AzTrials
AzTrials

MalariaPhase 3NCT00432367

Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPTp) Versus Rapid Diagnostic Testing (RDT) and Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy

A Phase 3 study testing Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in people with Malaria and Anaemia, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Ghana.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Among the best practices recommended for malaria control during pregnancy is ensuring effective case management of malaria illness. However, this is often not practiced because (1) malaria infection in pregnancy is often asymptomatic, (2) peripheral parasitaemia may be absent even when the placenta is heavily… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Malaria, Anaemia, Pregnancy
What is being tested?
Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,333 participants
Where
1 siteGhana
Study dates
Feb 2007to Sep 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Her pregnancy is confirmed at 16 to 24 weeks at their first booking.
  • She is willing to participate and complete the test schedule, and has given informed consent.
  • She is willing to have supervised delivered at maternity units in the district.
  • She lives within the study district.

Who cannot join

  • She has a past obstetric and medical history that will adversely affect the interpretation of outcomes such as repeated stillbirths and eclampsia.
  • She has a haemoglobin level below 5.0 g/dl.
  • She has malaria that is severe enough to require parenteral medication.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ghana1 site
  • Juaben Government Hospital

    Juaben, Ashanti Region

Other trials in Ghana

About this study

Official title: The Effectiveness, Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Treatment or Screening and Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy Among Women Using Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Bed Net: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Among the best practices recommended for malaria control during pregnancy is ensuring effective case management of malaria illness. However, this is often not practiced because (1) malaria infection in pregnancy is often asymptomatic, (2) peripheral parasitaemia may be absent even when the placenta is heavily parasitized, (3) implementing diagnosis and treatment of malaria within a routine antenatal service may be difficult and (4) antimalarial treatment options available to pregnant women are limited due to resistance to chloroquine(CQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine(SP0 and paucity of safety and efficacy data on other antimalarial drugs in pregnancy, particularly artemisinin combination treatments (ACT). Therefore the commonest recommended practice in pregnancy is the administration of SP as intermittent preventive treatment (SP-IPTp). However, the effectiveness of SP-IPTp has been questioned because parasite resistance to SP is spreading rapidly across sub-Saharan Africa.

This is a three-arm open label randomised control non-inferiority trial of insecticide-treated nets(ITN) plus rapid diagnostic test(RDT) screening, and treatment with SP or amodiaquine plus artimisinin(AQ+AS) versus ITN plus IPTp using SP. It is to be carried out in pregnant women of all parities presenting at enrolling antenatal clinics with a gestation of 16 to 20 weeks at their first booking. The key objectives are to demonstrate that (1) the prevalence of severe anaemia (Hb < 8g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation (2) the prevalence of low birth weight (BW < 2500g) at delivery or within 72 hours after delivery (3) the prevalence of placenta parasitaemia and (4) the incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events in the ITN plus RDT screening and treatment arm are not greater than those in the ITN plus IPTp arm. Alongside the clinical assessments, health care cost assessments will be done to determine the cost-effectiveness of the two delivery strategies measured as cases of severe maternal anaemia averted.

Read the detailed description

General objective To show that the long-lasting insecticide-treated nets(LLIN)///// plus RDT screening and treatment strategy is not inferior to LLIN plus SP-IPTp in reducing the burden of malaria during pregnancy.

Specific objectives Primary

  1. To demonstrate that the prevalence of severe anaemia (Hb < 8g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation in the LLIN plus RDT screening and case management arm is not greater than that in the LLIN plus IPTp arm.

Secondary

  1. To demonstrate that the prevalence of low birth weight (BW < 2500g) at delivery or within 72 hours after delivery in the LLIN plus RDT screening and case management arm is not greater than that in the LLIN plus IPTp arm.
  2. To demonstrate that the prevalence of anaemia (Hb < 11g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation in the LLIN plus RDT screening and case management arm is not greater than that in the LLIN plus IPTp arm.
  3. To demonstrate that the prevalence of placental parasitaemia in the LLIN plus RDT screening and case management arm is not greater than that in the LLIN plus IPTp arm.
  4. To demonstrate that the incidence of spontaneous abortions, intrauterine deaths/stillbirths, neonatal and maternal mortality and developmental delays in the LLIN plus RDT screening and case management arm is not greater than that in the LLIN plus IPTp arm.
  5. To demonstrate that the cost per case of (1) severe maternal anaemia averted (2) maternal anaemia averted (3) peripheral malaria averted and (4) placenta malaria averted is not higher in the LLIN plus RDT screening and case management arm than in LLIN plus SP-IPTp arm.

