AnaesthesiaPhase 4NCT00455117
Effect of Parecoxib on Post-craniotomy Pain
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer) in people with Anaesthesia, run by Melbourne Health at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
Aim of this trial: To investigate whether post-craniotomy analgesia with (i) intravenous (IV) parecoxib plus intravenous paracetamol is superior to (ii) intravenous paracetamol alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anaesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Sep 2006to Dec 2008
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Supratentorial craniotomy, glasgow coma scale 15
Who cannot join
- Chronic pain,
- Chronic opioid use.
- History of significant alcohol or benzodiazepine (BZD) use,
- Inability to speak English,
- Pre-operative aphasia or dysphasia,
- Renal impairment (Creatinine level > 0.1),
Show all 12Show fewer
- Asthma (or evidence of reversible airway obstruction,
- Known ischaemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease,
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade IV or V,
- Allergy to any study drug (paracetamol, parecoxib, sulphas, morphine, bupivacaine, propofol, remifentanil;
- Administration of oral paracetamol within previous 8 hours.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase Four Study of Intravenous Parecoxib on Post-craniotomy Pain
Aim of this trial:
To investigate whether post-craniotomy analgesia with (i) intravenous (IV) parecoxib plus intravenous paracetamol is superior to (ii) intravenous paracetamol alone.
Study Hypothesis:
Post-operative analgesia with intravenous parecoxib in combination with intravenous paracetamol will be superior to intravenous paracetamol alone.
Read the detailed description
Neurosurgical patients undergoing brain procedures (craniotomy patients) are known to suffer moderately severe postoperative pain and high rates of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Post-craniotomy pain is poorly treated with more than 50% of craniotomy patients experiencing postoperative pain of moderate or severe intensity. Fear of drug complications such as sedation, respiratory depression, seizures and intracranial bleeding has inhibited prescribing of effective pain treatment.Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are known to be effective analgesics in the peri-operative period however there use in cranial neurosurgery has been limited due to risk of bleeding. Parecoxib is an injectable form of NSAID that works through inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase type-2 (COX-2). The main benefit of COX-2 inhibitors is that they have minimal inhibition of platelet function and therefore minimal risk of increased bleeding.This project aims to evaluate whether parecoxib is an effective pain reliever (analgesic) after brain surgery. Patients aged 18-65 years presenting for elective craniotomy will be randomly allocated to two different analgesic programs (i) IV parecoxib and IV paracetamol or (ii) IV paracetamol. All patients will receive a standardised anaesthetic. Scalp infiltration, using 20mls of local anesthetic (bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline), will occur prior to skin incision. Intermittent morphine administration will used post-operatively to ensure adequate analgesia in each arm of the trial. Immediate post-operative adjunctive analgesia will be provided with nurse administered IV morphine in the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU) as per protocol (RMH protocol for opioid titration), followed by patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine once the verbal rating scale is < 4 (rating out of ten). A score of less than four is considered to be mild pain. PCA will be continued for the first twenty-four hours then discontinued. Patients will then receive strict oral paracetamol and nurse administered IV morphine as required. The primary study endpoint will be morphine consumption in the first 24 hours. Data will be analysed on an intention to treat basis. Continuous variables will be graphed to determine their distribution. Normally distributed variables will be described using mean and standard deviation and compared using Student's t-tests. Skewed variables will be described using median and range (or interquartile range) and compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. A p-value les than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Anaesthesia
- Being tested
- Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer)
- Keywords
- analgesia, pain, neurosurgery, NSAIDS, parecoxib, morphine consumption
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer)Drug
Also called Intravenous parecoxib ("Dynastat" Pfizer)
parecoxib or placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | placebo (2 ml normal saline) administered intravenously at dural closure during craniotomy Receives: Drug: Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer) |
| 2 | Active comparator | parecoxib 40 mg in 2 ml normal saline administered intravenously at dural closure during craniotomy Receives: Drug: Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Morphine consumption in 24 hour period.
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Secondary outcomes (10)
Immediate post-operative hypertension (first 2 hours)
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Pain scores at zero (time of extubation), 1, 2, 4, 12, 24 hours post operatively
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Analgesic efficacy at 24 hours
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (first 24 hours)
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Sedation or respiratory depression (first 24 hours)
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Safety Monitoring (Serious adverse side effects)
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative AMI
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative renal failure
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative thromboembolic stroke
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative intracranial haemorrhage
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2006
- Primary completionDec 2008
- Study completionDec 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnaesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Melbourne Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daryl L Williams, MBBS, Principal investigator, Director of Anaesthesia, Royal Melbourne Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00455117
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Parecoxib_HREC2006.133
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 30 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Williams DL, Pemberton E, Leslie K. Effect of intravenous parecoxib on post-craniotomy pain. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):398-403. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer223.
