HypercholesterolemiaPhase 3NCT00463606
A Multicenter Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium Combination Therapy to Monotherapy in Subjects With Dyslipidemia
A Phase 3 study testing ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium, ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium in people with Hypercholesterolemia and Dyslipidemia, run by AstraZeneca at 168 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium combination therapy to monotherapy in subjects with dyslipidemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypercholesterolemia, Dyslipidemia
- What is being tested?
- ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium, ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 760 participants
- Where
- 168 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2007to Feb 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult male and female participants who voluntarily sign the informed consent.
- Fasting lipid results following greater than 12-hour fasting period:
- Triglycerides level greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL,
- High-density lipoprotein cholesterol less than 40 mg/dL for males and less than 50 mg/dL for females, and
- Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol greater than or equal to 130 mg/dL.
- Participant must agree to utilize adequate birth control methods and adhere to the American Heart Association (AHA) diet.
Who cannot join
- Participants with unstable medical conditions, medical conditions considered inappropriate in a clinical trial, or participants who are taking excluded concomitant medications are not allowed in the study.
- Participants receiving coumarin anticoagulants or systemic cyclosporine.
Trial locations and contacts
168 sites in 1 country.
168 sites in 1 country
United States168 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4427
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4702
Anaheim, California, 92804
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5533
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6237
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4393
Arkansas City, Kansas, 67005
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5454
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4472
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60004
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4473
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5635
Auburn, Maine, 04210
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4442
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4527
Avon, Indiana, 46123
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5070
Baltimore, Maryland, 21209
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4979
Billings, Montana, 59101
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5469
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4428
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209-6802
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4985
Birmingham, Alabama, 35235
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5478
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4463
Bronxville, New York, 10708
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4480
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, 55430
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4470
Carlisle, Pennsylvania, 17015
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4395
Chandler, Arizona, 85225
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4506
Charleston, South Carolina, 29407
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4531
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4396
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5585
Chicago, Illinois, 60654
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5593
Chula Vista, California, 91911
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4390
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4400
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4501
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4517
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45246
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4499
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4419
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5584
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4503
Concord, California, 94520
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5444
Concord, New Hampshire, 03301
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4401
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4388
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5581
Downingtown, Pennsylvania, 19335
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4511
Dunwoody, Georgia, 30338
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4908
Elizabeth, New Jersey, 07202
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4530
Encinitas, California, 92024
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4485
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4458
Fair Oaks, California, 95628
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4456
Falls Church, Virginia, 22044
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4434
Feasterville, Pennsylvania, 19053
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4453
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4542
Fresno, California, 93703
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4574
Fresno, California, 93710
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4483
Gilbert, Arizona, 85295
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5443
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4484
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4478
Harleysville, Pennsylvania, 19438-2513
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4412
Haverhill, Massachusetts, 01830
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5494
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4490
Holly Hill, Florida, 32117
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4420
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5578
Houston, Texas, 77030
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5669
Houston, Texas, 77030
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4493
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4510
Huntsville, Alabama, 35802
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4445
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4403
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4515
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4435
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5011
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4444
Jacksonville, Florida, 32259
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4436
Jersey Shore, Pennsylvania, 17740
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4454
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37601
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4399
Jupiter, Florida, 33458-7200
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4500
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4433
Kissimmee, Florida, 34741
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4438
Lafayette, Indiana, 47904
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4421
Lakewood, Washington, 98499
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4397
Lansdale, Pennsylvania, 19046
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4469
Largo, Florida, 33773
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4460
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4466
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5484
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89146
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5027
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4441
Lincoln, California, 95648
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4417
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72204
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4432
Long Beach, California, 90806
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5579
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4471
Louisville, Kentucky, 40213
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4468
Madison, Wisconsin, 53719
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4467
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4525
Melbourne, Florida, 32935
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4426
Melrose Park, Pennsylvania, 19027
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4477
Miami, Florida, 33173
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4481
Missoula, Montana, 59808
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4410
Mogadore, Ohio, 44260
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4455
Moncks Corner, South Carolina, 29461
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4479
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4513
