AzTrials
AzTrials

Cytomegalovirus InfectionPhase 3NCT00466817

Short-Term vs. Long-Term Valganciclovir Therapy for Symptomatic Congenital CMV Infections

A Phase 3 study testing Valganciclovir in people with Cytomegalovirus Infection, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 48 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to cause hearing loss and mental retardation. The purpose of this study is to compare a 6-week course to a 6-month course of the drug valganciclovir in babies born with CMV to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 30 days
Conditions the study is for
Cytomegalovirus Infection
What is being tested?
Valganciclovir
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
109 participants
Where
48 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jun 2008to Jun 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 30 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent from parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
  • Confirmation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) from urine or throat swab specimens by culture, shell vial, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests
  • Symptomatic congenital CMV disease, as manifest by one or more of the following:
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Petechiae
  • Hepatomegaly
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Splenomegaly
  • Intrauterine growth restriction
  • Hepatitis (elevated transaminases and/or bilirubin)
  • Central nervous system (CNS) involvement of the CMV disease [such as microcephaly, radiographic abnormalities indicative of CMV CNS disease, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indices for age, chorioretinitis, hearing deficits as detected by formal brainstem evoked response (not a screening auditory brainstem response {ABR}), and/or positive CMV PCR from CSF]
  • Less than or equal to 30 days of age at study enrollment
  • Weight at study enrollment greater than or equal to 1800 grams
  • Gestational age greater than or equal to 32 weeks at birth

Who cannot join

  • Imminent demise
  • Patients receiving other antiviral agents or immune globulin
  • Gastrointestinal abnormality which might preclude absorption of an oral medication (e.g., a history of necrotizing enterocolitis)
  • Documented renal insufficiency, as noted by a creatinine clearance less than 10 mL/min/1.73m^2 at time of study enrollment
  • Breastfeeding from mother who is receiving ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir, or maribivir
  • Infants known to be born to women who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive (but HIV testing is not required for study entry)
  • Current receipt of other investigational drugs

Trial locations and contacts

48 sites in 2 countries.

48 sites in 2 countries

United States41 sites
  • Emory Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322-1014

  • Children's Hospital Colorado - Infectious Disease

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045-7106

  • Johns Hopkins Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-0011

  • University of Alabama - Children's of Alabama - Clinical Virology

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233-1711

  • Children's Hospital Boston - Infectious Diseases

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115-5711

  • Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo - Infectious Diseases

    Buffalo, New York, 14222-2006

  • Medical University of South Carolina - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-8903

  • Carolinas Medical Center - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203-5812

  • MetroHealth Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Disease

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44109-1998

  • Cleveland Clinic Main Campus - Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195-0001

  • Nationwide Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases

    Columbus, Ohio, 43205-2664

  • Children's Medical Center Dallas - Neonatal ICU

    Dallas, Texas, 75235-7701

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Pediatrics

    Dallas, Texas, 75390-9063

  • Cook Children's Infectious Disease Services

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104-2710

  • University of Mississippi - Children's Infectious Diseases

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216-4505

  • University of Florida - College of Medicine - Jacksonville

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32209-6511

  • Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics - Infectious Diseases

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64108-4619

  • Arkansas Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202-3500

  • Los Angeles County - University of Southern California - Medical Center - Pediatrics

    Los Angeles, California, 90033-1075

  • Plaza Towers Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Los Angeles, California, 90048-5970

  • University of Louisville School of Medicine - Kosair Childrens Hospital - Infectious Diseases

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202-1821

  • Cohen Children's Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases

    Manhasset, New York, 11030-3816

  • University of Minnesota - Pediatric Infectious Disease

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455-0341

  • University of South Alabama - Children's Specialty Clinic

    Mobile, Alabama, 36604-3207

  • Vanderbilt University - Pediatric - Infectious Diseases

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-0011

  • Childrens Hospital at Saint Peters University Hospital - Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901-1766

