AzTrials
AzTrials

Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Unspecified Eye, Intermediate Dry StagePhase 2NCT00447954

A Study of an Encapsulated Cell Technology (ECT) Implant for Patients With Atrophic Macular Degeneration

A Phase 2 study testing High Dose NT-501 implant and Low Dose NT-501 implant in people with Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Unspecified Eye, Intermediate Dry Stage, run by Neurotech Pharmaceuticals at 8 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to look at the safety and effectiveness of CNTF implants on vision in participants with atrophic macular degeneration. This research is being done because there are no effective therapies for people with atrophic macular degeneration. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
What is being tested?
High Dose NT-501 implant and Low Dose NT-501 implant
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
53 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
5 Jan 2007to 11 May 2009
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study inclusion criteria:

  1. To participate in this study, the participant had to understand and sign the protocol's informed consent (if the participant's vision was impaired to the point where it was not possible to read the informed consent document, the informed consent document was read in its entirety to the participant).
  2. Women of childbearing potential (women with last menses <1 year prior to screening) had to agree to use an effective form of birth control from study onset until they completed the 18 month study visit.
  3. Participant had to be medically able to undergo ophthalmic surgery for NT-501 implant.
  4. Best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye between 20/50 and 20/200 (68-34 letter score) as measured using EVA.
  5. Presence in the study and/or fellow eye of geographic atrophy (GA) compatible with category 3 or 4 age-related macular degeneration (AMD) as defined by AREDS (AREDS, 2001). Also, the GA in the study eye had to be associated with vision loss as assessed by a vision test. GA was defined as one or more well-defined, usually more or less circular patches of partial or complete depigmentation of the RPE, typically with exposure of underlying choroidal blood vessels. Even if much of the RPE appeared to be preserved and large choroidal vessels were not visible, a roundish patch of RPE partial depigmentation might still be classified as early GA. A patch had to be at least 175 microns in area.
  6. Participants had steady fixation in the study eye in the foveal or parafoveal area with media clear enough for good quality photographs.

Study exclusion criteria:

  1. Participant less than 50 years of age (to minimize geographic atrophy from causes other than AMD).
  2. Participant medically unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits.
  3. Participant had evidence of ocular disease other than AMD that might confound the outcome of the study (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, uveitis, etc.).
  4. Participant had chronic requirement (e.g., > or = 4 weeks at a time) for ocular medications or had disease(s), that in the judgment of the examining physician, were vision threatening or might affect the primary outcome (artificial tears were permitted).
  5. Participant had evidence of classic or occult choroidal neovascularization in either eye, which might include serous RPE detachment, stippling on a fluorescein angiogram, macular edema, evidence of hemorrhage and lipid, and disciform scar.
  6. Participant had a requirement for acyclovir and/or related products during study duration. To be eligible for this study, the participant had to discontinue use of these products prior to enrollment and could not continue with the products until after they had completed the study.
  7. Participant had evidence of central serous chorio-retinopathy (CSR) in either eye.
  8. Participant had evidence of pathologic myopia in either eye.
  9. Participant had evidence of pseudovitelliform macular degeneration (a dominantly inherited disease characterized by a round or oval yellow subretinal macular deposit) in either eye.
  10. Participant was receiving systemic steroids or other immunosuppressive medications.
  11. Participant with evidence of vitreo-retinal traction maculopathy in either eye.
  12. Participant had a history of laser, photodynamic therapy (PDT), intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, or any previous treatment for AMD other than AREDS or equivalent supplement formulation.
  13. Prior history of vitrectomy, penetrating keratoplasty, trabeculectomy or trabeculoplasty.
  14. Participant had any of the following lens opacities: cortical opacity > standard 3, posterior subcapsular opacity > standard 3, or a nuclear opacity > standard 3 as measured on the AREDS clinical lens grading system.
  15. Participant had undergone lens removal in the last 3 months.
  16. Participant had participated in any other clinical trial of a drug or within the last 6 months.
  17. Participant was on chemotherapy.
  18. Participant was on ocular or systemic medications known to be toxic to the lens, retina, or optic nerve.
  19. Participant was pregnant or lactating.
  20. Participant had other retinal disease(s).
  21. Participant had a history of malignancy, except study participants with a history of successfully treated cancer (≥5 years prior to inclusion in the trial).
  22. Participant was considered immunodeficient or had a known history of HIV.
  23. Participant with a history of ocular herpes zoster.
  24. Participant's fellow eye visual acuity worse than 20/400.
  25. Participant had undergone LASIK surgery or other refractive surgery for either eye in less than 6 months prior to screening.
  26. Participants with severe hearing disabilities in both ears.
  27. Participants with unmanaged diabetes, patients with CME, or retinopathy in either eye.
  28. Participant had a history of retinal detachment in either eye.
  29. Participant who had been diagnosed and treated for amblyopia as an infant.
  30. Participant with a history of Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites
  • Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Retina Foundation of Southwest

