OsteoporosisPhase 4NCT00431444
Effects of Zoledronic Acid and Raloxifene on Bone Turnover Markers in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density
A Phase 4 study testing Raloxifene and Zoledronic acid in people with Osteoporosis, run by Novartis at 17 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare the effects of Zoledronic acid and Raloxifene in reducing bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density over 6 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Raloxifene and Zoledronic acid
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2007to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Females, between 45 and 80 years (inclusive) of age, considered post-menopausal according to one of the following guidelines:
- Cessation of menses for 18 months in women < 50 years of age
- Cessation of menses for 12 months in women age 50 years or over
- Documented bilateral oophorectomy at least 1 year previously
- Documented T score of less than or equal to -1.5 on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck within 24 months prior to screening, and clinically indicated for treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs) for osteopenia or osteoporosis
- Signed informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedure
Who cannot join
- Prior treatment with i.v. bisphosphonates within the last 2 years
- Previous use of oral bisphosphonates within the past 2 years (unless used for less than 8 weeks*).
- *NOTE: If used less than 8 weeks, the washout period is 6 months.
- Treatment with raloxifene, calcitonin, tibolone or hormone replacement therapy. The washout period for these medications is 6 months prior to randomization.
- Any treatment with strontium renalate, sodium fluoride or parathyroid hormone
- Use of systemic high dose corticosteroids at an average dose of ≥ 7.5 mg per day of oral prednisone or equivalent for a period of three months or more within the previous year
Show all 21Show fewer
- Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomization
- Any woman of child bearing potential
- Patients with fractures occurring within three months prior to randomization
- History of hypersensitivity to bisphosphonates
- History of non-traumatic uveitis or iritis, within 2 years prior to study entry.
- A history of invasive malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated, within the past 12 months prior to screening; excluding, basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, colonic polyps with non-invasive malignancy which have been removed, Ductal Carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) that has been surgically removed, and Carcinoma in-situ (CIS) of the uterine cervix that has been surgically removed.
- Previous major solid organ transplant recipient or on a transplant waiting list
- History of hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, Osteogenesis imperfecta, Paget's disease or any metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis
- Any medical condition which would interfere with the action of the study drug or limit life expectancy to less than 6 months
- Any medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the participant from adhering to the protocol or completing the trial
- Active dental infection, unhealed dental extraction or planned oral surgery within 3 month prior to randomization.
- Calculated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min
- Greater than 2+ protein on urine dipstick without evidence of contamination or bacteriuria (may be repeated one time, at least a day apart).
- Serum calcium > 2.75 mmol/L (11.0 mg/dL) or < 2.08 mmol/L (8.3 mg/dL) at screening
- AST, ALT or serum alkaline phosphatase greater than twice the upper limit of normal
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
United States17 sites
Associated Pharma Research Center
Buena Park, California, 90620
Kernodle Clinic, Inc.
Burlington, North Carolina, 27215
Texas Institute for Clinical Research
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Women's Physicians of Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
Columbia University
New York, New York, 10032
Alegent Health
Omaha, Nebraska, 68152
Specialty Medical and Research Center
Pahrump, Nevada, 89048
Women's Health Research
Phoenix, Arizona, 85015
The Portland Clinic
Portland, Oregon, 97205
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Valley Women's Health Clinic
Renton, Washington, 98055
Springfield Clinic
Springfield, Illinois, 62703
Consultants in Women's Health Care
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
Tampa Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33624
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20036
About this study
Official title: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density to Compare the Effects of a Single Dose of i.v. Zoledronic Acid 5 mg, With Daily Oral Raloxifene 60 mg OD on Bone Turnover Markers
This study will compare the effects of Zoledronic acid and Raloxifene in reducing bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density over 6 months.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Raloxifene, Zoledronic acid, Placebo oral pills, Placebo intravenous (i.v.) infusion
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Post-menopausal, Bone mineral density
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RaloxifeneDrug
Zoledronic acidDrug
Also called Reclast, Aclasta
Placebo oral pillsDrug
Placebo intravenous (i.v.) infusionDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Zoledronic Acid | Active comparator | Zoledronic acid 5 mg (single i.v. infusion) + daily oral placebo for 6 months (zoledronic acid group) Receives: Drug: Zoledronic acid; Drug: Placebo oral pills |
| Raloxifene | Active comparator | Placebo (single i.v. infusion) + oral raloxifene 60 mg/day for 6 months (raloxifene group) Receives: Drug: Raloxifene; Drug: Placebo intravenous (i.v.) infusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Urine N-telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (NTx.)
The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in urine NTx (corrected by creatinine). The primary analysis time point was at 6 months of treatment. The results are reported as nanomoles (nM) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per millimole (mM) of urine creatinine.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change From Baseline in Urine NTx at 2 Months
The results are reported as nanomoles (nM) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per millimole (mM) of urine creatinine.
Measured: Baseline and 2 months
Change From Baseline in Urine NTx at 4 Months
The results are reported as nanomoles (nM) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per millimole (mM) of urine creatinine.
