Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4ARNONCT00448461
Antithrombotic Regimens and Outcome
A Phase 4 study testing heparin and bivalirudin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Careggi Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Title: Comparison of bivalirudin and unfractioned heparin (UFH)+ protamine in elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial Hypothesis: Bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine for the improvement of outcomes in patients undergoing elective PCI… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- heparin and bivalirudin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 850 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Mar 2007to Jun 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients older than age 18 to undergo PCI
- Pretreatment at least 6 hours before PCI with clopidogrel according to the PCI guidelines.
- Informed, written consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.
Who cannot join
- Recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction within the last 48 hours.
- Chronic coronary artery occlusion to be treated
- Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than one year or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
- Active bleeding, bleeding diathesis, recent surgery (< 15 days)
- History of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the last 6 weeks
- Treatment with UFH within 6 hours or low-molecular weight heparin within 8 hours before randomization.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Treatment with bivalirudin within 24 hours beforerandomization.
- Severe uncontrolled hypertension >180/110 mmHg unresponsive to therapy
- Relevant hematologic deviations: hemoglobin < 100 g/L OR platelet count < 100 x 109 /L.
- Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 ml/min or serum creatinine > 30 mg/L or dependence on renal dialysis.
- Known allergy to the study medications: aspirin, clopidogrel, UFH, bivalirudin; stainless steel; true anaphylaxis after prior exposure to contrast media.
- Known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Bivalirudin and Unfractioned Heparin in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Title: Comparison of bivalirudin and unfractioned heparin (UFH)+ protamine in elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)
Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Read more
Hypothesis: Bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine for the improvement of outcomes in patients undergoing elective PCI
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Patients older than 18 years of age to undergo PCI Clopidogrel loading > 6 hrs prior to PCI according to the PCI guidelines Informed, written consent
Key Exclusion Criteria:
ST-elevation myocardial infarction within the prior 48 hours Active bleeding, bleeding diathesis, recent surgery Severe renal failure Chronic coronary artery occlusion to be treated
Primary endpoint:
Inhospital major bleeding
Secondary endpoints:
- Composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) inhospital, and at 6 months
- Composite rate of inhospital death, MI or TVR and major bleeding
- Major and minor bleedings
- Total vascular complications
- Post-procedure renal failure
Randomization:
Bivalirudin versus unfractioned heparin followed by protamine at the end of the PCI procedure
Sample size:
Assumed incidence of inhospital major bleeding of 6% in UFH + protamine and of 2% in bivalirudin group; for a power of 80% and a level of 0.05 for each group 425 patients are needed. An interim analysis will be performed after the enrolment of 425 (50%) patients.
Follow-up:
Inhospital, and 6-month clinical follow-up (out-patient clinic or by phone)
Read the detailed description
Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been recently introduced as an alternative to UFH given several important biologic and pharmacokinetic advantages.1,2 In contrast to UFH, it acts independently of antithrombin and inhibits both free and clotbound thrombin; it is not neutralized by circulating inhibitors; does not bind to plasma protein and cause thrombocytopenia.1,2 In the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study, bivalirudin was associated with a 45% reduction in the relative risk for the composite of death, myocardial infarction, revascularization or hemorrhage as compared to UFH among patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty.3 Recently, in another randomized trial of patients with intermediate risk undergoing coronary stenting after varying pre-treatment intervals with different doses of thienopyridines, use of bivalirudin was estimated to result in 38% reduction in the relative risk of death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization or in-hospital major bleeding at 30 days compared to UFH.4 In addition, bivalirudin was associated with a similar rate of ischemic events and less major bleeding and estimated to be more cost-effective than abciximab administered in adjunct to UFH.4,5 However, previous studies have included patients treated with plain balloon angioplasty or stenting after inadequate pretreatment with thienopyridines (ticlopidine or clopidogrel). Recent guidelines recommend that all patients undergoing PCI must receive a loading dose of 300 - 600 mg of clopidogrel.6 Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine that acts by irreversibly inhibiting the platelet adenosine 5'- diphosphate (ADP) receptor. Compared to ticlopidine, it has the advantage of a more favourable side effect profile 7, 8 and more rapid onset of action.9 Pre-treatment with clopidogrel has been associated with better outcomes among patients undergoing PCI.10-12 After a loading dose of 600 mg, maximum inhibition of aggregation with clopidogrel is achieved within two hours.13 The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) trial showed that after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel for at least 2 hours before intervention, additional use of abicximab to UFH was not associated with any clinically measurable benefit among low-to-intermediate risk patients who underwent PCI.14 On the other hand, patients who received abciximab had a higher rate of thrombocytopenia and more frequently required blood transfusions. Thus, an antithrombotic strategy consisting of a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel in addition to UFH and aspirin is a safe and effective way to improve patients' outcomes and reduce costs after PCI. There are few data about the use of protamine neutralization of circulating heparin after successful stent implantation.15-18 However, all the previous studies showed no excess in ischemic complications after stent implantation and subsequent protamine administration, with a strong potential for bleeding complication limitation.