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Retina Group of Florida

    Hollywood, Florida, 33021-6746

  • Vitreoretinal Consultants

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

    Miami, Florida, 33101

  • Beaumont Eye Institute

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073-6710

  • University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Study of Implants of Encapsulated Human NTC-201 Cells Releasing Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF), in Participants With Visual Acuity Impairment Associated With Atrophic Macular Degeneration

The purpose of this study is to look at the safety and effectiveness of CNTF implants on vision in participants with atrophic macular degeneration. This research is being done because there are no effective therapies for people with atrophic macular degeneration. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a condition that affects the macula, the central part of the retina that we use for seeing details. There are two types of AMD, one is the wet type in which new blood vessels grow, also known as choroidal neovascularization (CNV), but the other is the dry type in which the healthy cells die, and that is the target of this study. This is called atrophic macular degeneration. The implant is a small capsule that contains human retinal pigment epithelium cells. These cells have been given the ability to make CNTF and release it through the capsule membrane into the surrounding fluid. In this study, two different CNTF dose levels will be used: a high dose and a low dose, as well as a sham surgery (or placebo) group.

Read the detailed description

Histopathologic studies of multiple forms of retinal neurodegenerative diseases have demonstrated the possibility of using the neurotrophic factor CNTF as an effective approach to reducing photoreceptor cell loss. Consequently, it had been hypothesized that the use of the implanted NT-501 capsule, which secretes CNTF into the vitreous, might be beneficial in people with atrophic macular degeneration. The purpose of this pilot study was to accumulate preliminary data on the effect of the intraocular NT-501 implant on visual acuity in patients with atrophic macular degeneration.

The study had a double-masked, multi-center, randomized, parallel group design. Eligible patients were randomized on a 2:1:1 basis to the higher CNTF output NTC-201-6A.02 implant, the lower CNTF output NTC-201-10.02 implant or to sham surgery, respectively.

The surgeon designated by the Principal Investigator (PI), the PI, vision examiners, reading center graders, and patients were all masked as to the dose of the implant. The patients and the vision examiners were masked as to which treatment was received.

Approximately 48 patients with geographic atrophy compatible with category 3 or 4 AMD were planned to be enrolled. All patients were to be followed clinically for 18 months. Patients randomized to the CNTF implants were implanted at baseline, had the option of being explanted at or after 12 months, and all were followed clinically for 18 months. Follow-up for safety occurred throughout the study period.

Being tested
High Dose NT-501 implant, Low Dose NT-501 implant, Sham
Keywords
eye disease, retinal disorder, CNTF, AMD, Atrophic AMD
Medical subject headings
Eye Diseases, Retinal Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High Dose NT-501 implantCombination product

    High Dose NT-501

  • Low Dose NT-501 implantCombination product

    Low Dose NT-501

  • ShamOther

    Sham Procedure

Study groups in NCT00447954
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1 - High DoseExperimentalParticipant had surgically implanted high dose (NT-501-6A.02) CNTF-secreting NT-501 device which produced ~20 ng/device/day.
Receives: Combination Product: High Dose NT-501 implant
2 - Low DoseExperimentalParticipant had surgically implanted high dose (NT-501-6A.02) CNTF-secreting NT-501 device which produced ~5 ng/device/day.
Receives: Combination Product: Low Dose NT-501 implant
3 - ShamSham comparatorSham surgery procedure in which no device was implanted
Receives: Other: Sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. BCVA Response Defined as an Increased in 10 Letters at 1 Year Post-implant

    Response is defined as a improvement from baseline at Month 12 in monocular best visual acuity (BCVA) in the study eye of at least 10 letters as assessed by standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.

    Measured: 1 year post-implant

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The Change in BCVA Over the 18-month Follow-up Period

    Change from baseline at post-baseline visits in monocular best visual acuity (BCVA) as assessed by standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.

    Measured: From initial implant 18 months post-implant

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Mar 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study start5 Jan 2007
  3. Primary completion11 May 2009
  4. Study completion11 May 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00447954
Sponsor's protocol ID
CNTF 2
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
9 Mar 2007
Last updated
28 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kauper K, McGovern C, Sherman S, Heatherton P, Rapoza R, Stabila P, Dean B, Lee A, Borges S, Bouchard B, Tao W. Two-year intraocular delivery of ciliary neurotrophic factor by encapsulated cell technology implants in patients with chronic retinal degenerative diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 1;53(12):7484-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9970.

    PubMed 23049090

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing High Dose NT-501 implant and Low Dose NT-501 implant in people with Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Unspecified Eye, Intermediate Dry Stage, run by Neurotech Pharmaceuticals at 8 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

BCVA Response Defined as an Increased in 10 Letters at 1 Year Post-implant (time frame: 1 year post-implant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00447954, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in