AzTrials
AzTrials

Open Angle GlaucomaNCT00430287

Does the Optic Disc Grading Done Visually by Your Doctor Agree With Optic Nerve Testing Which is Done by Machines?

An observational study of Open Angle Glaucoma, run by Wills Eye at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine how well the DDLS (Disc Damage Likelihood Scale) (which is a method used by the eye doctor to evaluate how healthy the optic nerve is) measures up to the standard glaucoma tests: OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography), the HRT (Heidelberg Retinal Tomography) and the HVF (Humphrey… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Open Angle Glaucoma
How many people
101 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2007to Oct 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: glaucoma service

Who may be able to join

  • Vision 20/50 or better
  • Less than 3 diopters of astigmatism
  • 3 diopters or less of myopia or hyperopia
  • Pattern Standard Deviation on HVF less than 2.5dB in normals
  • Pattern Standard Deviation on HVF greater than 2.5 db in glaucoma patients

Who cannot join

  • Abnormalities of cornea or ocular media
  • Significant ocular pathologies affecting visual field
  • History of hypotony
  • Ocular surgery within 6 months
  • Nystagmus
  • Unreliable visual fields
  • OCT signal strength scan less than 6

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wills Eye Glaucoma Service

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Correlation of DDLS Grading to OCT, HRT, and HVF

The purpose of this study is to determine how well the DDLS (Disc Damage Likelihood Scale) (which is a method used by the eye doctor to evaluate how healthy the optic nerve is) measures up to the standard glaucoma tests: OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography), the HRT (Heidelberg Retinal Tomography) and the HVF (Humphrey Visual Field).

Read the detailed description

The Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) has been shown to be a reproducible method for clinicians to evaluate the optic nerve for glaucomatous damage and is highly correlated to diagnosis of glaucoma, severity of glaucoma as evidenced by visual field loss and Heidelberg Retina Tomography (HRT) evaluation. In comparison with the commonly used cup-disc ratio, the DDLS has less inter-observer variation and captures glaucomatous aspects of the optic nerve not assessed by the cup-disc ratio. The optic nerve imagers do not have the potential to completely replace the clinical examination of the optic nerve since they do not assess many critical features such as optic nerve pallor, hemorrhages, asymmetry of disc size, edema, etc. The DDLS presents the opportunity to provide a system to clinicians to increase the quality and objectivity of clinical optic nerve evaluation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation of the DDLS grading to OCT, HRT and HVF testing of glaucomatous and normal optic nerves.

Keywords
primary open angle glaucoma, low tension glaucoma, pigmentary glaucoma, exfoliative glaucoma
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Low Tension Glaucoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00430287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1: Primary open angle glaucomaPatients with a form of primary open angle glaucoma
2: No known eye disease (controls)Patients with no known eye disease (controls)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00430287
Sponsor's protocol ID
06-775
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
30 Jan 2007
Last updated
10 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: A manuscript has been published.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Open Angle Glaucoma, run by Wills Eye at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in