Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2/3NCT00430677
Efficacy and Safety Study of Abatacept to Treat Lupus Nephritis
A Phase 2/3 study testing Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), Abatacept and Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 84 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if addition of abatacept is safe and improves the effectiveness of treatment of patients with active lupus nephritis who are also taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), Abatacept and Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 423 participants
- Where
- 84 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2007to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) as defined by meeting at least 4 of the 11 classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for the classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, either sequentially or coincident. The 4 criteria need not be present at study entry
- Renal biopsy within 12 months prior to screening visit indicating active proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis (met ISN/RPS Class III or IV classification criteria [2003], excluding Class III [C], IV-S [C] and IV-G [C], or the World Health Organization Class III or IV classification criteria [1982], excluding Class IIIc, IVd). If the renal biopsy was performed >3 months but ≤12 months prior to screening visit, at least 1 of the following 3 serologies (performed locally) must have been abnormal prior to screening visit: complement (C3 or C4) level below normal range OR anti-dsDNA >upper limit of normal range.
- A stable serum creatinine ≤3 mg/dL
Who cannot join
- Subjects with a rise in serum creatinine of ≥1 mg/dL within 1 month prior to the screening visit
- Subjects with drug-induced SLE, as opposed to idiopathic SLE
- Subjects with severe, unstable and/or progressive Central nervous system (CNS) lupus
- Subjects with autoimmune disease other than SLE as their main diagnosis (e.g.; Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Multiple Sclerosis [MS])
- Subjects who have received treatment with cyclophosphamide within 3 months of randomization (Day 1).
- Subjects who have received treatment with rituximab < 6 months prior to the screening visit
Trial locations and contacts
84 sites in 18 countries.
84 sites in 18 countries
United States14 sites
University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Boston University School Of Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Suny Downstate Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
University Of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Rheumatology Consultants Pllc
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Northshore Lij Health System
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Wallace Rheumatic Study Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
The Feinstein Institute For Medical Research
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
Ok Medical Research Foundation
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Suny Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Arizona Arthritis Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
India10 sites
Local Institution
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 007
Local Institution
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 017
Local Institution
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 034
Local Institution
Gujarat, Ahmedabad, 380016
Local Institution
Hyderabad, 500082
Local Institution
Kochi, Kerala, 682026
Local Institution
Mumbai, Maharajhsra, 400064
Local Institution
Nadiād, Gujarat, 387001
Local Institution
Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500003
Local Institution
Visakhapatnam, 530002
China8 sites
Local Institution
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034
Local Institution
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044
Local Institution
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730
Local Institution
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853
Local Institution
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Local Institution
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200001
Local Institution
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025
Local Institution
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032
Mexico8 sites
Local Institution
Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20000
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44100
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44690
Local Institution
Mérida, Yucatán, 97000
Local Institution
Metepec, State of Mexico, 52140
Local Institution
Mexico City, Mexico City, 06726
Local Institution
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64020
Local Institution
San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, 78240
Brazil5 sites
Local Institution
Curitiba, Paraná, 80060
Local Institution
Goiânia, Goiás, 74110
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91610
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20551
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04026
Taiwan5 sites
Local Institution
Kaohsiung City, 833
Local Institution
Taichung, 402
Local Institution
Taichung, 407
Local Institution
Taipei, 11217
Local Institution
Taoyuan, 333
Argentina4 sites
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1015
Local Institution
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire, Buenos Aires, 1055
Local Institution
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, 5016
Local Institution
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, 4000
Australia4 sites
Local Institution
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Local Institution
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Local Institution
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
Local Institution
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Canada4 sites
Local Institution
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2
Local Institution
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Local Institution
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
Local Institution
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M4
France4 sites
Local Institution
Créteil, 94010
Local Institution
Paris, 75651
Local Institution
Strasbourg, 67098
Local Institution
Toulouse, 31403
Poland3 sites
Local Institution
Bydgoszcz, 85-094
Local Institution
Gdansk, 80-952
Local Institution
Wroclaw, 50-417
Russia3 sites
Local Institution
Moscow, 115522
Local Institution
Yaroslaval, 150062
Local Institution
Yekaterinburg, 620102
South Africa3 sites
Local Institution
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2013
Local Institution
Observatory, Western Cape, 7925
Local Institution
Panorama, Western Cape, 7500
South Korea3 sites
Local Institution
Seoul, Sungdong-Gu, 133-792
Local Institution
Seoul, 110-744
Local Institution
Seoul, 137-040
United Kingdom2 sites
Local Institution
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 2QQ
Local Institution
London, Greater London, SE1 7EX
About this study
Official title: A Phase II/III Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Versus Placebo on a Background of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Glucocorticosteroids in Subjects With Active Proliferative Glomerulonephritis Due to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if addition of abatacept is safe and improves the effectiveness of treatment of patients with active lupus nephritis who are also taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids.
