AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionsPhase 3MONETNCT00458302

Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir 800/100 mg Once a Day Versus a Triple Combination Therapy With Darunavir/Ritonavir

A Phase 3 study testing darunavir (DRV, TMC114) in people with HIV Infections and AIDS Virus, run by Janssen-Cilag International NV at 27 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and darunavir/ritonavir in 250 HIV-1 infected patients who have been on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
darunavir (DRV, TMC114)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
256 participants
Where
27 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
Jun 2007to Jan 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with documented HIV-1 infection
  • Patients currently receiving HAART for at least 24 weeks
  • Plasma viral load < 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to screening (two results must be documented)
  • Patients taking the same antiretroviral combination for at least 8 weeks before screening
  • Patients and physician's preference to change the current HAART regimen for reasons of simplification and/or toxicity
  • CD4 > 100/mm3 at the start of HAART and > 200/mm3 at screening.

Who cannot join

  • No history of virological failure defined as two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA > 500 copies/mL while on previous or current antiretroviral therapy
  • No history of any primary PI mutations as defined by the IAS-USA guidelines 2006
  • No patients co-infected with hepatitis B
  • No pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • No active clinically significant disease or life threatening disease or findings during screening of medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or outcome of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

27 sites in 11 countries.

27 sites in 11 countries

Germany5 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin

  • Study site

    Frankfurt

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Hanover

  • Study site

    Kÿln N/A

Other trials in Germany

Spain5 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona

  • Study site

    Donostia Guipuzcoa

  • Study site

    Granada

  • Study site

    Madrid

  • Study site

    Valladolid

Other trials in Spain

Denmark4 sites
  • Study site

    Aarhus

  • Study site

    Copenhagen

  • Study site

    Hvidovre

  • Study site

    Odense

Other trials in Denmark

Israel3 sites
  • Study site

    Jerusalem

  • Study site

    Tel Aviv

  • Study site

    Tel HaShomer

Other trials in Israel

Belgium2 sites
  • Study site

    Antwerp

  • Study site

    Brussels

Other trials in Belgium

Portugal2 sites
  • Study site

    Lisbon

  • Study site

    Porto

Other trials in Portugal

Russia2 sites
  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Austria1 site
  • Study site

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Hungary1 site
  • Study site

    Budapest

Other trials in Hungary

Switzerland1 site
  • Study site

    Sankt Gallen

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom1 site
  • Study site

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Controlled, Open-label Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg O.D. vs a Triple Combination Therapy With DRV/r in HIV-1 Infected Patients With Undetectable Plasma HIV-RNA on Their Current Treatments.

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and darunavir/ritonavir in 250 HIV-1 infected patients who have been on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) and have plasma viral load below 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks.

Read the detailed description

This study is randomised (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), controlled, open-label trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r in 250 HIV-1 infected patients. Patients will be considered eligible if they have not changed any antiretroviral drugs for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and have documented evidence of plasma viral load (or plasma HIV-1 RNA) < 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to being screened. The trial will consist of a screening period up to 4 weeks, a 48-week treatment period, followed by a 4-week follow-up (FU) period. The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority in efficacy of DRV/r versus the triple combination therapy containing DRV/r, with respect to confirmed virologic response, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.Patients will be assigned a study medication based on a 1:1 ratio to either switch to a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D, or initiate monotherapy with DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. Patients in the triple combination arm who are already on 2 nucleosides prior to randomisation may remain on these or switch them at baseline. Patients randomised to the monotherapy arm will discontinue Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) at baseline and commence DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has been commissioned for this study. The role of the DSMB is to review the progress of the trial and the accumulating data to detect evidence of early safety issues for the patients while the trial is ongoing. An interim analysis will be performed after 24 weeks of treatment. The results of the Week 24 analysis will be used to determine whether long-term follow-up to 72 and 96 weeks will be done. The protease inhibitor (PI) component of the regimen cannot be changed until the end of the treatment period and the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) cannot be modified until the end of the treatment period with the following exception: single antiretroviral (ARV) substitutions will be allowed for tolerability/toxicity reasons, as long as this can be linked to an adverse event (AE) or an serious adverse event (SAE). After withdrawal of the patient from the trial, changes in the ARV regimen are allowed after the assessments of the withdrawal visit have been performed.

