Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 2NCT00456092
Phase II Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Adults With in Psoriatic Arthritis
A Phase 2 study testing Apremilast in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Amgen at 38 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
This study is to look at the preliminary efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of apremilast (20 mg twice a day and 40 mg once a day) versus placebo in patients with active psoriatic arthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Apremilast
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 204 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- 5 Mar 2007to 9 May 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (Moll and Wright Criteria), including symmetrical or asymmetrical peripheral joint involvement for at least 6 months
- Active psoriatic arthritis at the time of screening and baseline as defined by: 3 or more swollen joints AND 3 or more tender joints
- Negative rheumatoid factor (RF)
- If using methotrexate, be on methotrexate for at least 168 days (24 weeks) and be on a stable dose for at least 56 days prior to screening and throughout the study
- If using oral corticosteroids, be on a stable dose of prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to screening and throughout the study
- If using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy, be on a stable dose for at least 14 days prior to screening and throughout the study
Show all 17Show fewer
- Must meet the following laboratory criteria:
- Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL
- Hematocrit ≥ 27%
- White blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 3000/μL (≥ 3.0 X 10^9/L) and < 20,000/μL (< 20 X 10^9/L)
- Neutrophils ≥ 1500 /μL (≥ 1.5 X 10^9/L)
- Platelets ≥ 100,000 /μL (≥ 100 X 10^9/L)
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL (≤ 132.6 μmol/L)
- Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
- Aspartate transaminase (AST [serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, SGOT]) and alanine transaminase (ALT [serum glutamate pyruvic transaminase, SGPT]) ≤ 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening (Visit 1). In addition, sexually active FCBP must agree to use TWO adequate forms of contraception while on study medication. A FCBP must agree to have pregnancy tests every 28 days while on study medication
- Males (including those who have had a vasectomy) must agree to use barrier contraception (latex condoms) when engaging in reproductive sexual activity with FCBP while on study medication and for at least 84 days after taking the last dose of study medication
Who cannot join
- History of any clinically significant cardiac, endocrinologic, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic, or other major diseases
- Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study
- Pregnant or lactating female
- History of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (any subspecies) within 3 years prior to the screening visit. Infections that occurred > 3 years prior to entry must have been effectively treated.
- History of incompletely treated latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (as indicated by a positive Purified Protein Derivative [PPD] skin test or in vitro test [T SPOT®.TB, QuantiFERON Gold®])
- Clinically significant abnormality on the chest x-ray (CXR) at screening
Show all 20Show fewer
- Current erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular forms of psoriasis
- History of infected joint prosthesis within the past 5 years
- Systemic therapy for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis (except for methotrexate, ≤ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent, and NSAIDs) including, but not limited to, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, gold compounds, parenteral corticosteroids (including intra-articular), penicillamine, cyclosporine, oral retinoids, mycophenolate mofetil, thioguanine, hydroxyurea, sirolimus, tacrolimus, azathioprine, and fumaric acid esters within 28 days of randomization and throughout the study
- Topical therapy for the treatment of psoriasis including, but not limited to topical steroids, topical vitamin A or D analog preparations, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, or anthralin within 14 days of randomization (Note: Topical background therapy for treatment of psoriasis is allowed, except within 24 hours of a study visit, as follows: mild or moderate potency corticosteroids for treatment of the palms, face, scalp, axillae, plantar surfaces, and groin in accordance with the manufacturer's suggested usage. Nonmedicated emollients [eg, Eucerin®] and tar shampoo are also allowed.)
- Phototherapy (ultraviolet light A [UVA], narrow-band ultraviolet light B [NB-UVB], psoralens and long-wave ultraviolet radiation [PUVA]) within 28 days prior to randomization
- Etanercept use within 56 days prior to randomization
- Adalimumab, efalizumab, or infliximab use within 84 days prior to randomization
- Alefacept use within 168 days (24 weeks) prior to randomization
- Use of intra-articular corticosteroids within 28 days prior to randomization
- Use of any investigational medication within 28 days prior to randomization or 5 half-lives if known (whichever is longer)
- Any clinically significant abnormality on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at screening
- High-risk factor(s) for, or a history of, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C virus infection
- History of malignancy within previous 5 years (except for treated basal-cell skin carcinoma(s) and/or fewer than 3 treated squamous-cell skin carcinomas)
- Evidence of skin conditions at the time of screening visit that would interfere with evaluations of the effect of study medication on psoriasis
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 5 countries.
