Colorectal Cancer MetastaticPhase 3CAIRO3NCT00442637
Maintenance Treatment Versus Observation After Induction in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine + bevacizumab and observation in people with Colorectal Cancer Metastatic, run by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The optimal duration of systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is unknown. In this study the effects of bevacizumab and low-dose continuous chemotherapy with capecitabine is investigated in patients who have responded to 6 courses of oxaliplatin, capecitabine and bevacizumab ("induction… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
- What is being tested?
- capecitabine + bevacizumab and observation
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 635 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jan 2007to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained);
- Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible);
- Unidimensionally measurable disease (> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or > 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation;
- In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.
- Ongoing or planned first line treatment with 6 cycles of Xeloda, Eloxatin, and Avastin.
- WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky PS > 70%);
Show all 28Show fewer
- Disease evaluation with proven SD, PR or CR according to RECIST after 6 cycles of MTD chemotherapy performed in week 3-4 of the 6th cycle induction therapy, and randomisation performed in week 3-5 of the 6th cycle (see time table);
- Laboratory values obtained ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomisation: adequate bone marrow function (Hb > 6.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count > 1.5 x 109/L, platelets > 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, > 30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤ 3 x ULN without presence of liver metastases or ≤ 5x ULN with presence of liver metastases);
- Life expectancy > 12 weeks;
- Age >= 18 yrs;
- Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential;
- Expected adequacy of follow-up;
- Institutional Review Board approval;
- Written informed consent Exclusion criteria
- History or clinical signs/symptoms of CNS metastases;
- History of a second malignancy ≤ 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma of cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of skin;
- Previous intolerance of XelodaR, EloxatinR, and/or AvastinR for which any of these drugs have been permanently discontinued; patients with previous dose reductions or delays are eligible; patients with grade 2 neurotoxicity after the 6th cycle are eligible, and retreatment with EloxatinR after PFS1 should depend on the grade of neurotoxicity at that moment;
- Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency;
- (Planned) radical resection of all metastatic disease;
- Uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. consistently > 150/100 mmHg;
- Use of more than 3 antihypertensive drugs;
- Significant cardiovascular disease < 1 yr before randomisation (symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia or infarction, unstable angina pectoris, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular event, pulmonary embolism);
- Any of these significant cardiovascular events during previous fluoropyrimidine therapy;
- Chronic active infection;
- Any other concurrent severe or uncontrolled disease preventing the safe administration of study drugs;
- Any impairment of gastrointestinal function or -disease that may significantly impair the absorption of oral drugs (i.e. uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (defined as >CTC grade 2), malabsorption syndrome, bowel obstruction, or inability to swallow tablets);
- Concomitant treatments: concomitant (or within 4 weeks before randomisation) administration of any other experimental drug under investigation; concurrent treatment with any other anti-cancer therapy; full-dose anticoagulation (is allowed if started during induction therapy);
- Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents (except the use of corticosteroids as anti-emetic prophylaxis/treatment).
Who cannot join
- Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment
- Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases
- Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease
- At randomisation:
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Maintenance Treatment With Capecitabine and Bevacizumab Versus Observation After Induction Treatment With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
The optimal duration of systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is unknown.
In this study the effects of bevacizumab and low-dose continuous chemotherapy with capecitabine is investigated in patients who have responded to 6 courses of oxaliplatin, capecitabine and bevacizumab ("induction treatment", at standard doses). This treatment is continued until progression or severe toxicity. This regimen is compared to the effects a observation without treatment after the induction treatment.
In case of disease progression, induction treatment will be reintroduced.
Read the detailed description
Standard 1st-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer currently consists of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. With this approach the median overall survival is approximately 20 months, and progression-free survival in first-line approximately 9-11 months. The optimal duration of treatment is unknown. Current data suggest that the efficacy of bevacizumab is dependent on concomitant use of chemotherapy. However, oxaliplatin almost invariably gives rise to neuropathy after 6-8 cycles. Prolonged use of capecitabine is associated with e.g. hand-foot syndrome. Lastly, the prolonged use of these agents is associated with considerable costs.
Evidence, mainly preclinical, suggests that continuous dosing metronomic chemotherapy may be more efficacious than interval-chemotherapy given at MTD. In this study the concept of metronomic chemotherapy is explored by administering a continuous daily instead of the usual 2 weeks-on/1 week-off oral dosing regimen of low-dose capecitabine plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy after induction combination chemotherapy given at MTD plus bevacizumab.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
- Being tested
- capecitabine + bevacizumab, observation
- Keywords
- CAIRO3, DCCG, colorectal cancer, induction, metronomic chemotherapy, observation, capecitabine, bevacizumab, oxaliplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
capecitabine + bevacizumabDrug
Ca 1250 mg/m2 daily orally continuously, B 7.5 mg/kg i.v. q 3 w
observationOther
observation after induction treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | observation Receives: Other: observation |
| 2 | Active comparator | capecitabine plus bevacizumab Receives: Drug: capecitabine + bevacizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival after re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab (PFS2)
Measured: study duration
Secondary outcomes (6)
Progression-free survival between observation versus maintenance therapy (PFS1)
Measured: study duration
Response rate during re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab
Measured: study duration
Toxicity
Measured: study duration
Quality of life
Measured: study duration
Overall survival
Measured: study duration
Translational research
Measured: study duration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2007
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionDec 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal Cancer MetastaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 635 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds, Sanofi, Hoffmann-La Roche
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- C. JA Punt, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam Netherlands
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00442637
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAIRO3
- Acronym
- CAIRO3
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2007
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kurk S, Peeters P, Stellato R, Dorresteijn B, de Jong P, Jourdan M, Creemers GJ, Erdkamp F, de Jongh F, Kint P, Simkens L, Tanis B, Tjin-A-Ton M, Van Der Velden A, Punt C, Koopman M, May A. Skeletal muscle mass loss and dose-limiting toxicities in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Aug;10(4):803-813. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12436. Epub 2019 May 15.
