AzTrials
AzTrials

Rhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalPhase 4NCT00435461

Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Oral Fexofenadine

A Phase 4 study testing Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine in people with Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 6 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the nighttime symptom relief of fluticasone furoate nasal spray and oral fexofenadine Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
What is being tested?
Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
20 Dec 2006to 28 Feb 2007
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent.
  • Outpatient.
  • Females of child-bearing potential must use appropriate contraception.
  • Diagnosis of seasonal allergic rhinitis to mountain cedar.
  • Adequate exposure to allergen.
  • Able to comply with study procedures.
  • Literate.

Who cannot join

  • Significant concomitant medical condition.
  • Use of corticosteroids, allergy medications, or other medication that affect allergic rhinitis
  • Positive pregnancy test.
  • Allergy to any component of the investigational product.
  • Tobacco use
  • Contact lens use
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Has chickenpox or measles or recent exposure
  • Other clinical trial drug exposure in last 30 days
  • Affiliation with clinic site

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Austin, Texas, 78750

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kerrville, Texas, 78028

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New Braunfels, Texas, 78130

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78205

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Oral Fexofenadine in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

The primary objective of this study is to compare the nighttime symptom relief of fluticasone furoate nasal spray and oral fexofenadine

Being tested
Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine
Keywords
once daily, mountain cedar, fexofenadine, allergic rhinitis, fluticasone furoate
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Rhinitis, Allergic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadineDrug

    Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Symptoms Score (NSS)

    The NSS is a three-item questionnaire which assesses three aspects of allergic rhinitis symptoms at night which were rated using three 4-point scales, the sum of which comprises NSS. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). The symptoms were: PM nasal congestion upon awakening (PMNCA) (0- None, 1- Mild, 2- Moderate, 3- Severe), difficulty in going to sleep due to nasal symptoms (DSNS) (0- Not at all, 1- Little, 2- Moderately, 3- Very), and nighttime awakenings due to nasal symptoms (NANS) (0- Not at all, 1- Once, 2- More than once, 3- I felt like I was awake all night). Each participant's Baseline NSS was defined as the average of the NSS calculated for the day of randomization and the three highest NSS scores calculated during the six days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline NSS for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average NSS over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline NSS.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (N-rTNSS) and Component Nasal Symptoms Score

    The nighttime reflective assessments were recorded each morning and assessed 4 nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, sneezing) at evening and night using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). Scores of each of the 4 symptoms were summed for each participant to create a N-rTNSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). Each participant's Baseline total score was average of nighttime total symptom score on day of randomization and 3 highest scores calculated for 6 days immediately prior to day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline nighttime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Nighttime total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  2. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in D-rTNSS

    The Daytime reflective assessments were recorded each evening and assessed 4 nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing) at evening and night using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The scores of each of the four Daytime symptoms were summed for each participant to create a D-rTNSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). Each participant's Baseline total symptom score was the average of the four highest total symptom score calculated for the seven days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline Daytime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Daytime total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participants Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  3. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in 24-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (24-hour rTNSS) and Component Nasal Score

    Daily 24-hour rTNSS was calculated as the average of the corresponding N-rTNSS and D-rTNSS using a 4-point scale where, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). The 24-hour total symptom score for a Day is the average of the daytime total symptom score for that Day and the nighttime score for (D+1). If either component of a given date's 24-hour total symptom score was missing, then the 24-hour total symptom score itself were to be set to missing. Each participant's average change from Baseline 24-hour total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participants average 24-hour total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  4. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (N-rTOSS)

    The nighttime reflective assessments were recorded each morning and assessed 3 ocular symptoms (tearing/watering, itching/burning, and redness) at evening and night using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). Scores of each of 3 Nighttime symptoms were summed for each participant to create a N-rTOSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). Each participants Baseline total score was average of nighttime total symptom score on day of randomization and the 3 highest scores calculated for 6 days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline nighttime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Nighttime total symptom score over treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  5. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Daytime Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (D-rTOSS)

