Cholesterol, LDLNCT00461968
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe or Statin Monotherapy to Co-Administration of Both
A study testing Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in people with Cholesterol, LDL, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the percent change in LDL cholesterol induced by ezetimibe or simvastatin monotherapy and by co-administration of both agents in Black, White and Hispanic men. Ezetimibe is a drug that blocks sterol absorption and simvastatin blocks hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 70 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cholesterol, LDL
- What is being tested?
- Ezetimibe and Simvastatin
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2005to Apr 2007
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 70 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Black, white and hispanic males between the ages of 20 to 70 years
- In good general health
- Having a body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 35 kg/m2
- Plasma LDL-C concentrations greater than or equal to 130 mg/dl but less than or equal to 175 mg/dL
- TG (triglyceride) levels less than or equal to 250 mg/dL.
Who cannot join
- Any condition that would be likely to render the individual unable to complete the study
- Hypersensitivity to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors
- Poor mental function, drug or substance abuse, or unstable psychiatric illnesses that may interfere with optimal participation in the study
- Treatment with another investigational drug within 30 days prior to Visit 1
- Alcohol consumption >14 drinks per week
- Phytosterol/phytostanol-containing products including margarines within 2 weeks
Show all 19Show fewer
- History of CHD, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, CHF, or uncontrolled arrhythmias
- Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, nephrotic syndrome, or other renal disease
- Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >126 mg/dL or history of diabetes
- Abnormal TSH
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP >160 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP >100 mm Hg)
- Known active liver diseases or elevated serum transaminases (ALT and AST >1.5 times the upper limit of normal)
- Digestive disorders or any abdominal surgery within the past 6 months
- Cancer within the past 5 years (except for skin cancer)
- HIV, HBV, or HCV positive
- Lipid-lowering agents: bile-acid binding resins, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, ezetimibe, niacin (>200 mg/day), cholestin, fish oil, and fibrates, or cholesterol absorption inhibitors (e.g., neomycin) taken within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1
- Medications that are potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 (cyclosporine, systemic itraconazole or ketoconazole, erythromycin or clarithromycin, nefazodone, verapamil, amiodarone, and protease inhibitors)
- Anti-obesity medications: orlistat or sibutramine taken within 8 weeks prior to Visit 1
- Systemic corticosteroids.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390
About this study
Official title: Genetic Determinanats of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe or Statin Monotherapy to Co-Administration of Both
The purpose of this study is to compare the percent change in LDL cholesterol induced by ezetimibe or simvastatin monotherapy and by co-administration of both agents in Black, White and Hispanic men. Ezetimibe is a drug that blocks sterol absorption and simvastatin blocks hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis. The hypothesis to be tested is that Blacks are likely to be more responsive to LDL lowering by ezetimibe than statins because Blacks have a low production of cholesterol.
Read the detailed description
Statins effectively lower plasma LDL cholesterol levels at the lowest recommended doses, and subsequent doubling of the dosage results in a modest additional reduction of about ~6%. A large inter-individual variability in the magnitude of the LDL-lowering response is seen in patients taking statins, as revealed by data provided to the P.I. by Merck \& Co. Inc. Mean reductions in plasma levels of LDL-C and the variation in response (SD) are provided for ~300 subjects taking only simvastatin, only ezetimibe or both ezetimibe and simvastatin. The mechanisms responsible for this inter-individual variability in lipid-lowering response is not known. The effect of ethnicity on the statin-associated LDL-lowering has only been examined in one study. In this study, directed attempts were made to implement the NCEP guidelines for secondary prevention using statins. Fewer Blacks than Whites reached the goal of treatment for plasma LDL-C levels, despite being seen more frequently in the clinic and having their lipoproteins measured more often. It was proposed that this difference was due to lower compliance with the drug regimen among Blacks. An alternative explanation for the ethnic difference in response to therapy is that the effectiveness of statins differs between ethnic groups.
We hypothesize that Blacks are likely to be more responsive to agents that inhibit cholesterol absorption and less responsive to agents that interfere with cholesterol synthesis. This hypothesis is also based on the results of a recent study conducted in our laboratory that showed lower levels of lathosterol in Blacks than in Whites. Lathosterol is a precursor of cholesterol and therefore it is a marker of de novo synthesis of the sterol. In contrast, campesterol is a plant sterol and its plasma levels are assumed to be indicators of sterol absorption. To directly address the study question, an intervention study that compares the relative efficacy of ezetimibe and simvastatin will be carried out. In this aim we will answer the following questions:
- Do Blacks, Whites and Hispanics respond differently to simvastatin and ezetimibe?
- Do baseline levels of noncholesterol sterols and/or the campesterol:lathosterol ratios predict responsiveness to cholesterol-lowering drugs?
- Does the low level of plasma lathosterol in Blacks reflect reduced rates of cholesterol synthesis secondary to increased cholesterol absorption, and is the relative responsiveness to the two different classes of LDL-lowering agents used in the clinical trial related to the balance between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in an individual?