Measured: Baseline and 4 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 2 Months
Measured: Baseline and 2 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 4 Months
Measured: Baseline and 4 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 6 Months
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Overall Principal Investigator Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
The investigator was asked to complete satisfaction questionnaires at baseline (Visit 2/Day 1) when each patient's i.v. drug administration occurred. The questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction with the i.v. infusion procedure. The possible answers to the question were: "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "quite," or "completely."
Measured: Immediately after infusion procedure
Overall Nurse Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
The study coordinator (nurse) was asked to complete satisfaction questionnaires at baseline (Visit 2/Day 1) when each patient's i.v. drug administration occurred. The questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction with the i.v. infusion procedure. The possible answers to the question were: "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "quite," or "completely."
Measured: Immediately after infusion procedure
Overall Patient Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
Patients were asked to complete the satisfaction questionnaire at baseline. The questionnaire assessed overall satisfaction with the i.v. infusion procedure. The possible answers to the question were: "not at all," "a little," "somewhat," "quite," or "completely."
Measured: Immediately after infusion procedure
Patient Preference at 6 Months for Annual i.v Therapy or Daily Oral Regimens
At the end-of-study visit, Month 6, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire to assess preference for the different treatment modalities (annual i.v. infusion vs. daily oral capsule). The possible answers to question were: "once a year i.v. infusion," "once daily pill," or "both are equal."
Measured: At 6 month visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2007
- Primary completionJul 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00431444
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CZOL446HUS121
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Bachmann G, Kriegman A, Goncalves J, Kianifard F, Warren M, Simon JA. Effect of zoledronic acid compared with raloxifene on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone density. Menopause. 2011 Aug;18(8):851-6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31820b80f1.
PubMed 21796066
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density to Compare the Effects of a Single Dose of i.v. Zoledronic Acid 5 mg, With Daily Oral Raloxifene 60 mg OD on Bone Turnover Markers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00431444
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CZOL446HUS121
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Post-menopausal, Bone mineral density
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NovartisIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Mar 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare the effects of Zoledronic acid and Raloxifene in reducing bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density over 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Zoledronic Acid | Active comparator | Drug: Zoledronic acid, Drug: Placebo oral pillsZoledronic acid 5 mg (single i.v. infusion) + daily oral placebo for 6 months (zoledronic acid group) |
| Raloxifene | Active comparator | Drug: Raloxifene, Drug: Placebo intravenous (i.v.) infusionPlacebo (single i.v. infusion) + oral raloxifene 60 mg/day for 6 months (raloxifene group) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Females, between 45 and 80 years (inclusive) of age, considered post-menopausal according to one of the following guidelines:
- Cessation of menses for 18 months in women < 50 years of age
- Cessation of menses for 12 months in women age 50 years or over
- Documented bilateral oophorectomy at least 1 year previously
- Documented T score of less than or equal to -1.5 on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at the lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck within 24 months prior to screening, and clinically indicated for treatment with bisphosphonates (BPs) for osteopenia or osteoporosis
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Prior treatment with i.v. bisphosphonates within the last 2 years
- Previous use of oral bisphosphonates within the past 2 years (unless used for less than 8 weeks*).
- *NOTE: If used less than 8 weeks, the washout period is 6 months.
- Treatment with raloxifene, calcitonin, tibolone or hormone replacement therapy. The washout period for these medications is 6 months prior to randomization.
- Any treatment with strontium renalate, sodium fluoride or parathyroid hormone
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Raloxifene | Drug | Raloxifene |
| Zoledronic acidAlso: Reclast, Aclasta | Drug | Zoledronic Acid |
| Placebo oral pills | Drug | Zoledronic Acid |
| Placebo intravenous (i.v.) infusion | Drug | Raloxifene |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Urine N-telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (NTx.)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in urine NTx (corrected by creatinine). The primary analysis time point was at 6 months of treatment. The results are reported as nanomoles (nM) of bone collagen equivalents (BCE) per millimole (mM) of urine creatinine.
9 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Urine NTx at 2 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 2 months
Change From Baseline in Urine NTx at 4 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 2 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 2 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 4 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Change From Baseline in Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP) at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Overall Principal Investigator Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: Immediately after infusion procedure
Overall Nurse Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: Immediately after infusion procedure
Overall Patient Satisfaction Assessed by Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: Immediately after infusion procedure
Patient Preference at 6 Months for Annual i.v Therapy or Daily Oral Regimens
Time frame: At 6 month visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21796066Bachmann G, Kriegman A, Goncalves J, Kianifard F, Warren M, Simon JA. Effect of zoledronic acid compared with raloxifene on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone density. Menopause. 2011 Aug;18(8):851-6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31820b80f1.
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status
Pre-Frailty, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment and Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Factors After Stroke
Stroke, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Raloxifene and Zoledronic acid in people with Osteoporosis, run by Novartis at 17 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Mar 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Urine N-telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (NTx.) (time frame: Baseline and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00431444, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2011; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.