a fixed time. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS) and No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
216 participants
Where
24 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
May 2007to Mar 2009
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 35 years or older
  • suffered a stroke from any cause that is unlikely to progress or recur within 2 years of onset (thrombotic infarct, cardioembolus, intracerebral hemorrhage)
  • unilateral hemiparesis with strength of the proximal leg muscles ≤4/5
  • able to follow simple instructions and understand verbal reinforcement about walking speed
  • able to take 5 steps with not more than the assistance of one person

Who cannot join

  • premorbid walking difficulty in the community, such as a prior stroke with residual impairment, arthritis with pain on stepping, dyspnea or angina on modest exertion, limited walking endurance due to cardiopulmonary or other disease
  • history of dementia
  • current medical disease that will limit physical therapy at the time of randomization, such as critical illness myopathy/neuropathy, serious infection, thrombophlebitis, orthostatic hypertension, decubitus ulcer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, organ transplantation, recent surgery (including coronary bypass), or pain with weigh bearing

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 10 countries.

24 sites in 10 countries

United States11 sites
  • Kernan Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • St. Luke's Hospital

    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

  • The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois

  • St. Luke's and Whiteside Institute for Clinical Research

    Duluth, Minnesota

  • University of California Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island

    North Smithfield, Rhode Island, 02896

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota

  • Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation

    West Orange, New Jersey

  • Burke Rehabilitation Hospital

    White Plains, New York, 10605

Other trials in United States

Italy3 sites
  • Fondazione Instituto San Raffaele-Giglio

    Cefalù, 90015

  • University of Salute, San Raffaele Hospital

    Milan

  • I.R.C.C.S San Camillo

    Venezia

Other trials in Italy

India2 sites
  • Father Muller Medical College

    Mangalore, Karnataka

  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences

    New Dehli

Other trials in India

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Ankara University Faculty of Medicine

    Ankara

  • Gazi University Faculty of Medicine

    Ankara

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Austria1 site
  • Hospital Hochzirl

    Zirl

Other trials in Austria

Germany1 site
  • St. Mauritius Therapieklinik

    Düsseldorf

Other trials in Germany

Japan1 site
  • Morinomia Hospital

    Osaka

Other trials in Japan

Nigeria1 site
  • Federal Medical Center

    Abeokuta

Other trials in Nigeria

South Korea1 site
  • Chonnam National Medical School & Hospital

    Gwangju

Other trials in South Korea

Spain1 site
  • University Hospital of Vigo

    Vigo

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation Reinforcement of Walking Speed

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effects of reinforcement of walking speed on recovery of walking speed over the course of inpatient rehabilitation for people after stroke. The study will also examine the relationship between short distance walking speed and walking distance over a fixed time.

Read the detailed description

This study is a single-blind, randomized, multi-center trial design. People who are admitted post-stroke for inpatient rehabilitation will be examined for eligibility by the treating physician. Subjects who satisfy the selection criteria and who agree to participate will be randomized to either the experimental group or the control group.

Intervention

All subjects will receive usual therapy during their inpatient rehabilitation stay.

Subjects in the experimental group (Daily Reinforcement of Speed or DRS group) will receive encouragement to walk faster with feedback on their performance every day for the duration of their inpatient stay. During one of the daily therapy sessions (preferably morning), the experimental subjects will be encouraged by their physical therapist to walk at least 10 m (25 feet) along a straight hallway. Subjects in the experimental group will be timed with a stopwatch by their treating physical therapist each day during the 10-meter walking task. If a subject is not able to walk 10 meters, then a shorter distance is used until the 10-meter distance can be achieved (if possible). Before starting the timed walk, the therapist will remind the subject to "walk as fast as safely possible" and to try to walk the distance "a few seconds faster than what you were able to do in the past few days". The therapist can provide the assistance of another person and use aids, and whatever is needed for safety. The timed test should be stopped or not performed on any one day if this is best for patient care. The subject's safety must not be compromised. At the end of the timed walk, the therapist will provide the results for that day in a positive tone, such as "Very good! You walked that in xx seconds". Then, (a) 'This is better by x seconds', or (b) 'This shows you are holding your own', or (c) 'I believe that you will soon be able to walk a bit faster with a better walking pattern'."

Subjects who are randomized to the control group (No Reinforcement of Speed or NRS group) will not be timed during a daily 10-meter walk, nor specifically encouraged to walk faster each day.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome measure is walking speed, measured with a stopwatch over 15.2 m (50 feet).3 A blinded evaluator (i.e. a physical therapist or other trained person who is not involved in the subject's treatment and does not work on the inpatient unit) will conduct all assessments. The treating physical therapist will assist the subject during the gait speed assessments as necessary. The subject will employ his or her usual assistive devices for that stage of recovery.

