AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT00432276

Efficacy of Alogliptin and Pioglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 3 study testing Alogliptin, Pioglitazone and Metformin in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Takeda at 86 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of adding alogliptin, once daily (QD), to the ongoing treatment regimen of pioglitazone HCl and metformin in patients with inadequate glycemic control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Alogliptin, Pioglitazone and Metformin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
803 participants
Where
86 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2007to Jun 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Has a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Meets one of the following:
  • Has been inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 10%, inclusive) on a stable dose of greater than or equal to 1500 mg (or maximum tolerated dose) of metformin and 30 mg of pioglitazone
  • Has been inadequately controlled (as defined by an HbA1c ≥7.5%) on a combination therapy including metformin and another oral antidiabetic agent (ie, sulfonylureas, rosiglitazone maleate, or pioglitazone 15 mg, etc). Subjects on a combination therapy that included a DPP-4 inhibitor were excluded.
  • No treatment with antidiabetic agents other than metformin and pioglitazone.
  • Body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m^2 and less than or equal to 45 kg/m^2.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Fasting plasma C-peptide concentration greater than or equal to 0.8 ng/mL.
  • Systolic blood pressure less than 160 mmHg and diastolic pressure less than 100 mmHg.
  • Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 12 g/dL for males and greater than or equal to 10 g/dL for females.
  • Alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to 2.5 x upper limit of normal.
  • Serum creatinine less than 1.5 mg/dL for males and less than 1.4 mg/dL for females.
  • Thyroid-stimulating hormone level less than or equal to the upper limit of normal range and the patient is clinically euthyroid.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
  • Able and willing to monitor their own blood glucose concentrations with a home glucose monitor.
  • No major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the patient from completing the study.

Who cannot join

  • Urine albumin/creatinine ratio of greater than 1000 μg/mg.
  • History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening.
  • History of bladder cancer.
  • History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within the 6 months prior to Screening.
  • Patients with unexplained microscopic hematuria of greater than +1, confirmed by repeat testing.
  • History of treated diabetic gastroparesis.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • History of gastric bypass surgery.
  • New York Heart Association Class I-IV heart failure regardless of therapy.
  • History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within the 6 months prior to Screening.
  • History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.
  • History of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.
  • History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect the patient's ability to participate in the study.
  • History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.
  • History of alcohol abuse or substance abuse within the 2 years prior to Screening.
  • Receipt of any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Prior treatment in an investigational study of alogliptin.
  • Hypersensitive to pioglitazone HCl, metformin, alogliptin or other excipients.
  • The patient has donated more than 400 mL of blood within the 90 days prior to Screening and Pre-Screening, if applicable.

Trial locations and contacts

86 sites in 1 country.

86 sites in 1 country

United States86 sites
  • Study site

    Aliquippa, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Altoona, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Arlington, Texas

  • Study site

    Asheboro, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Ashland, Oregon

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas

  • Study site

    Bay City, Michigan

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Bismarck, North Dakota

  • Study site

    Blackwood, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Bloomington, Indiana

  • Study site

    Blue Ridge, Georgia

  • Study site

    Boise, Idaho

  • Study site

    Burr Ridge, Illinois

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Clearwater, Florida

  • Study site

    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

  • Study site

    Colleyville, Texas

  • Study site

    Conyers, Georgia

  • Study site

    Dawningtown, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Decatur, Georgia

  • Study site

    Duluth, Georgia

  • Study site

    Dunwoody, Georgia

  • Study site

    El Paso, Texas

  • Study site

    Elkton, Maryland

  • Study site

    Fleetwood, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Florence, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Foothill Ranch, California

  • Study site

    Garland, Texas

  • Study site

    Golden, Colorado

  • Study site

    Hampton, Virginia

  • Study site

    Hialeah, Florida

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Huntsville, Alabama

  • Study site

    Hurst, Texas

  • Study site

    Kingsport, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Kingston, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Lake Havasu City, Arizona

  • Study site

    Lakeland, Florida

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Study site

    Los Alamitos, California

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Study site

    Marianna, Florida

  • Study site

    Marlborough, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Marrero, Louisiana

  • Study site

    McCook, Nebraska

  • Study site

    Melrose Park, Illinois

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Milan, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Mishawaka, Indiana

  • Study site

    Mooresville, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Naperville, Illinois

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    Norfolk, Virginia

  • Study site

    Norman, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    Norristown, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    North Miami Beach, Florida

  • Study site

    O'Fallon, Illinois

  • Study site

    Orrville, Ohio

  • Study site

    Overland Park, Kansas

  • Study site

    Pembroke Pines, Florida

  • Study site

    Pismo Beach, California

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Study site

    Rockville, Maryland

  • Study site

    Saint Clair Shores, Michigan

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Study site

    San Diego, California

  • Study site

    Sebastian, Florida

  • Study site

    Seguin, Texas

  • Study site

    Shelby, North Carolina

  • Study site

    South Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Sparta, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    Taylors, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Tipton, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Towson, Maryland

  • Study site

    Trenton, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Virginia Beach, Virginia

  • Study site

    Warner Robins, Georgia

  • Study site

    Watertown, South Dakota

  • Study site

    West Caldwell, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Williamston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Winter Park, Florida

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of SYR-322 25 mg Versus Dose Titration From 30 mg to 45 mg of Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS®) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Control on a Combination of Metformin and 30 mg of Pioglitazone HCl Therapy

The purpose of the study is to compare the effect of adding alogliptin, once daily (QD), to the ongoing treatment regimen of pioglitazone HCl and metformin in patients with inadequate glycemic control.

