Prostate CancerNCT00442000
Outcomes Comparison of Robotic, Retropubic, and Perineal Prostatectomy
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Compare peri-operative and postoperative outcomes of the three different surgical approaches to prostatectomy Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Prostatectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 700 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2005to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing prostatectomy at William Beaumont-Royal Oak.
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age
- Radical Prostatectomy at William Beaumont Hospital
Who cannot join
- Dementia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
About this study
Compare peri-operative and postoperative outcomes of the three different surgical approaches to prostatectomy
Read the detailed description
Existing data collected from Prostatectomy Database study and Urology Database study will be analyzed. Compare peri-operative and postoperative outcomes of the three different surgical approaches to prostatectomy
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Prostatectomy
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer, Prostatectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ProstatectomyProcedure or surgery
Patients undergoing prostatectomy.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2005
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Corewell Health East
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kevin Feber, M.D., Principal investigator, Corewell Health East
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00442000
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E2007-024
- Status last verified
- Mar 2012
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcomes Comparison of Robotic, Retropubic, and Perineal Prostatectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00442000
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E2007-024
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer, Prostatectomy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Corewell Health EastUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2005
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Compare peri-operative and postoperative outcomes of the three different surgical approaches to prostatectomy
Detailed description
Existing data collected from Prostatectomy Database study and Urology Database study will be analyzed. Compare peri-operative and postoperative outcomes of the three different surgical approaches to prostatectomy
Study design
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing prostatectomy at William Beaumont-Royal Oak.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 18 years of age
- Radical Prostatectomy at William Beaumont Hospital
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Dementia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ProstatectomyPatients undergoing prostatectomy. | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2012.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin Feber, M.D. principal investigator
Corewell Health East
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2012.