  • Robert Wood Johnson Medical School - Pediatrics

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901-1935

  • Tulane University - Tulane Medical Center - Pediatrics

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112-2600

  • Creighton University Medical Center - Medicine - Infectious Diseases

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68131-2137

  • Children's Hospital of Orange County - Infectious Diseases

    Orange, California, 92868-3835

  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC - Pediatric Infectious Diseases

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224-1529

  • Rhode Island Hospital - Pediatrics

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02903-4923

  • University of Rochester Medical Center - Golisano Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases

    Rochester, New York, 14642-0001

  • University of Utah - Pediatric Pharmacology Program

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108-1457

  • Seattle Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases

    Seattle, Washington, 98105-3901

  • Louisiana State University Health Shreveport - Pediatrics

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103-4228

  • Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Center for Clinical Studies

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1010

  • Stanford University School of Medicine

    Stanford, California, 94305-2200

  • SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital - Pediatrics

    Syracuse, New York, 13210-2342

  • University of South Florida - Tampa General Hospital - Pediatrics

    Tampa, Florida, 33606-3438

  • Children's National Medical Center - Sheikh Zayed Campus - Infectious Disease

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010-2916

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom7 sites
  • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

    Birmingham, Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Bristol Royal Hospital for Children - UBHT Education Centre

    Bristol, Bristol, City of, BS2 8AE

  • Alder Hey Childrens Hospital

    Liverpool, Liverpool, L12 2AP

  • University College London - Royal Free Campus - Virology

    London, London, City of, NW3 2PF

  • Saint George's Hospital - Pediatric Infectious Diseases

    London, London, City of, SW17 0QT

  • Newcastle General Hospital

    Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 6BE

  • John Radcliffe Hospital

    Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Blinded Investigation of Six Weeks vs. Six Months of Oral Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants With Symptomatic Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection (CASG 112)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to cause hearing loss and mental retardation. The purpose of this study is to compare a 6-week course to a 6-month course of the drug valganciclovir in babies born with CMV to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment. Participants will include 104 infants (30 days old or younger) born with CMV disease. All infants will take valganciclovir by mouth for 6 weeks. At the end of the 6 week period, subjects will be assigned by chance to receive either valganciclovir or placebo (inactive substance) to complete the 6 months of antiviral treatment. Patients will be followed for the study related evaluations of safety, changes to hearing, and developmental milestones for up to 2 years. Patients will be followed by telephone contact for an additional 3 years. Thus, participants may be involved in study related procedures for approximately 5 years.

Read the detailed description

This study is a multi-center, prospective, international, Phase III, randomized and blinded investigation of 6 weeks versus 6 months of oral valganciclovir therapy in babies with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Following enrollment, study subjects will receive 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir. Near the end of the 6-week course, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion either to continue on valganciclovir to complete 6 months of therapy or to begin a matching placebo to complete the 6 months. Study subjects will be stratified according to whether or not there is central nervous system (CNS) involvement at study entry. During the 6-month treatment period and the 1 month thereafter, study subjects will be followed weekly for 4 weeks, then every other week for 8 weeks, then every month for 4 months. At each of these visits, safety labs will be checked, growth parameters recorded, and adverse events assessed. The dose of study medication will be adjusted for weight gain at each of these study visits. Dose adjustments may also occur as indicated per protocol for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or renal impairment. Whole blood will be obtained for CMV viral load at each of these visits as well. Hearing outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Developmental outcomes will be assessed at 12 months and 24 months. Changes in whole blood viral load measurements will be correlated with both hearing and neurologic outcomes. In study subjects with increasing whole blood viral loads during the course of treatment, assessment for antiviral resistance may be undertaken.Safety assessments include: hematology labs, chemistry labs, physical examinations, and adverse event data performed/collected serially. Development of neutropenia will be confirmed by repeat blood testing within one week, and study drug will be held until it resolves. Efficacy assessments include: hearing assessments at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months; and neurodevelopmental assessments at 12 months and 24 months. Study objectives are: to compare the impact on hearing outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the safety profile of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral therapy with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the impact on neurologic outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; and to correlate change in whole blood viral load with hearing and neurologic outcomes. Participants will include 104 male and female neonates (less than or equal to 30 days) with symptomatic congenital CMV.