Read the detailed description

Despite the introduction of new classes of medications for glycemic control, just over half of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) achieve a glycosylated hemoglobin level less than 7.0%, the American Diabetes Association recommended glycosylated hemoglobin goal. The rising incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus along with limitations of the currently available treatments suggest the need for new therapies for glycemic control along with the increased requirement for combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Thiazolidinediones increase glucose utilization, decrease gluconeogenesis, and increase glucose disposal through an incompletely understood mechanism but one associated with binding of the drug to nuclear receptors known as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma are found in tissues important for insulin action, such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and the liver. The greatest concentration of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma receptors is in adipose tissue. Thiazolidinediones reduce insulin resistance by enhancing insulin sensitivity in muscle cells, adipose tissue, and hepatic cells (inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis) with no direct impact on insulin secretion. Thus, thiazolidinediones improve glycemic control and result in reduced levels of circulating insulin. Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS®) is a thiazolidinedione developed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Pioglitazone depends on the presence of insulin for its mechanism of action. Worldwide clinical investigation has shown that, as an adjunct to diet and exercise, pioglitazone improves glycemic control when used as monotherapy, and in combination with commonly used antidiabetic medications (ie, sulfonylureas, metformin, or insulin).

SYR-322 (alogliptin) is a selective, orally available inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV currently in development by Takeda Global Research \& Development Center, Inc. as a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV is the primary enzyme involved in the in vivo degradation of at least 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Both peptides exert important effects on islet β-cells to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion and regulate β-cell proliferation and cytoprotection. Glucagon-like peptide-1 also inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. The glucose-lowering actions of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, are preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Given the complementary mechanisms of action of alogliptin (stimulation of insulin secretion) and pioglitazone (enhancement of insulin sensitivity) and the absence of overlapping safety risks, the introduction of this combination therapy in patients with T2DM could potentially show enhanced glycemic control and allow patients to reach and maintain their HbA1c goal more effectively.

This study is designed to determine if the addition of alogliptin to a combination of pioglitazone with metformin can be effective at achieving glycemic control without increasing safety risks versus the titration of pioglitazone to 45 mg with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are experiencing inadequate glycemic control on a current regimen of metformin.

Being tested
Alogliptin, Pioglitazone, Metformin, Placebo
Keywords
Glucose Metabolism Disorder, Dysmetabolic Syndrome, Type II Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic, Dyslipidemia, Hyperglycemia, Drug Therapy
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Lipoatrophic, Dyslipidemias, Hyperglycemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AlogliptinDrug

    Also called SYR-322

    Alogliptin tablets.

  • PioglitazoneDrug

    Also called ACTOS®

    Pioglitazone tablets.

  • MetforminDrug

    Metformin HCl tablets (immediate-release, commercially available formulation) ≥1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo tablets.

Study groups in NCT00432276
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Alogliptin 25 mg + Pioglitazone 30 mg add-on to MetforminExperimentalAlogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily; pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily; and the maximum tolerated dose of metformin, tablets, orally, for up to 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Alogliptin; Drug: Pioglitazone; Drug: Metformin; Drug: Placebo
Pioglitazone 45 mg add-on to MetforminActive comparatorAlogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily; pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily; and the maximum tolerated dose of metformin, tablets, orally, for up to 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Pioglitazone; Drug: Metformin; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    The change from Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 52.

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time

    The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) during the study. Least Squares Means were from an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, study schedule, and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HbA1c as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 34 and 42.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 6.5%

    Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5%.

    Measured: Weeks 26 and 52.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.0%

    Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7%.

    Measured: Weeks 26 and 52.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≤ 7.5%

    Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with HbA1c less than or equal to 7.5%.

    Measured: Weeks 26 and 52.

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 0.5%

    Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 0.5%.

    Measured: Weeks 26 and 52.

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.0%

    Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.0%.

    Measured: Weeks 26 and 52.

  7. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 1.5%

    Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 1.5%.

    Measured: Weeks 26 and 52.

  8. Percentage of Participants With a Decrease in Glycosylated Hemoglobin ≥ 2.0%

    Clinical response at Weeks 26 and 52 was assessed by the percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline in HbA1c of greater than or equal to 2.0%.

    Measured: Weeks 26 and 52.

  9. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

    The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was assessed at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline FPG as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Marked Hyperglycemia

    Marked Hyperglycemia is defined as fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.10 mmol/L).