Read the detailed description
Double Blind Period: Treatment, Parallel Assignment, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Randomized, Active Control, Safety/Efficacy Study
Open Label Period: Prevention, Single Group Assignment, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Safety/Efficacy Study
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), Abatacept, Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone)Drug
tablets, oral, 0.5-0.8 mg/kg, daily
AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
intravenous solution, injectable, 30 mg/kg, every 28 days
AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia, BMS-188667
intravenous solution, injectable, 10 mg/kg, every 28 days
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)Drug
tablets, oral, 1.5 to 2 g, daily
AbataceptDrug
intravenous solution, injectable, 10 mg/kg, every 28 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept 30 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF | Experimental | Short-term Period Receives: Drug: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone); Drug: Abatacept; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) |
| Abatacept 10 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF | Experimental | Short-term Period Receives: Drug: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone); Drug: Abatacept; Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) |
| Placebo+Corticosteroids+MMF | Experimental | Short-term Period Receives: Drug: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone); Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) |
| Abatacept 10mg/kg | Experimental | Long-term Extension Period Receives: Drug: Abatacept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to First Confirmed Complete Renal Response (CRR) During the Short-term (Double-blind) Period
Confirmed at 2 consecutive visits. CRR defined as meeting all of 5 criteria. Renal function (RF): (Glomerular filtration rate [GFR] calculated using Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases equation equation) Calculated function abnormal at screening visit - return of renal function to greater than or equal to 90% of function at approximately 6 months prior to onset of the current episode of lupus nephritis. Calculated function normal at screening visit - estimated renal function 90% or greater of level at screening visit. Proteinuria: urinary protein/creatinine ratio <30 mg/mmol. Hematuria: red blood cell (RBC) count within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Pyuria: White blood cell count (WBC) within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Cylindruria: No RBC or WBC casts reported.
Measured: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 months.
Secondary outcomes (40)
Number of Participants With Confirmed Complete Renal Response (CRR) During Short-term Period
Confirmed at 2 consecutive visits. CRR defined as meeting all of 5 criteria. Renal function (RF): (Glomerular filtration rate [GFR] calculated using Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases equation equation) Calculated function abnormal at screening visit - return of renal function to greater than or equal to 90% of function at approximately 6 months prior to onset of the current episode of lupus nephritis. Calculated function normal at screening visit - estimated renal function 90% or greater of level at screening visit. Proteinuria: urinary protein/creatinine ratio <30 mg/mmol. Hematuria: red blood cell (RBC) count within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Pyuria: White blood cell count (WBC) within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Cylindruria: No RBC or WBC casts reported.
Measured: Day 1 to 12 months
Participants Achieving a Confirmed Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Month 12 During Short-term Period
Confirmed at 2 consecutive visits. CRR defined as meeting all of 5 criteria. Renal function (RF): (Glomerular filtration rate [GFR] calculated using Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases equation equation) Calculated function abnormal at screening visit - return of renal function to greater than or equal to 90% of function at approximately 6 months prior to onset of the current episode of lupus nephritis. Calculated function normal at screening visit - estimated renal function 90% or greater of level at screening visit. Proteinuria: urinary protein/creatinine ratio <30 mg/mmol. Hematuria: red blood cell (RBC) count within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Pyuria: White blood cell count (WBC) within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Cylindruria: No RBC or WBC casts reported.
Measured: At Month 12 from Day 1
Time to Achieve First Confirmed Renal Improvement (RI) During Short-term Period (as Determined by Kaplan-Meier Methodology)
RI is defined as meeting all of the following criteria. Renal function: If MDRD is abnormal at screening, within 10% of the MDRD at screening; if MDRD is 60-89 at screening, greater than or equal to 50% improvement based on the screening value or 90% or greater of MDRD at screening; if MDRD is 15-59 at screening, if MDRD is normal at screening-within 10% of the MDRD at screening. Proteinuria: improvement greater than or equal to 50% from screening. Hematuria: red blood cell (RBC)count within normal limit of central laboratory. Pyuria: white blood cell (WBC) count within normal limit of central laboratory. Cylindruria: No RBC or WBC casts.
