Type 1 DiabetesNCT00460304
The Effect of Pramlintide on Meal Time Insulin Bolus
A study testing pramlintide and continuous glucose monitoring in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Diabetes Care Center.
Trial summary
The primary objective is to establish the mean percentage of change in the insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio due to pramlintide treatment once a maximum tolerated dose or 6 mcg before each meal is reached. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- pramlintide and continuous glucose monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2007to Nov 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: >17
- Type I diabetes
- Onset of diabetes >3 months
- Use of insulin pump >3 months
- Hb A1C <8.9%
- Demonstrated compliance to clinic visits
- Demonstrated knowledge and use of bolus dosing calculations, carbohydrate counting, use of insulin pump and blood glucose meter
- Monitor blood glucose >4/day
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or nursing
- Recent (within last 3 months) factor that may cause change in insulin sensitivity, e.g. severe emotional or physical stress, recent significant infection or surgery. etc.
- Renal failure (creatinine >1.5 mg/dl
- Symptomatic gastroparesis
- Using a medication that would interfere with insulin sensitivity
- Treatment with extenatide or DPP IV inhibitor within the last 4 weeks
Show all 10Show fewer
- HbA1C change >0.9 % within the last 3 months
- Significant change in eating or activity pattern
- Weight change of >1.9 kg within the last 3 months
- ALT >3 times upper limits of normal
About this study
The primary objective is to establish the mean percentage of change in the insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio due to pramlintide treatment once a maximum tolerated dose or 6 mcg before each meal is reached. The secondary objective is to establish which insulin bolus wave form is associated with the lowest post-bolus without hypoglycemia in subjects treated with maximum pramlintide dosage.
Read the detailed description
Pramlintide. an amylinomimetic, is effective in reducing post-meal glucose by non-insulin means. As such, when patients requiring insulin treatment are treated with pramlintide, the bolus insulin does must be reduced. Current recommendations suggest a 50% reduction but in our experience and that of a recent study this appears excessive. By using continuous glucose monitoring(CGM) to guide pre-meal insulin treatment, we will determine the percentage reduction in meal time insulin bolus comparing pre-pramlintide to maximum pramlintide treatment. We anticipate that the reduction in bolus dosage will be about 25%. In addition, the secondary aim of this study is to determine which bolus pattern, standard, square or dual wave, provides the best post-meal glucose control with pramlintide therapy.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Being tested
- pramlintide, continuous glucose monitoring
- Keywords
- Type I diabetes, Insulin pump, Continuous glucose monitoring, Insulin to carbohydrate ratio, Correction factor, Pramlintide
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pramlintideDrug
continuous glucose monitoringProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The mean ICR from Vist 3a-e and 4a-e will be compared. Percentage reduction of ICR will be calculated. From these the mean ICR will be calculated.
Measured: 12-10-07
Secondary outcomes (1)
The mean post-meal glucose from the four hour period after beginning a meal will be averaged for each bolus wave form. Then the three wave form mean glucose results will be compared.
Measured: 12-10-07
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2007
- Primary completionNov 2008
- Study completionNov 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Diabetes Care Center
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
- Investigators
- Allen B King, MD, Principal investigator, Diabetes Care CenterGary S Wolfe, RN, CCM, Study director, Diabetes Care Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00460304
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07-01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2009
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Edelman S, Garg S, Frias J, Maggs D, Wang Y, Zhang B, Strobel S, Lutz K, Kolterman O. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing pramlintide treatment in the setting of intensive insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Oct;29(10):2189-95. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0042.
PubMed 17003291Symlin (package insert) San Diego, CA Amylin Pharmacetucials. 2005
King AB, Armstrong DU. Basal bolus dosing: a clinical experience. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2005 May;1(2):215-20. doi: 10.2174/1573399054022794.
PubMed 18220597King AB, Armstrong DU. A prospective evaluation of insulin dosing recommendations in patients with type 1 diabetes at near normal glucose control: Basal dosing. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Jan;1(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100106.
PubMed 19888377King AB, Armstrong DU. A prospective evaluation of insulin dosing recommendations in patients with type 1 diabetes at near normal glucose control: bolus dosing. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Jan;1(1):42-6. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100107.
PubMed 19888378Young AA, Gedulin B, Vine W, Percy A, Rink TJ. Gastric emptying is accelerated in diabetic BB rats and is slowed by subcutaneous injections of amylin. Diabetologia. 1995 Jun;38(6):642-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00401833.
PubMed 7672483Gedulin BR, Rink TJ, Young AA. Dose-response for glucagonostatic effect of amylin in rats. Metabolism. 1997 Jan;46(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(97)90170-0.
PubMed 9005972Rushing PA, Lutz TA, Seeley RJ, Woods SC. Amylin and insulin interact to reduce food intake in rats. Horm Metab Res. 2000 Feb;32(2):62-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978590.
