HypertensionPhase 3NCT00441350
Olmesartan/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg Combination Therapy Versus Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy in Essential Hypertension
A Phase 3 study testing OM 40 and OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 in people with Hypertension, run by Menarini Group at 65 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study was to assess the anti-hypertensive effect of OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination therapy compared to OM 40 mg monotherapy in lowering sitting diastolic BP in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- OM 40 and OM/HCTZ 40/12.5
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,004 participants
- Where
- 65 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to May 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension, either treatment-naive or including currently on anti-hypertensive medication (in Italy only treatment naive patients) in whom it is medically justifiable to withdraw treatment , and who are likely to meet the required BP inclusion criteria at randomisation:
- Mean sitting dBP ≥ 100 mmHg and ≤ 120 mmHg.
- Mean sitting sBP ≥ 160 mmHg and ≤ 200 mmHg.
- Main Exclusion Criteria:
- Mean sitting sBP values > 200 mmHg and/or dBP > 120 mmHg.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Patients with serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of the tested medication, including cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine or metabolic, haematological, oncological, neurological, and psychiatric diseases. The same applies for immunocompromised and/or neutropenic patients.
- Patients with secondary hypertension of any aetiology such as renal disease, pheochromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 8 countries.
65 sites in 8 countries
Germany16 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Cologne
Study site
Dresden
Study site
Einbeck
Study site
Essen
Study site
Giengen an der Brenz
Study site
Großheirath
Study site
Hamburg
Study site
Hanau
Study site
Heidelberg
Study site
Künzing
Study site
Leipzig
Study site
Lollar
Study site
Mannheim
Study site
München
Study site
Nuremberg
Czechia10 sites
Study site
Benátky nad Jizerou
Study site
Bílovec
Study site
Brodce
Study site
Jablonec nad Nisou
Study site
Mladá Boleslav
Study site
Prague
Study site
Rokycany
Study site
Tábor
Study site
Teplice
Study site
Uničov
Israel9 sites
Study site
Ashkelon
Study site
Beersheba
Study site
Haifa
Study site
Jerusalem
Study site
Kfar Saba
Study site
Nahariya
Study site
Petah Tikva
Study site
Tel Aviv
Study site
Tel HaShomer
Italy8 sites
Study site
Busto Arsizio
Study site
Ferrara
Study site
Pavia
Study site
Pisa
Study site
San Daniele del Friuli
Study site
Sassari
Study site
Somma Lombardo
Study site
Venezia
Poland7 sites
Study site
Bialystok
Study site
Gdansk
Study site
Gdynia
Study site
Lublin
Study site
Płock
Study site
Wąbrzeżno
Study site
Warsaw
Croatia6 sites
Study site
Rijeka
Study site
Slavonski Brod
Study site
Split
Study site
Varaždin
Study site
Zadar
Study site
Zagreb
Romania6 sites
Study site
Baia Mare
Study site
Brăila
Study site
Bucharest
Study site
Cluj-Napoca
Study site
Oradea
Study site
Suceava
Denmark3 sites
Study site
Aalborg
Study site
Ballerup Municipality
Study site
Vejle
About this study
Official title: Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil/Hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg Combination Therapy Versus Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension
The primary objective of this study was to assess the anti-hypertensive effect of OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination therapy compared to OM 40 mg monotherapy in lowering sitting diastolic BP in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment.
The study consisted of two sequential phases of 8 weeks duration each:
Read more
During the first phase, OM 40 mg monotherapy was compared with OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg in order to evaluate the additional benefit of OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg in the treatment of essential moderate to severe hypertension.
During the second phase, patients whose BP proved to be insufficiently controlled by the OM 40 mg monotherapy were to start OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination therapy while patients whose BP proved to be insufficiently controlled by the OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination were to be up-titrated to the OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg combination to evaluate the additional benefit of the up-titrated combination.
The study was be conducted by qualified and experienced personnel with adherence to GCP, current guidelines on the design of studies in hypertension, the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles based on the Declaration of Helsinki.