Measured: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 months.
Participants Achieving Renal Improvement (RI) or CRR at Month 12 During Short-term Period
CRR defined as meeting all of 5 criteria. RF: (Glomerular filtration rate [GFR] calculated using MDRD equation) Calculated function abnormal at screening visit - return of renal function to greater than or equal to 90% of function at approximately 6 months prior to onset of the current episode of lupus nephritis. Calculated function normal at screening visit - estimated renal function 90% or greater of level at screening visit. Proteinuria: urinary protein/creatinine ratio <30 mg/mmol. Hematuria: red blood cell (RBC) count within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Pyuria: White blood cell count (WBC) within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Cylindruria: No RBC or WBC casts reported.
Measured: At Month 12 from Day 1
Number of Months CRR Was Maintained During Short-term Period
Durability of CRR, defined as the number of months (number of consecutive planned visits beyond Day 15) a participant met the definition of CRR during the double-blind treatment period. Refer to outcome 1 for description of CRR.
Measured: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 Months
Baseline Renal Function Over Time During Short-term Period
Baseline (BL) renal function, as estimated by calculation of the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) equation, over time. Renal MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine. A negative value indicates worsening.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Day 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 365
Change in Renal Function From Baseline Over Time During Short-term Period
Mean change from baseline in renal function, as estimated by calculation of the MDRD equation, over time. Renal MDRD is an equation (calculation) used to estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in participants with impaired renal function based on serum creatinine, age, race, and gender. GFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) = 175 * (Scr)^-1.154 * (Age)^-0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.212 if African American) (conventional units). mL, milliliters; min, minute; m^2, meters squared; Scr, serum creatinine. A positive value indicates improvement. Change from baseline=Post-baseline-baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Day 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 365
Baseline and Post Baseline Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index During Short-term Period
SLICC/ACR score or damage index is a measure of cumulative damage due to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Damage is defined as nonreversible change (not related to active inflammation) occurring since onset of lupus, ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. A score of 0=no damage, early damage is defined as ≥1. The total maximum score is 48, and increasing score indicates increasing disease severity.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Post baseline (Month 12 or 28 days after last dose)
Number of Participants Achieving Renal Response (RR) at Month 12 During Short-term Period
RR is defined as meeting BOTH of the following criteria:RENAL FUNCTION: Less than or equal to 25% increase from baseline;PROTEINURIA: Greater than or equal to 50% improvement in the urine protein/creatinine ratio with one of the following - urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) <113 mg/mmol,, if the baseline ratio was <=339 mg/mmol OR UPCR <339 mg/mmol,if the baseline ratio > 339 mg/mmol. A participant was considered as achieving RR if response criteria at both months 11 and 12 (Days 337 and 365, respectively) were met. For 95% CI within each group, normal approximation is used if n>=5.
Measured: Month 12
Change in SLICC/ACR Damage Index From Baseline During Short-term Period
SLICC/ACR score or damage index is a measure of cumulative damage due to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Damage is defined as non-reversible change (not related to active inflammation) occurring since onset of lupus, ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. A score of 0=no damage, early damage is defined as ≥1. The total maximum score is 48, and increasing score indicates increasing disease severity. Change from baseline=Postbaseline - baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Postbaseline (Month 12 or 28 days after last dose)
Baseline Physical Component Summary of the Short Form (SF)-36 During Short-term Period
The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 During Short-term Period
The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Baseline Mental Component Summary of the Short SF-36 During Short-term Period
The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary of the SF-36 During Short-term Period
The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Baseline Fatigue as Measured by the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale During Short-term Period
A visual analogue scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale for measurement of subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS for Fatigue (VAS-F) consists of a 100 mm line, with 0 (No Fatigue) on 1 end and 100 (Extreme Fatigue) on the other end, which a participant marks to indicate how much fatigue he or she feels. The marked point in mm is converted into a numeric value from 0 to 100, where 0=no fatigue and 100=maximum fatigue. Increasing numbers=increasing fatigue.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change in Fatigue From Baseline as Measured by the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale During Short-term Period
A visual analogue scale is a psychometric response scale for measurement of subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.
