Pulmonary EmbolismPhase 4PREPIC2NCT00457158
PREPIC 2 : Prevention of Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism by Vena Cava Interruption
A Phase 4 study testing ALN optional filter in people with Pulmonary Embolism and Venous Thrombosis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 20 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of optional vena cava filter implanted 3 months in prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism associated with thrombotic risk factors Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thrombosis
- What is being tested?
- ALN optional filter
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 399 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2006to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent
- Acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism; AND
- Deep or superficial vein thrombosis; AND
- At least one of the risk factors below :
- More than 75 years old
- Evolutiv cancer (excepting locally cutaneous cancer)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Known chronic heart failure treated
- Chronic respiratory insufficiency treated
- Bilateral deep vein thrombosis
- Ilio-cava thrombosis
- Ischemic stroke > 3 days and < 6 months, with lower limb deficit
- Cardiac repercussion of pulmonary embolism assessed by echocardiography or increasing troponin I or T, or Brain Natriuretic Peptid or proBNP
Who cannot join
- Contrindication to an anticoagulant treatment or recurrent thromboembolic event despite adequate anticoagulation
- Vena cava filter already inserted
- Filter insertion impossible due to caval thrombosis
- More than 72 hours pre-randomized treatment with therapeutic dosage of anticoagulant therapy
- Non carcinologic surgery within 3 months prior randomization
- Carcinologic surgery within 10 days prior randomization
Show all 10Show fewer
- Hypersensitivity to contrast media
- Access port in place or programmed within 3 months
- Woman who are child bearing
- Life expectancy < 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 1 country.
20 sites in 1 country
France20 sites
Service de Médecine Vasculaire, CHU Amiens
Amiens, 80080
Service d'Accueil des Urgences, CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49100
Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Besançon
Besançon, 25000
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33000
Département de Medecine Interne et Pneumologie, CHU de Brest
Brest, 29200
Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Antoine Beclere
Clamart, 92140
Service d'Accueil des Urgences, CHU de Clermont Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, 21000
Service des Urgences, CHG de Firminy
Firminy, 42700
Unité de Médecine Vasculaire, CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, 38000
Service d'Urgences Soins Intensifs cardiologiques, CHU de Lille
Lille, 59000
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
Service de Medecine Interne et Maladies Vasculaires, CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, 34295
Service de Medecine Interne et Vasculaire, CHU de Nancy
Nancy, 54000
Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Nice
Nice, 06000
Département de Pneumologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP HP
Paris, 75015
Service d'Urgences et de Réanimation Medicale, CHU de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Service de Medecine et Therapeutique - CHU de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Service de Médecine Vasculaire, CH Toulon
Toulon, 83056
Service de Cardiologie, CHU de Tours
Tours, 37000
About this study
Official title: PREPIC 2 : Interruption of Inferior Vena Cava by a Retrievable Filter for the Prevention of Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism : a Randomised, Open Label Study
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of optional vena cava filter implanted 3 months in prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism associated with thrombotic risk factors
Read the detailed description
Pulmonary embolism is a common pathology, which could be fatal (about 10 000 death/year in France). It mainly originates from a deep vein thrombosis. In order to reduce mortality, prevention of new or recurrent PE is a major therapeutic aim. Only one randomised trial (PREPIC) assessed the interest of a vena cava filter in patients treated by anticoagulant treatment for a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Results show a significant 50 % reduction of the embolic risk with the filter. This benefit occurs from the first days, but are counterbalanced by a long-term increasing risk of recurrent DVT. The filter appears promising in patients with a high risk of PE, for exemple the elderly, presenting with a thromboembolic history, cancer, heart failure or respiratory insufficiency, or a recent PE. Moreover, retrievable filters, which may be either left in place permanently or retrieved after some days or weeks, could limit the filter thrombosis risk.
The aim of PREPIC 2 study is to assess, in a multicenter randomised trial, efficacy and safety of a retrievable vena cava filter implanted 3 months versus no filter in 400 patients treated with anticoagulant drugs for a symptomatic PE associated with at least one thrombotic risk factor. A clinical follow-up will be performed at 6 months. The primary outcome is the incidence of recurrent PE at 3 months, including symptomatic and fatal PE. It will be adjudicated by an independent committee, blinded to patients' allocation.
This study will assess the benefit risk ratio of the retrievable filter for the prevention of recurrent PE, without increasing the thrombotic risk and the disadvantage due to post thrombotic syndrome.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thrombosis
- Being tested
- ALN optional filter
- Keywords
- pulmonary embolism, inferior vena cava filters, venous thrombosis, randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thrombosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ALN optional filterDevice
J1 : ALN optional filter M3 : ALN optional filter removed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | ALN optional filter Receives: Device: ALN optional filter |
| 2 | No intervention | No ALN optional filter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
at 3 months, combined criteria including recurrent PE confirmed by objective tests and fatal PE confirmed by autopsy and death which can not be attribuated to a documented cause and for which PE/DVT can't be ruled out
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
recurrent pulmonary embolism, fatal or not, at 6 months (combined criteria including recurrent pulmonary ambolism confirmed by objective tests and fatal PE confirmed by autopsy and death which can not be attribuated to a documented cause and for which P
Measured: 6 months
current or new symptomatic DVT confirmed by objective tests
Measured: 6 months
mecanical complication of filter (migration, tilt, transfixion) and or puncture site hematoma, and/or local or general infection due to filter
Measured: 6 months
filter thrombosis
Measured: 6 months
filter retrieval failure
Measured: 6 months
total death
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2006
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary EmbolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 399 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France, Fondation de France, Fondation de l'Avenir, ALN Implants Company
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Patrick MISMETTI, MD PhD, Principal investigator, CHU de Saint-Etienne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00457158
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0501105
- Other IDs
- 2006-01-001
- Acronym
- PREPIC2
- Status last verified
- Nov 2012
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, Page Y, Tardy B, Girard P, Laporte S, Faivre R, Charbonnier B, Barral FG, Huet Y, Simonneau G. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 12;338(7):409-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802123380701.
