Respiratory Insufficiency of PrematurityPhase 3NIPPVNCT00433212
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Premature Infants (NIPPV)
A Phase 3 study testing nCPAP and NIPPV in people with Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity, run by McMaster University at 35 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The machines and oxygen used to help very premature babies breathe can have side-effects, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD get more complications (a higher death rate, a longer time in intensive care and on assisted ventilation, more hospital readmissions in the first year of life, and more… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 28 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity
- What is being tested?
- nCPAP and NIPPV
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,011 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2007to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 28 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Birth weight <1000 gm
- Gestational age <30 completed weeks
- Intention to manage the infant with non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. no endotracheal tube), where either:
- the infant is within the first 7 days of life and has never been intubated or has received less than 24 hours of total cumulative intubated respiratory support;
- the infant is within the first 28 days of life, has been managed with intubated respiratory support for 24 hours or more and is a candidate for extubation followed by non-invasive respiratory support.
Who cannot join
- Considered non-viable by clinician (decision not to administer effective therapies)
- Life-threatening congenital abnormalities including congenital heart disease (excluding patent ductus arteriosis)
- Infants known to require surgical treatment
- Abnormalities of the upper and lower airways
- Neuromuscular disorders
- Infants who are >28 days old and continue to require mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 10 countries.
35 sites in 10 countries
United States14 sites
Tufts University Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11023
Kings County Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
New York Hospital Queens
Brooklyn, New York, 11355
Queens Hospital Center
Jamaica, New York, 11432
Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center
New York, New York, 11212
Pennsylvania Hospital/U. of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19035
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84158-1289
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8111
Virtua West Jersey Hospital
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Georgetown University Children's Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
The George Washington University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
Canada8 sites
IWK Health Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4J9
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1
The Ottawa Hospital General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Royal University Hospital
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario
St. Boniface General Hospital/University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0L8
Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Ireland3 sites
Coombe Women's Hospital
Dublin
National Maternity Hospital
Dublin
Cork University Maternity Hospital
Wilton, Cork
United Kingdom3 sites
Royal Maternity Hospital
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT12 6BB
University of Leicester
Leicester, LE1 6TP
St. Mary's Hospital
London, W2 1NY
Netherlands2 sites
University Medical Center Groningen/Beatrix Children's Hosp
Groningen, 9700 RB
Princess Amalia Dept of Pediatrics, Isala Clinics
Zwolle, 8000 GK
Sweden1 site
Karolinska University Hospital/Astrid Lingrenn's Children's Hospital
Stockholm, S-171 76
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of NIPPV to Increase Survival Without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
The machines and oxygen used to help very premature babies breathe can have side-effects, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD get more complications (a higher death rate, a longer time in intensive care and on assisted ventilation, more hospital readmissions in the first year of life, and more learning problems) than infants who do not develop BPD. Doctors try to remove the tube in the wind-pipe that links the baby to the breathing machine as soon as possible. However, small babies get tired, and still require help to breathe. One of the standard and common techniques to help them breathe without a tube in the wind-pipe is to use simple pressure support, nasal continuous positive airway pressure or nCPAP. This supports breathing a little, but it is often not enough to prevent the need to go back on the breathing machine.
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is similar to nCPAP, but also gives some breaths, or extra support, to babies through a small tube in the nose. NIPPV is safe and effective, and already in use as an alternate "standard" therapy.
The main research question: After being weaned from the breathing machine, is NIPPV better than nCPAP in preventing BPD in premature babies weighing 999 grams or less at birth?
Read the detailed description
The immature lung of extremely low birth weight (ELBW, < 1000 g) infants is easily damaged by the placement of an endotracheal tube to deliver mechanical ventilation and oxygen. This and the total time of mechanical ventilation contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD have an increased risk of later death or neuro-impairment. With the increasing survival of ELBW infants in the NICU, there has been a proportionate increase in the number of infants surviving with BPD.
Following invasive ventilation via an endotracheal tube (ETT), extubation to nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP)ventilation is the standard approach. Currently, 40% of infants who are extubated and given nCPAP support fail, and require re-intubation. Previous work suggests that a less invasive respiratory support such as Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), without an endotracheal tube is less injurious to the lung. NIPPV may thereby reduce the duration of invasive ventilator support, and aid successful early extubation. We hypothesize that the use of NIPPV leads to a higher rate of survival without BPD than standard therapy with nCPAP.
