AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT00458172

Lay Theories of Health in Young and Middle Aged American Adults

An observational study of Healthy, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is the second empirical investigation in a series of studies, examining what everyday people believe that it means to be healthy. Part of this research also involves examining whether these lay theories of health vary according to various demographic classifications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Assessment of beliefs and attitudes
How many people
302 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2007to Sep 2007
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • English primary language
  • U.S. residency (but not necessarily citizenship)

Who cannot join

  • Only by age

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Study site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Study 1 of Lay Theories of Health: Conceptualizations of Physical, Mental, and Social Health in Young and Middle-Aged Adults

This study is the second empirical investigation in a series of studies, examining what everyday people believe that it means to be healthy. Part of this research also involves examining whether these lay theories of health vary according to various demographic classifications.

Read the detailed description

In the journal "Science," Engel (1977) proposed the term "biopsychosocial model" to recognize the social and psychological factors impacting health and illness. Psychologists have played a significant role in contributing to current evidence for this model, including understanding how individuals think about their health.

Work in this area has corresponded to work on the implicit theories of individuals, and how those implicit theories have an impact upon cognition, affect, and behavior. Implicit theories are mental constructions about specific phenomena which, while often elaborate in structure, content, and function, are not well articulated by those who hold them.

A failure to thoroughly investigate lay theories of health has implications for the biopsychosocial model of health and illness, which states that it is not only the knowledge of the physician, but also the beliefs of the patient, that have consequences for the patient's experience of health and illness. Research on individual beliefs regarding illness has been accumulating for some time, and it is becoming apparent that these beliefs have significant consequences for individual health behavior. However, current studies assessing lay theories regarding illness may be inadequate to achieving the goal of fully learning how lay theories have an impact upon health. The methodologies utilized rarely distinguish whether the implicit theories under study should be attributed to laypeople or to experts, and tend to assume that health and illness have perfect reciprocal correspondence with one another in the minds of laypeople. If researchers hope to understand laypeople's theories about health, exclusively investigating lay theories of illness will not suffice to answer the question.

The present series of studies seeks to investigate a number of unanswered questions in the existing literature on lay theories of health. In a Prestudy, we investigated how adult laypeople define what it is to be healthy through open-ended survey questions. At the present time (the focus of the current IRB application) we hope to have participants rate the importance of each of the previously-gathered items to their concept of health (Study 1). We will then present the most important items in pairs to a second sample, and ask those participants to rate how similar or dissimilar the items are to one another. From these ratings, we will determine the structure of lay theories of health through scaling procedures. After determining the structure of lay theories (e.g., in terms of dimensions), we will focus on developing a comprehensive measure of lay theories of health. We will at that time conduct a series of validation studies to determine whether and how these dimensions of lay theories differ from those of experts, do or do not correspond with existing constructs measuring well-being, and are utilized by laypeople in making health judgments and decisions (which will be reviewed and conducted at a later date).

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Assessment of beliefs and attitudes
Keywords
lay theories, health concepts, survey, internet research, Ideas about health

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Assessment of beliefs and attitudesBehavioural

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2007
  3. Primary completionSep 2007
  4. Study completionSep 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Enrolment
302 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00458172
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM00011805
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
4 Apr 2007
Last updated
29 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Healthy, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in