PubMed 9459643PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005 Jul 19;112(3):416-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512834. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
PubMed 16009794Mismetti P, Laporte S, Pellerin O, Ennezat PV, Couturaud F, Elias A, Falvo N, Meneveau N, Quere I, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Schmidt J, Seinturier C, Sevestre MA, Beregi JP, Tardy B, Lacroix P, Presles E, Leizorovicz A, Decousus H, Barral FG, Meyer G; PREPIC2 Study Group. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1627-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3780.
PubMed 25919526
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PREPIC 2 : Interruption of Inferior Vena Cava by a Retrievable Filter for the Prevention of Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism : a Randomised, Open Label Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00457158
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREPIC2 / 0501105
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thrombosis
- Keywords
- pulmonary embolism, inferior vena cava filters, venous thrombosis, randomized controlled trial
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 399 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France, Fondation de France, Fondation de l'Avenir, ALN Implants Company
- Study start
- Jul 2006
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of optional vena cava filter implanted 3 months in prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism associated with thrombotic risk factors
Detailed description
Pulmonary embolism is a common pathology, which could be fatal (about 10 000 death/year in France). It mainly originates from a deep vein thrombosis. In order to reduce mortality, prevention of new or recurrent PE is a major therapeutic aim. Only one randomised trial (PREPIC) assessed the interest of a vena cava filter in patients treated by anticoagulant treatment for a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Results show a significant 50 % reduction of the embolic risk with the filter. This benefit occurs from the first days, but are counterbalanced by a long-term increasing risk of recurrent DVT. The filter appears promising in patients with a high risk of PE, for exemple the elderly, presenting with a thromboembolic history, cancer, heart failure or respiratory insufficiency, or a recent PE. Moreover, retrievable filters, which may be either left in place permanently or retrieved after some days or weeks, could limit the filter thrombosis risk.
The aim of PREPIC 2 study is to assess, in a multicenter randomised trial, efficacy and safety of a retrievable vena cava filter implanted 3 months versus no filter in 400 patients treated with anticoagulant drugs for a symptomatic PE associated with at least one thrombotic risk factor. A clinical follow-up will be performed at 6 months. The primary outcome is the incidence of recurrent PE at 3 months, including symptomatic and fatal PE. It will be adjudicated by an independent committee, blinded to patients' allocation.
This study will assess the benefit risk ratio of the retrievable filter for the prevention of recurrent PE, without increasing the thrombotic risk and the disadvantage due to post thrombotic syndrome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Device: ALN optional filterALN optional filter |
| 2 | No intervention | –No ALN optional filter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Informed consent
- Acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism; AND
- Deep or superficial vein thrombosis; AND
- At least one of the risk factors below :
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Contrindication to an anticoagulant treatment or recurrent thromboembolic event despite adequate anticoagulation
- Vena cava filter already inserted
- Filter insertion impossible due to caval thrombosis
- More than 72 hours pre-randomized treatment with therapeutic dosage of anticoagulant therapy
- Non carcinologic surgery within 3 months prior randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ALN optional filterJ1 : ALN optional filter M3 : ALN optional filter removed | Device | 1 |
Primary outcome
at 3 months, combined criteria including recurrent PE confirmed by objective tests and fatal PE confirmed by autopsy and death which can not be attribuated to a documented cause and for which PE/DVT can't be ruled out
Time frame: 3 months
6 secondary outcomes
recurrent pulmonary embolism, fatal or not, at 6 months (combined criteria including recurrent pulmonary ambolism confirmed by objective tests and fatal PE confirmed by autopsy and death which can not be attribuated to a documented cause and for which P
Time frame: 6 months
current or new symptomatic DVT confirmed by objective tests
Time frame: 6 months
mecanical complication of filter (migration, tilt, transfixion) and or puncture site hematoma, and/or local or general infection due to filter
Time frame: 6 months
filter thrombosis
Time frame: 6 months
filter retrieval failure
Time frame: 6 months
total death
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2012.
- Background: PubMed 9459643Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, Page Y, Tardy B, Girard P, Laporte S, Faivre R, Charbonnier B, Barral FG, Huet Y, Simonneau G. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 12;338(7):409-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802123380701.
- Background: PubMed 16009794PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005 Jul 19;112(3):416-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512834. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25919526Mismetti P, Laporte S, Pellerin O, Ennezat PV, Couturaud F, Elias A, Falvo N, Meneveau N, Quere I, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Schmidt J, Seinturier C, Sevestre MA, Beregi JP, Tardy B, Lacroix P, Presles E, Leizorovicz A, Decousus H, Barral FG, Meyer G; PREPIC2 Study Group. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1627-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3780.
Related trials for Pulmonary Embolism
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Long-Term Safety and Outcomes of Treating Pulmonary Embolism With the Indigo Aspiration System
Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study Evaluating Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Device in Acute Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Embolism (PE), Pulmonary Embolism With Right Ventricle Enlargement
RecruitingObservational study
Inari VISION Registry
Pulmonary Embolism
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrick MISMETTI, MD PhD principal investigator
CHU de Saint-Etienne
20 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing ALN optional filter in people with Pulmonary Embolism and Venous Thrombosis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 20 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
at 3 months, combined criteria including recurrent PE confirmed by objective tests and fatal PE confirmed by autopsy and death which can not be attribuated to a documented cause and for which PE/DVT can't be ruled out (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00457158, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.