PubMed 21841050
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase Four Study of Intravenous Parecoxib on Post-craniotomy Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00455117
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Parecoxib_HREC2006.133
- Conditions
- Anaesthesia
- Keywords
- analgesia, pain, neurosurgery, NSAIDS, parecoxib, morphine consumption
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Melbourne HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2006
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of this trial:
To investigate whether post-craniotomy analgesia with (i) intravenous (IV) parecoxib plus intravenous paracetamol is superior to (ii) intravenous paracetamol alone.
Study Hypothesis:
Post-operative analgesia with intravenous parecoxib in combination with intravenous paracetamol will be superior to intravenous paracetamol alone.
Detailed description
Neurosurgical patients undergoing brain procedures (craniotomy patients) are known to suffer moderately severe postoperative pain and high rates of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Post-craniotomy pain is poorly treated with more than 50% of craniotomy patients experiencing postoperative pain of moderate or severe intensity. Fear of drug complications such as sedation, respiratory depression, seizures and intracranial bleeding has inhibited prescribing of effective pain treatment.Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are known to be effective analgesics in the peri-operative period however there use in cranial neurosurgery has been limited due to risk of bleeding. Parecoxib is an injectable form of NSAID that works through inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase type-2 (COX-2). The main benefit of COX-2 inhibitors is that they have minimal inhibition of platelet function and therefore minimal risk of increased bleeding.This project aims to evaluate whether parecoxib is an effective pain reliever (analgesic) after brain surgery. Patients aged 18-65 years presenting for elective craniotomy will be randomly allocated to two different analgesic programs (i) IV parecoxib and IV paracetamol or (ii) IV paracetamol. All patients will receive a standardised anaesthetic. Scalp infiltration, using 20mls of local anesthetic (bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline), will occur prior to skin incision. Intermittent morphine administration will used post-operatively to ensure adequate analgesia in each arm of the trial. Immediate post-operative adjunctive analgesia will be provided with nurse administered IV morphine in the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU) as per protocol (RMH protocol for opioid titration), followed by patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine once the verbal rating scale is < 4 (rating out of ten). A score of less than four is considered to be mild pain. PCA will be continued for the first twenty-four hours then discontinued. Patients will then receive strict oral paracetamol and nurse administered IV morphine as required. The primary study endpoint will be morphine consumption in the first 24 hours. Data will be analysed on an intention to treat basis. Continuous variables will be graphed to determine their distribution. Normally distributed variables will be described using mean and standard deviation and compared using Student's t-tests. Skewed variables will be described using median and range (or interquartile range) and compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. A p-value les than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer)placebo (2 ml normal saline) administered intravenously at dural closure during craniotomy |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer)parecoxib 40 mg in 2 ml normal saline administered intravenously at dural closure during craniotomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Supratentorial craniotomy, glasgow coma scale 15
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Chronic pain,
- Chronic opioid use.
- History of significant alcohol or benzodiazepine (BZD) use,
- Inability to speak English,
- Pre-operative aphasia or dysphasia,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer)Also: Intravenous parecoxib ("Dynastat" Pfizer)parecoxib or placebo | Drug | 1, 2 |
Primary outcome
Morphine consumption in 24 hour period.
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
10 secondary outcomes
Immediate post-operative hypertension (first 2 hours)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Pain scores at zero (time of extubation), 1, 2, 4, 12, 24 hours post operatively
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Analgesic efficacy at 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (first 24 hours)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Sedation or respiratory depression (first 24 hours)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Safety Monitoring (Serious adverse side effects)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative AMI
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative renal failure
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative thromboembolic stroke
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Post-operative intracranial haemorrhage
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21841050Williams DL, Pemberton E, Leslie K. Effect of intravenous parecoxib on post-craniotomy pain. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):398-403. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer223.
Related trials for Anaesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daryl L Williams, MBBS principal investigator
Director of Anaesthesia, Royal Melbourne Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous Parecoxib ('Dynastat' Pfizer) in people with Anaesthesia, run by Melbourne Health at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Morphine consumption in 24 hour period. (time frame: 24 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00455117, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2013.