Congestive Heart FailurePhase 4NCT00433043
BOAT: Beta Blocker Uptitration With OptiVol After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
A Phase 4 study testing Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate) and CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy) in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Many heart failure patients are unable to reach target beta blocker doses. This study will address whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) will enable uptitration of beta-blockers to target doses and whether it will favorably affect remodeling by reducing left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Congestive Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate) and CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2007to May 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- NYHA III-IV
- QRS > 120 msec
- On medical therapy, but beta blocker dose not @ target (carvedilol 25 bid, metoprolol succinate 200 qd)
Who cannot join
- QRS < 120 msec
- On target beta blocker dose
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital
New York, New York, 10019
Jefferson Medical College
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
About this study
Official title: Beta-blocker Uptitration in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Optivol Fluid Status Monitoring System
Many heart failure patients are unable to reach target beta blocker doses. This study will address whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) will enable uptitration of beta-blockers to target doses and whether it will favorably affect remodeling by reducing left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), with measurable clinical benefit, beyond CRT alone (without changes in beta-blocker dose).
Read the detailed description
Beta blockers have been proven to have benefit in heart failure (HF) patients with regard to morbidity and mortality. However, initiation and uptitration remains a challenge in many patients. Worsening of heart failure, symptomatic hypotension and symptomatic bradycardia all limit up-titration to the target doses that have been shown to have mortality benefits (carvedilol [Coreg] 25 mg bid, metoprolol succinate [Toprol-XL] 200 mg qd) in the large clinical trials (COPERNICUS, MERIT-HF).
It is debated whether the benefit of beta-blockade is solely due to heart rate reduction or more broadly from the cardiac, central and peripheral effects of blocking sympathetic activity. Clearly, there is a remodeling effect on the dilated ventricle. Furthermore, patients with heart rates of 64 bpm or less are rarely begun on beta-blocker therapy. It is not known whether these patients should be given a pacemaker in order to then safely initiate beta-blocker therapy.
It is also clear that isolated right ventricular pacing can have deleterious effects on ventricular dyssynchrony and symptomatic heart failure despite medical therapy. Biventricular pacing (BIVPM), also known as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is the pacing mode of choice for patients with wide QRS complexes and symptomatic HF.
It is hypothesized that CRT therapy allows for increased Beta -blocker dose (or initiation of beta-blocker in patients previously intolerant) with improved NYHA, ejection fraction, and remodeling effects. The synergy between two established heart failure therapies requires further evaluation in a prospective randomized trial.
- Conditions
- Congestive Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate), CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Beta blockers, Resynchronization, Congestive Heart Failure, NYHA III-IV, Candidate for BIVPM, Not on Target Dose (Coreg 25 Bid or Toprol XL 200 qd)
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate)Drug
Both groups get CRT. Group 1 is uptitrated to target dose beta blocker after CRT. Group 2 maintains their b-blocker dose from study entry.
CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)Procedure or surgery
Both arms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | CRT and b-blocker uptitration to target dose Receives: Drug: Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate); Procedure: CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy) |
| 2 | Active comparator | CRT and continuation of entry b-blocker dose to 6 month evaluation Receives: Drug: Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate); Procedure: CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
LVESVI change in patients with CRT/ increased dose of beta-blockers vs CRT and no change in beta-blocker dose.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Correlation of Optivol fluid measurement increases (decreased impedance) with symptomatic worsening of heart failure during beta blocker uptitration
Measured: 6 months
Optivol measurements (decreased impedance, increase volume index) correlated with the need for adjusting diuretic therapy when uptitrating beta blocker dose
Measured: 12 months
Functional improvements
Measured: 6 months
Exercise - 6 minute walk
Measured: 6 months
QOL - NYHA, Minnesota LWHFQ, Symptom Assessment Questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Ejection fraction
Measured: 6 months
LVEDVI
Measured: 6 months
Remodeling
Measured: 6 months
HF Hospitalizations/ Mortality
Measured: 6 months
Evaluation of LVESVI in patients who actually achieve target dose
Measured: 6 months
Comparison of LVESVI changes based on initial beta-blocker dose
Measured: 6 months
Plasma Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) change
Measured: 6 months
12 month comparison after Group 2 has been uptitrated.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2007
- Primary completionMay 2009
- Study completionMay 2009
Why it stopped: Insufficient enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Congestive Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marrick L Kukin, MD, Principal investigator, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00433043
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 06-107
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Aranda JM Jr, Woo GW, Conti JB, Schofield RS, Conti CR, Hill JA. Use of cardiac resynchronization therapy to optimize beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Apr 1;95(7):889-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.023.
PubMed 15781026Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2001-7.
PubMed 10376614Packer M, Coats AJ, Fowler MB, Katus HA, Krum H, Mohacsi P, Rouleau JL, Tendera M, Castaigne A, Roecker EB, Schultz MK, DeMets DL; Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study Group. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 31;344(22):1651-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105313442201.