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4529
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4406
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4430
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4409
New Smyrna Beach, Florida, 32168
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4415
New York, New York, 10021
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5010
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4894
Newtown, Pennsylvania, 18940
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4980
Norwalk, California, 90650
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4416
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4528
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4488
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4451
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4492
Olive Branch, Mississippi, 38654
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5103
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4446
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4526
Overland Park, Kansas, 66202
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4431
Ozark, Alabama, 36360
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4496
Penndel, Pennsylvania, 19047
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4524
Pensacola, Florida, 32514
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4520
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4404
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4437
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19115
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4387
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19152
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5583
Portage, Michigan, 49024
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4461
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4459
Richmond, Virginia, 23226
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4408
Richmond, Virginia, 23294
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4440
Rochester, New York, 14609
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4981
Roswell, Georgia, 30075
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4448
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4392
Sacramento, California, 95825
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4896
Sacramento, California, 95825
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4498
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4893
San Antonio, Texas, 78205
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4429
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4457
San Antonio, Texas, 78224
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4465
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4801
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4508
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4892
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5948
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5582
San Diego, California, 92128
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4443
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4505
Sarasota, Florida, 34233
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5580
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4502
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4411
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4521
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5586
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4509
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4504
South Bound Brook, New Jersey, 08880
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4487
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01103
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4405
Statesville, North Carolina, 28677
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4982
Summerville, South Carolina, 29485
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4497
Suwanee, Georgia, 30024
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4464
Syracuse, New York, 13202
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4413
Temple, Texas, 76502
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4394
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4402
Trenton, New Jersey, 08611
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4422
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4482
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 5636
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4519
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4447
Warminster, Pennsylvania, 18974
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4523
Warren, Ohio, 44483
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4391
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 6236
West Hills, California, 91307
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4494
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4407
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4423
Wichita, Kansas, 67203
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4424
Wichita, Kansas, 67207
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4425
Williamsville, New York, 14221
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4476
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4512
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4439
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
About this study
Official title: A 12-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study of the Combination of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Compared to ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Monotherapy in Subjects With Type IIa and IIb Dyslipidemia
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium combination therapy to monotherapy in subjects with dyslipidemia.
Read the detailed description
There are 3 treatment groups in the study: ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg, ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy, and rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy. The 3 primary outcome measures only compare 2 of the treatment groups for each variable (mean percent change in HDL-C and TG comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy, and mean percent change in LDL-C comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy. The 6 secondary outcome measures only compare 2 of the treatment groups for each variable (mean percent change in Non-HDL-C comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy, mean percent change in Non-HDL-C, VLDL-C, ApoB, and Total Cholesterol comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy, and median percent change in hsCRP comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy).
- Conditions
- Hypercholesterolemia, Dyslipidemia
- Being tested
- ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium, ABT-335, rosuvastatin calcium
- Medical subject headings
- Hypercholesterolemia, Dyslipidemias
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calciumDrug
Also called ABT-335 / Rosuvastatin Combination (ABT-143)
ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks
ABT-335Drug
Also called fenofibric acid
ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks
rosuvastatin calciumDrug
Also called Rosuvastatin
Rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium | Experimental | ABT-335 135mg in combination with rosuvastatin calcium 5mg administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium |
| ABT-335 | Active comparator | ABT-335 135mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: ABT-335 |
| Rosuvastatin Calcium | Active comparator | Rosuvastatin calcium 5mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: rosuvastatin calcium |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in triglycerides, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in apolipoprotein B (ApoB), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Median Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)
The median percent change from baseline to the final visit in high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in total cholesterol, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2007
- Primary completionFeb 2008
- Study completionFeb 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypercholesterolemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 760 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Torbjörn Lundström, MD, Study director, AstraZeneca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00463606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M06-844
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Rosenson RS, Carlson DM, Kelly MT, Setze CM, Hirshberg B, Stolzenbach JC, Williams LA. Achievement of lipid targets with the combination of rosuvastatin and fenofibric Acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2011 Feb;25(1):47-57. doi: 10.1007/s10557-010-6273-5.