The ultimate goal is to identify genetic or metabolic indices that can be used to individualize cholesterol lowering therapy, allowing the most effective therapeutic regimen to be selected. This is particularly important if long-term lipid lowering therapy is to be used in individuals whose short-term cardiovascular risk is low since it would be particularly desirable to use the most effective drugs at the lowest doses in this setting.
This will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period, crossover study of 26 weeks duration comprising a 3-day screening period; a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in period; and four 6-week, double-blind treatment periods. Each individual will be randomized to one of the four treatment sequences. Randomization will be stratified by race (Black/White); both Black and White subjects will be allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the 4 treatment sequences. The Allocation schedule will be generated at Merck and Merck will maintain the blinding. There are 10 required clinic visits (visit 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14), and 5 telephone contacts (visit 3,6,9,12) at the mid-point of each treatment period to review compliance with diet, study medications, and alcohol consumption requirements. A post-study follow-up will also be conducted via telephone for serious adverse experience review (visit 15). Total visits will be 15 (10 clinic and 5 telephone) Each treatment period will last about 6 weeks. During the screening visit, subjects will undergo a physical exam, dietary assessment, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respirations), and provide blood (3 tablespoons) sample for routine chemistries (metabolic comprehensive panel), complete blood count, liver function tests, thyroid test, and plasma cholesterol, triglyceride and lipoprotein cholesterol measurement by beta-estimation) levels, and a urine sample. Subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be scheduled to return for Visit 2 to begin a two-week single-blind placebo run-in phase. At Visit 3, subjects who, by pill count, miss no more than two tablets of the single-blind study medication will be randomized to one of the 4 treatment sequences. Subjects will take 2 pills each day. Vital signs will be performed at each visit. A physical will be completed at the end of the study. Serum chemistry measurements, plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels, lipoprotein cholesterol by beta-quantitation, measurement of apolipoprotein B and measurement of non-cholesterol sterols will be measured at all visits (3-4 tablespoons of blood will be drawn). The analyses will be repeated in a separate plasma sample if the data are inconsistent or needs verification. Circulating levels of noncholesterol sterols will be measured by gas chromatography and mass-spectrometry, a routine procedure in our laboratory, in the same samples. Investigators will be blinded to lipid/lipoprotein values after Visit 1. Hematology and urinalysis will be performed at Visits 1 and 14. Dietary counseling will be provided during the study. Also, DNA will be extracted from blood samples obtained during the trial to examine genes that control cholesterol metabolism.
- Conditions
- Cholesterol, LDL
- Being tested
- Ezetimibe and Simvastatin
- Keywords
- Cholesterol, LDL, Ezetimibe, Statin, Zetia, Zocor, Simvastin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ezetimibe and SimvastatinDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary endpoints of the study will be the percent change in plasma LDL-C concentrations in response to each agent.
The treatment effect for each individual will be the percent reduction achieved with each agent.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2005
- Study completionApr 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cholesterol, LDLStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 240 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Donald W. Reynolds Foundation
- Investigators
- Helen H Hobbs, MD, Principal investigator, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00461968
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 072004-28
- Status last verified
- Apr 2007
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Genetic Determinanats of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe or Statin Monotherapy to Co-Administration of Both
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00461968
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 072004-28
- Conditions
- Cholesterol, LDL
- Keywords
- Cholesterol, LDL, Ezetimibe, Statin, Zetia, Zocor, Simvastin
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 240 participants
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, Donald W. Reynolds Foundation
- Study start
- Feb 2005
- Study completion
- Apr 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the percent change in LDL cholesterol induced by ezetimibe or simvastatin monotherapy and by co-administration of both agents in Black, White and Hispanic men. Ezetimibe is a drug that blocks sterol absorption and simvastatin blocks hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis. The hypothesis to be tested is that Blacks are likely to be more responsive to LDL lowering by ezetimibe than statins because Blacks have a low production of cholesterol.
Detailed description
Statins effectively lower plasma LDL cholesterol levels at the lowest recommended doses, and subsequent doubling of the dosage results in a modest additional reduction of about ~6%. A large inter-individual variability in the magnitude of the LDL-lowering response is seen in patients taking statins, as revealed by data provided to the P.I. by Merck \& Co. Inc. Mean reductions in plasma levels of LDL-C and the variation in response (SD) are provided for ~300 subjects taking only simvastatin, only ezetimibe or both ezetimibe and simvastatin. The mechanisms responsible for this inter-individual variability in lipid-lowering response is not known. The effect of ethnicity on the statin-associated LDL-lowering has only been examined in one study. In this study, directed attempts were made to implement the NCEP guidelines for secondary prevention using statins. Fewer Blacks than Whites reached the goal of treatment for plasma LDL-C levels, despite being seen more frequently in the clinic and having their lipoproteins measured more often. It was proposed that this difference was due to lower compliance with the drug regimen among Blacks. An alternative explanation for the ethnic difference in response to therapy is that the effectiveness of statins differs between ethnic groups.