The VAS for Fatigue (VAS-F) consists of a 100 mm line, with 0 (No Fatigue) on 1 end and 100 (Extreme Fatigue) on the other end, which a participant marks to indicate how much fatigue he or she feels. The marked point in mm is converted into a numeric value from 0 to 100, where 0=no fatigue and 100=maximum fatigue. Increasing numbers=increasing fatigue.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Baseline Fatigue as Measured by Fatigue Severity Scale-Krupp During Short-term Period
The reduction of fatigue assessed by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The FSS questionnaire is comprised of 9 statements inquiring about the examinee's sleep habits over the preceding week. Participants are asked to rate their level of agreement (toward seven) or disagreement (toward zero) with the nine statements. A score of 36 and above (out of a maximum of 63) indicates the presence of significant fatigue.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change in Fatigue From Baseline as Measured by Fatigue Severity Scale-Krupp During Short-term Period
The reduction of fatigue assessed by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The FSS questionnaire is comprised of 9 statements inquiring about the examinee's sleep habits over the preceding week. Participants are asked to rate their level of agreement (toward seven) or disagreement (toward zero) with the nine statements. A score of 36 and above (out of a maximum of 63) indicates the presence of significant fatigue.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs Reported During the Short-term Period
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study drug.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the Short-term Period
AEs of special interest were prospectively identified to be those that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory agents. They are a subset of all AEs and may be either serious or non-serious.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Hematology Abnormalities During the Short-term Period
LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; PTV=pretreatment value. Normal ranges are provided by the Central Laboratory and may vary according to sex and age. Low(↓)Hemoglobin:>3g/dL decrease from PTV; ↓Hematocrit:<0.75xPTV;↓Erythrocyte count:<0.75xPTV; high(↑)Platelet count:>1.5xULN;↓Platelet count:<0.67xLLN;↓Leukocyte count:<0.75X LLN;↑Leukocyte count:>1.25xULN;↓Absolute(AB)Neutrophils+Bands:<1.00x10^3c/uL;↑AB Lymphocyte count:>7.50x10^3 c/uL; ↓AB lymphocyte count:<0.750x10^3 c/uL;↑AB monocyte count:>2000/mm^3;↑AB basophil count:>400/mm^3;↑AB eosinophil count:>0.750x10^3 c/uL.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Short-term Period
LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; PTV=pretreatment value. Normal ranges are provided by the Central Laboratory and may vary according to sex and age. ↑Serum Sodium:>1.05x ULN;↓Serum Potassium:<0.9x LLN;↑Serum Potassium:>1.1x ULN;↓Total Calcium:<0.8X LLN;↑Total Calcium:>1.2x ULN; ↓Serum Glucose(SG):<65 mg/dL;↑SG:>220 mg/dL;↓Fasting SG:<0.8x LLN;↑Fasting SG:>1.5x ULN;↓Total Protein:<0.9x LLN;↓Albumin:<0.9x LLN;↑Total Cholesterol:>2x PTV;↑Triglycerides:>=2.5x ULN;↑Fasting Triglycerides:>=2x ULN
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Abnormalities During the Short-term Period
ULN=upper limit of normal; PTV=pretreatment value. Normal ranges are provided by the Central Laboratory and may vary according to sex and age.
Alkaline Phosphatase:>2x ULN; ↑Aspartate Aminotransferase: >3x ULN; ↑Alanine Aminotransferase : >3x ULN; G-Glutamyl Transferase : >2x ULN; ↑Total Bilirubin : >2x ULN or if PTV > ULN then > 4x PTV; ↑Blood Urea Nitrogen >2x PTV; ↑Creatinine >1.5x PTV.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Abnormalities Urinalysis During the Short-term Period
PTV=pretreatment value. Criteria for marked abnormality: Protein, glucose, blood, leukocyte esterase , if missing PTV then use >=2+ (or, if value >=4, or if PTV=0 or 0.5, >=2 or if PTV=1, >=3, or if PTV=2 or 3, >=4).
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Measured: 0 - 12 Months
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Measured: 0 - 12 Months
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Heart Rate
Measured: 0 - 12 Months
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Temperature
Measured: 0 - 12 Months
Number of Participants With Positive Abatacept-induced Responses (ECL Method) Over Time During the Short-term Period
A validated, sensitive electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassay based on Meso-Scale Discovery instrumentation was used to evaluate immunogenicity. The ECL assay differentiated between two antibody specificities: (1) the 'Ig and/or Junction (Jn) Region' and (2) 'CLTA4 and possibly Ig'. A sample was considered positive if it had a titer of 10 or greater and if immunodepletion was observed with abatacept with or without CTLA4-T.