38 sites in 5 countries
Canada15 sites
Burlington Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Clinic
Burlington, Ontario, L7R 4B7
MAC Research Inc.
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 2B6
K-W Musculoskeletal Research Inc.
Kitchener, Ontario, N2M 5N6
Credit Valley Rheumatology
Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2V8
Arthritis Program Research Group Inc
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 3R7
Rheumatology Research Associates
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1A2
West Island Rheumatology Research Associates
Pointe-Claire, Quebec
Saskatoon Osteoporosis Center
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 0H6
Nexus Clinical Research
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3E1
Center for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3L9
The Arthritis Research Centre of Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L7
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8P4Y3
Probity Medical
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J1C4
Clinical Research and Arthritis Centre
Windsor, Ontario, N8X 5A6
Germany12 sites
Capio Franz von Prümmer Klinik
Bad Brückenau, 97769
Free University of Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Universitaetsklinik Koeln
Cologne, 50924
Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, 60590
Klinikum Eilbek
Hamburg, 22081
Universitaet Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
Herne, 44652
Universitaet Leipzig
Leipzig, 04103
Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig, 04103
University of Munich
Munich, 80336
Klinikum der Universität Munster
Münster, 48149
Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen
Nuremberg, 91054
Belgium4 sites
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020
Universiteit Hasselt
Diepenbeek, 3590
University Hospital
Leuven, 3000
Jan Palfijn Ziekenhuis
Merksem, 2170
United Kingdom4 sites
Chapel Allerton Hospital
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Hope Hospital
Salford, Manchester, M6 8HD
Haywood Hospital
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs, ST6 7AG
Netherlands3 sites
Leiden University Medical Centre
Leiden, 2300
Radboud University
Nijmegen, 6500
Hagaziekenhuis
The Hague, 2454 CH
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Dose Regimens of CC-10004 in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
This study is to look at the preliminary efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of apremilast (20 mg twice a day and 40 mg once a day) versus placebo in patients with active psoriatic arthritis.
Read the detailed description
Prior to the implementation of Amendment 1/UK3 the study consisted of 3 phases - pre-randomization up to 35 days, up to 84 days placebo-controlled treatment and a 28-day observational follow up. After the implementation of Amendment 1/UK3, the study consisted of 4 phases - pre-randomization up to 35 days, up to 84 days treatment in the placebo controlled treatment phase, up to 84 days treatment in the active treatment extension phase and a 28 day follow up. Participants who completed the treatment phase prior to implementation of amendment 1/UK3 did not have the option of entering the extension phase.
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Apremilast, Placebo
- Keywords
- psoriatic arthritis, ACR, PASI, DAS, pharmacokinetic, biopsy
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ApremilastDrug
Also called CC-10004, Otezla®
Capsules for oral administration
PlaceboDrug
Capsules for oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 40 mg QD | Experimental | Participants received 40 mg apremilast orally once a day (QD) for 12 weeks in the Treatment Phase. Participants who entered the Extension Phase continued to receive 40 mg apremilast QD for an additional 12 weeks.
The dose of apremilast was titrated starting at 10 mg QD during Days 1 to 3 followed by 20 mg QD during Days 4 to 7 and then 40 mg QD thereafter. A single dose reduction to 20 mg per day was allowed for participants who experienced intolerable adverse effects from study medication. Receives: Drug: Apremilast |
| Apremilast 20 mg BID | Experimental | Participants received 20 mg apremilast orally twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks in the Treatment Phase. Participants who entered the Extension Phase continued to receive 20 mg apremilast BID for an additional 12 weeks. The dose of apremilast was titrated starting at 10 mg QD during Days 1 to 3 followed by 20 mg QD during Days 4 to 7 and then 20 mg BID thereafter. A single dose reduction to 20 mg per day was allowed for participants who experienced intolerable adverse effects from study medication. Receives: Drug: Apremilast |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received matching placebo to apremilast orally BID for 12 weeks during the Treatment Phase. Participants who entered the Extension Phase were re-randomized on Day 85 to receive either 40 mg apremilast QD or 20 mg apremilast BID for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With a Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR 20) Response at Week 12
A modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR 20) response was defined as a participant who met the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count (includes 10 additional joints often involved in psoriatic arthritis: the first carpometacarpal [CMC] and the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints of the fingers); • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. Participants with no post-baseline ACR scores were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (41)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the Treatment Phase
The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded based upon the participant's symptoms according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE, Version 3.0), on a scale from 1 (Mild AE) to 5 (Death due to AE). Severe AEs are defined as NCI CTCAE grade 3 or higher. AEs related to study drug are those determined by the investigator as suspected to be related to study drug where a temporal relationship of the adverse event to study drug administration made a causal relationship possible, and other medications, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions did not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed event. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE which: - Resulted in death - Was life-threatening - Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization - Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity - Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect - Constituted an important medical event.
