AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4ARNONCT00448461

Antithrombotic Regimens and Outcome

A Phase 4 study testing heparin and bivalirudin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Careggi Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Title: Comparison of bivalirudin and unfractioned heparin (UFH)+ protamine in elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial Hypothesis: Bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine for the improvement of outcomes in patients undergoing elective PCI… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
heparin and bivalirudin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
850 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Mar 2007to Jun 2008
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients older than age 18 to undergo PCI
  • Pretreatment at least 6 hours before PCI with clopidogrel according to the PCI guidelines.
  • Informed, written consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction within the last 48 hours.
  • Chronic coronary artery occlusion to be treated
  • Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than one year or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
  • Active bleeding, bleeding diathesis, recent surgery (< 15 days)
  • History of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the last 6 weeks
  • Treatment with UFH within 6 hours or low-molecular weight heparin within 8 hours before randomization.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Treatment with bivalirudin within 24 hours beforerandomization.
  • Severe uncontrolled hypertension >180/110 mmHg unresponsive to therapy
  • Relevant hematologic deviations: hemoglobin < 100 g/L OR platelet count < 100 x 109 /L.
  • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 ml/min or serum creatinine > 30 mg/L or dependence on renal dialysis.
  • Known allergy to the study medications: aspirin, clopidogrel, UFH, bivalirudin; stainless steel; true anaphylaxis after prior exposure to contrast media.
  • Known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital

    Florence, 50141

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Bivalirudin and Unfractioned Heparin in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Title: Comparison of bivalirudin and unfractioned heparin (UFH)+ protamine in elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Read more

Hypothesis: Bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine for the improvement of outcomes in patients undergoing elective PCI

Key Inclusion Criteria:

Patients older than 18 years of age to undergo PCI Clopidogrel loading > 6 hrs prior to PCI according to the PCI guidelines Informed, written consent

Key Exclusion Criteria:

ST-elevation myocardial infarction within the prior 48 hours Active bleeding, bleeding diathesis, recent surgery Severe renal failure Chronic coronary artery occlusion to be treated

Primary endpoint:

Inhospital major bleeding

Secondary endpoints:

  1. Composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) inhospital, and at 6 months
  2. Composite rate of inhospital death, MI or TVR and major bleeding
  3. Major and minor bleedings
  4. Total vascular complications
  5. Post-procedure renal failure

Randomization:

Bivalirudin versus unfractioned heparin followed by protamine at the end of the PCI procedure

Sample size:

Assumed incidence of inhospital major bleeding of 6% in UFH + protamine and of 2% in bivalirudin group; for a power of 80% and a level of 0.05 for each group 425 patients are needed. An interim analysis will be performed after the enrolment of 425 (50%) patients.

Follow-up:

Inhospital, and 6-month clinical follow-up (out-patient clinic or by phone)

Read the detailed description

Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been recently introduced as an alternative to UFH given several important biologic and pharmacokinetic advantages.1,2 In contrast to UFH, it acts independently of antithrombin and inhibits both free and clotbound thrombin; it is not neutralized by circulating inhibitors; does not bind to plasma protein and cause thrombocytopenia.1,2 In the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study, bivalirudin was associated with a 45% reduction in the relative risk for the composite of death, myocardial infarction, revascularization or hemorrhage as compared to UFH among patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty.3 Recently, in another randomized trial of patients with intermediate risk undergoing coronary stenting after varying pre-treatment intervals with different doses of thienopyridines, use of bivalirudin was estimated to result in 38% reduction in the relative risk of death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization or in-hospital major bleeding at 30 days compared to UFH.4 In addition, bivalirudin was associated with a similar rate of ischemic events and less major bleeding and estimated to be more cost-effective than abciximab administered in adjunct to UFH.4,5 However, previous studies have included patients treated with plain balloon angioplasty or stenting after inadequate pretreatment with thienopyridines (ticlopidine or clopidogrel). Recent guidelines recommend that all patients undergoing PCI must receive a loading dose of 300 - 600 mg of clopidogrel.6 Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine that acts by irreversibly inhibiting the platelet adenosine 5'- diphosphate (ADP) receptor. Compared to ticlopidine, it has the advantage of a more favourable side effect profile 7, 8 and more rapid onset of action.9 Pre-treatment with clopidogrel has been associated with better outcomes among patients undergoing PCI.10-12 After a loading dose of 600 mg, maximum inhibition of aggregation with clopidogrel is achieved within two hours.13 The Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) trial showed that after pre-treatment with 600 mg clopidogrel for at least 2 hours before intervention, additional use of abicximab to UFH was not associated with any clinically measurable benefit among low-to-intermediate risk patients who underwent PCI.14 On the other hand, patients who received abciximab had a higher rate of thrombocytopenia and more frequently required blood transfusions. Thus, an antithrombotic strategy consisting of a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel in addition to UFH and aspirin is a safe and effective way to improve patients' outcomes and reduce costs after PCI. There are few data about the use of protamine neutralization of circulating heparin after successful stent implantation.15-18 However, all the previous studies showed no excess in ischemic complications after stent implantation and subsequent protamine administration, with a strong potential for bleeding complication limitation.

Based on the above-mentioned data it can be said that antithrombotic regimens based on either bivalirudin or UFH intraprocedurally followed by protamine neutralization, are effective strategies to reduce ischemic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI. At present, it is not known whether bivalirudin is superior to UFH in patients who have been optimally pre-treated with a loading dose of clopidogrel.

We designed this study to assess whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractioned heparin + protamine in patients undergoing PCI. All patients older than 18 years of age, who require coronary angiography for suspected or established coronary artery disease, but without ST-segment changes, will receive a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel at least 2 hours prior to the procedure. Eligible patients who do not meet the exclusion criteria and in whom angiography reveals that revascularization is required and the target lesion(s) is (are) amenable to PCI, will be randomized to receive a bolus of 140 U/kg of heparin or bivalirudin to be administered as an intravenous bolus of 0.75 mg/kg prior to the start of the intervention, followed by infusion of 1.75 mg/kg per hour for the duration of the procedure. All patients will receive aspirin indefinitely and clopidogrel for at least 1 month after PTCA or implantation of bare metal stents and for at least 6 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents; clopidogrel treatment for more than 6 months will be encouraged.19 The primary end point of the study is in-hospital major bleeding. The study is designed to show whether bivalirudin is superior to UFH + protamine with respect to the primary end point.

Being tested
heparin, bivalirudin
Keywords
coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary interventions
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • heparinDrug

    comparison between heparin and bivalirudin

  • bivalirudinDrug

    comparison between heparin and bivalirudin

Study groups in NCT00448461
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorheparin
Receives: Drug: heparin
2Active comparatorbivalirudin
Receives: Drug: bivalirudin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome measure will be in-hospital major bleeding.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Composite rate of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or urgent

    Measured: 6 months

  2. target vessel revascularization (TVR) inhospital, and at 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Composite rate of inhospital death, MI or TVR and major bleeding

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Major and minor bleedings

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Total vascular complications

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Post-procedure renal failure

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Mar 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionJun 2008
  4. Study completionJun 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
850 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00448461
Sponsor's protocol ID
arcard2007/001
Acronym
ARNO
Status last verified
Feb 2009
First submitted
14 Mar 2007
Last updated
10 Feb 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing heparin and bivalirudin in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Careggi Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome measure will be in-hospital major bleeding. (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in