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants Meeting Hyperglycemic Rescue Criteria

    Rescue was defined as meeting 1 of the following criteria, confirmed by a 2nd sample drawn within 7 days after the first sample and analyzed by the central laboratory:

    1. After more than 2 weeks of treatment but prior to the Week 4 Visit: A single fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥275 mg/dL;
    2. From the Week 4 Visit but prior to the Week 8 Visit: A single FPG ≥250 mg/dL;
    3. From the Week 8 Visit but prior to the Week 12 Visit: A single FPG ≥225 mg/dL;
    4. From the Week 12 Visit through the End-of-Treatment Visit: HbA1c ≥8.5% AND ≤0.5% reduction in HbA1c as compared with the baseline HbA1c.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 52

  12. Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin

    Proinsulin is a precursor to insulin, and was measured as an indicator of pancreatic function. The change from Baseline in fasting proinsulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting proinsulin as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  13. Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin

    The change from Baseline in fasting insulin was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting insulin as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  14. Change From Baseline in Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio

    The ratio of proinsulin to insulin was calculated as proinsulin (pmol/L) / insulin (μIU/mL) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52 relative to the Baseline value. Least squares means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting proinsulin/insulin ratio as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  15. Change From Baseline in C-peptide

    C-peptide is a byproduct created when the hormone insulin is produced and is measured by a blood test. Change from Baseline was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline fasting C-peptide as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  16. Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Insulin Resistance

    The Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) measures insulin resistance based on fasting glucose and insulin measurements:

    HOMA IR = fasting plasma insulin (µIU/mL) * fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) / 22.5

    A higher number indicates a greater degree of insulin resistance. The change from Baseline in HOMA IR was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA insulin resistance as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  17. Change From Baseline in Calculated HOMA Beta-cell Function

    The Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) estimates steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population.

    HOMA %B = 20 * insulin (µIU/mL) / fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5

    The change from Baseline in the homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HOMA beta cell function as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  18. Change From Baseline in Body Weight

    Change from Baseline in body weight was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline body weight as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  19. Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol

    Change from Baseline in total cholesterol was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline total cholesterol as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  20. Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

    Change from Baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL cholesterol as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  21. Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

    Change from Baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL cholesterol as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  22. Change From Baseline in Triglycerides

    Change from Baseline in triglycerides was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline triglycerides as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 34, 42 and 52.

  23. Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids

    Change from Baseline in free fatty acids was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline free fatty acids as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42, and 52.

  24. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1

    Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A1 as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  25. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2

    Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein A2 was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein A2 as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  26. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B

    Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein B was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein B as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  27. Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III

    Change from Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline apolipoprotein C-III as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  28. Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1

    Change from Baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline PAI-1 as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  29. Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein

    Change from Baseline in high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline hsCRP as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  30. Change From Baseline in Adiponectin

    Change from Baseline in adiponectin was assessed at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline adiponectin as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  31. Change From Baseline in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lipid Fractionation Total Triglycerides

    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) lipid fractionation was used to assess the change from Baseline in total triglyceride levels at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline NMR triglycerides as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  32. Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) / Chylomicron Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of total VLDL/chylomicron particles and large VLDL/chylomicron particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL/chylomicron particles as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  33. Change From Baseline in VLDL / Chylomicron Triglycerides

    The change from Baseline in levels of VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

    Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL/chylomicron triglycerides as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  34. Change From Baseline in VLDL Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of medium VLDL particles and small VLDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline VLDL particles as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  35. Change From Baseline in Mean VLDL Particle Size

    Change from Baseline in mean VLDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean VLDL particle size as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  36. Change From Baseline in Intermediate Density Lipoprotein (IDL) Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of IDL particles was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline IDL particles as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  37. Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium-small, total small and very small LDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline LDL particles as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  38. Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Particle Size

    Change from Baseline in mean LDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean LDL particle size as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  39. Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Particles

    The change from Baseline in levels of total, large, medium and small HDL particles was assessed by NMR fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline HDL particles as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

  40. Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Particle Size

    Change from Baseline in mean HDL particle size was assessed by NMR lipid fractionation at Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52. Least squares means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment, study schedule and geographic region as class variables, and baseline metformin dose and baseline mean HDL particle size as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 12, 26, 42 and 52.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionJun 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
803 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00432276
Sponsor's protocol ID
01-06-TL-322OPI-004
Other IDs
2006-006025-73, U1111-1112-3363
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
5 Feb 2007
Last updated
4 Apr 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bosi E, Ellis GC, Wilson CA, Fleck PR. Alogliptin as a third oral antidiabetic drug in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin and pioglitazone: a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Dec;13(12):1088-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01463.x.

    PubMed 21733058

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Alogliptin, Pioglitazone and Metformin in people with Diabetes Mellitus, run by Takeda at 86 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 86 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Apr 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (time frame: Baseline and Weeks 26 and 52.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00432276, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in