PubMed 31094083Goey KKH, Elias SG, van Tinteren H, Lacle MM, Willems SM, Offerhaus GJA, de Leng WWJ, Strengman E, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GM, van der Velden A, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FLG, Tanis BC, Punt CJA, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study. Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2128-2134. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx322.
PubMed 28911067Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FL, Erjavec Z, van der Torren AM, Tol J, Braun HJ, Nieboer P, van der Hoeven JJ, Haasjes JG, Jansen RL, Wals J, Cats A, Derleyn VA, Honkoop AH, Mol L, Punt CJ, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1843-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PubMed 25862517
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Maintenance Treatment With Capecitabine and Bevacizumab Versus Observation After Induction Treatment With Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00442637
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAIRO3 / CAIRO3
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
- Keywords
- CAIRO3, DCCG, colorectal cancer, induction, metronomic chemotherapy, observation, capecitabine, bevacizumab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 635 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Dutch Colorectal Cancer GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds, Sanofi, Hoffmann-La Roche
- Study start
- Jan 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The optimal duration of systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is unknown.
In this study the effects of bevacizumab and low-dose continuous chemotherapy with capecitabine is investigated in patients who have responded to 6 courses of oxaliplatin, capecitabine and bevacizumab ("induction treatment", at standard doses). This treatment is continued until progression or severe toxicity. This regimen is compared to the effects a observation without treatment after the induction treatment.
In case of disease progression, induction treatment will be reintroduced.
Detailed description
Standard 1st-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer currently consists of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. With this approach the median overall survival is approximately 20 months, and progression-free survival in first-line approximately 9-11 months. The optimal duration of treatment is unknown. Current data suggest that the efficacy of bevacizumab is dependent on concomitant use of chemotherapy. However, oxaliplatin almost invariably gives rise to neuropathy after 6-8 cycles. Prolonged use of capecitabine is associated with e.g. hand-foot syndrome. Lastly, the prolonged use of these agents is associated with considerable costs.
Evidence, mainly preclinical, suggests that continuous dosing metronomic chemotherapy may be more efficacious than interval-chemotherapy given at MTD. In this study the concept of metronomic chemotherapy is explored by administering a continuous daily instead of the usual 2 weeks-on/1 week-off oral dosing regimen of low-dose capecitabine plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy after induction combination chemotherapy given at MTD plus bevacizumab.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Other: observationobservation |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: capecitabine + bevacizumabcapecitabine plus bevacizumab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained);
- Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible);
- Unidimensionally measurable disease (> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or > 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation;
- In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.
- Ongoing or planned first line treatment with 6 cycles of Xeloda, Eloxatin, and Avastin.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment
- Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases
- Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| capecitabine + bevacizumabCa 1250 mg/m2 daily orally continuously, B 7.5 mg/kg i.v. q 3 w | Drug | 2 |
| observationobservation after induction treatment | Other | 1 |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival after re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab (PFS2)
Time frame: study duration
6 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival between observation versus maintenance therapy (PFS1)
Time frame: study duration
Response rate during re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab
Time frame: study duration
Toxicity
Time frame: study duration
Quality of life
Time frame: study duration
Overall survival
Time frame: study duration
Translational research
Time frame: study duration
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31094083Kurk S, Peeters P, Stellato R, Dorresteijn B, de Jong P, Jourdan M, Creemers GJ, Erdkamp F, de Jongh F, Kint P, Simkens L, Tanis B, Tjin-A-Ton M, Van Der Velden A, Punt C, Koopman M, May A. Skeletal muscle mass loss and dose-limiting toxicities in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Aug;10(4):803-813. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12436. Epub 2019 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28911067Goey KKH, Elias SG, van Tinteren H, Lacle MM, Willems SM, Offerhaus GJA, de Leng WWJ, Strengman E, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GM, van der Velden A, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FLG, Tanis BC, Punt CJA, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study. Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2128-2134. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx322.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25862517Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FL, Erjavec Z, van der Torren AM, Tol J, Braun HJ, Nieboer P, van der Hoeven JJ, Haasjes JG, Jansen RL, Wals J, Cats A, Derleyn VA, Honkoop AH, Mol L, Punt CJ, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1843-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
- Dutch Colorectal Cancer GroupLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Targeted Therapies in Subpopulations of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (INTRINSIC)
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ERAS-0015 in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumors
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase Ib/II Study of GFH276 in Combination With Chemotherapy (± Bevacizumab) or Cetuximab in Patients With RAS-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
CRC
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
C. JA Punt, MD PhD principal investigator
Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam Netherlands
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing capecitabine + bevacizumab and observation in people with Colorectal Cancer Metastatic, run by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 28 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival after re-introduction of MTD chemotherapy and bevacizumab (PFS2) (time frame: study duration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00442637, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2013.