We hypothesize that Blacks are likely to be more responsive to agents that inhibit cholesterol absorption and less responsive to agents that interfere with cholesterol synthesis. This hypothesis is also based on the results of a recent study conducted in our laboratory that showed lower levels of lathosterol in Blacks than in Whites. Lathosterol is a precursor of cholesterol and therefore it is a marker of de novo synthesis of the sterol. In contrast, campesterol is a plant sterol and its plasma levels are assumed to be indicators of sterol absorption. To directly address the study question, an intervention study that compares the relative efficacy of ezetimibe and simvastatin will be carried out. In this aim we will answer the following questions:
- Do Blacks, Whites and Hispanics respond differently to simvastatin and ezetimibe?
- Do baseline levels of noncholesterol sterols and/or the campesterol:lathosterol ratios predict responsiveness to cholesterol-lowering drugs?
- Does the low level of plasma lathosterol in Blacks reflect reduced rates of cholesterol synthesis secondary to increased cholesterol absorption, and is the relative responsiveness to the two different classes of LDL-lowering agents used in the clinical trial related to the balance between cholesterol absorption and synthesis in an individual?
The ultimate goal is to identify genetic or metabolic indices that can be used to individualize cholesterol lowering therapy, allowing the most effective therapeutic regimen to be selected. This is particularly important if long-term lipid lowering therapy is to be used in individuals whose short-term cardiovascular risk is low since it would be particularly desirable to use the most effective drugs at the lowest doses in this setting.
This will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period, crossover study of 26 weeks duration comprising a 3-day screening period; a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in period; and four 6-week, double-blind treatment periods. Each individual will be randomized to one of the four treatment sequences. Randomization will be stratified by race (Black/White); both Black and White subjects will be allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the 4 treatment sequences. The Allocation schedule will be generated at Merck and Merck will maintain the blinding. There are 10 required clinic visits (visit 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14), and 5 telephone contacts (visit 3,6,9,12) at the mid-point of each treatment period to review compliance with diet, study medications, and alcohol consumption requirements. A post-study follow-up will also be conducted via telephone for serious adverse experience review (visit 15). Total visits will be 15 (10 clinic and 5 telephone) Each treatment period will last about 6 weeks. During the screening visit, subjects will undergo a physical exam, dietary assessment, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respirations), and provide blood (3 tablespoons) sample for routine chemistries (metabolic comprehensive panel), complete blood count, liver function tests, thyroid test, and plasma cholesterol, triglyceride and lipoprotein cholesterol measurement by beta-estimation) levels, and a urine sample. Subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be scheduled to return for Visit 2 to begin a two-week single-blind placebo run-in phase. At Visit 3, subjects who, by pill count, miss no more than two tablets of the single-blind study medication will be randomized to one of the 4 treatment sequences. Subjects will take 2 pills each day. Vital signs will be performed at each visit. A physical will be completed at the end of the study. Serum chemistry measurements, plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels, lipoprotein cholesterol by beta-quantitation, measurement of apolipoprotein B and measurement of non-cholesterol sterols will be measured at all visits (3-4 tablespoons of blood will be drawn). The analyses will be repeated in a separate plasma sample if the data are inconsistent or needs verification. Circulating levels of noncholesterol sterols will be measured by gas chromatography and mass-spectrometry, a routine procedure in our laboratory, in the same samples. Investigators will be blinded to lipid/lipoprotein values after Visit 1. Hematology and urinalysis will be performed at Visits 1 and 14. Dietary counseling will be provided during the study. Also, DNA will be extracted from blood samples obtained during the trial to examine genes that control cholesterol metabolism.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 70 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Black, white and hispanic males between the ages of 20 to 70 years
- In good general health
- Having a body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 35 kg/m2
- Plasma LDL-C concentrations greater than or equal to 130 mg/dl but less than or equal to 175 mg/dL
- TG (triglyceride) levels less than or equal to 250 mg/dL.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Any condition that would be likely to render the individual unable to complete the study
- Hypersensitivity to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors
- Poor mental function, drug or substance abuse, or unstable psychiatric illnesses that may interfere with optimal participation in the study
- Treatment with another investigational drug within 30 days prior to Visit 1
- Alcohol consumption >14 drinks per week
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ezetimibe and Simvastatin | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
The primary endpoints of the study will be the percent change in plasma LDL-C concentrations in response to each agent.
The treatment effect for each individual will be the percent reduction achieved with each agent.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2007.
Related trials for Cholesterol, LDL
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Evaluate Treatment Patterns in High, Very High and Extreme Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia, Including Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Hypercholesterolaemia, Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Effect of Lomitapide Treatment on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Recruiting
Effects of Concurrent Training on Serum PCSK9 Levels in Adults With Overweight
Overweight, Lipid Metabolism
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of AZD4954 in Healthy Adult Participants With or Without Elevated Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) Levels, and Participants With Dyslipidemia
Healthy Participants, Dyslipidemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helen H Hobbs, MD principal investigator
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ezetimibe and Simvastatin in people with Cholesterol, LDL, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary endpoints of the study will be the percent change in plasma LDL-C concentrations in response to each agent.. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2007.