AzTrials
AzTrials

Age Related Macular DegenerationPhase 2NCT00457678

Second Line Therapy to Treat Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) for Patients Not Responding Well to Lucentis Therapy by Itself

A Phase 2 study testing Visudyne, Lucentis and Dexamethasone in people with Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by Vitreous -Retina- Macula Consultants of New York.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Visudyne-Lucentis-dexamethasone (V-L-D) triple therapy will give similar efficacy and safety results as Lucentis monotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Age Related Macular Degeneration
What is being tested?
Visudyne, Lucentis and Dexamethasone
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2007to 4 Dec 2007
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with subfoveal CNV due to AMD who, after 2-6 previous treatments with Lucentis monotherapy, continue to have exudative activity associated with the CNV lesion 4-8 weeks after the last treatment. Exudative activity is defined as one or more of:
  • CNV leakage confirmed by FA
  • New hemorrhage associated with the CNV lesion
  • Subretinal fluid or cystoid macular edema by OCT showing retinal thickness ≥ 230 μm
  • All lesion composition types with a lesion greatest linear dimension (GLD) ≤ 5400 microns (approximately ≤ 9 disc areas [DA])
  • Best corrected ETDRS VA score of 25-73 letters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40-20/320)

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subfoveal geographic atrophy or subfoveal fibrosis in the study eye
  • Intraocular surgery within 3 months of enrollment
  • Inability to attend the protocol-required visits
  • Known allergies or hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Masked Comparison of Lucentis™ Monotherapy With Triple Therapy of Reduced Fluence Visudyne-Lucentis-Dexamethasone (V-L-D) in Patients With CNV Secondary to AMD as Second Line Therapy After Lucentis Monotherapy

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that Visudyne-Lucentis-dexamethasone (V-L-D) triple therapy will give similar efficacy and safety results as Lucentis monotherapy.

Read the detailed description

Study Design:

Patients who have received 2-6 previous treatments with Lucentis monotherapy and who have exudative activity associated with the choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion, as confirmed by fluorescein angiography (FA) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), will be eligible. Patients will be randomly assigned at 4-8 weeks after the previous Lucentis treatment to either

  1. continuation of Lucentis monotherapy
  2. triple therapy with half fluence Visudyne (300 mW/cm2 for 83 seconds) followed within 2 hours by intravitreal Lucentis 0.5 mg (first injection) and then dexamethasone 0.5 mg (second injection) (V-L-D).

Both groups will receive treatment at baseline and then as needed (PRN), according to retreatment criteria, with monthly assessments thereafter for 12 months. In the triple therapy group, patients may only be retreated with the V-L-D combination at intervals of no less than 3 months; if retreatment is needed 1 or 2 months after a previous V-L-D treatment, the patient will receive a Lucentis injection at that visit; however, if retreatment is needed and the previous V-L-D treatment was at least 3 months prior, then V-L-D treatment is mandatory. OCT, visual acuity (VA) testing, and possibly FA will be conducted at each assessment visit to define the need for retreatment.

Being tested
Visudyne, Lucentis, Dexamethasone
Keywords
Vision loss, Retina, VEG-F, Fovea, AMD
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration, Vision Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2007 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion4 Dec 2007
  4. Study completion4 Dec 2007

Why it stopped: Site did not enroll any patients to the study.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients with AMD will be randomly assigned to one of 2 treatments: * Continuation of previous Lucentis monotherapy (50 patients) * V-L-D triple therapy with half fluence (300 mW/cm2 for 83 seconds) Visudyne followed within 2 hours by intravitreal Lucentis 0.5 mg (first injection) and intravitreal dexamethasone 0.5 mg (second injection) (50 patients)
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00457678
Sponsor's protocol ID
TAPER
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
4 Apr 2007
Last updated
23 Aug 2017
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Visudyne, Lucentis and Dexamethasone in people with Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by Vitreous -Retina- Macula Consultants of New York.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in