PubMed 11386263Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423.
PubMed 15152059
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Beta-blocker Uptitration in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Optivol Fluid Status Monitoring System
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00433043
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 06-107
- Conditions
- Congestive Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Beta blockers, Resynchronization, Congestive Heart Failure, NYHA III-IV, Candidate for BIVPM, Not on Target Dose (Coreg 25 Bid or Toprol XL 200 qd)
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Insufficient enrollment
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Study start
- Jan 2007
- Primary completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many heart failure patients are unable to reach target beta blocker doses. This study will address whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) will enable uptitration of beta-blockers to target doses and whether it will favorably affect remodeling by reducing left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), with measurable clinical benefit, beyond CRT alone (without changes in beta-blocker dose).
Detailed description
Beta blockers have been proven to have benefit in heart failure (HF) patients with regard to morbidity and mortality. However, initiation and uptitration remains a challenge in many patients. Worsening of heart failure, symptomatic hypotension and symptomatic bradycardia all limit up-titration to the target doses that have been shown to have mortality benefits (carvedilol [Coreg] 25 mg bid, metoprolol succinate [Toprol-XL] 200 mg qd) in the large clinical trials (COPERNICUS, MERIT-HF).
It is debated whether the benefit of beta-blockade is solely due to heart rate reduction or more broadly from the cardiac, central and peripheral effects of blocking sympathetic activity. Clearly, there is a remodeling effect on the dilated ventricle. Furthermore, patients with heart rates of 64 bpm or less are rarely begun on beta-blocker therapy. It is not known whether these patients should be given a pacemaker in order to then safely initiate beta-blocker therapy.
It is also clear that isolated right ventricular pacing can have deleterious effects on ventricular dyssynchrony and symptomatic heart failure despite medical therapy. Biventricular pacing (BIVPM), also known as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is the pacing mode of choice for patients with wide QRS complexes and symptomatic HF.
It is hypothesized that CRT therapy allows for increased Beta -blocker dose (or initiation of beta-blocker in patients previously intolerant) with improved NYHA, ejection fraction, and remodeling effects. The synergy between two established heart failure therapies requires further evaluation in a prospective randomized trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate), Procedure: CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)CRT and b-blocker uptitration to target dose |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate), Procedure: CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)CRT and continuation of entry b-blocker dose to 6 month evaluation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- NYHA III-IV
- QRS > 120 msec
- On medical therapy, but beta blocker dose not @ target (carvedilol 25 bid, metoprolol succinate 200 qd)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- QRS < 120 msec
- On target beta blocker dose
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate)Both groups get CRT. Group 1 is uptitrated to target dose beta blocker after CRT. Group 2 maintains their b-blocker dose from study entry. | Drug | 1, 2 |
| CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy)Both arms | Procedure or surgery | 1, 2 |
Primary outcome
LVESVI change in patients with CRT/ increased dose of beta-blockers vs CRT and no change in beta-blocker dose.
Time frame: 6 months
13 secondary outcomes
Correlation of Optivol fluid measurement increases (decreased impedance) with symptomatic worsening of heart failure during beta blocker uptitration
Time frame: 6 months
Optivol measurements (decreased impedance, increase volume index) correlated with the need for adjusting diuretic therapy when uptitrating beta blocker dose
Time frame: 12 months
Functional improvements
Time frame: 6 months
Exercise - 6 minute walk
Time frame: 6 months
QOL - NYHA, Minnesota LWHFQ, Symptom Assessment Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months
Ejection fraction
Time frame: 6 months
LVEDVI
Time frame: 6 months
Remodeling
Time frame: 6 months
HF Hospitalizations/ Mortality
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of LVESVI in patients who actually achieve target dose
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison of LVESVI changes based on initial beta-blocker dose
Time frame: 6 months
Plasma Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) change
Time frame: 6 months
12 month comparison after Group 2 has been uptitrated.
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 15781026Aranda JM Jr, Woo GW, Conti JB, Schofield RS, Conti CR, Hill JA. Use of cardiac resynchronization therapy to optimize beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Apr 1;95(7):889-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.023.
- Background: PubMed 10376614Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2001-7.
- Background: PubMed 11386263Packer M, Coats AJ, Fowler MB, Katus HA, Krum H, Mohacsi P, Rouleau JL, Tendera M, Castaigne A, Roecker EB, Schultz MK, DeMets DL; Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study Group. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 31;344(22):1651-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105313442201.
- Background: PubMed 15152059Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423.
Related trials for Congestive Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marrick L Kukin, MD principal investigator
St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospitals
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Beta blocker (carvedilol or metoprolol succinate) and CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy) in people with Congestive Heart Failure, run by St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Insufficient enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
LVESVI change in patients with CRT/ increased dose of beta-blockers vs CRT and no change in beta-blocker dose. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00433043, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2015.