Peptic UlcerPhase 4NPHNCT00471029
Compare Efficacy of Gastric Acid Suppression by Oral and Intravenous Administration of Esomeprazole in Patients With Peptic Ulcer
A Phase 4 study testing esomeprazole in people with Peptic Ulcer, run by Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the gastric acid suppression profile among different regimen (Oral Vs Intravenous)of administration of proton pump inhibitor - Esomeprazole by 24hours intragastric pH monitoring. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Peptic Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- esomeprazole
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Sep 2007
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with non-bleeding peptic ulcer which do not require endoscopic therapy.
- Chinese, Age ³18 and <90
- Provision of an informed written consent signed by the patient.
Who cannot join
- Treatment of antisecretory drugs during the preceding 4 weeks
- The present inter-current ulcer complication (gastric outlet obstruction or ulcer perforation)
- Presence of esophageal / gastric varices
- aspirin or NSAID user
- Pregnancy
- Age <18 or >90
Show all 11Show fewer
- Moribund patients, patients with severe liver or renal disease
- Known sensitivity to proton pump inhibitors
- Previous gastric surgery (except simple patch repair)
- Patient unable to give written consent
- Special population, e.g. prisoner, mentally disabled, investigators' student or employees
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Hong Kong
Simon KH Wong, MBChB, wongkhmo@netvigator.com
Simon KH Wong, MBChB
About this study
Official title: Compare Gastric Acid Suppression of Esomeprazole by Oral or Intravenous Administration - A Randomized Trial
The purpose of this study is to compare the gastric acid suppression profile among different regimen (Oral Vs Intravenous)of administration of proton pump inhibitor - Esomeprazole by 24hours intragastric pH monitoring.
Read the detailed description
Peptic ulcer bleeding is a common medical emergency. Although primary hemostasis can be achieved by endoscopic hemostasis in more than 90% of cases, rebleeding during the first 72 hours is still common. The use of secretory inhibitors in ulcer bleeding had theoretical benefit in preventing rebleeding. In vitro, platelet aggregation and disaggregation, coagulation and fibrinolysis are strongly dependent on intra-gastric pH. When pH falls below 6.0, platelet disaggregation takes place and below 4.0, fibrin clots dissolved. Pharmacological studies have clearly shown that primed proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) infusion is superior to H2-receptor blocler (H2B) injection or infusion in maintaining high intra-gastric pH. Randomized trials had demonstrated the advantage of adjuvant use of intravenous or oral PPI in reducing rebleeding as compared to placebo. However, as Asian subjects generally have lower body weight and acid output than Caucasians, the dosage of PPI required for prevent rebleeding may be different. Lin et al had demonstrated that in an Asian population study, in order to show a significant clinical effect in prevent peptic ulcer rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis, at least a 30% difference in duration in maintaining an intragastric pH >6 must be achieved. As there is substantial cost implication of routine use of high dose intravenous PPI infusion (80mg bolus + 8mg/hour for 72 hours, cost ~HKD$1100) against high dose oral esomeprazole (40mg BD for 3 days, cost ~HKD$60), the optimal doses and routes of administration of PPI in achieving effective acid suppression is needed to be clearly defined.
Protocol:
Patients presented with bleeding peptic ulcers (melena, hememtesis) will undergo endoscopy. If clean base peptic ulcer which dos not require endoscopic treatment is diagnosed, consented patients will randomly allocated into 2 groups using sealed envelopes containing a therapeutic option derived from a randomized table.
- Esomeprazole infusion (80mg bolus then 8mg/hour) (192mg/d)
- Esomeprazole Tablet oral 40mg 12 hourly (80mg/d)
A pH electrode with internal reference (Synetic) was inserted transnasally and positioned 10cm below the cardia. It was calibrated before and after the pH recording with standard buffer solutions of pH 7.00 and pH 1.00. The electrode was connected to a data logger (Mircodigitrapper, Synetic). At the end of 24hours recording, the data were transfer to a personal computer for analysis. Medication will be given after insertion of intra-gastric pH monitor probe.
Outcome measures Primary Outcome: total % Time pH > 6 \& 4 Secondary outcome: Median intragastric pH \& Time to reach pH 4 and 6
- Conditions
- Peptic Ulcer
- Being tested
- esomeprazole
- Keywords
- pH study, peptic ulcer, proton pump inhibitor
- Medical subject headings
- Peptic Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
esomeprazoleDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
percentage of time intragstric pH > 6 and > 4
Measured: 24hours after endoscopy
Secondary outcomes (2)
Median intragastric pH
Measured: 24hours after endoscopy
time to attain intragastric pH 4 & 6
Measured: 24hours after endoscopy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 May 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Study completionSep 2007 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peptic UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Simon K.H. Wong, MBChB, FRCSEd, FHKAM, Principal investigator, Pamela Youde Nethersole Hospital - SurgeryMichael K.W. Li, MD, Study chair, PYNEH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00471029
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HKEC-2005-110
- Acronym
- NPH
- Status last verified
- May 2007
- First submitted
- 8 May 2007
- Last updated
- 9 May 2007
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 May 2007. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Compare Gastric Acid Suppression of Esomeprazole by Oral or Intravenous Administration - A Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00471029
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NPH / HKEC-2005-110
- Conditions
- Peptic Ulcer
- Keywords
- pH study, peptic ulcer, proton pump inhibitor
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Study completion
- Sep 2007 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 May 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the gastric acid suppression profile among different regimen (Oral Vs Intravenous)of administration of proton pump inhibitor - Esomeprazole by 24hours intragastric pH monitoring.