Measured: Day 169, Day 365
Baseline Quantitative Immunoglobulins During the Short-term Period
A quantitative immunoglobulins (Igs) test is used to detect abnormal levels of the three major classes of Igs (IgG, IgA, and IgM). Abnormal test results typically indicate that there is something affecting the immune system which requires further testing.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1)
Change in Quantitative Immunoglobulin From Baseline During Short-term Period
A quantitative immunoglobulin (Ig) test is used to detect abnormal levels of the 3 major classes of Ig (IgG, IgA, and IgM). Abnormal test results typically indicate that something is affecting the immune system and further testing is required.
Please refer to Outcome 31 for the respective baseline values
Measured: Day 365
Number of Participants Achieving Complete Response by ACCESS Definition
The Abatacept and Cyclophosphamide Combination Efficacy and Safety Study (ACCESS) defines complete response as a response meeting all of the following criteria: serum creatinine ≤upper limit of normal as defined by the central laboratory or ≤125% of the higher value at either screening or baseline; urine protein/creatinine ratio <50 mg/mmoL; and prednisone or prednisone-equivalent dose tapered to 10 mg per day.
Measured: End of short-term period (Day 365) to termination of the long-term extension period
Number of Participants Achieving Patient Response of Complete or Partial Response, Based on the June 2010 Food and Drug Administration Guidance Document for Lupus Nephritis
Patient response=complete, partial, or no response. Complete response=serum creatinine (SCr) normal, inactive urinary sediment, no cellular casts, urinary protein/creatinine (UPCR) ratio<56.5 mg/mmol. Partial response=SCr normal or ≤25% above baseline value, RBCs at reference range, UPCR <56.5 mg/mmoL OR ≥50% improvement in UPCR with one of the following: UPCR <113 or <339 mg/mmoL, based on the baseline ratio. No response=Not achieving complete or partial response criteria.
Measured: At Day 365 (end of Short-term Period) and Day 645
Mean Change From Baseline in SLICC/ACR Damage Index
SLICC=Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics; ACR=American College of Rheumatology. The SLICC/ACR Damage Index measures organ damage (nonreversible change, unrelated to active inflammation) occurring since onset of lupus, ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months unless otherwise stated. The index assesses 47 items in 12 systems: Ocular, Neuropsychiatric, Renal, Pulmonary, Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, Peripheral Vascular, Musculoskeletal, Skin, Premature Gonadal Failure, Diabetes, Malignancy. Scores range from 0 to 2, and the same lesion cannot be scored twice. If damage is noted for a particular item, it is scored 1. No damage is scored 0. Some items may score 2 points if they occur more than once, so that the maximum possible score is 47. Scores can only increase with time, but scores rarely reach over 12. It is usually completed (or updated) yearly.
Measured: Day 365 to termination of the long-term extension phase
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Treatment-related Adverse Events SAEs, Discontinuations Due to SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs During Long-term Extension Period
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study drug.
Measured: From start of study drug in long-term period (Day 365) to up to 56 days after the last dose of the long-term extension (LTE). Deaths in LTE reported to >56 days post last dose.
Number of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Seropositive Result During the Long-term Extension Period
Collected in at least 1 sample. Assessment includes immunogenicity (detection of serum antibodies which bind to CTLA4-Ig in the in vitro assays) and exposure to corticosteroids
Measured: Day 365 to end of long-term extension period
Number of Participants Achieving Renal Response
Renal response=serum creatinine level ≤25% above baseline value and greater than or equal to 50% improvement in the urine protein/creatinine ratio with 1 of the following: urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) <113 mg/mmol, if the baseline ratio was <= 339 mg/mmol OR UPCR <339 mg/mmol,if the baseline ratio >339 mg/mmol.