Sample size The prevalences of severe anaemia at delivery and low birth weight have been shown to be 12% and 5.7% respectively among Gambian multigravidae who received varying doses of SP-IPT (Mbaye et al. 2006). In the absence of local data from the proposed study site, we estimate that the prevalences of severe anaemia in the third trimester and low birth weight will be 12% and 6% respectively in the LLIN +SP-IPTp arm of this study, similar to that in the Gambian population.

For trial planning we have set a non-inferiority margin of 5%. This means we would consider the LLIN + RDT screening with SP or AQ+AS treatment options to be inferior to the LLIN +SP-IPTp option if the prevalence of severe anaemia at 34 to 36 weeks is 5% greater in the LLIN+RDT with SP or AS+AQ treatment arm than that is observed in the LLIN+SP-IPT arm. Since we expect the prevalence of severe anaemia in the LLIN +SP-IPTp arm would be 12%, we need 887 women per arm to detect a 5% difference between the two study arms at 95% significance with 90% power. Considering a 20% dropout rate we need 1110 women per arm.

Setting a non-inferiority margin of 5% seems clinically and statistically relevant; and yields a sample size that makes the execution of the study feasible within the time frame and with the resources available. Choosing a smaller margin than 5% may be too tight requiring large sample size of over 2000 per arm which might not be feasible and achievable within the time frame; a larger margin than 5% may be too liberal to compare the public health impact of these interventions.

We estimate that 925 women per arm can show with 90% power at 95% significance level and accounting for a 20% dropout rate, that the prevalence of low birth weight associated with the LLIN + RDT screening with or without SP or AQ+AS treatment is no worse than LLIN + SP-IPTp by a margin of 4%.

Since, a sample size of 1110 per arm is adequate to detect any effects of the interventions on both birth weight and maternal Hb, a total of 3330 pregnant women will be recruited into this study.

Study Design A three-arm open label randomised control non-inferiority trial of RDT screening with or without treatment with SP or AQ+AS versus IPTp using SP as follows: -

  1. OptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with SP plus LLIN
  2. OptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with AQ+AS plus LLIN
  3. SP-IPTp plus LLIN

Study site and population The study will be conducted in the Ejisu-Juaben and Sekyere East districts of the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Enrolment will be done simultaneously at the antenatal clinics of the Effiduase and Juaben district hospitals and a sub district health centre in each of the districts. The Effiduase and Juaben hospitals have 50 and 40 beds respectively and provide all basic medical services including adult medicine, paediatrics, surgery and obstetrics and gynaecology. They run weekly antenatal clinic sessions and together they register an average of 220 new pregnant women per month. The sub district health centres (at Kwaso and Kumawu) are manned by qualified medical assistants and midwives. Together they register an average of 80 new pregnant women per month. All health facilities in the study districts including the proposed enrolling clinics offer SP-IPT to pregnant women following the MoH guidelines. Pregnant women in their second or third trimester diagnosed with malaria are treated with AQ+AS as recommended by the MoH at these facilities. The study population will comprise pregnant women presenting at the hospital's antenatal clinic with a gestation of 16 to 24 weeks at their first booking.

Enrolment Procedures

A schematic profile of the study is shown in Figure 1. All study women will be recruited from weekly antenatal clinic sessions held at the study sites over a period of one and half years. Three teams of midwives and their assistants put together and trained by the principal investigator (PI) will assist the PI and research teams to conduct the recruitment during antenatal clinic hours. The standard operating procedures at the clinic will be as follows:

  1. Randomise pregnant women reporting at the ANC who consent to participate in the study into three arms: an IPTp arm, RDT screening and SP case management arm and RDT screening and AQ+AS case management arm. Distribute LLIN to eligible pregnant women in all arms.
  2. Obtain blood for baseline investigations including haemoglobin level, thin and thick blood films for malaria parasite counts and, filter paper blood spots.
  3. Assess all pregnant women in the RDT and treatment groups clinically and obstetrically prior to OptiMAL® dipstick screening; for those parasitaemic offer SP or AQ+AS and ingestion of first dose observed directly at the ANC. Encourage the women to regularly sleep under the bed nets provided and take their daily doses of iron and folic acid tablets.
  4. For women in the RDT and treatment groups who are negative offer only daily doses of iron and folic acid tablets and encourage them to regularly sleep under the bed nets provided.
  5. Women in the IPTp group will receive SP and ingestion will be directly observed at the ANC according to the national guideline. Encourage the women to regularly sleep under the bed nets provided and take their daily doses of iron and folic acid tablets.
  6. Women who decline participation in the study will receive SP-IPTp according to the national guideline.