Measured: 12 weeks
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 12
A PsARC response is defined as improvement from Baseline in at least 2 of the following 4 measures, at least 1 of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures, according to the following: • At least 30% improvement in the 78 tender joint count, • At least 30% improvement in the 76 swollen joint count, • At least 20% improvement in the patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; • At least 20% improvement in the physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Participants with no post-baseline PsARC scores were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 50 Response at Week 12
A modified American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR 50) response was defined as a participant who met the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count (includes 10 additional joints often involved in psoriatic arthritis: the first carpometacarpal [CMC] and the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints of the fingers); • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. Participants with no post-baseline ACR scores were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 70 Response at Week 12
A modified American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR 70) response was defined as a participant who met the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count (includes 10 additional joints often involved in psoriatic arthritis: the first carpometacarpal [CMC] and the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints of the fingers); • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-reactive protein. Participants with no post-baseline ACR scores were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on Disease Activity Score (DAS28)-CRP(4) at Week 12
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time. DAS28-CRP(4) is derived from the following 4 variables: • 28 tender joint count, (TJC; does not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee) • 28 swollen joint count (SJC) • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (GH) according to the formula: DAS28-CRP(4) = 0.56*√(TJC28) + 0.28*(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014*GH + 0.96. DAS28 scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 from Baseline and a DAS28 score ≤ 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 and a DAS28 score ≤ to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 and a DAS28 score > 3.2
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response Based on DAS28-CRP(3) at Week 12
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time. DAS28-CRP(3) is derived from the following 3 variables: • 28 tender joint count, (does not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee) • 28 swollen joint count • C-reactive protein (CRP) according to the formula: DAS28-CRP(3) = [0.56*√(TJC28) + 0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1)] * 1.10 + 1.15. DAS28 scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score ≤ 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 and a DAS28 score ≤ to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 and a DAS28 score > 3.2
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP(4) Score of Mild Disease Activity or In Remission at Week 12
The DAS28-CRP(4) measures the severity of disease derived from the following 4 variables: • 28 tender joint count, (does not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee) • 28 swollen joint count • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-CRP(4) scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. Mild disease severity is defined as a DAS28-CRP(4) score of ≤ 3.2. In remission is defined as a DAS28-CRP(4) score of ≤ 2.6.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP(3) Score of Mild Disease Activity or In Remission at Week 12
The DAS28-CRP(3) measures the severity of disease derived from the following 3 variables: • 28 tender joint count (does not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee) • 28 swollen joint count • C-reactive protein (CRP) DAS28-CRP(3) scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. Mild disease severity is defined as a DAS28-CRP(3) score of ≤ 3.2. In remission is defined as a DAS28-CRP(3) score of ≤ 2.6.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Prematurely Due to Lack of Efficacy
The number of participants who withdrew prematurely from the treatment phase due to lack of efficacy, including flare of psoriasis, flare of psoriatic arthritis or worsening or not responding to study treatment.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to a Dose Reduction
The number of participants who were dose reduced during the treatment phase due to adverse events.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Maximal ACR Response During the Treatment Phase
The ACR-N index score was calculated for each participant at each time point in the study according to the following definition: ACR-N = the lowest of the following 3 values: - percent improvement from Baseline in the 76 swollen joint count, - percent improvement from Baseline in the 78 tender joint count - median percent improvement from Baseline in the following 5 measures ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. The maximal ACR-N for each participant during the 12-week treatment period was calculated, and represents the maximal ACR response achieved.
