Ovarian Hyperstimulation SyndromePhase 3NCT00440258
Cabergoline Reduces OHSS
A Phase 3 study testing Cabergoline, MR and Ultrasound in people with Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, run by Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA.
Trial summary
The present study was designed to provide clinical confirmation of Cb2's value as a new approach in the prevention of increased vascular permeability and hemoconcentration, both signs of OHSS in humans, and in order to explore its mechanism of action. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Cabergoline, MR and Ultrasound
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2004to Jul 2006
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 - 35 years old healthy women, with risk of developing OHSS.
Who cannot join
- No risk of developing OHSS; < 20 oocytes retrieved.
About this study
Official title: Dopamine Agonist Cabergoline Reduces Hemoconcentration and Ascites in Hyperstimulated Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction.
The present study was designed to provide clinical confirmation of Cb2's value as a new approach in the prevention of increased vascular permeability and hemoconcentration, both signs of OHSS in humans, and in order to explore its mechanism of action. To this end, a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed in which Cb2 was employed in women at risk of OHSS after gonadotropin administration for ART. Simultaneously, ovarian perfusion was assessed in these patients using MR pharmacokinetic modeling.
Read the detailed description
Patients and Study design This study was performed in 82 oocyte donors between April 2004 and July 2006. The study protocol was approved by our institution's Ethical Committee and all participants signed a written consent form. The protocol for COH has previously been described (23). Only patients at risk of developing OHSS were included. The definition of risk was the development of 20-30 follicles >12 mm in diameter, and retrieval of >20 oocytes. Once the decision to administer hCG was taken, patients were immediately allocated into two groups based on a computer randomization: the study group initially consisted of 41 patients, but 6 of these were discarded after randomization because <20 oocytes were retrieved despite the development of >20 follicles >12 mm. Thus, a remaining total of 35 patients received one 0.5 mg tablet of Cb2 daily for eight days. The control group was also initially composed of 41 women. However, 7 of these did not meet the criteria of number of oocytes retrieved, and 2 donors decided to withdraw themselves from the study. This left a remaining total of 32 women, all of whom completed the study, and who received a placebo tablet daily for 8 days. Women were monitored every 48 hours from the day of hCG (day 0) until day 8.
On day hCG+4, in order to define ascites, and provided that there was a certain degree of fluid in the pouch of Douglas after ovum pick-up, we employed transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) to measure two major perpendicular diameters of fluid pockets in 15 donors who showed no risk of OHSS. We observed 3.5±2.8 cm2 of fluid in the pelvis in normal conditions. Therefore, the existence of ascites was confirmed when a pocket of peritoneal fluid >9 cm2 was observed when the patient was in lithotomy position (with the gynecological table always at 45º from the floor of the room), which is the result of the mean± 2 standard deviations (SD) of the value found in non-OHSS candidates. TVU scans were performed by the same researcher (CA), who was blind to the treatment to which the patient was submitted. A 6.5 MHz vaginal probe (Voluson 730 Pro V, General Electric, Madrid, Spain) was employed for all TVU scans.
To evaluate the biochemical risk of hemoconcentration, we evaluated hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocyte count. Moreover, renal (creatinine) and liver [transaminases: aspartate aminotransferase (AST); alanine aminotransferase (ALT)] functions, and electrolytes (Na, K) were analyzed to ascertain the severity of the syndrome.
Since all women undergoing ART experience a certain degree of discomfort and enlarged ovaries (known as mild OHSS), we centered our attention on analyzing the incidence of moderate and severe OHSS, which were identified according to our modified (24) classification of Golan et al (25). Moderate OHSS was confirmed when a patient presented ultrasonographic evidence of ascites, while diagnosis of severe OHSS required clinical evidence of ascites and/or hydrothorax and breathing difficulties, or one of the following criteria: a) increased blood viscosity due to hemoconcentration (hemoglobin ≥15 g/dl, hematocrit ≥45%, or leukocyte count ≥20,000/mm3); b) coagulation abnormality; c) diminished renal perfusion and function (serum creatinine levels >1.2 mg/dl); d)liver dysfunction: defined when transaminases (AST or ALT) were >40 U/ml (24, 25).
Additionally, serum PRL levels were measured and adverse drug reactions recorded. An end-of-study assessment was scheduled 7-10 days after the last dose of Cb2/placebo.
Moreover, in the first 8 patients included in the study, follicular fluid aspirates without obvious blood contamination were collected, pooled and and mRNA extracted to quantify the amount of Dp-r2 in human ovaries, employing two different molecular techniques.