PubMed 21174145Roth EM, Rosenson RS, Carlson DM, Fukumoto SM, Setze CM, Blasetto JW, Khurmi NS, Stolzenbach JC, Williams LA. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 5 mg in combination with fenofibric acid 135 mg in patients with mixed dyslipidemia - a phase 3 study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2010 Dec;24(5-6):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s10557-010-6266-4.
PubMed 20953684
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study of the Combination of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Compared to ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Monotherapy in Subjects With Type IIa and IIb Dyslipidemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00463606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M06-844
- Conditions
- Hypercholesterolemia, Dyslipidemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 760 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2007
- Primary completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Aug 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium combination therapy to monotherapy in subjects with dyslipidemia.
Detailed description
There are 3 treatment groups in the study: ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg, ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy, and rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy. The 3 primary outcome measures only compare 2 of the treatment groups for each variable (mean percent change in HDL-C and TG comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy, and mean percent change in LDL-C comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy. The 6 secondary outcome measures only compare 2 of the treatment groups for each variable (mean percent change in Non-HDL-C comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy, mean percent change in Non-HDL-C, VLDL-C, ApoB, and Total Cholesterol comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy, and median percent change in hsCRP comparing ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg to rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium | Experimental | Drug: ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calciumABT-335 135mg in combination with rosuvastatin calcium 5mg administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks |
| ABT-335 | Active comparator | Drug: ABT-335ABT-335 135mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks |
| Rosuvastatin Calcium | Active comparator | Drug: rosuvastatin calciumRosuvastatin calcium 5mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult male and female participants who voluntarily sign the informed consent.
- Fasting lipid results following greater than 12-hour fasting period:
- Participant must agree to utilize adequate birth control methods and adhere to the American Heart Association (AHA) diet.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants with unstable medical conditions, medical conditions considered inappropriate in a clinical trial, or participants who are taking excluded concomitant medications are not allowed in the study.
- Participants receiving coumarin anticoagulants or systemic cyclosporine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calciumAlso: ABT-335 / Rosuvastatin Combination (ABT-143)ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin calcium 5 mg administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks | Drug | ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium |
| ABT-335Also: fenofibric acidABT-335 135 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks | Drug | ABT-335 |
| rosuvastatin calciumAlso: RosuvastatinRosuvastatin calcium 5 mg monotherapy administered orally, once daily for 12 weeks | Drug | Rosuvastatin Calcium |
Primary outcome
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in triglycerides, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.
6 secondary outcomes
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Median Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21174145Rosenson RS, Carlson DM, Kelly MT, Setze CM, Hirshberg B, Stolzenbach JC, Williams LA. Achievement of lipid targets with the combination of rosuvastatin and fenofibric Acid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2011 Feb;25(1):47-57. doi: 10.1007/s10557-010-6273-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20953684Roth EM, Rosenson RS, Carlson DM, Fukumoto SM, Setze CM, Blasetto JW, Khurmi NS, Stolzenbach JC, Williams LA. Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 5 mg in combination with fenofibric acid 135 mg in patients with mixed dyslipidemia - a phase 3 study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2010 Dec;24(5-6):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s10557-010-6266-4.
Related trials for Hypercholesterolemia
RecruitingObservational study
Causes and Natural History of Dyslipidemias
Hypercholesterolemia, Atherosclerosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Treat-to-Target Versus Fixed-Dose Statin Strategy in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Dyslipidemia, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertriglyceridemia, Stroke (CVA) or TIA
Not yet recruiting
Penn Family Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia (NHLBI R33) Trial 3
Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Effect of Lomitapide Treatment on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Torbjörn Lundström, MD study director
AstraZeneca
168 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium, ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium in people with Hypercholesterolemia and Dyslipidemia, run by AstraZeneca at 168 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 168 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set) (time frame: Baseline to 12 Weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00463606, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.