    The Daytime reflective assessments were recorded each evening and assessed the 3 nasal symptoms (tearing/watering, itching/burning, and redness) at evening and night using a 4-point scale where, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The scores of each of the three Daytime symptoms were summed for each participant to create a D-rTOSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). Each participants Baseline total symptom score was the average of the four highest total symptom score calculated for the seven days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline Daytime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Daytime total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  6. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in 24-hour Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (24-hour rTOSS)

    Daily 24-hour rTOSS was calculated as the average of the corresponding N-rTOSS and D-rTOSS using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). The 24-hour total symptom score for a Day is the average of the daytime total symptom score for that Day and the nighttime score for (D+1). If either component of a given date's 24-hour total symptom score was missing, then the 24-hour total symptom score itself was to be set to missing. Each participant's average change from Baseline 24-hour total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average 24-hour total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score. Baseline is the 4 highest scores calculated for the 7 days prior to Day 1.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  7. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (Pre-dose iTNSS) and Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (Pre-dose iTOSS)

    Participants were instructed to score and document their symptoms in an instantaneous manner on a diary card. The instantaneous rating was performed once daily just prior to administering their morning dose. The scores of each of the instantaneous nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing) and ocular symptoms (tearing/watering, itching/burning, and redness) were summed for each participant to create a iTNSS and iTOSS, respectively using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). Total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst) for iTNSS and 0 (best) to 9 (worst) for iTOSS. Each participant's average change from Baseline iTNSS and iTOSS was participant's average iTNSS and iTOSS total score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  8. Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Peak NasalIinspiratory Flow (PNIF)

    PNIF was measured by participants using an In-Check Nasal portable hand-held inspiratory flow meter and face mask. Participants recorded PNIF twice daily (in the morning prior to taking their study medication and in the evening). Three measurements were taken on each occasion and the highest measurement recorded on the electronic diary. Each participant's average change from Baseline PNIF was the participant's average PNIF over the treatment period minus the participant's baseline PNIF.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks

  9. Mean Change From Baseline for Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NRQLQ)

    The NRQLQ is a paper instrument administered on the day of randomization and at Visit 4/Early Withdrawal to assess nocturnal rhinitis-related quality of life. The NRQLQ is a 16-item, self-administered, disease-specific (allergic rhinitis), and quality of life instrument that measures the functional problems most troublesome to patients with nocturnal allergy symptoms over a one-week interval. Each question is scored from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating more nocturnal impairment. Items are grouped into four domains: Sleep problems, Sleep time problems, Symptoms on waking in the morning and Practical problems. An overall score was calculated from the mean score of all items. Each participant's average change from Baseline NRQLQ score was the participant's average NRQLQ score over the treatment period minus the participant's baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study start20 Dec 2006
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2007
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Enrolment
1,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00435461
Sponsor's protocol ID
FFU109045
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
14 Feb 2007
Last updated
7 Mar 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Publications

  • Andrews C, Martin B, Jacobs R, Toler T, Prillaman B, Philpot E. Efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray versus oral fexofenadine on nighttime sleep disturbance caused by seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) nasal symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 100(1) (Supplement 1):A6 (abstract)

  • Andrews CP, Martin BG, Jacobs RL, Diaz J, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Dalal AA, Philpot EE. Once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray showed greater improvement in nocturnal quality of life in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with oral fexofenadine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121(2) (Supplement 1): S53 (abstract)

  • Andrews CP, Martin BG, Jacobs RL, Mohar DE, Diaz JD, Amar NJ, Kaiser HB, Vandewalker ML, Bernstein J, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Dalal AA, Lee LA, Philpot EE. Fluticasone furoate nasal spray is more effective than fexofenadine for nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):128-38. doi: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3204.

    PubMed 19463203
  • Martin BG, Andrews CP, Jacobs R, Mohar D, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Philpot EE. Once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray showed greater improvements in relieving nighttime nasal symptoms and increasing peak nasal inspiratory flow versus oral fexofenadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121(2) (Supplement 1): S54-S55 (abstract)

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine in people with Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 6 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Symptoms Score (NSS) (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00435461, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in