Measured: At Day 365 (end of short-term period) and Day 645
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Long-term Extension Period
preRX=pretreatment; LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal. Hemoglobin (g/dL): >3g/dL decrease from preRX value. Hematocrit(%): <0.75*preRX. Erythrocytes (*10^6 c/uL): <0.75*preRX. Platelet count (*10^9 c/L): <0.67*LLN, or >1.5*ULN, or if preRX <LLN, use <0.5*preRX and <100,000/mm^3. Leukocytes (*10^3 c/uL): <0.75*LLN or >1.25*ULN, or if preRX <LLN, use <0.8* preRX or >ULN; if preRX>ULN, use >1.2*preRX or <LLN. Neutrophils + Bands (absolute) (*10^3 c/uL): If value <1.0*10^3 or if value >7.50*10^3 c/uL. Monocytes (absolute) (*10^3 c/uL): If value >2000/mm^3. Basophils (absolute)(*10^3 c/uL): If value >.750*10^3 c/uL. Eosinophils (absolute) (*10^3 c/uL): If value >.750*10^3 c/uL. ALP (U/L): >2*ULN, or if preRX>ULN, use >3* preRX. AST (U/L): >3*ULN, or if preRX>ULN, use >4*preRX. ALT (U/L): >3*ULN, or if preRX>ULN, use >4*preRX. GGT (U/L):>2*ULN, or if preRX >ULN, use >3*preRX. Bilirubin, total (mg/dL): >2*ULN, or if preRX>ULN, use >4*preRX. BUN (mg/dL): >1.5*preRX.
Measured: From start of study drug on Day 365 up to 56 days after last dose in the long-term extension period
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Long-term Extension Period (Continued)
LLN=lower limit of normal; ULN=upper limit of normal; preRX=pretreatment. Sodium, serum (mEq/L): <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN, or if preRX<LLN, use <0.95*preRX or >ULN if preRX>ULN, use >1.05*preRX or <LLN. Potassium, serum (mEq/L): <0.9* LLN or >1.1*ULN, or if preRX <LLN, use <0.9*preRX or >ULN if preRX>ULN, use >1.1*preRX or <LLN. Chloride, serum (mEq/L): <0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN, or if preRX<LLN, use <0.9*preRX or >ULN. Calcium, total (mg/dL): <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, or if preRX<LLN, use <0.75*preRX or >ULN if preRX>ULN, use >1.25*preRX or <LLN. Glucose, serum (mg/dL): <65 mg/dL, or >220 mg/dL. Glucose, fasting serum (mg/dL): <0.8*LLN or >1.5*ULN, or if preRX <LLN, use <0.8*preRX or >ULN if preRX>ULN, use >2.0*preRX or <LLN. Albumin (g/dL): <0.9*LLN, or if preRX <LLN, use <0.75*preRX. Cholesterol, total (mg/dL): >2*preRX. Triglycerides (mg/dL): >=2.5*ULN, or if preRX>ULN, use >=2.5*preRX. Triglycerides, fasting (mg/dL): >=2*ULN, or if preRX>ULN, use >2.0*preRX.
Measured: From start of study drug on Day 365 up to 56 days after last dose in the long-term extension period
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Long-term Extension Period (Continued)
preRX=pretreatment. Protein, urine: If missing preRX, use >=2, or if value >=4, or if preRX =0 or 0.5, use >=2, or if preRX=1, use >=3, or if preRX=2 OR 3 then use >=4. Glucose, urine: If missing preRX, use >=2, or if value >=4, or if preRX=0 or 0.5, use >=2, or if preRX=1, use >=3, or if preRX=2 or 3, use >=4. Blood, urine: If missing preRX, use >=2, or if value >=4, or if preRX =0 or 0.5, use >=2, or if preRX=1, use >=3, or if preRX=2 or 3, use >=4. Leukocyte esterase, urine: If missing preRX, use >=2, or if value >=4, or if preRX=0 or 0.5, use >=2, or if preRX=1, use >=3, or if preRX=2 or 3, use >=4.
Measured: From start of study drug on Day 365 to up to 56 days after last dose in the long-term extension period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2007
- Primary completionSep 2010
- Study completionAug 2011
Why it stopped: Terminated due to failure to meet the primary efficacy endpoint in the Short-term Period
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 423 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00430677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM101-075
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Wolf BJ, Spainhour JC, Arthur JM, Janech MG, Petri M, Oates JC. Development of Biomarker Models to Predict Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Aug;68(8):1955-63. doi: 10.1002/art.39623.
PubMed 26867033Furie R, Nicholls K, Cheng TT, Houssiau F, Burgos-Vargas R, Chen SL, Hillson JL, Meadows-Shropshire S, Kinaszczuk M, Merrill JT. Efficacy and safety of abatacept in lupus nephritis: a twelve-month, randomized, double-blind study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):379-89. doi: 10.1002/art.38260.
PubMed 24504810Wofsy D, Hillson JL, Diamond B. Comparison of alternative primary outcome measures for use in lupus nephritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Jun;65(6):1586-91. doi: 10.1002/art.37940.