Based on the above-mentioned data it can be said that antithrombotic regimens based on either bivalirudin or UFH intraprocedurally followed by protamine neutralization, are effective strategies to reduce ischemic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI. At present, it is not known whether bivalirudin is superior to UFH in patients who have been optimally pre-treated with a loading dose of clopidogrel.
We designed this study to assess whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractioned heparin + protamine in patients undergoing PCI. All patients older than 18 years of age, who require coronary angiography for suspected or established coronary artery disease, but without ST-segment changes, will receive a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel at least 2 hours prior to the procedure. Eligible patients who do not meet the exclusion criteria and in whom angiography reveals that revascularization is required and the target lesion(s) is (are) amenable to PCI, will be randomized to receive a bolus of 140 U/kg of heparin or bivalirudin to be administered as an intravenous bolus of 0.75 mg/kg prior to the start of the intervention, followed by infusion of 1.75 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the procedure. All patients will receive aspirin indefinitely and clopidogrel for at least 1 month after PTCA or implantation of bare metal stents and for at least 6 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents; clopidogrel treatment for more than 6 months will be encouraged.19 The primary end point of the study is in-hospital major bleeding. The study is designed to show whether bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine with respect to the primary end point.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- heparin, bivalirudin
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary interventions
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
heparinDrug
comparison between heparin and bivalirudin
bivalirudinDrug
comparison between heparin and bivalirudin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | heparin Receives: Drug: heparin |
| 2 | Active comparator | bivalirudin Receives: Drug: bivalirudin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome measure will be in-hospital major bleeding.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (6)
Composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or urgent
Measured: 6 months
target vessel revascularization (TVR) inhospital, and at 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Composite rate of inhospital death, MI or TVR and major bleeding
Measured: 6 months
Major and minor bleedings
Measured: 6 months
Total vascular complications
Measured: 6 months
Post-procedure renal failure
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2007
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionJun 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Careggi Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- David Antoniucci, MD, Study director, Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00448461
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- arcard2007/001
- Acronym
- ARNO
- Status last verified
- Feb 2009
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2007
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Bivalirudin and Unfractioned Heparin in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00448461
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARNO / arcard2007/001
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary interventions
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Careggi HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Title: Comparison of bivalirudin and unfractioned heparin (UFH)+ protamine in elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)
Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Hypothesis: Bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine for the improvement of outcomes in patients undergoing elective PCI
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Patients older than 18 years of age to undergo PCI Clopidogrel loading > 6 hrs prior to PCI according to the PCI guidelines Informed, written consent
Key Exclusion Criteria:
ST-elevation myocardial infarction within the prior 48 hours Active bleeding, bleeding diathesis, recent surgery Severe renal failure Chronic coronary artery occlusion to be treated
Primary endpoint:
Inhospital major bleeding
Secondary endpoints:
- Composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) inhospital, and at 6 months
- Composite rate of inhospital death, MI or TVR and major bleeding
- Major and minor bleedings
- Total vascular complications
- Post-procedure renal failure
Randomization:
Bivalirudin versus unfractioned heparin followed by protamine at the end of the PCI procedure
Sample size:
Assumed incidence of inhospital major bleeding of 6% in UFH + protamine and of 2% in bivalirudin group; for a power of 80% and a level of 0.05 for each group 425 patients are needed. An interim analysis will be performed after the enrolment of 425 (50%) patients.