This randomized clinical trial is appropriately powered to compare NIPPV with nCPAP to detect effects on clinically relevant long-term outcomes, such as death and BPD at 36 weeks. This is a multi-national, randomized, open clinical trial of two different standard methods of providing non-invasive respiratory support to 1000 extremely preterm infants weighing less than 1000 grams at birth.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity
- Being tested
- nCPAP, NIPPV
- Keywords
- prematurity, respiratory insufficiency, non-invasive ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, hyaline membrane disease
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Premature Birth, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Hyaline Membrane Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nCPAPDevice
Deliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with nCPAP device
NIPPVDevice
Deliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with NIPPV device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Non-invasive respiratory support via nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation Receives: Device: NIPPV |
| B | Active comparator | Non-invasive respiratory support via nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Receives: Device: nCPAP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite of survival to 36 weeks gestational age, free of moderate-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Measured: 36 weeks gestational age
Secondary outcomes (15)
All cause mortality at 36 weeks gestational age
Measured: 36 weeks gestational age
All cause mortality before first discharge home
Measured: first discharge home
retinopathy of prematurity
Measured: discharge home
ultrasonographic evidence of brain injury
Measured: 36 weeks gestional age
necrotizing enterocolitis
Measured: 36 weeks gestational age
growth
Measured: discharge home
time to establish full feeds
Measured: discharge home
nosocomial infections
Measured: discharge home
need for re-intubation
Measured: 36 weeks gestational age
time on supplemental oxygen
Measured: discharge home
duration of positive pressure respiratory support
Measured: discharge home
comparison of synchronized and non-synchronized NIPPV
Measured: discharge home
bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Measured: 36 weeks gestational age
air leak syndromes
Measured: 36 weeks gestational age
nasal trauma
Measured: discharge home
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2007
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory Insufficiency of PrematurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McMaster UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,011 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Haresh Kirpalani, MD, MSc, Study chair, Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationBrigitte Lemyre, MD, Study director, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioAaron Chiu, MD, Study director, St. Boniface HospitalDavid Millar, MD, Study director, Royal Maternity Hospital, BelfastRobin S Roberts, MTech, Study director, Hamilton Health Sciences/McMaster UniversityBradley Yoder, MD, Study director, University of UtahPeter H Dijk, MD, PhD, Study director, University Medical Centrum Groningen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00433212
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NTG-2007-NIPPV
- Other IDs
- CIHR MCT-80246, ISRCTN15233270
- Acronym
- NIPPV
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, Yoder BA, Chiu A, Roberts RS; NIPPV Study Group. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 15;369(7):611-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214533.
PubMed 23944299Bamat NA, Guevara JP, Bryan M, Roberts RS, Yoder BA, Lemyre B, Chiu A, Millar D, Kirpalani H. Variation in Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:28-33.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.065. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
PubMed 29275926Millar D, Lemyre B, Kirpalani H, Chiu A, Yoder BA, Roberts RS. A comparison of bilevel and ventilator-delivered non-invasive respiratory support. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jan;101(1):F21-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308123. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
PubMed 26162889
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of NIPPV to Increase Survival Without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00433212
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NIPPV / NTG-2007-NIPPV
- Conditions
- Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity
- Keywords
- prematurity, respiratory insufficiency, non-invasive ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, hyaline membrane disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,011 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Apr 2007
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The machines and oxygen used to help very premature babies breathe can have side-effects, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD get more complications (a higher death rate, a longer time in intensive care and on assisted ventilation, more hospital readmissions in the first year of life, and more learning problems) than infants who do not develop BPD. Doctors try to remove the tube in the wind-pipe that links the baby to the breathing machine as soon as possible. However, small babies get tired, and still require help to breathe. One of the standard and common techniques to help them breathe without a tube in the wind-pipe is to use simple pressure support, nasal continuous positive airway pressure or nCPAP. This supports breathing a little, but it is often not enough to prevent the need to go back on the breathing machine.
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is similar to nCPAP, but also gives some breaths, or extra support, to babies through a small tube in the nose. NIPPV is safe and effective, and already in use as an alternate "standard" therapy.
The main research question: After being weaned from the breathing machine, is NIPPV better than nCPAP in preventing BPD in premature babies weighing 999 grams or less at birth?