The gait speed assessment will be conducted on a flat tiled surface along a walkway that is not within sight of other patients. A chair will be placed at either end of the 15 m straight walkway. The subject starts approximately 3 steps behind the start line to allow for acceleration. The blinded assessor instructs the subject to "walk as fast as you safely can until I tell you to stop. If you have to sit or rest, tell me." When the subject's lead toe crosses the line, timing begins. When the lead toe crosses the 15.2-meter (finish) line, timing stop. The subject is told to stop walking once both feet cross the line. This ensures that the subject does not decelerate until he or she has traversed the full 15.2 meters. Data is recorded as time in seconds.

At entry to the study, it is anticipated that some subjects may not be able to walk continuously for 15 meters. In these cases, a timed 5-meter walk can be substituted at study entry and designated so on the data entry form, and if still necessary, at discharge. If a subject at study entry cannot walk 5 meters without stopping to rest or needs maximal assistance, the test is marked "unable" on the data recording sheet.

Gait speed measurements will be collected by the blinded evaluator at study entry (if possible), at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after entry if still an inpatient, within one day of inpatient discharge, and, if possible, 3 months and 6 months after study entry. The Functional Ambulation Classification Index will be completed by the blinded evaluator after each gait speed assessment. Thus, a FAC score will be recorded at the same time points as each gait speed evaluation.

The secondary outcome measure is distance walked in 3 minutes. The subject will be instructed by the blinded assessor to walk as many laps of the walkway as possible in 3 minutes. A straight 25-meter walkway will be used. The patient turns at each end and continues walking for the 3 minutes. The distance covered in 3 minutes is measured in meters. The subject may halt to rest at any time and continue walking when ready. If the subject must sit down to rest, the test is discontinued and the time and distance are recorded. The 3-minute walking test will be conducted at up to 4 time points: 4 weeks after entry if still an inpatient, within 2 days of inpatient discharge, 3 months post study entry, and 6 months post study entry. If the evaluator believes that the test was not an accurate reflection of the walking distance (some interruption occurred or the subject stopped when distracted), the test can be repeated and the best distance recorded.

The blinded observer should find an isolated and convenient place to perform the tests. Before the trial begins, the observer should practice the timed walking speed and distance test with 3 hemiparetic inpatients and their therapists for 4 repeated tests within 1-2 days to try to obtain reproducible data. The walking speeds and distances should not differ by more than 10%.

Descriptive data and further assessments

Each subject will have data recorded by site and randomization number, not by name, birth date or other identifying characteristics. In addition to the results from the gait speed and walking distance assessments (collected and entered by the blinded evaluator), basic descriptive information for each subject will also be collected in order to adequately characterize the study population. This information will be obtained by the study physician or designated person from the medical record and from interview with the subject or family. The following information will be collected for each subject: age, gender, handedness; dates of stroke onset, admission for rehabilitation, entry into the trial, and discharge from in patient care; and (selected from a list) type of stroke, general location of stroke, and side of hemiparesis. Severity of stroke at the time of entry into the study will be characterized using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,4-5 the modified Rankin Scale, and the Functional Ambulation Classification Index, which are well accepted measures. The investigators will also ask subjects to record the number of falls they had from discharge to 3 months and from 3 months to 6 months after entry using a calendar that they will bring with them to each follow-up.

Data entry

All data entry will be via a web-based system. The blinded observer will enter all walking-related data and will be given a password to access the data entry site that differs from the password and access by the study physician.

Data analysis

For an anticipated effect size of 0.4, a conservative estimate using a two-tailed alpha of 0.01 and power of 0.9, we will need a sample size of 150 subjects in each group. An ideal sample size for this varied population and for the primary and secondary outcomes will be 250 subjects in each arm to allow for dropouts and to gather enough subjects who are also tested at 3 and 6 months study entry. This would make the trial the largest prospective neurorehabilitation study ever attempted.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS), No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS)Behavioural

    Also called DRS

    Inpatients are encouraged to walk faster and given feedback on their walking speed during a daily 10-meter walk as part of their usual physical therapy.

  • No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)Behavioural

    Also called NRS

    Inpatients complete a 10-meter walk as part of their daily physical therapy but are not given any encouragement to walk faster or feedback on their walking speed.

Study groups in NCT00428480
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalDaily reinforcement of walking speed
Receives: Behavioral: Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS)
2Active comparatorNo reinforcement of walking speed
Receives: Behavioral: No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gait speed

    Measured: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Distance walked in 3 minutes

    Measured: 4 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months

  2. Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC)

    Measured: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months

  3. Number of falls post inpatient rehabilitation

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2007
  3. Primary completionMar 2009
  4. Study completionMar 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
216 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00428480
Sponsor's protocol ID
UCLA-06-07-104-01
Acronym
SIRROWS
Status last verified
Jul 2009
First submitted
29 Jan 2007
Last updated
11 Nov 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Daily reinforcement of walking speed (DRS) and No reinforcement of walking speed (NRS) in people with Stroke, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 24 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United States, Italy, India, Turkey (Türkiye), Austria and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gait speed (time frame: Admission, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, discharge, 3 months, 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in