Measured: ACR was measured at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Time to ACR 20 Response During the Treatment Phase
The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to ACR 20 response was calculated for participants who had an ACR 20 response at any time during the treatment phase.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Time to ACR 50 Response During the Treatment Phase
The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to ACR 50 response was calculated for participants who had an ACR 50 response at any time during the treatment phase.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Time to ACR 70 Response During the Treatment Phase
The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to ACR 70 response was calculated for participants who had an ACR 70 response at any time during the treatment phase.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 12
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated on a scale from 0 (no dactylitis) to 3 (severe dactylitis). The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit and ranges from 0 to 60.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis
Enthesitis is inflammation of the entheses, the sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone. Enthesitis is characterized by swelling, pain, and tenderness around the calcaneous, and occasionally by effusion in the bursa associated with this joint. The enthesitis assessment is an evaluation of inflammation at the insertions of the Achilles tendon into the calcaneous and of the plantar fascia into the calcaneous. Inflammation at 1 or more insertions on either the right or left side constituted a positive assessment.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Time to Relapse of Psoriatic Arthritis During the Observational Follow-up Phase
Relapse of psoriatic arthritis was defined as a 50% loss of the maximal ACR improvement during the Observation Phase in participants who received apremilast and achieved at least an ACR 20 at their Final Treatment Phase/Early Termination Visit. The time to relapse during the Observational Phase was calculated from the time of maximum ACR reduction and from the date of the Final Treatment Phase visit. Participants classified as responders who did not relapse were censored at the day of the last follow-up.
Measured: From Week 12 to end of 28-day observational follow-up (1) and from the date of maximal ACR during the 12-week Treatment Phase until the end of the 28-day observational follow-up phase (2).
Number of Participants Who Relapsed During the Observational Follow-up Phase
Relapse of psoriatic arthritis was defined as a 50% loss of the maximal ACR improvement during the Observation Phase in participants who received apremilast and achieved at least an ACR 20 at their Final Treatment Phase/Early Termination Visit.
Measured: 28-day observational follow-up period following Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Summary Physical and Mental Component Scores at Week 12
The Medical Outcome SF 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The summary physical health score included the following subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The summary mental health score included other subscales: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10, where higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale. A higher change from baseline indicates an improvement in better health results or functioning.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 12
The DLQI is a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participants' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, leisure, work, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question is answered on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 30 where a higher score indicates that a participant's dermatological condition has a greater impact on their daily life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
The HAQ-DI is a self-administered instrument consisting of 20 questions in eight categories of functioning which represent a comprehensive set of functional activities - dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Each item asks over the past week whether a particular task can be performed. For each item, there is a four-level difficulty scale that is scored from 0 to 3, representing normal (no difficulty) (0), some difficulty (1), much difficulty (2), and unable to do (3). The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from zero (no disability) to three (completely disabled).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Fatigue (FACIT-F) at Week 12
The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13 item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue based on recall during the past 7 days. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher scores representing less fatigue.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the Extension Phase
The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded based upon the participant's symptoms according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE, Version 3.0), on a scale from 1 (Mild AE) to 5 (Death due to AE). Severe AEs are defined as NCI CTCAE grade 3 or higher. AEs related to study drug are those determined by the investigator as suspected to be related to study drug where a temporal relationship of the adverse event to study drug administration made a causal relationship possible, and other medications, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions did not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed event. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE which: - Resulted in death - Was life-threatening - Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization - Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity - Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect - Constituted an important medical event.