Read the detailed description
Methodology:
After the signature of the informed consent, patients were screened for eligibility and eligible patients entered into a pre-randomisation period consisting of a taper-off phase of approximately 1-2 weeks (during which patients treated for hypertension were to discontinue their antihypertensive therapy) followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in phase (Visit 1). After conclusion of the placebo run-in phase (Visit 2), eligible patients were randomised to the double-blind active treatment period which consisted of two phases:
First double-blind treatment phase (Phase A, from Randomisation to Week 8):
Eligible patients with mean sitting sBP ≥ 160 and ≤ 200 mmHg and dBP ≥ 100 mmHg and ≤ 120 mmHg were randomised in a 1:2 ratio to receive either OM 40 mg or OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg for a total of 8 weeks of treatment (Phase A). Study visits were held after 4 and 8 weeks of double-blind active treatment (Visit 3 and 4, respectively). After 8 weeks (Visit 4), patients reaching the BP goal of < 140/90 mmHg or < 130/80 mmHg for diabetics were considered as responders. All patients (responders and non-responders) then entered into the titration phase of the study (Phase B):
Second double-blind treatment phase/titration phase (Phase B, from Week 8 to Week 16):
Treatment assignment in the second part of the study was based on the following criteria:
- Responders to Phase A treatment continued to receive the same double-blind treatment for an additional 8 weeks.
- Non-responders Phase A treatment had their treatment assigned as follows:
- Non-responders to OM 40 mg were treated with OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg for an additional 8 weeks.
- Non-responders to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg were uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg for an additional 8 weeks. During Phase B of the study, visits were held 12 and 16 weeks after randomisation (Visits 5 and 6, respectively).
The study ended at Visit 6 and a final examination was performed. A safety follow-up (SFU) telephone contact was performed 2 weeks after the end of the treatment. An SFU visit was performed if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Sphygmomanometer was used for BP measurement throughout the trial. BP was measured at all visits as nearly as possible at the same time of the day as trough readings (24 ± 2 h after last drug intake) after a 10 minute rest period. Three separate sitting BP measurements were taken at least 1 minute apart from each other. The 3 results were then averaged and rounded to a whole integer.
Patients with sBP values > 200 mmHg and/or dBP values > 120 mmHg at any time during the study were to be discontinued from the study.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- OM 40, OM/HCTZ 40/12.5
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OM 40Drug
Also called Treatment
Initially patients were to be treated with Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM)40 mg tablets once daily for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks non-responders were to be uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg and responders remained on the previous therapy for further 8 weeks.
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5Drug
Also called Treatment
Initially patients were to be treated with Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM) /Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)40/12.5 mg tablets once daily for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks non-responders were to be uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg and responders remained on the previous therapy for further 8 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OM 40 | Active comparator | Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM)40 mg tablets. Receives: Drug: OM 40 |
| OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 | Experimental | Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM) /Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)40/12.5 mg tablets. Receives: Drug: OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
dBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase A
Reduction in Mean Trough Sitting dBP (mmHg) from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8
Measured: Eight weeks
sBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase A
Reduction in Mean Trough Sitting sBP (mmHg) from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8
Measured: Eight weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
dBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase B
Reduction in trough sitting diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of additional treatment, depending on Phase A treatment and outcome (responder/non-responder).
Measured: Eight weeks
sBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase B
Reduction in trough sitting systolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of additional treatment, depending on Phase A treatment and outcome (responder/non-responder).
Measured: Eight weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionMay 2008
- Study completionMay 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,004 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Menarini Group
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo Europe, GmbH, a Daiichi Sankyo Company
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Roberto Fogari, MD, Principal investigator, Medical Clinic Policlinico San Matteo University of Pavia Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00441350
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS866CM-B-E303
- Status last verified
- Jun 2009
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fogari R, Taddei S, Holm-Bentzen M, Baszak J, Melani L, Schumacher K. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination therapy versus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase III study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(9):581-97. doi: 10.2165/11536710-000000000-00000.
PubMed 20593911
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil/Hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg Combination Therapy Versus Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00441350
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CS866CM-B-E303
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,004 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Menarini GroupIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Daiichi Sankyo Europe, GmbH, a Daiichi Sankyo Company
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Jul 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the anti-hypertensive effect of OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination therapy compared to OM 40 mg monotherapy in lowering sitting diastolic BP in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment.
The study consisted of two sequential phases of 8 weeks duration each:
During the first phase, OM 40 mg monotherapy was compared with OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg in order to evaluate the additional benefit of OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg in the treatment of essential moderate to severe hypertension.
During the second phase, patients whose BP proved to be insufficiently controlled by the OM 40 mg monotherapy were to start OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination therapy while patients whose BP proved to be insufficiently controlled by the OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination were to be up-titrated to the OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg combination to evaluate the additional benefit of the up-titrated combination.
The study was be conducted by qualified and experienced personnel with adherence to GCP, current guidelines on the design of studies in hypertension, the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles based on the Declaration of Helsinki.