Being tested
Placebo, Valganciclovir
Keywords
Cytomegalovirus, congenital, infants
Medical subject headings
Cytomegalovirus Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboOther

    9 grams of powder which contains no Valganciclovir free base. The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: mannitol, lactose anhydrous, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, saccharin sodium, flavor, and purified water.

  • ValganciclovirDrug

    Mono-valyl ester pro-drug of ganciclovir, oral solution, provided as a 12 grams of powder containing 5 grams of Valganciclovir free base. The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: Providone K30, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, sodium saccharin, mannitol, flavor, and purified water.

Study groups in NCT00466817
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ValganciclovirExperimentalSix months of oral Valganciclovir.
Receives: Drug: Valganciclovir
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSix weeks of oral Valganciclovir followed by placebo to complete the six month time period.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 6 Months.

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 6 months

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Adverse Events Which Lead to Permanent Discontinuation of Valganciclovir Therapy or Lead to Irreversible Outcome of the Adverse Event.

    Adverse events were assessed at each visit through month 7 of the study. No subject discontinued valganciclovir therapy due to permanent discontinuation of valganciclovir therapy or lead to irreversible outcome of any adverse event.

    Measured: baseline through 7 months

  2. Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 12 Months.

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 12 months

  3. Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 24 Months.

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 24 months

  4. Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects)

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 6 months

  5. Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects)

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 12 months

  6. Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects)

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 24 months

  7. Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects)

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 6 months

  8. Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects)

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 12 months

  9. Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects)

    Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.

    Measured: Between baseline and 24 months

  10. Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score).

    Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cogonitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.

    Measured: 12 Months after enrollment

  11. Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score).

    Receptive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 12 Months after enrollment

  12. Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score).

    Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 12 Months after enrollment

  13. Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score).

    Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.

    Measured: 12 Months after enrollment

  14. Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score).

    Fine Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 12 Months after enrollment

  15. Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score).

    Gross Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 12 Months after enrollment

  16. Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score).

    Motor Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.

    Measured: 12 Months after enrollment

  17. Neurological Impairment at 24 Months Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score).

    Receptive Communication Scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 24 Months after enrollment

  18. Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score).

    Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores are between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cognitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.

    Measured: 24 months after enrollment

  19. Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score).

    Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 24 Months after enrollment

  20. Neurologic Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score).

    Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.

    Measured: 24 Months after enrollment

  21. Neurological Impairment at 24 Months, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score).

    Fine motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 24 Months after enrollment

  22. Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score).

    Gross motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.

    Measured: 24 Months after enrollment.

  23. Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score).

    Motor composite score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.

    Measured: 24 Months after enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
109 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00466817
Sponsor's protocol ID
06-0046
Other IDs
CASG 112
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
26 Apr 2007
Last updated
26 Aug 2015

Publications

  • Kimberlin DW, Jester PM, Sanchez PJ, Ahmed A, Arav-Boger R, Michaels MG, Ashouri N, Englund JA, Estrada B, Jacobs RF, Romero JR, Sood SK, Whitworth MS, Abzug MJ, Caserta MT, Fowler S, Lujan-Zilbermann J, Storch GA, DeBiasi RL, Han JY, Palmer A, Weiner LB, Bocchini JA, Dennehy PH, Finn A, Griffiths PD, Luck S, Gutierrez K, Halasa N, Homans J, Shane AL, Sharland M, Simonsen K, Vanchiere JA, Woods CR, Sabo DL, Aban I, Kuo H, James SH, Prichard MN, Griffin J, Giles D, Acosta EP, Whitley RJ; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group. Valganciclovir for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 5;372(10):933-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404599.

    PubMed 25738669

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Valganciclovir in people with Cytomegalovirus Infection, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 48 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 48 sites in United States, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 6 Months. (time frame: Between baseline and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00466817, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in