Detailed description
Peptic ulcer bleeding is a common medical emergency. Although primary hemostasis can be achieved by endoscopic hemostasis in more than 90% of cases, rebleeding during the first 72 hours is still common. The use of secretory inhibitors in ulcer bleeding had theoretical benefit in preventing rebleeding. In vitro, platelet aggregation and disaggregation, coagulation and fibrinolysis are strongly dependent on intra-gastric pH. When pH falls below 6.0, platelet disaggregation takes place and below 4.0, fibrin clots dissolved. Pharmacological studies have clearly shown that primed proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) infusion is superior to H2-receptor blocler (H2B) injection or infusion in maintaining high intra-gastric pH. Randomized trials had demonstrated the advantage of adjuvant use of intravenous or oral PPI in reducing rebleeding as compared to placebo. However, as Asian subjects generally have lower body weight and acid output than Caucasians, the dosage of PPI required for prevent rebleeding may be different. Lin et al had demonstrated that in an Asian population study, in order to show a significant clinical effect in prevent peptic ulcer rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis, at least a 30% difference in duration in maintaining an intragastric pH >6 must be achieved. As there is substantial cost implication of routine use of high dose intravenous PPI infusion (80mg bolus + 8mg/hour for 72 hours, cost ~HKD$1100) against high dose oral esomeprazole (40mg BD for 3 days, cost ~HKD$60), the optimal doses and routes of administration of PPI in achieving effective acid suppression is needed to be clearly defined.
Protocol:
Patients presented with bleeding peptic ulcers (melena, hememtesis) will undergo endoscopy. If clean base peptic ulcer which dos not require endoscopic treatment is diagnosed, consented patients will randomly allocated into 2 groups using sealed envelopes containing a therapeutic option derived from a randomized table.
- Esomeprazole infusion (80mg bolus then 8mg/hour) (192mg/d)
- Esomeprazole Tablet oral 40mg 12 hourly (80mg/d)
A pH electrode with internal reference (Synetic) was inserted transnasally and positioned 10cm below the cardia. It was calibrated before and after the pH recording with standard buffer solutions of pH 7.00 and pH 1.00. The electrode was connected to a data logger (Mircodigitrapper, Synetic). At the end of 24hours recording, the data were transfer to a personal computer for analysis. Medication will be given after insertion of intra-gastric pH monitor probe.
Outcome measures Primary Outcome: total % Time pH > 6 \& 4 Secondary outcome: Median intragastric pH \& Time to reach pH 4 and 6
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with non-bleeding peptic ulcer which do not require endoscopic therapy.
- Chinese, Age ³18 and <90
- Provision of an informed written consent signed by the patient.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Treatment of antisecretory drugs during the preceding 4 weeks
- The present inter-current ulcer complication (gastric outlet obstruction or ulcer perforation)
- Presence of esophageal / gastric varices
- aspirin or NSAID user
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| esomeprazole | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
percentage of time intragstric pH > 6 and > 4
Time frame: 24hours after endoscopy
2 secondary outcomes
Median intragastric pH
Time frame: 24hours after endoscopy
time to attain intragastric pH 4 & 6
Time frame: 24hours after endoscopy
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 May 2007.
Related trials for Peptic Ulcer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ilaprazole 10 mg in Prevention NSAIDs Associated Peptic Ulcer
Peptic Ulcer
Active, not recruiting
To Develop Methods for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Gastroduodenal Pathology in Children.
Gastritis Chronic, Gastroduodenitis
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Vonorasan Versus Esomeprazole in the Treatment of Ulcers After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Ulcers, Gastric
Recruiting
SPADE Clinical Trial.
Early Gastric Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach
RecruitingObservational study
Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole 40 mg IV in Post-Surgical Patients Admitted to the ICU
Stress Ulcers, Reflux Episodes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Simon K.H. Wong, MBChB, FRCSEd, FHKAM principal investigator
Pamela Youde Nethersole Hospital - Surgery
Michael K.W. Li, MD study chair
PYNEH
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing esomeprazole in people with Peptic Ulcer, run by Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Simon K.H. Wong, MBChB, FRCSEd, FHKAM (852-25956416, wongkhmo@netvigator.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
percentage of time intragstric pH > 6 and > 4 (time frame: 24hours after endoscopy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2007.