Rhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalPhase 4NCT00435461
Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Oral Fexofenadine
A Phase 4 study testing Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine in people with Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the nighttime symptom relief of fluticasone furoate nasal spray and oral fexofenadine Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
- What is being tested?
- Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2006to 28 Feb 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent.
- Outpatient.
- Females of child-bearing potential must use appropriate contraception.
- Diagnosis of seasonal allergic rhinitis to mountain cedar.
- Adequate exposure to allergen.
- Able to comply with study procedures.
- Literate.
Who cannot join
- Significant concomitant medical condition.
- Use of corticosteroids, allergy medications, or other medication that affect allergic rhinitis
- Positive pregnancy test.
- Allergy to any component of the investigational product.
- Tobacco use
- Contact lens use
Show all 9Show fewer
- Has chickenpox or measles or recent exposure
- Other clinical trial drug exposure in last 30 days
- Affiliation with clinic site
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78750
GSK Investigational Site
Kerrville, Texas, 78028
GSK Investigational Site
New Braunfels, Texas, 78130
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78205
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Oral Fexofenadine in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
The primary objective of this study is to compare the nighttime symptom relief of fluticasone furoate nasal spray and oral fexofenadine
- Conditions
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
- Being tested
- Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine
- Keywords
- once daily, mountain cedar, fexofenadine, allergic rhinitis, fluticasone furoate
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Rhinitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadineDrug
Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Symptoms Score (NSS)
The NSS is a three-item questionnaire which assesses three aspects of allergic rhinitis symptoms at night which were rated using three 4-point scales, the sum of which comprises NSS. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). The symptoms were: PM nasal congestion upon awakening (PMNCA) (0- None, 1- Mild, 2- Moderate, 3- Severe), difficulty in going to sleep due to nasal symptoms (DSNS) (0- Not at all, 1- Little, 2- Moderately, 3- Very), and nighttime awakenings due to nasal symptoms (NANS) (0- Not at all, 1- Once, 2- More than once, 3- I felt like I was awake all night). Each participant's Baseline NSS was defined as the average of the NSS calculated for the day of randomization and the three highest NSS scores calculated during the six days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline NSS for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average NSS over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline NSS.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (9)
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (N-rTNSS) and Component Nasal Symptoms Score
The nighttime reflective assessments were recorded each morning and assessed 4 nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, sneezing) at evening and night using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). Scores of each of the 4 symptoms were summed for each participant to create a N-rTNSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). Each participant's Baseline total score was average of nighttime total symptom score on day of randomization and 3 highest scores calculated for 6 days immediately prior to day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline nighttime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Nighttime total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in D-rTNSS
The Daytime reflective assessments were recorded each evening and assessed 4 nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing) at evening and night using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The scores of each of the four Daytime symptoms were summed for each participant to create a D-rTNSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). Each participant's Baseline total symptom score was the average of the four highest total symptom score calculated for the seven days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline Daytime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Daytime total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participants Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in 24-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (24-hour rTNSS) and Component Nasal Score
Daily 24-hour rTNSS was calculated as the average of the corresponding N-rTNSS and D-rTNSS using a 4-point scale where, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst). The 24-hour total symptom score for a Day is the average of the daytime total symptom score for that Day and the nighttime score for (D+1). If either component of a given date's 24-hour total symptom score was missing, then the 24-hour total symptom score itself were to be set to missing. Each participant's average change from Baseline 24-hour total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participants average 24-hour total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (N-rTOSS)
The nighttime reflective assessments were recorded each morning and assessed 3 ocular symptoms (tearing/watering, itching/burning, and redness) at evening and night using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). Scores of each of 3 Nighttime symptoms were summed for each participant to create a N-rTOSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). Each participants Baseline total score was average of nighttime total symptom score on day of randomization and the 3 highest scores calculated for 6 days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline nighttime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Nighttime total symptom score over treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Daytime Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (D-rTOSS)
