InfluenzaPhase 3NCT00464672
Safety, and Immunogenicity of Two Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Subjects 3 to 64 Years Old
A Phase 3 study testing Influenza virus vaccine and Comparator influenza vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Novartis at 2 sites in Argentina.
Trial summary
This protocol is designed to evaluate safety, clinical tolerability and immunogenicity of the 2007 southern hemisphere formulation of a Novartis conventional influenza vaccine licensed in the EU and many other worldwide countries, according to the US FDA Draft Guidance for Industry "Clinical data needed to support the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 64 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza
- What is being tested?
- Influenza virus vaccine and Comparator influenza vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,893 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesArgentina
- Study dates
- Apr 2007to Dec 2007
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 64 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy subjects 3 to 64 years of age
Who cannot join
- Receipt of other investigational products within 3 months or other vacine within 1 month;
- Allergy to eggs, egg products, or any other vaccine component;
- Laboratory confirmed influenza disease within 6 months;
- Have previously received an influenza vaccination (3 to 8 years only);
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Observer-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Two Trivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Children Aged 3 to 8 Years, in Healthy Children/Adolescents Aged 9 to 17 Years,and in Healthy Adults Aged 18 to 64 Years
This protocol is designed to evaluate safety, clinical tolerability and immunogenicity of the 2007 southern hemisphere formulation of a Novartis conventional influenza vaccine licensed in the EU and many other worldwide countries, according to the US FDA Draft Guidance for Industry "Clinical data needed to support the licensure of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine", issued in March 2006, and to evaluate safety, clinical tolerability and immunogenicity of the 2007 southern hemisphere formulation of a Novartis conventional influenza vaccine already licensed in US. The purpose of the control arm is primarily to provide a comparative assessment for safety, not immunogenicity or effectiveness.
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Being tested
- Influenza virus vaccine, Comparator influenza vaccine
- Keywords
- Influenza, Egg-Derived, Healthy Children, Healthy Adolescents, Healthy Adults, Safety, Immunogenicity, Trivalent, Inactivated, Vaccination
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Influenza virus vaccineBiological
Two intramuscular injections of the investigational influenza virus vaccine administered 4 weeks part to group 3 to 8 years of age while one injection was administered to groups 9 to 17 years of age and 18 to 64 years of age.
Comparator influenza vaccineBiological
Two intramuscular injections were administered 4 weeks apart to group 3 to 8 years of age while one injection was administered to groups 9 to 17 years of age and 18 to 64 years of age.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza virus vaccine | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Influenza virus vaccine |
| Comparator influenza vaccine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Comparator influenza vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection, in Healthy Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
To evaluate immunogenicity, measured by seroprotection (percentage of subjects achieving a hemagglutination inhibition [HI] titer ≥40) after one injection of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, administered to healthy adults 18 to 64 years of age. The CBER Guidance states that the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of subjects achieving seroprotection meet or exceed 70%.
Measured: 21 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Seroconversion Rate, in Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
Seroconversion rate is defined as percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion (defined as negative pre-vaccination serum [HI<10]/ post-vaccination HI titer ≥40) or significant increase defined as at least a 4-fold increase). According to the CBER Guidance, the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of subjects achieving seroconverion/significant increase meet or exceed 40%.
Measured: 21 days after vaccination
Secondary outcomes (10)
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Symptoms in Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
Solicited local and systemic reactions were assessed after vaccination in adults 18 to 64 years of age.
Measured: 7 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection, in Healthy Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
To descriptively evaluate immunogenicity, measured by seroprotection rate (percentage of subjects achieving a hemagglutination inhibition [HI] titer ≥40) after one injection of investigational influenza virus vaccine, administered to healthy children/adolescents 9 to 17 years of age.
Measured: 21 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion Rate, in Healthy Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
Seroconversion rate is defined as percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion (defined as negative pre-vaccination serum [HI<10]/ post-vaccination HI titer ≥40) or significant increase (defined as at least a 4-fold increase) after one injection of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, administered to healthy children/adolescents 9 to 17 years of age.
Measured: 21 days after vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), in Healthy Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
To evaluate immunogenicity measured by GMTs after one injection of investigational influenza virus vaccine, administered to healthy children/adolescents 9 to 17 years of age.
Measured: 21 days after vaccination
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Symptoms in Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
Solicited local and systemic reactions were assessed after vaccination in children/adolescents 9 to 17 years of age.
Measured: 7 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection, in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age
To descriptively evaluate immunogenicity, measured by seroprotection rate (percentage of subjects achieving a hemagglutination inhibition [HI] titer ≥40) after two injections of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, in healthy children 3 to 8 years of age.
Measured: 50 days after last vaccination
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion Rate, in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age
Seroconversion rate is defined as percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion (defined as negative pre-vaccination serum [HI<10]/ post-vaccination HI titer ≥40) or significant increase (defined as at least a 4-fold increase) after two injections of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, in healthy children 3 to 8 years of age.
Measured: 50 days after last vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age
To evaluate immunogenicity measured by GMTs after two injections of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, in healthy children 3 to 8 years of age.
