AzTrials
AzTrials

Ovarian Hyperstimulation SyndromePhase 3NCT00440258

Cabergoline Reduces OHSS

A Phase 3 study testing Cabergoline, MR and Ultrasound in people with Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, run by Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study was designed to provide clinical confirmation of Cb2's value as a new approach in the prevention of increased vascular permeability and hemoconcentration, both signs of OHSS in humans, and in order to explore its mechanism of action. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
What is being tested?
Cabergoline, MR and Ultrasound
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2004to Jul 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 - 35 years old healthy women, with risk of developing OHSS.

Who cannot join

  • No risk of developing OHSS; < 20 oocytes retrieved.

About this study

Official title: Dopamine Agonist Cabergoline Reduces Hemoconcentration and Ascites in Hyperstimulated Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction.

The present study was designed to provide clinical confirmation of Cb2's value as a new approach in the prevention of increased vascular permeability and hemoconcentration, both signs of OHSS in humans, and in order to explore its mechanism of action. To this end, a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed in which Cb2 was employed in women at risk of OHSS after gonadotropin administration for ART. Simultaneously, ovarian perfusion was assessed in these patients using MR pharmacokinetic modeling.

Read the detailed description

Patients and Study design This study was performed in 82 oocyte donors between April 2004 and July 2006. The study protocol was approved by our institution's Ethical Committee and all participants signed a written consent form. The protocol for COH has previously been described (23). Only patients at risk of developing OHSS were included. The definition of risk was the development of 20-30 follicles >12 mm in diameter, and retrieval of >20 oocytes. Once the decision to administer hCG was taken, patients were immediately allocated into two groups based on a computer randomization: the study group initially consisted of 41 patients, but 6 of these were discarded after randomization because <20 oocytes were retrieved despite the development of >20 follicles >12 mm. Thus, a remaining total of 35 patients received one 0.5 mg tablet of Cb2 daily for eight days. The control group was also initially composed of 41 women. However, 7 of these did not meet the criteria of number of oocytes retrieved, and 2 donors decided to withdraw themselves from the study. This left a remaining total of 32 women, all of whom completed the study, and who received a placebo tablet daily for 8 days. Women were monitored every 48 hours from the day of hCG (day 0) until day 8.

On day hCG+4, in order to define ascites, and provided that there was a certain degree of fluid in the pouch of Douglas after ovum pick-up, we employed transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) to measure two major perpendicular diameters of fluid pockets in 15 donors who showed no risk of OHSS. We observed 3.5±2.8 cm2 of fluid in the pelvis in normal conditions. Therefore, the existence of ascites was confirmed when a pocket of peritoneal fluid >9 cm2 was observed when the patient was in lithotomy position (with the gynecological table always at 45º from the floor of the room), which is the result of the mean± 2 standard deviations (SD) of the value found in non-OHSS candidates. TVU scans were performed by the same researcher (CA), who was blind to the treatment to which the patient was submitted. A 6.5 MHz vaginal probe (Voluson 730 Pro V, General Electric, Madrid, Spain) was employed for all TVU scans.

To evaluate the biochemical risk of hemoconcentration, we evaluated hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocyte count. Moreover, renal (creatinine) and liver [transaminases: aspartate aminotransferase (AST); alanine aminotransferase (ALT)] functions, and electrolytes (Na, K) were analyzed to ascertain the severity of the syndrome.

Since all women undergoing ART experience a certain degree of discomfort and enlarged ovaries (known as mild OHSS), we centered our attention on analyzing the incidence of moderate and severe OHSS, which were identified according to our modified (24) classification of Golan et al (25). Moderate OHSS was confirmed when a patient presented ultrasonographic evidence of ascites, while diagnosis of severe OHSS required clinical evidence of ascites and/or hydrothorax and breathing difficulties, or one of the following criteria: a) increased blood viscosity due to hemoconcentration (hemoglobin ≥15 g/dl, hematocrit ≥45%, or leukocyte count ≥20,000/mm3); b) coagulation abnormality; c) diminished renal perfusion and function (serum creatinine levels >1.2 mg/dl); d)liver dysfunction: defined when transaminases (AST or ALT) were >40 U/ml (24, 25).

Additionally, serum PRL levels were measured and adverse drug reactions recorded. An end-of-study assessment was scheduled 7-10 days after the last dose of Cb2/placebo.

Moreover, in the first 8 patients included in the study, follicular fluid aspirates without obvious blood contamination were collected, pooled and and mRNA extracted to quantify the amount of Dp-r2 in human ovaries, employing two different molecular techniques.

To further objectively analyze changes in vascular permeability and fluid shifts, confirmatory studies were performed on six women in the study group and four controls, employing magnetic resonance (MR) as described below. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR was performed at three different stages of the study: at baseline, before gonadotropin administration was initiated; just before hCG injection; and on day hCG+5, after oocyte pick-up.

Being tested
Cabergoline, MR, Ultrasound, Blood Analysis
Keywords
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, dopamine agonists, cabergoline, hemoconcentration, ascites, ovarian perfusion, dopamine receptor 2
Medical subject headings
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, Ascites

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CabergolineDrug

  • MRProcedure or surgery

  • UltrasoundProcedure or surgery

  • Blood AnalysisProcedure or surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2004
  3. Study completionJul 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
60 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00440258
Sponsor's protocol ID
VLC-AP-404-207-1
Status last verified
Feb 2007
First submitted
23 Feb 2007
Last updated
27 Feb 2007
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Cabergoline, MR and Ultrasound in people with Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, run by Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2007.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in