The Daytime reflective assessments were recorded each evening and assessed the 3 nasal symptoms (tearing/watering, itching/burning, and redness) at evening and night using a 4-point scale where, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The scores of each of the three Daytime symptoms were summed for each participant to create a D-rTOSS for each day. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). Each participants Baseline total symptom score was the average of the four highest total symptom score calculated for the seven days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline Daytime total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average Daytime total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in 24-hour Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (24-hour rTOSS)
Daily 24-hour rTOSS was calculated as the average of the corresponding N-rTOSS and D-rTOSS using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). The 24-hour total symptom score for a Day is the average of the daytime total symptom score for that Day and the nighttime score for (D+1). If either component of a given date's 24-hour total symptom score was missing, then the 24-hour total symptom score itself was to be set to missing. Each participant's average change from Baseline 24-hour total symptom score for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average 24-hour total symptom score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score. Baseline is the 4 highest scores calculated for the 7 days prior to Day 1.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (Pre-dose iTNSS) and Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (Pre-dose iTOSS)
Participants were instructed to score and document their symptoms in an instantaneous manner on a diary card. The instantaneous rating was performed once daily just prior to administering their morning dose. The scores of each of the instantaneous nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing) and ocular symptoms (tearing/watering, itching/burning, and redness) were summed for each participant to create a iTNSS and iTOSS, respectively using a 4-point scale, 0- 'None' (symptom is not present), 1- 'Mild' (sign/symptom present; easily tolerated), 2- 'Moderate' (sign/symptom bothersome but tolerable), 3- 'Severe' (sign/symptom hard to tolerate; interference with activities of daily living). Total score ranged from 0 (best) to 12 (worst) for iTNSS and 0 (best) to 9 (worst) for iTOSS. Each participant's average change from Baseline iTNSS and iTOSS was participant's average iTNSS and iTOSS total score over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Peak NasalIinspiratory Flow (PNIF)
PNIF was measured by participants using an In-Check Nasal portable hand-held inspiratory flow meter and face mask. Participants recorded PNIF twice daily (in the morning prior to taking their study medication and in the evening). Three measurements were taken on each occasion and the highest measurement recorded on the electronic diary. Each participant's average change from Baseline PNIF was the participant's average PNIF over the treatment period minus the participant's baseline PNIF.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline for Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NRQLQ)
The NRQLQ is a paper instrument administered on the day of randomization and at Visit 4/Early Withdrawal to assess nocturnal rhinitis-related quality of life. The NRQLQ is a 16-item, self-administered, disease-specific (allergic rhinitis), and quality of life instrument that measures the functional problems most troublesome to patients with nocturnal allergy symptoms over a one-week interval. Each question is scored from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating more nocturnal impairment. Items are grouped into four domains: Sleep problems, Sleep time problems, Symptoms on waking in the morning and Practical problems. An overall score was calculated from the mean score of all items. Each participant's average change from Baseline NRQLQ score was the participant's average NRQLQ score over the treatment period minus the participant's baseline score.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study start20 Dec 2006
- Primary completion1 Feb 2007
- Study completion28 Feb 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00435461
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FFU109045
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 7 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Andrews C, Martin B, Jacobs R, Toler T, Prillaman B, Philpot E. Efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray versus oral fexofenadine on nighttime sleep disturbance caused by seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) nasal symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 100(1) (Supplement 1):A6 (abstract)
Andrews CP, Martin BG, Jacobs RL, Diaz J, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Dalal AA, Philpot EE. Once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray showed greater improvement in nocturnal quality of life in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with oral fexofenadine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121(2) (Supplement 1): S53 (abstract)
Andrews CP, Martin BG, Jacobs RL, Mohar DE, Diaz JD, Amar NJ, Kaiser HB, Vandewalker ML, Bernstein J, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Dalal AA, Lee LA, Philpot EE. Fluticasone furoate nasal spray is more effective than fexofenadine for nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):128-38. doi: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3204.
