AzTrials
AzTrials

Wound HealingNCT00428623

Aquacel Compared to Traditional Post Surgical Wound Dressing in Vascular Surgery Patients

An observational study of Wound Healing and Patient Comfort, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is a prospective randomised, controlled study of 136 patients undergoing vascular surgery. Their closed wounds were covered with either aquacel, a hydrofiber dressing, or a traditional gauze dressing.Number of changes, patient comfort,number of infections, length of hospital stay and wound complications were… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Wound Healing, Patient Comfort
What is being tested?
wound dressing
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Jan 2004to Jan 2006
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients undergoing elective vascular surgery, with an expected hospital stay of at least 4 days. informed consent

Who cannot join

  • known hypersensitivity to the dressing materials. age under 18 years. dementia, insufficient danish language understanding, pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, 2100

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

The study is a prospective randomised, controlled study of 136 patients undergoing vascular surgery. Their closed wounds were covered with either aquacel, a hydrofiber dressing, or a traditional gauze dressing.Number of changes, patient comfort,number of infections, length of hospital stay and wound complications were compared between the two groups.

Being tested
wound dressing
Keywords
Patient comfort, Wound dressings, infection, vascular surgery
Medical subject headings
Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • wound dressingProcedure or surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jan 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2004
  3. Study completionJan 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
160 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00428623
Sponsor's protocol ID
Torben V Schroeder
Status last verified
Jan 2007
First submitted
29 Jan 2007
Last updated
30 Jan 2007
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Cristino MA, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Correia RM, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in aortic or aortoiliac peripheral arterial reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD015192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015192.pub2.

    PubMed 40260835

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Wound Healing and Patient Comfort, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00428623, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in