Follow-up:
Inhospital, and 6-month clinical follow-up (out-patient clinic or by phone)
Detailed description
Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been recently introduced as an alternative to UFH given several important biologic and pharmacokinetic advantages.1,2 In contrast to UFH, it acts independently of antithrombin and inhibits both free and clotbound thrombin; it is not neutralized by circulating inhibitors; does not bind to plasma protein and cause thrombocytopenia.1,2 In the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study, bivalirudin was associated with a 45% reduction in the relative risk for the composite of death, myocardial infarction, revascularization or hemorrhage as compared to UFH among patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty.3 Recently, in another randomized trial of patients with intermediate risk undergoing coronary stenting after varying pre-treatment intervals with different doses of thienopyridines, use of bivalirudin was estimated to result in 38% reduction in the relative risk of death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization or in-hospital major bleeding at 30 days compared to UFH.4 In addition, bivalirudin was associated with a similar rate of ischemic events and less major bleeding and estimated to be more cost-effective than abciximab administered in adjunct to UFH.4,5 However, previous studies have included patients treated with plain balloon angioplasty or stenting after inadequate pretreatment with thienopyridines (ticlopidine or clopidogrel). Recent guidelines recommend that all patients undergoing PCI must receive a loading dose of 300 - 600 mg of clopidogrel.6 Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine that acts by irreversibly inhibiting the platelet adenosine 5'- diphosphate (ADP) receptor. Compared to ticlopidine, it has the advantage of a more favourable side effect profile 7, 8 and more rapid onset of action.9 Pre-treatment with clopidogrel has been associated with better outcomes among patients undergoing PCI.10-12 After a loading dose of 600 mg, maximum inhibition of aggregation with clopidogrel is achieved within two hours.13 The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) trial showed that after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel for at least 2 hours before intervention, additional use of abicximab to UFH was not associated with any clinically measurable benefit among low-to-intermediate risk patients who underwent PCI.14 On the other hand, patients who received abciximab had a higher rate of thrombocytopenia and more frequently required blood transfusions. Thus, an antithrombotic strategy consisting of a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel in addition to UFH and aspirin is a safe and effective way to improve patients' outcomes and reduce costs after PCI. There are few data about the use of protamine neutralization of circulating heparin after successful stent implantation.15-18 However, all the previous studies showed no excess in ischemic complications after stent implantation and subsequent protamine administration, with a strong potential for bleeding complication limitation.
Based on the above-mentioned data it can be said that antithrombotic regimens based on either bivalirudin or UFH intraprocedurally followed by protamine neutralization, are effective strategies to reduce ischemic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI. At present, it is not known whether bivalirudin is superior to UFH in patients who have been optimally pre-treated with a loading dose of clopidogrel.
We designed this study to assess whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractioned heparin + protamine in patients undergoing PCI. All patients older than 18 years of age, who require coronary angiography for suspected or established coronary artery disease, but without ST-segment changes, will receive a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel at least 2 hours prior to the procedure. Eligible patients who do not meet the exclusion criteria and in whom angiography reveals that revascularization is required and the target lesion(s) is (are) amenable to PCI, will be randomized to receive a bolus of 140 U/kg of heparin or bivalirudin to be administered as an intravenous bolus of 0.75 mg/kg prior to the start of the intervention, followed by infusion of 1.75 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the procedure. All patients will receive aspirin indefinitely and clopidogrel for at least 1 month after PTCA or implantation of bare metal stents and for at least 6 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents; clopidogrel treatment for more than 6 months will be encouraged.19 The primary end point of the study is in-hospital major bleeding. The study is designed to show whether bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine with respect to the primary end point.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: heparinheparin |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: bivalirudinbivalirudin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients older than age 18 to undergo PCI
- Pretreatment at least 6 hours before PCI with clopidogrel according to the PCI guidelines.
- Informed, written consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction within the last 48 hours.
- Chronic coronary artery occlusion to be treated
- Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than one year or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
- Active bleeding, bleeding diathesis, recent surgery (< 15 days)
- History of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the last 6 weeks
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| heparincomparison between heparin and bivalirudin | Drug | 1 |
| bivalirudincomparison between heparin and bivalirudin | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome measure will be in-hospital major bleeding.
Time frame: 30 days
6 secondary outcomes
Composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or urgent
Time frame: 6 months
target vessel revascularization (TVR) inhospital, and at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Composite rate of inhospital death, MI or TVR and major bleeding
Time frame: 6 months
Major and minor bleedings
Time frame: 6 months
Total vascular complications
Time frame: 6 months
Post-procedure renal failure
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2009.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
CCTA Evaluation of SGLT2i-related Pericoronary Fat Changes Patients With Stage 4 CKM Syndrome
ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome), SGLT2 Inhibitors
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Propionic Acid Supplementation on Endothelial Function
Cardiovascular Diseases, Endothelial Dysfunction
Recruiting
Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David Antoniucci, MD study director
Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing heparin and bivalirudin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Careggi Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome measure will be in-hospital major bleeding. (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2009.