Detailed description
The immature lung of extremely low birth weight (ELBW, < 1000 g) infants is easily damaged by the placement of an endotracheal tube to deliver mechanical ventilation and oxygen. This and the total time of mechanical ventilation contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD have an increased risk of later death or neuro-impairment. With the increasing survival of ELBW infants in the NICU, there has been a proportionate increase in the number of infants surviving with BPD.
Following invasive ventilation via an endotracheal tube (ETT), extubation to nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP)ventilation is the standard approach. Currently, 40% of infants who are extubated and given nCPAP support fail, and require re-intubation. Previous work suggests that a less invasive respiratory support such as Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), without an endotracheal tube is less injurious to the lung. NIPPV may thereby reduce the duration of invasive ventilator support, and aid successful early extubation. We hypothesize that the use of NIPPV leads to a higher rate of survival without BPD than standard therapy with nCPAP.
This randomized clinical trial is appropriately powered to compare NIPPV with nCPAP to detect effects on clinically relevant long-term outcomes, such as death and BPD at 36 weeks. This is a multi-national, randomized, open clinical trial of two different standard methods of providing non-invasive respiratory support to 1000 extremely preterm infants weighing less than 1000 grams at birth.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Active comparator | Device: NIPPVNon-invasive respiratory support via nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation |
| B | Active comparator | Device: nCPAPNon-invasive respiratory support via nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 28 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Birth weight <1000 gm
- Gestational age <30 completed weeks
- Intention to manage the infant with non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. no endotracheal tube), where either:
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Considered non-viable by clinician (decision not to administer effective therapies)
- Life-threatening congenital abnormalities including congenital heart disease (excluding patent ductus arteriosis)
- Infants known to require surgical treatment
- Abnormalities of the upper and lower airways
- Neuromuscular disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nCPAPDeliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with nCPAP device | Device | B |
| NIPPVDeliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with NIPPV device | Device | A |
Primary outcome
Composite of survival to 36 weeks gestational age, free of moderate-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age
15 secondary outcomes
All cause mortality at 36 weeks gestational age
Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age
All cause mortality before first discharge home
Time frame: first discharge home
retinopathy of prematurity
Time frame: discharge home
ultrasonographic evidence of brain injury
Time frame: 36 weeks gestional age
necrotizing enterocolitis
Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age
growth
Time frame: discharge home
time to establish full feeds
Time frame: discharge home
nosocomial infections
Time frame: discharge home
need for re-intubation
Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age
time on supplemental oxygen
Time frame: discharge home
duration of positive pressure respiratory support
Time frame: discharge home
comparison of synchronized and non-synchronized NIPPV
Time frame: discharge home
bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age
air leak syndromes
Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age
nasal trauma
Time frame: discharge home
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 23944299Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, Yoder BA, Chiu A, Roberts RS; NIPPV Study Group. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 15;369(7):611-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214533.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29275926Bamat NA, Guevara JP, Bryan M, Roberts RS, Yoder BA, Lemyre B, Chiu A, Millar D, Kirpalani H. Variation in Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:28-33.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.065. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26162889Millar D, Lemyre B, Kirpalani H, Chiu A, Yoder BA, Roberts RS. A comparison of bilevel and ventilator-delivered non-invasive respiratory support. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jan;101(1):F21-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308123. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
Related trials for Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Predictors of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Preterm Infants
Premature Birth, Respiration Failure
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Dexmedetomidine for Invasive Ventilation In the NEOnate
Invasive Ventilation, Infant Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Profile of Understudied Drugs Administered to Children Per Standard of Care (POPS)
Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19), Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
RecruitingPhase 4
Dopamine vs. Norepinephrine for Hypotension in Neonates With Pulmonary Hypertension (DONE)
Hypotension and Shock, Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN)
Recruiting
Supraglottic Airway for Resuscitation in Preemies
Respiratory Failure, Premature Neonates
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Haresh Kirpalani, MD, MSc study chair
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Brigitte Lemyre, MD study director
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Aaron Chiu, MD study director
St. Boniface Hospital
35 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing nCPAP and NIPPV in people with Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity, run by McMaster University at 35 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in United States, Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, Netherlands and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite of survival to 36 weeks gestational age, free of moderate-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (time frame: 36 weeks gestational age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00433212, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2014.