Measured: 50 days after last vaccination
Number or Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Symptoms, in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age.
Solicited local and systemic reactions were assessed after each vaccination, in healthy children 3 to 8 years of age.
Measured: 7 days after each vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), in Healthy Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
Immunogenicity measured by GMTs after one injection of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, in healthy adults 18 to 64 years of age.
Measured: 21 days after vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2007
- Primary completionJul 2007
- Study completionDec 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,893 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Novartis Vaccines
- Investigators
- Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Study director, Novartis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00464672
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- V71P5
- Other IDs
- IND: 13299
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 23 Apr 2007
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Tregnaghi MW, Stamboulian D, Vanadia PC, Tregnaghi JP, Calvari M, Fragapane E, Casula D, Pellegrini M, Groth N. Immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of two trivalent subunit inactivated influenza vaccines: a phase III, observer-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Viral Immunol. 2012 Jun;25(3):216-25. doi: 10.1089/vim.2011.0063.
PubMed 22691101
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Observer-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Two Trivalent Subunit Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Children Aged 3 to 8 Years, in Healthy Children/Adolescents Aged 9 to 17 Years,and in Healthy Adults Aged 18 to 64 Years
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00464672
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- V71P5
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Keywords
- Influenza, Egg-Derived, Healthy Children, Healthy Adolescents, Healthy Adults, Safety, Immunogenicity, Trivalent, Inactivated, Vaccination
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,893 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NovartisIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Novartis Vaccines
- Study start
- Apr 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 May 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This protocol is designed to evaluate safety, clinical tolerability and immunogenicity of the 2007 southern hemisphere formulation of a Novartis conventional influenza vaccine licensed in the EU and many other worldwide countries, according to the US FDA Draft Guidance for Industry "Clinical data needed to support the licensure of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine", issued in March 2006, and to evaluate safety, clinical tolerability and immunogenicity of the 2007 southern hemisphere formulation of a Novartis conventional influenza vaccine already licensed in US. The purpose of the control arm is primarily to provide a comparative assessment for safety, not immunogenicity or effectiveness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza virus vaccine | Experimental | Biological: Influenza virus vaccine |
| Comparator influenza vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Comparator influenza vaccine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Healthy subjects 3 to 64 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Receipt of other investigational products within 3 months or other vacine within 1 month;
- Allergy to eggs, egg products, or any other vaccine component;
- Laboratory confirmed influenza disease within 6 months;
- Have previously received an influenza vaccination (3 to 8 years only);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza virus vaccineTwo intramuscular injections of the investigational influenza virus vaccine administered 4 weeks part to group 3 to 8 years of age while one injection was administered to groups 9 to 17 years of age and 18 to 64 years of age. | Biological | Influenza virus vaccine |
| Comparator influenza vaccineTwo intramuscular injections were administered 4 weeks apart to group 3 to 8 years of age while one injection was administered to groups 9 to 17 years of age and 18 to 64 years of age. | Biological | Comparator influenza vaccine |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection, in Healthy Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
Time frame: 21 days after vaccination
To evaluate immunogenicity, measured by seroprotection (percentage of subjects achieving a hemagglutination inhibition [HI] titer ≥40) after one injection of the investigational influenza virus vaccine, administered to healthy adults 18 to 64 years of age. The CBER Guidance states that the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of subjects achieving seroprotection meet or exceed 70%.
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Seroconversion Rate, in Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
Time frame: 21 days after vaccination
Seroconversion rate is defined as percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion (defined as negative pre-vaccination serum [HI<10]/ post-vaccination HI titer ≥40) or significant increase defined as at least a 4-fold increase). According to the CBER Guidance, the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentage of subjects achieving seroconverion/significant increase meet or exceed 40%.
10 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Symptoms in Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
Time frame: 7 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection, in Healthy Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
Time frame: 21 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion Rate, in Healthy Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
Time frame: 21 days after vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), in Healthy Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
Time frame: 21 days after vaccination
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Symptoms in Children/Adolescents 9 to 17 Years of Age
Time frame: 7 days after vaccination
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection, in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age
Time frame: 50 days after last vaccination
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion Rate, in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age
Time frame: 50 days after last vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age
Time frame: 50 days after last vaccination
Number or Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Symptoms, in Healthy Children 3 to 8 Years of Age.
Time frame: 7 days after each vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs), in Healthy Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age
Time frame: 21 days after vaccination
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22691101Tregnaghi MW, Stamboulian D, Vanadia PC, Tregnaghi JP, Calvari M, Fragapane E, Casula D, Pellegrini M, Groth N. Immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of two trivalent subunit inactivated influenza vaccines: a phase III, observer-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Viral Immunol. 2012 Jun;25(3):216-25. doi: 10.1089/vim.2011.0063.
Related trials for Influenza
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics study director
Novartis
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Influenza virus vaccine and Comparator influenza vaccine in people with Influenza, run by Novartis at 2 sites in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 May 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotection, in Healthy Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age (time frame: 21 days after vaccination). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00464672, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2015.