AzTrials
AzTrials

MalariaTDR-PALUNCT00451269

Evaluation of Rapid Diagnosis Tests in Imported Malaria

An observational study of Malaria, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The annual number of cases of clinical malaria worldwide is estimated to be 300-500 million leading to 1.5 million deaths. Delayed care and frequent drug resistance of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), the most frequent form of malaria, is responsible for these deaths. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Malaria
What is being tested?
Rapid diagnosis test for malaria
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
1,297 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Apr 2007to Jan 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Suspected malaria

Who may be able to join

  • No refusal by patient
  • Sample for malaria diagnosis

Who cannot join

  • Patient who do not want to participated to the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hopital BICHAT CLAUDE BERNARD

    Paris, 75018

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Multicentric Evaluation of Rapid Diagnosis Tests for the Diagnosis of Imported Malaria.

The annual number of cases of clinical malaria worldwide is estimated to be 300-500 million leading to 1.5 million deaths. Delayed care and frequent drug resistance of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), the most frequent form of malaria, is responsible for these deaths. Each year, 5000-8000 travellers return to France with malaria, 4/5 from Africa and with Pf. Clinical features associated with a malaria crisis are poorly predictive and misdiagnosis can be easily made. Diagnosis of accurate malaria rely on microscopic examination of stained thin and thick blood films by a well trained microscopist. Few emergency wards are specialized for tropical diseases. For most of them, malaria is a rare disease and hours are lost before accurate microscopy can permit the decision

Read the detailed description

The annual number of cases of clinical malaria worldwide is estimated to be 300-500 million leading to 1.5 million deaths. Delayed care and frequent drug resistance of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), the most frequent form of malaria, is responsible for these deaths. Each year, 5000-8000 travellers return to France with malaria, 4/5 from Africa and with Pf. Clinical features associated with a malaria crisis are poorly predictive and misdiagnosis can be easily made. Diagnosis of accurate malaria rely on microscopic examination of stained thin and thick blood films by a well trained microscopist. Few emergency wards are specialized for tropical diseases. For most of them, malaria is a rare disease and hours are lost before accurate microscopy can permit the decision The rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for malaria are designed to give a sensitive response within 15 minutes. They are based on the immunodetection of HISTIDIN rich protein 2 (HRP2) or the Pf LACTICO dehydrogenase (PfLDH), specific of Plasmodium falciparum or plasmodial LACTICO dehydrogenase (pLDH), or aldolase, specific of gender of the four species of human malaria. Recent increase of performances and availability prompted WHO to recommend their use for the diagnosis of malaria when microscopy is unavailable. In France, competence exists on the whole of the territory but expertise is usually confined to major referral centers. We intend to evaluate the performances of 4 RDT in 6 laboratories who perform the diagnosis of malaria on patients samples who returned from tourist or family or professional trips. The simultaneous detection of the plasmodial HRP2, PfLDH, aldolase and pLDH will be compared with the thick blood film as reference. Discrepant results will be analysed by PCR. The determination of the sensitivity, the specificity, the predictive positive value and the predictive negative value of the RDT is the principal objective.

Conditions
Malaria
Being tested
Rapid diagnosis test for malaria
Keywords
Malaria, Diagnosis, RDT, pLDH, HRP2, Patients with fever and history of travel in a malaria, country
Medical subject headings
Malaria, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rapid diagnosis test for malariaDevice

    Rapid diagnosis test for malaria

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2007
  3. Primary completionJan 2010
  4. Study completionJan 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,297 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00451269
Sponsor's protocol ID
AOR 06066
Acronym
TDR-PALU
Status last verified
Mar 2007
First submitted
21 Mar 2007
Last updated
21 Feb 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Musset L, Bouchaud O, Matheron S, Massias L, Le Bras J. Clinical atovaquone-proguanil resistance of Plasmodium falciparum associated with cytochrome b codon 268 mutations. Microbes Infect. 2006 Sep;8(11):2599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Aug 10.

    PubMed 16962361

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Malaria, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00451269, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in