Antenatal Follow-Up Procedures

  1. Day 7: Women receiving SP or AQ+AS treatment will be followed up actively on the day 7 post treatment to assess any adverse events during the week post treatment.
  2. At 6 months: repeat SP-IPT for women in the IPT arm and treat women in the case management arm with SP or AQ+AS if they are RDT positive. Women in the case management arm with negative RDT would receive only haematinics. Ask all study women to regularly sleep under bed nets provided.
  3. At 8 months: repeat SP-IPT for women in the IPT arm and treat women in the case management arm with SP or AQ+AS if they are RDT positive. Women in the case management arm with negative RDT would receive only haematinics. Ask all study women to regularly sleep under bed nets provided.
  4. At 34 to 36 weeks: actively follow up women to sample blood by finger prick for haemoglobin measurements, slide smears for malaria parasite counts and filter paper blood spots.
  5. Unscheduled visits: Women presenting with a history of fever during an unscheduled visit will be tested for malaria parasites. If they are found to be parasitaemic, they will be deemed to be a treatment failure and will be given quinine as rescue medication.
  6. All pregnant women will receive haematinics packs at each of the follow ups.

Delivery and Postpartum Follow-up

  1. The midwives will record all birth weights and note any stillbirths and perinatal deaths.
  2. Midwives will record all congenital deformities for verification and confirmation by a clinician.
  3. Visits will be made toall women and babies at 6 to 8 weeks post-delivery to obtain reports of any neonatal deaths or other adverse events.
  4. At 6 weeks post-partum, if a woman has peripheral parasitaemia she will be treated with SP and followed up for parasite clearance on days 14 and 28 post-treatment. If there is no parasite clearance on day 14 and/or day 28 a course of rescue medication (quinine) will be given. This part of the study is necessary to assess the efficacy of SP to clear parasitaemia.
Being tested
Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
Keywords
Malaria in pregnancy, Case management, Screening, RDT, IPTp, Amodiaquine, Artesunate
Medical subject headings
Malaria, Anemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamineDrug

    Eligible women will be allocated randomly to one of three groups and treated as follows:

    Arm 1 (OptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with SP plus LLIN group) - a woman in this will receive 1500mg/75mg (S/P) administered at the ANC as single dose on enrollment if her screening test is positive.

    Arm 2 (OptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with AQ+AS plus LLIN) - a woman in this will receive 300mg of AQ and 100mg co-administered two times a day for 3 days if her screening test is positive. The first dose is observed on enrolment day at the ANC.

    Arm 3 (SP-IPTp plus LLIN group) - a woman in this will receive 1500mg/75mg (S/P) administered at the ANC as single dose on enrollment as recommended by national policy.

    All enrolled women will be given one long lasting insecticide treated bed net each for use.

Study groups in NCT00432367
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalOptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with SP plus LLIN
Receives: Drug: Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
2ExperimentalOptiMAL® antigen screening and treatment with AQ+AS plus LLIN
Receives: Drug: Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
3Active comparatorSP-IPTp plus LLIN
Receives: Drug: Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of severe maternal anaemia (Hb < 8g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation.

    Measured: At 34 to 36 weeks of gestation

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Prevalence of low birth weight (BW < 2500g) at delivery or within 72 hours of delivery.

    Measured: At delivery or within 72 hours of delivery.

  2. Prevalence of maternal anaemia (Hb < 11g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation.

    Measured: At 34 to 36 weeks of gestation

  3. Prevalence of placenta parasitaemia.

    Measured: At delivery

  4. Incidence of post-intervention malaria cases

    Measured: Anytime after enrolment and prior to delivery

  5. Proportions of congenital anomalies in live births among the intervention groups stratified by gestation, gravidity, parity and age.

    Measured: At delivery

  6. Proportions of spontaneous abortions, intrauterine death, stillbirths, neonatal and maternal mortality and pre-term deliveries.

    Measured: Anytime after enrolment and prior to delivery

  7. Cost per severe maternal anaemia averted.

    Measured: Anytime after enrolment and prior to delivery

  8. Cost per (non-severe) maternal anaemia averted.

    Measured: Anytime after enrolment and prior to delivery

  9. Cost per peripheral malaria case averted.

    Measured: Anytime after enrolment and prior to delivery

  10. Cost per placental malaria averted.

    Measured: At delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2007
  3. Primary completionFeb 2009
  4. Study completionSep 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3,333 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00432367
Sponsor's protocol ID
GMP_REG04
Other IDs
HKT-GMP
Status last verified
Feb 2014
First submitted
5 Feb 2007
Last updated
20 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Tagbor H, Bruce J, Agbo M, Greenwood B, Chandramohan D. Intermittent screening and treatment versus intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 28;5(12):e14425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014425.

    PubMed 21203389

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Amodiaquine plus artesunate combination; sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in people with Malaria and Anaemia, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Ghana.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ghana. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of severe maternal anaemia (Hb < 8g/dl) at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation. (time frame: At 34 to 36 weeks of gestation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00432367, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in