To further objectively analyze changes in vascular permeability and fluid shifts, confirmatory studies were performed on six women in the study group and four controls, employing magnetic resonance (MR) as described below. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR was performed at three different stages of the study: at baseline, before gonadotropin administration was initiated; just before hCG injection; and on day hCG+5, after oocyte pick-up.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- Being tested
- Cabergoline, MR, Ultrasound, Blood Analysis
- Keywords
- Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, dopamine agonists, cabergoline, hemoconcentration, ascites, ovarian perfusion, dopamine receptor 2
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, Ascites
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CabergolineDrug
MRProcedure or surgery
UltrasoundProcedure or surgery
Blood AnalysisProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2004
- Study completionJul 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ovarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 60 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Antonio Pellicer, MD, Study director, IVI VALENCIA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00440258
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VLC-AP-404-207-1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2007
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dopamine Agonist Cabergoline Reduces Hemoconcentration and Ascites in Hyperstimulated Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00440258
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VLC-AP-404-207-1
- Conditions
- Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
- Keywords
- Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, dopamine agonists, cabergoline, hemoconcentration, ascites, ovarian perfusion, dopamine receptor 2
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIAUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2004
- Study completion
- Jul 2006
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study was designed to provide clinical confirmation of Cb2's value as a new approach in the prevention of increased vascular permeability and hemoconcentration, both signs of OHSS in humans, and in order to explore its mechanism of action. To this end, a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed in which Cb2 was employed in women at risk of OHSS after gonadotropin administration for ART. Simultaneously, ovarian perfusion was assessed in these patients using MR pharmacokinetic modeling.
Detailed description
Patients and Study design This study was performed in 82 oocyte donors between April 2004 and July 2006. The study protocol was approved by our institution's Ethical Committee and all participants signed a written consent form. The protocol for COH has previously been described (23). Only patients at risk of developing OHSS were included. The definition of risk was the development of 20-30 follicles >12 mm in diameter, and retrieval of >20 oocytes. Once the decision to administer hCG was taken, patients were immediately allocated into two groups based on a computer randomization: the study group initially consisted of 41 patients, but 6 of these were discarded after randomization because <20 oocytes were retrieved despite the development of >20 follicles >12 mm. Thus, a remaining total of 35 patients received one 0.5 mg tablet of Cb2 daily for eight days. The control group was also initially composed of 41 women. However, 7 of these did not meet the criteria of number of oocytes retrieved, and 2 donors decided to withdraw themselves from the study. This left a remaining total of 32 women, all of whom completed the study, and who received a placebo tablet daily for 8 days. Women were monitored every 48 hours from the day of hCG (day 0) until day 8.
On day hCG+4, in order to define ascites, and provided that there was a certain degree of fluid in the pouch of Douglas after ovum pick-up, we employed transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) to measure two major perpendicular diameters of fluid pockets in 15 donors who showed no risk of OHSS. We observed 3.5±2.8 cm2 of fluid in the pelvis in normal conditions. Therefore, the existence of ascites was confirmed when a pocket of peritoneal fluid >9 cm2 was observed when the patient was in lithotomy position (with the gynecological table always at 45º from the floor of the room), which is the result of the mean± 2 standard deviations (SD) of the value found in non-OHSS candidates. TVU scans were performed by the same researcher (CA), who was blind to the treatment to which the patient was submitted. A 6.5 MHz vaginal probe (Voluson 730 Pro V, General Electric, Madrid, Spain) was employed for all TVU scans.
To evaluate the biochemical risk of hemoconcentration, we evaluated hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocyte count. Moreover, renal (creatinine) and liver [transaminases: aspartate aminotransferase (AST); alanine aminotransferase (ALT)] functions, and electrolytes (Na, K) were analyzed to ascertain the severity of the syndrome.
Since all women undergoing ART experience a certain degree of discomfort and enlarged ovaries (known as mild OHSS), we centered our attention on analyzing the incidence of moderate and severe OHSS, which were identified according to our modified (24) classification of Golan et al (25). Moderate OHSS was confirmed when a patient presented ultrasonographic evidence of ascites, while diagnosis of severe OHSS required clinical evidence of ascites and/or hydrothorax and breathing difficulties, or one of the following criteria: a) increased blood viscosity due to hemoconcentration (hemoglobin ≥15 g/dl, hematocrit ≥45%, or leukocyte count ≥20,000/mm3); b) coagulation abnormality; c) diminished renal perfusion and function (serum creatinine levels >1.2 mg/dl); d)liver dysfunction: defined when transaminases (AST or ALT) were >40 U/ml (24, 25).
Additionally, serum PRL levels were measured and adverse drug reactions recorded. An end-of-study assessment was scheduled 7-10 days after the last dose of Cb2/placebo.
Moreover, in the first 8 patients included in the study, follicular fluid aspirates without obvious blood contamination were collected, pooled and and mRNA extracted to quantify the amount of Dp-r2 in human ovaries, employing two different molecular techniques.
To further objectively analyze changes in vascular permeability and fluid shifts, confirmatory studies were performed on six women in the study group and four controls, employing magnetic resonance (MR) as described below. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR was performed at three different stages of the study: at baseline, before gonadotropin administration was initiated; just before hCG injection; and on day hCG+5, after oocyte pick-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 18 - 35 years old healthy women, with risk of developing OHSS.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No risk of developing OHSS; < 20 oocytes retrieved.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cabergoline | Drug | – |
| MR | Procedure or surgery | – |
| Ultrasound | Procedure or surgery | – |
| Blood Analysis | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2007.
Related trials for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Cabergoline to Coasting in Reducing the Incidence of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Gynecologic Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evidence on Follitropin Delta Individual Dosing
Infertility, Sterility
Recruiting
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Prevention
Ovarian Hyper Stimulation Syndrome (OHSS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Antonio Pellicer, MD study director
IVI VALENCIA
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cabergoline, MR and Ultrasound in people with Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, run by Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2007.