Measured: Weeks 12 to 24 (Extension Phase)
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24
A PsARC response is defined as improvement from Baseline in at least 2 of the following 4 measures, at least 1 of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • At least 30% improvement in the 78 tender joint count, • At least 30% improvement in the 76 swollen joint count, • At least 20% improvement in the patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; • At least 20% improvement in the physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Participants with missing data were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 20 Response at Week 24
A modified ACR 20 response was defined as a participant who met the following 3 criteria for improvement: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count (includes 10 additional joints often involved in psoriatic arthritis: the first carpometacarpal [CMC] and the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints of the fingers); • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. Response at Week 24 was measured as improvement from Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 12 (Day 85). Participants with no post-baseline ACR scores were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 50 Response at Week 24
A modified ACR 50 response was defined as a participant who met the following 3 criteria for improvement: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count (includes 10 additional joints often involved in psoriatic arthritis: the first carpometacarpal [CMC] and the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints of the fingers); • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. Response at Week 24 was measured as improvement from Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 12 (Day 85). Participants with no post-baseline ACR scores were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 70 Response at Week 24
A modified ACR 70 response was defined as a participant who met the following 3 criteria for improvement: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count (includes 10 additional joints often involved in psoriatic arthritis: the first carpometacarpal [CMC] and the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints of the fingers); • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. Response at Week 24 was measured as improvement from Baseline (Day 1). Participants with no post-baseline ACR scores were considered non-responders.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response Based on DAS28-CRP(4) at Week 24
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time. DAS28-CRP(4) is derived from the following 4 variables: • 28 tender joint count, (does not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee) • 28 swollen joint count • C-reactive protein • Patient's global assessment of disease activity according to the formula: DAS28-CRP(4) = 0.56*√(TJC28) + 0.28*(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014*GH + 0.96. DAS28 scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score ≤ 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 and a DAS28 score ≤ to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 and a DAS28 score > 3.2
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response Based on DAS28-CRP(3) at Week 24
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time. DAS28-CRP(3) is derived from the following 3 variables: • 28 tender joint count, (does not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee) • 28 swollen joint count • C-reactive protein (CRP) according to the formula: DAS28-CRP(3) = [0.56*√(TJC28) + 0.28*√(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1)] * 1.10 + 1.15. DAS28 scores range from 0 to 9.4, where higher scores indicate more disease activity. A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score ≤ 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 and a DAS28 score ≤ to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 > 1.2 and a DAS28 score > 3.2
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Maximal ACR Response During the Extension Period
The ACR-N index score was calculated for each participant at each time point in the study according to the following definition: ACR-N = the lowest of the following 3 values: • percent improvement from Baseline in the 76 swollen joint count, • percent improvement from Baseline in the 78 tender joint count • median percent improvement from Baseline in the following 5 measures ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. The maximal ACR-N for each participant during the 12-week extension period was calculated, and represents the maximal ACR response achieved.
Measured: ACR was measured at Baseline and Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Time to ACR 20 Response During the Study
Time to ACR 20 was measured from the first dose of apremilast to the first time a participant achieved an ACR 20 response in the treatment or extension phase. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to ACR 20 response were calculated for participants who had an ACR 20 response at any time during the study.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Time to ACR 50 Response During the Treatment and Extension Phase
Time to ACR 50 response was measured from the first dose of apremilast to the first time a participant achieved an ACR 50 response in the treatment or extension phase. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to ACR 50 response were calculated for participants who had an ACR 50 response at any time during the study.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Time to ACR 70 Response During the Treatment and Extension Phase
Time to ACR 70 response was measured from the first dose of apremilast to the first time a participant achieved an ACR 70 response in the treatment or extension phase. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to ACR 70 response were calculated for participants who had an ACR 70 response at any time during the study.
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated on a scale from 0 (no dactylitis) to 3 (severe dactylitis). The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit and ranges from 0 to 60. Change in the dactylitis severity score was assessed from Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 12 (Day 85).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis in the Extension Phase
Enthesitis is inflammation of the entheses, the sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone. Enthesitis is characterized by swelling, pain, and tenderness around the calcaneous, and occasionally by effusion in the bursa associated with this joint. The enthesitis assessment is an evaluation of inflammation at the insertions of the Achilles tendon into the calcaneous and of the plantar fascia into the calcaneous. Inflammation at 1 or more insertions on either the right or left side constituted a positive assessment.
Measured: Week 12 and Week 24
Time to Relapse of Psoriatic Arthritis After Extension Phase
Relapse of psoriatic arthritis was defined as a 50% loss of the maximal ACR improvement during the Follow-up Phase in participants who achieved at least an ACR 20 at their Final Extension Phase (Week 24)/Early Termination Visit. The time to relapse during the Follow-up Phase was calculated from the time of maximum ACR reduction and from the date of the Final Extension Phase visit. Participants classified as responders who did not relapse were censored at the day of the last follow-up.