PubMed 10741687Gross TM, Mastrototaro JJ. Efficacy and reliability of the continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2 Suppl 1:S19-26. doi: 10.1089/15209150050214087. No abstract available.
PubMed 11469628
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Pramlintide on Meal Time Insulin Bolus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00460304
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07-01
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Type I diabetes, Insulin pump, Continuous glucose monitoring, Insulin to carbohydrate ratio, Correction factor, Pramlintide
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Diabetes Care CenterIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
- Study start
- Sep 2007
- Primary completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective is to establish the mean percentage of change in the insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio due to pramlintide treatment once a maximum tolerated dose or 6 mcg before each meal is reached. The secondary objective is to establish which insulin bolus wave form is associated with the lowest post-bolus without hypoglycemia in subjects treated with maximum pramlintide dosage.
Detailed description
Pramlintide. an amylinomimetic, is effective in reducing post-meal glucose by non-insulin means. As such, when patients requiring insulin treatment are treated with pramlintide, the bolus insulin does must be reduced. Current recommendations suggest a 50% reduction but in our experience and that of a recent study this appears excessive. By using continuous glucose monitoring(CGM) to guide pre-meal insulin treatment, we will determine the percentage reduction in meal time insulin bolus comparing pre-pramlintide to maximum pramlintide treatment. We anticipate that the reduction in bolus dosage will be about 25%. In addition, the secondary aim of this study is to determine which bolus pattern, standard, square or dual wave, provides the best post-meal glucose control with pramlintide therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age: >17
- Type I diabetes
- Onset of diabetes >3 months
- Use of insulin pump >3 months
- Hb A1C <8.9%
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Pregnancy or nursing
- Recent (within last 3 months) factor that may cause change in insulin sensitivity, e.g. severe emotional or physical stress, recent significant infection or surgery. etc.
- Renal failure (creatinine >1.5 mg/dl
- Symptomatic gastroparesis
- Using a medication that would interfere with insulin sensitivity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pramlintide | Drug | – |
| continuous glucose monitoring | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
The mean ICR from Vist 3a-e and 4a-e will be compared. Percentage reduction of ICR will be calculated. From these the mean ICR will be calculated.
Time frame: 12-10-07
1 secondary outcome
The mean post-meal glucose from the four hour period after beginning a meal will be averaged for each bolus wave form. Then the three wave form mean glucose results will be compared.
Time frame: 12-10-07
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2009.
- Background: PubMed 17003291Edelman S, Garg S, Frias J, Maggs D, Wang Y, Zhang B, Strobel S, Lutz K, Kolterman O. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing pramlintide treatment in the setting of intensive insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Oct;29(10):2189-95. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0042.
- BackgroundSymlin (package insert) San Diego, CA Amylin Pharmacetucials. 2005
- Background: PubMed 18220597King AB, Armstrong DU. Basal bolus dosing: a clinical experience. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2005 May;1(2):215-20. doi: 10.2174/1573399054022794.
- Background: PubMed 19888377King AB, Armstrong DU. A prospective evaluation of insulin dosing recommendations in patients with type 1 diabetes at near normal glucose control: Basal dosing. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Jan;1(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100106.
- Background: PubMed 19888378King AB, Armstrong DU. A prospective evaluation of insulin dosing recommendations in patients with type 1 diabetes at near normal glucose control: bolus dosing. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Jan;1(1):42-6. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100107.
- Background: PubMed 7672483Young AA, Gedulin B, Vine W, Percy A, Rink TJ. Gastric emptying is accelerated in diabetic BB rats and is slowed by subcutaneous injections of amylin. Diabetologia. 1995 Jun;38(6):642-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00401833.
- Background: PubMed 9005972Gedulin BR, Rink TJ, Young AA. Dose-response for glucagonostatic effect of amylin in rats. Metabolism. 1997 Jan;46(1):67-70. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(97)90170-0.
- Background: PubMed 10741687Rushing PA, Lutz TA, Seeley RJ, Woods SC. Amylin and insulin interact to reduce food intake in rats. Horm Metab Res. 2000 Feb;32(2):62-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978590.
- Background: PubMed 11469628Gross TM, Mastrototaro JJ. Efficacy and reliability of the continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2 Suppl 1:S19-26. doi: 10.1089/15209150050214087. No abstract available.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Allen B King, MD principal investigator
Diabetes Care Center
Gary S Wolfe, RN, CCM study director
Diabetes Care Center
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing pramlintide and continuous glucose monitoring in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Diabetes Care Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The mean ICR from Vist 3a-e and 4a-e will be compared. Percentage reduction of ICR will be calculated. From these the mean ICR will be calculated. (time frame: 12-10-07). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00460304, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2009.