PubMed 19463203Martin BG, Andrews CP, Jacobs R, Mohar D, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Philpot EE. Once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray showed greater improvements in relieving nighttime nasal symptoms and increasing peak nasal inspiratory flow versus oral fexofenadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121(2) (Supplement 1): S54-S55 (abstract)
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Oral Fexofenadine in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00435461
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FFU109045
- Conditions
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
- Keywords
- once daily, mountain cedar, fexofenadine, allergic rhinitis, fluticasone furoate
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2006
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the nighttime symptom relief of fluticasone furoate nasal spray and oral fexofenadine
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Informed consent.
- Outpatient.
- Females of child-bearing potential must use appropriate contraception.
- Diagnosis of seasonal allergic rhinitis to mountain cedar.
- Adequate exposure to allergen.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Significant concomitant medical condition.
- Use of corticosteroids, allergy medications, or other medication that affect allergic rhinitis
- Positive pregnancy test.
- Allergy to any component of the investigational product.
- Tobacco use
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadineFluticasone furoate and fexofenadine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Symptoms Score (NSS)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
The NSS is a three-item questionnaire which assesses three aspects of allergic rhinitis symptoms at night which were rated using three 4-point scales, the sum of which comprises NSS. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 9 (worst). The symptoms were: PM nasal congestion upon awakening (PMNCA) (0- None, 1- Mild, 2- Moderate, 3- Severe), difficulty in going to sleep due to nasal symptoms (DSNS) (0- Not at all, 1- Little, 2- Moderately, 3- Very), and nighttime awakenings due to nasal symptoms (NANS) (0- Not at all, 1- Once, 2- More than once, 3- I felt like I was awake all night). Each participant's Baseline NSS was defined as the average of the NSS calculated for the day of randomization and the three highest NSS scores calculated during the six days immediately prior to the day of randomization. Each participant's average change from Baseline NSS for Weeks 1-2 was the participant's average NSS over the treatment period minus the participant's Baseline NSS.
9 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (N-rTNSS) and Component Nasal Symptoms Score
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in D-rTNSS
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in 24-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (24-hour rTNSS) and Component Nasal Score
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (N-rTOSS)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Daytime Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (D-rTOSS)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in 24-hour Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (24-hour rTOSS)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (Pre-dose iTNSS) and Pre-dose Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (Pre-dose iTOSS)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Peak NasalIinspiratory Flow (PNIF)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks
Mean Change From Baseline for Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (NRQLQ)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BackgroundAndrews C, Martin B, Jacobs R, Toler T, Prillaman B, Philpot E. Efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray versus oral fexofenadine on nighttime sleep disturbance caused by seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) nasal symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 100(1) (Supplement 1):A6 (abstract)
- BackgroundAndrews CP, Martin BG, Jacobs RL, Diaz J, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Dalal AA, Philpot EE. Once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray showed greater improvement in nocturnal quality of life in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with oral fexofenadine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121(2) (Supplement 1): S53 (abstract)
- Background: PubMed 19463203Andrews CP, Martin BG, Jacobs RL, Mohar DE, Diaz JD, Amar NJ, Kaiser HB, Vandewalker ML, Bernstein J, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Dalal AA, Lee LA, Philpot EE. Fluticasone furoate nasal spray is more effective than fexofenadine for nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):128-38. doi: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3204.
- BackgroundMartin BG, Andrews CP, Jacobs R, Mohar D, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Philpot EE. Once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray showed greater improvements in relieving nighttime nasal symptoms and increasing peak nasal inspiratory flow versus oral fexofenadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;121(2) (Supplement 1): S54-S55 (abstract)
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability And Pharmacodynamics of DM-101PX in Birch Pollen Allergy
Birch Pollen Allergy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SHR-1819 Injection in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Identification of Allergen-reactive Antibodies in the Blood of Pollen Allergic Patients
Pollen Allergy
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Nasal and Ocular Immune Response to Conjunctival Allergen Exposure
Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of PL-14 Allergy Blocker Compared to Saline Spray in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR), Allergic Rhinitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Fluticasone furoate and fexofenadine in people with Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Two-week Treatment Period in Nighttime Symptoms Score (NSS) (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 2 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00435461, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2018.