Detailed description
Methodology:
After the signature of the informed consent, patients were screened for eligibility and eligible patients entered into a pre-randomisation period consisting of a taper-off phase of approximately 1-2 weeks (during which patients treated for hypertension were to discontinue their antihypertensive therapy) followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in phase (Visit 1). After conclusion of the placebo run-in phase (Visit 2), eligible patients were randomised to the double-blind active treatment period which consisted of two phases:
First double-blind treatment phase (Phase A, from Randomisation to Week 8):
Eligible patients with mean sitting sBP ≥ 160 and ≤ 200 mmHg and dBP ≥ 100 mmHg and ≤ 120 mmHg were randomised in a 1:2 ratio to receive either OM 40 mg or OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg for a total of 8 weeks of treatment (Phase A). Study visits were held after 4 and 8 weeks of double-blind active treatment (Visit 3 and 4, respectively). After 8 weeks (Visit 4), patients reaching the BP goal of < 140/90 mmHg or < 130/80 mmHg for diabetics were considered as responders. All patients (responders and non-responders) then entered into the titration phase of the study (Phase B):
Second double-blind treatment phase/titration phase (Phase B, from Week 8 to Week 16):
Treatment assignment in the second part of the study was based on the following criteria:
- Responders to Phase A treatment continued to receive the same double-blind treatment for an additional 8 weeks.
- Non-responders Phase A treatment had their treatment assigned as follows:
- Non-responders to OM 40 mg were treated with OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg for an additional 8 weeks.
- Non-responders to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg were uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg for an additional 8 weeks. During Phase B of the study, visits were held 12 and 16 weeks after randomisation (Visits 5 and 6, respectively).
The study ended at Visit 6 and a final examination was performed. A safety follow-up (SFU) telephone contact was performed 2 weeks after the end of the treatment. An SFU visit was performed if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Sphygmomanometer was used for BP measurement throughout the trial. BP was measured at all visits as nearly as possible at the same time of the day as trough readings (24 ± 2 h after last drug intake) after a 10 minute rest period. Three separate sitting BP measurements were taken at least 1 minute apart from each other. The 3 results were then averaged and rounded to a whole integer.
Patients with sBP values > 200 mmHg and/or dBP values > 120 mmHg at any time during the study were to be discontinued from the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OM 40 | Active comparator | Drug: OM 40Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM)40 mg tablets. |
| OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 | Experimental | Drug: OM/HCTZ 40/12.5Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM) /Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)40/12.5 mg tablets. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension, either treatment-naive or including currently on anti-hypertensive medication (in Italy only treatment naive patients) in whom it is medically justifiable to withdraw treatment , and who are likely to meet the required BP inclusion criteria at randomisation:
- Mean sitting sBP values > 200 mmHg and/or dBP > 120 mmHg.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Patients with serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of the tested medication, including cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine or metabolic, haematological, oncological, neurological, and psychiatric diseases. The same applies for immunocompromised and/or neutropenic patients.
- Patients with secondary hypertension of any aetiology such as renal disease, pheochromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OM 40Also: TreatmentInitially patients were to be treated with Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM)40 mg tablets once daily for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks non-responders were to be uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg and responders remained on the previous therapy for further 8 weeks. | Drug | OM 40 |
| OM/HCTZ 40/12.5Also: TreatmentInitially patients were to be treated with Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM) /Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)40/12.5 mg tablets once daily for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks non-responders were to be uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg and responders remained on the previous therapy for further 8 weeks. | Drug | OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 |
Primary outcome
dBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase A
Time frame: Eight weeks
Reduction in Mean Trough Sitting dBP (mmHg) from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8
sBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase A
Time frame: Eight weeks
Reduction in Mean Trough Sitting sBP (mmHg) from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8
2 secondary outcomes
dBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase B
Time frame: Eight weeks
sBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase B
Time frame: Eight weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20593911Fogari R, Taddei S, Holm-Bentzen M, Baszak J, Melani L, Schumacher K. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination therapy versus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase III study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(9):581-97. doi: 10.2165/11536710-000000000-00000.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roberto Fogari, MD principal investigator
Medical Clinic Policlinico San Matteo University of Pavia Italy
65 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing OM 40 and OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 in people with Hypertension, run by Menarini Group at 65 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in Germany, Czechia, Israel, Italy, Poland and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
dBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase A (time frame: Eight weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00441350, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2021.