Measured: From Week 24 to the end of the 28-day follow-up (1) and from the date of maximal ACR until the end of the 28-day follow-up phase (2).
Number of Participants Who Relapsed After the Extension Phase
Relapse of psoriatic arthritis was defined as a 50% loss of the maximal ACR improvement during the Follow-up Phase in participants who achieved at least an ACR 20 at their Final Extension Phase/Early Termination Visit.
Measured: Week 24 to Week 28 (28-day follow-up period)
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in SF-36 at Week 24
The Medical Outcome SF 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). The summary physical health score included the following subscales: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The summary mental health score included other subscales: vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10, where higher scores are associated with better functioning/quality of life. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale. A higher change from baseline indicates an improvement in better health results or functioning.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 24
The DLQI is a validated, self-administered, 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on participants' quality of life, based on recall over the past week. Domains include symptoms, feelings, daily activities, leisure, work, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question is answered on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) The total score ranges from 0 to 30 where a higher score indicates that a participant's dermatological condition has a greater impact on their daily life.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24
The HAQ-DI is a self-administered instrument consisting of 20 questions in eight categories of functioning which represent a comprehensive set of functional activities - dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Each item asks over the past week whether a particular task can be performed. For each item, there is a four-level difficulty scale that is scored from 0 to 3, representing normal (no difficulty) (0), some difficulty (1), much difficulty (2), and unable to do (3). The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from zero (no disability) to three (completely disabled).
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Fatigue (FACIT-F) at Week 24
The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13 item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue based on recall during the past 7 days. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher scores representing less fatigue.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study start5 Mar 2007
- Primary completion9 May 2009
- Study completion9 May 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psoriatic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00456092
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CC-10004-PSA-001
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 2 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Publications
Schett G, Wollenhaupt J, Papp K, Joos R, Rodrigues JF, Vessey AR, Hu C, Stevens R, de Vlam KL. Oral apremilast in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Oct;64(10):3156-67. doi: 10.1002/art.34627.
PubMed 22806399Strand V, Schett G, Hu C, Stevens RM. Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life with apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a phase II, randomized, controlled study. J Rheumatol. 2013 Jul;40(7):1158-65. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121200. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
PubMed 23588944
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Dose Regimens of CC-10004 in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00456092
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CC-10004-PSA-001
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- psoriatic arthritis, ACR, PASI, DAS, pharmacokinetic, biopsy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 5 Mar 2007 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 May 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 May 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Oct 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to look at the preliminary efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of apremilast (20 mg twice a day and 40 mg once a day) versus placebo in patients with active psoriatic arthritis.
Detailed description
Prior to the implementation of Amendment 1/UK3 the study consisted of 3 phases - pre-randomization up to 35 days, up to 84 days placebo-controlled treatment and a 28-day observational follow up. After the implementation of Amendment 1/UK3, the study consisted of 4 phases - pre-randomization up to 35 days, up to 84 days treatment in the placebo controlled treatment phase, up to 84 days treatment in the active treatment extension phase and a 28 day follow up. Participants who completed the treatment phase prior to implementation of amendment 1/UK3 did not have the option of entering the extension phase.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 40 mg QD | Experimental | Drug: ApremilastParticipants received 40 mg apremilast orally once a day (QD) for 12 weeks in the Treatment Phase. Participants who entered the Extension Phase continued to receive 40 mg apremilast QD for an additional 12 weeks. The dose of apremilast was titrated starting at 10 mg QD during Days 1 to 3 followed by 20 mg QD during Days 4 to 7 and then 40 mg QD thereafter. A single dose reduction to 20 mg per day was allowed for participants who experienced intolerable adverse effects from study medication. |
| Apremilast 20 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: ApremilastParticipants received 20 mg apremilast orally twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks in the Treatment Phase. Participants who entered the Extension Phase continued to receive 20 mg apremilast BID for an additional 12 weeks. The dose of apremilast was titrated starting at 10 mg QD during Days 1 to 3 followed by 20 mg QD during Days 4 to 7 and then 20 mg BID thereafter. A single dose reduction to 20 mg per day was allowed for participants who experienced intolerable adverse effects from study medication. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received matching placebo to apremilast orally BID for 12 weeks during the Treatment Phase. Participants who entered the Extension Phase were re-randomized on Day 85 to receive either 40 mg apremilast QD or 20 mg apremilast BID for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (Moll and Wright Criteria), including symmetrical or asymmetrical peripheral joint involvement for at least 6 months
- Active psoriatic arthritis at the time of screening and baseline as defined by: 3 or more swollen joints AND 3 or more tender joints
- Negative rheumatoid factor (RF)
- If using methotrexate, be on methotrexate for at least 168 days (24 weeks) and be on a stable dose for at least 56 days prior to screening and throughout the study
- If using oral corticosteroids, be on a stable dose of prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day or equivalent for at least 28 days prior to screening and throughout the study
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- History of any clinically significant cardiac, endocrinologic, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic, or other major diseases
- Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study
- Pregnant or lactating female
- History of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (any subspecies) within 3 years prior to the screening visit. Infections that occurred > 3 years prior to entry must have been effectively treated.