PubMed 23529285Wofsy D, Hillson JL, Diamond B. Abatacept for lupus nephritis: alternative definitions of complete response support conflicting conclusions. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Nov;64(11):3660-5. doi: 10.1002/art.34624.
PubMed 22806274
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II/III Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Versus Placebo on a Background of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Glucocorticosteroids in Subjects With Active Proliferative Glomerulonephritis Due to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00430677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM101-075
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Terminated due to failure to meet the primary efficacy endpoint in the Short-term Period
- Enrolment
- 423 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 May 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if addition of abatacept is safe and improves the effectiveness of treatment of patients with active lupus nephritis who are also taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids.
Detailed description
Double Blind Period: Treatment, Parallel Assignment, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Randomized, Active Control, Safety/Efficacy Study
Open Label Period: Prevention, Single Group Assignment, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Safety/Efficacy Study
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept 30 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF | Experimental | Drug: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), Drug: Abatacept, Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)Short-term Period |
| Abatacept 10 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF | Experimental | Drug: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), Drug: Abatacept, Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)Short-term Period |
| Placebo+Corticosteroids+MMF | Experimental | Drug: Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)Short-term Period |
| Abatacept 10mg/kg | Experimental | Drug: AbataceptLong-term Extension Period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) as defined by meeting at least 4 of the 11 classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for the classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, either sequentially or coincident. The 4 criteria need not be present at study entry
- Renal biopsy within 12 months prior to screening visit indicating active proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis (met ISN/RPS Class III or IV classification criteria [2003], excluding Class III [C], IV-S [C] and IV-G [C], or the World Health Organization Class III or IV classification criteria [1982], excluding Class IIIc, IVd). If the renal biopsy was performed >3 months but ≤12 months prior to screening visit, at least 1 of the following 3 serologies (performed locally) must have been abnormal prior to screening visit: complement (C3 or C4) level below normal range OR anti-dsDNA >upper limit of normal range.
- A stable serum creatinine ≤3 mg/dL
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects with a rise in serum creatinine of ≥1 mg/dL within 1 month prior to the screening visit
- Subjects with drug-induced SLE, as opposed to idiopathic SLE
- Subjects with severe, unstable and/or progressive Central nervous system (CNS) lupus
- Subjects with autoimmune disease other than SLE as their main diagnosis (e.g.; Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Multiple Sclerosis [MS])
- Subjects who have received treatment with cyclophosphamide within 3 months of randomization (Day 1).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone)tablets, oral, 0.5-0.8 mg/kg, daily | Drug | Abatacept 10 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF, Abatacept 30 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF, Placebo+Corticosteroids+MMF |
| AbataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667intravenous solution, injectable, 30 mg/kg, every 28 days | Drug | Abatacept 30 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF |
| AbataceptAlso: Orencia, BMS-188667intravenous solution, injectable, 10 mg/kg, every 28 days | Drug | Abatacept 10 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF |
| Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)tablets, oral, 1.5 to 2 g, daily | Drug | Abatacept 10 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF, Abatacept 30 mg/kg+Corticosteroids+MMF, Placebo+Corticosteroids+MMF |
| Abataceptintravenous solution, injectable, 10 mg/kg, every 28 days | Drug | Abatacept 10mg/kg |
Primary outcome
Time to First Confirmed Complete Renal Response (CRR) During the Short-term (Double-blind) Period
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 months.
Confirmed at 2 consecutive visits. CRR defined as meeting all of 5 criteria. Renal function (RF): (Glomerular filtration rate [GFR] calculated using Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases equation equation) Calculated function abnormal at screening visit - return of renal function to greater than or equal to 90% of function at approximately 6 months prior to onset of the current episode of lupus nephritis. Calculated function normal at screening visit - estimated renal function 90% or greater of level at screening visit. Proteinuria: urinary protein/creatinine ratio <30 mg/mmol. Hematuria: red blood cell (RBC) count within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Pyuria: White blood cell count (WBC) within normal limits of Central Laboratory. Cylindruria: No RBC or WBC casts reported.
40 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Confirmed Complete Renal Response (CRR) During Short-term Period
Time frame: Day 1 to 12 months
Participants Achieving a Confirmed Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Month 12 During Short-term Period
Time frame: At Month 12 from Day 1
Time to Achieve First Confirmed Renal Improvement (RI) During Short-term Period (as Determined by Kaplan-Meier Methodology)
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 months.