Temporary interruption of all ARVs will be allowed in the event of suspected toxicity, as long as the temporary interruption is associated with and can be linked to an AE or a SAE. For the control arm, the nucleoside analogues could be re-optimized at baseline or on study, and all approved ARVs allowed. However, PIs other than DRV/r are not allowed during the treatment period. Patients who cannot resume study medication will have to be withdrawn. A physical examination will be done at protocol-scheduled visits and vital signs will be monitored at each study visit. In addition, at each study visit, every patient will be asked about the occurrence of or change to AEs since they were last seen by the investigator. Laboratory samples for haematology and serum chemistry will be drawn and the results determined and transmitted to the investigator. Urinalysis will be performed. Pregnancy test will be done at each visit for female participants of child-bearing potential. The primary endpoint will be the proportion with virologic response, defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48.The study hypothesis is that DRV/r monotherapy will be as effective as a triple combination regimen and will be well tolerated in this early pre-treated HIV-1 patients. Two 400mg tablets of darunavir once daily orally within 30 minutes after completion of a meal for 48 weeks.

Being tested
darunavir (DRV, TMC114)
Keywords
HIV, Monotherapy, Darunavir, Protease inhibitor, Early pre-treated, Undetectable, Treatment Experienced
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • darunavir (DRV, TMC114)Drug

    800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks

  • darunavir (DRV, TMC114)Drug

    800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) monotherapy for 144 weeks

Study groups in NCT00458302
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
darunavir monotherapyExperimentaldarunavir (DRV, TMC114) 800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) monotherapy for 144 weeks
Receives: Drug: darunavir (DRV, TMC114)
darunavir + 2 NRTIExperimentaldarunavir (DRV, TMC114) 800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks
Receives: Drug: darunavir (DRV, TMC114)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]

    Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 48

    Measured: Week 48

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT) - TLOVR, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]

    Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 48 window

    Measured: Week 48

  2. Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]

    Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144

    Measured: Week 144

  3. Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT), TLOVR - All Switches Included, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]

    Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load < 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). All switches included means that all data even after any changes of treatment were kept. *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 144 window.

    Measured: Week 144

  4. Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, <200 Copies/ml, Week 144]

    Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load < 200 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). *Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144

    Measured: week 144

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count

    The mean change in CD4+ cell count from baseline was calculated with a last observation carried forward method; i.e. the last observed value was carried forward, irrespective of the reason for discontinuation.

    Measured: at week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 112, 128, 144

  6. Resistance Determinations

    Number of patients with resistance mutations at any time point when a patient had a viral load > 50 copies/mL after randomization.

    Measured: at each visit from baseline to week 144

  7. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Score

    The FAHI is a validated health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire consist of 44 items and includes 5 functional scales (physical, social, emotional, functional and global well-being and cognitive function). Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

    Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

  8. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscale

    The FAHI cognitive function subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on cognitive function on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

    Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

  9. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale

    The FAHI emotional well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on emotional well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

    Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

  10. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscale

    The FAHI functional and global well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on functional and global well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

    Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

  11. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale

    The FAHI physical well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

    Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

  12. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale

    The FAHI social well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

    Measured: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2007
  3. Primary completionFeb 2009
  4. Study completionJan 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
256 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00458302
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR013159
Other IDs
TMC114HIV3006, 2006-006437-40
Acronym
MONET
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
6 Apr 2007
Last updated
19 Dec 2012
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Arribas JR, Horban A, Gerstoft J, Fatkenheuer G, Nelson M, Clumeck N, Pulido F, Hill A, van Delft Y, Stark T, Moecklinghoff C. The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml. AIDS. 2010 Jan 16;24(2):223-30. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283348944.

    PubMed 20010070

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing darunavir (DRV, TMC114) in people with HIV Infections and AIDS Virus, run by Janssen-Cilag International NV at 27 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 27 sites in Germany, Spain, Denmark, Israel, Belgium and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Feb 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48] (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00458302, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in