- History of incompletely treated latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (as indicated by a positive Purified Protein Derivative [PPD] skin test or in vitro test [T SPOT®.TB, QuantiFERON Gold®])
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ApremilastAlso: CC-10004, Otezla®Capsules for oral administration | Drug | Apremilast 20 mg BID, Apremilast 40 mg QD |
| PlaceboCapsules for oral administration | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With a Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR 20) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
A modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR 20) response was defined as a participant who met the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count (includes 10 additional joints often involved in psoriatic arthritis: the first carpometacarpal [CMC] and the distal interphalangeal [DIP] joints of the fingers); • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); ◦ C-reactive protein. Participants with no post-baseline ACR scores were considered non-responders.
41 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the Treatment Phase
Time frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 50 Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 70 Response at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on Disease Activity Score (DAS28)-CRP(4) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response Based on DAS28-CRP(3) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP(4) Score of Mild Disease Activity or In Remission at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP(3) Score of Mild Disease Activity or In Remission at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Prematurely Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to a Dose Reduction
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Maximal ACR Response During the Treatment Phase
Time frame: ACR was measured at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Time to ACR 20 Response During the Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Time to ACR 50 Response During the Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Time to ACR 70 Response During the Treatment Phase
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Time to Relapse of Psoriatic Arthritis During the Observational Follow-up Phase
Time frame: From Week 12 to end of 28-day observational follow-up (1) and from the date of maximal ACR during the 12-week Treatment Phase until the end of the 28-day observational follow-up phase (2).
Number of Participants Who Relapsed During the Observational Follow-up Phase
Time frame: 28-day observational follow-up period following Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Summary Physical and Mental Component Scores at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Fatigue (FACIT-F) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the Extension Phase
Time frame: Weeks 12 to 24 (Extension Phase)
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified ACR 70 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response Based on DAS28-CRP(4) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response Based on DAS28-CRP(3) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Maximal ACR Response During the Extension Period
Time frame: ACR was measured at Baseline and Weeks 16, 20 and 24
Time to ACR 20 Response During the Study
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Time to ACR 50 Response During the Treatment and Extension Phase
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Time to ACR 70 Response During the Treatment and Extension Phase
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis in the Extension Phase
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24
Time to Relapse of Psoriatic Arthritis After Extension Phase
Time frame: From Week 24 to the end of the 28-day follow-up (1) and from the date of maximal ACR until the end of the 28-day follow-up phase (2).
Number of Participants Who Relapsed After the Extension Phase
Time frame: Week 24 to Week 28 (28-day follow-up period)
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in SF-36 at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Change From Baseline and Week 12 in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 (Day 85) and Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22806399Schett G, Wollenhaupt J, Papp K, Joos R, Rodrigues JF, Vessey AR, Hu C, Stevens R, de Vlam KL. Oral apremilast in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Oct;64(10):3156-67. doi: 10.1002/art.34627.
- Results publication: PubMed 23588944Strand V, Schett G, Hu C, Stevens RM. Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life with apremilast for psoriatic arthritis: a phase II, randomized, controlled study. J Rheumatol. 2013 Jul;40(7):1158-65. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121200. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Related trials for Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogs on Disease Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
38 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Apremilast in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Amgen at 38 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Canada, Germany, Belgium, United Kingdom, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With a Modified American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR 20) Response at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00456092, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2020.