Participants Achieving Renal Improvement (RI) or CRR at Month 12 During Short-term Period
Time frame: At Month 12 from Day 1
Number of Months CRR Was Maintained During Short-term Period
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 Months
Baseline Renal Function Over Time During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 365
Change in Renal Function From Baseline Over Time During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 15, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281, 309, 337, 365
Baseline and Post Baseline Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Post baseline (Month 12 or 28 days after last dose)
Number of Participants Achieving Renal Response (RR) at Month 12 During Short-term Period
Time frame: Month 12
Change in SLICC/ACR Damage Index From Baseline During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Postbaseline (Month 12 or 28 days after last dose)
Baseline Physical Component Summary of the Short Form (SF)-36 During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Baseline Mental Component Summary of the Short SF-36 During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary of the SF-36 During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Baseline Fatigue as Measured by the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change in Fatigue From Baseline as Measured by the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Baseline Fatigue as Measured by Fatigue Severity Scale-Krupp During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Change in Fatigue From Baseline as Measured by Fatigue Severity Scale-Krupp During Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Days 85, 169, 253, and 365
Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs Reported During the Short-term Period
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With AEs of Special Interest During the Short-term Period
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Hematology Abnormalities During the Short-term Period
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Short-term Period
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function Abnormalities During the Short-term Period
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Participants With Marked Abnormalities Urinalysis During the Short-term Period
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to 56 days post last dose in the double-blind period or the first dose in the open-label long-term extension, whichever occurred first.
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time frame: 0 - 12 Months
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Time frame: 0 - 12 Months
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Heart Rate
Time frame: 0 - 12 Months
Vital Signs Summary During the Short-term Period: Temperature
Time frame: 0 - 12 Months
Number of Participants With Positive Abatacept-induced Responses (ECL Method) Over Time During the Short-term Period
Time frame: Day 169, Day 365
Baseline Quantitative Immunoglobulins During the Short-term Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Change in Quantitative Immunoglobulin From Baseline During Short-term Period
Time frame: Day 365
Number of Participants Achieving Complete Response by ACCESS Definition
Time frame: End of short-term period (Day 365) to termination of the long-term extension period
Number of Participants Achieving Patient Response of Complete or Partial Response, Based on the June 2010 Food and Drug Administration Guidance Document for Lupus Nephritis
Time frame: At Day 365 (end of Short-term Period) and Day 645
Mean Change From Baseline in SLICC/ACR Damage Index
Time frame: Day 365 to termination of the long-term extension phase
Number of Participants With Death, Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Treatment-related Adverse Events SAEs, Discontinuations Due to SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs During Long-term Extension Period
Time frame: From start of study drug in long-term period (Day 365) to up to 56 days after the last dose of the long-term extension (LTE). Deaths in LTE reported to >56 days post last dose.
Number of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Seropositive Result During the Long-term Extension Period
Time frame: Day 365 to end of long-term extension period
Number of Participants Achieving Renal Response
Time frame: At Day 365 (end of short-term period) and Day 645
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Long-term Extension Period
Time frame: From start of study drug on Day 365 up to 56 days after last dose in the long-term extension period
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Long-term Extension Period (Continued)
Time frame: From start of study drug on Day 365 up to 56 days after last dose in the long-term extension period
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the Long-term Extension Period (Continued)
Time frame: From start of study drug on Day 365 to up to 56 days after last dose in the long-term extension period
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26867033Wolf BJ, Spainhour JC, Arthur JM, Janech MG, Petri M, Oates JC. Development of Biomarker Models to Predict Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Aug;68(8):1955-63. doi: 10.1002/art.39623.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24504810Furie R, Nicholls K, Cheng TT, Houssiau F, Burgos-Vargas R, Chen SL, Hillson JL, Meadows-Shropshire S, Kinaszczuk M, Merrill JT. Efficacy and safety of abatacept in lupus nephritis: a twelve-month, randomized, double-blind study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):379-89. doi: 10.1002/art.38260.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23529285Wofsy D, Hillson JL, Diamond B. Comparison of alternative primary outcome measures for use in lupus nephritis clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Jun;65(6):1586-91. doi: 10.1002/art.37940.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22806274Wofsy D, Hillson JL, Diamond B. Abatacept for lupus nephritis: alternative definitions of complete response support conflicting conclusions. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Nov;64(11):3660-5. doi: 10.1002/art.34624.
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
84 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), Abatacept and Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 84 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 84 sites in United States, India, China, Mexico, Brazil and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 May 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to First Confirmed Complete Renal Response (CRR) During the Short-term (Double-blind) Period (time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 12 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00430677, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2015.