OsteoporosisVIDOSNCT00472823
Vitamin D Supplementation in Older Women
A study testing Vitamin D3 and Calcium Citrate (Citracal) in people with Osteoporosis and Aging, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of several doses of vitamin D on hormones related to bone, calcium absorption, bone density and muscle strength. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 57 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis, Aging
- What is being tested?
- Vitamin D3 and Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 273 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2007to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 57 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 7 years post-menopause
- Serum 25OHD level 5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml
- BMI less than or equal to 40 kg/m2
- Willing to discontinue multivitamins that contain vitamin D during the study
Who cannot join
- Cancer (except basal cell carcinoma) or terminal illness
- Previous hip fracture
- Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body)
- Uncontrolled type I diabetes or fasting blood sugar greater than 140 mg in type II
- Kidney stones more than twice in a lifetime
- Chronic renal failure
Show all 16Show fewer
- Evidence of chronic liver disease, including alcoholism
- Physical conditions such as severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, heart failure severe enough to prevent reasonable physical activity
- Previous treatment with bisphosphonates (more that 3 months), PTH or PTH derivatives, (e.g. Teriparatide or Fluoride) in the last 6 months
- Previous treatment within the last 6 months with calcitonin or estrogen
- Chronic high dose corticosteroid therapy (more than 10 mg per day) for over 6 months and not within the last 6 months
- Anticonvulsant therapy
- High dose thiazide therapy (more than 37.5 mg)
- 24 hour urine calcium greater than 290 mg on 2 baseline tests
- Serum calcium exceeding upper normal limit on 2 baseline tests
- Bone Mineral Density T-score less than -3.0 for spine or hip
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Creighton University Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
About this study
Official title: Determination of RDA for Vitamin D in Caucasian and African American Women
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of several doses of vitamin D on hormones related to bone, calcium absorption, bone density and muscle strength.
Read the detailed description
The prevalence of osteoporosis is high in the United States, with about 10 million people over the age of 50 already having the disease and another 34 million at risk for developing it. Development of low-cost and effective strategies is important for preventing osteoporosis and reducing osteoporotic fractures. A simple inexpensive strategy to prevent osteoporosis is adequate nutrition with calcium and vitamin D. Serum 25OHD (25-hydroxyvitamin D) is now accepted as the objective measure of vitamin D nutrition. There is a growing understanding that serum 25OHD concentrations of at least 30-32 ng/ml are needed for optimal bone health at which serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations reach a minimum.
There are no systematic prospective dose response studies aimed at determining the optimum amount of vitamin D intake required to maintain optimum serum 25OHD levels in the population which will help in determining the estimated average requirement (EAR) and recommended dietary requirement (RDA) for vitamin D. More work to determine the RDA for vitamin D has been recommended by the Panel on Calcium and Related Nutrients of the Food and Nutrition Board. This study is aimed at filling the information gap by concentrating on the high risk group of postmenopausal women. We are testing the theory that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml will reduce serum PTH in the high risk group of vitamin D insufficient postmenopausal women with an adequate intake of calcium. We also believe that the dose of vitamin D that will achieve this level is approximately 4400IU per day, which is well above the suggested adequate intake of 400-600 ID recommended for the elderly.
In a one year double blind, randomized prospective clinical trial, we will examine the dose response effect of supplementation with different doses of vitamin D3 (400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, 4800IU/day) on the primary outcomes of serum 25OHD and PTH in 160 postmenopausal Caucasian and 160 African American women who have inadequate vitamin D levels in winter. We expect that the results from this study will add useful and important information about the RDA for vitamin D for postmenopausal women who are more susceptible to osteoporosis. The results from this study will also help in designing future clinical trials to study the effect of vitamin D, for example in preventing fractures, falls, cancer.
The main objective of the current proposal is to study the effect of increasing doses of vitamin D3 in the high risk group of postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD <20 ng/ml) in winter in presence of sufficient calcium intake, in order to determine the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) that covers 50% and the Recommended Daily allowance (RDA) covers 97.5% of population for vitamin D. We will use a serum 25OHD concentration equal >30 ng/ml and normalization of serum PTH as indicators of adequacy. We expect that the results from this proposal will add important information helpful in designing future larger clinical trials to determine the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for vitamin D in other ethnic groups and designing clinical trials on the effect of vitamin D on falls and fractures.
We hypothesize that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml with vitamin D supplements in 97 percent of the study subjects will reduce serum PTH and bone markers to premenopausal range. We postulate that the RDA of vitamin D that will achieve a serum 25OHD of ≥ 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of women during winter is approximately 4400 IU/d and the EAR dose of vitamin D is between 800-1000 IU.
The specific aims of the proposal are,
- To examine the dose response effect of vitamin D3, 400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, and 4800 IU /d in postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD equal <20 ng/ml) in winter plus an adequate calcium intake compared to a calcium control group, on serum 25OHD and PTH levels, which constitute our primary outcome measures.
- To determine the EAR and RDA for postmenopausal women by establishing the dose of vitamin D3 that will increase serum 25OHD above 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of study subjects in winter and reduce serum PTH to the normal premenopausal range.
- To study the dose response effect of vitamin D3 on calcium absorption, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) serum calcium, serum bone markers, bone mineral density (BMD) and falls (only in elderly) (the secondary outcome measures)
- To establish the long term safety of these doses relating to hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria
Progress: Caucasian enrollment completed July 2008; African American enrollment completed May 2009
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Aging
- Being tested
- Vitamin D3, Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
- Keywords
- cholecalciferol, vitamin D deficiency, bone density, dietary calcium, hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Vitamin D Deficiency, Hypercalcemia, Hypercalciuria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vitamin D3Dietary supplement
Orally for one year
Calcium Citrate (Citracal)Dietary supplement
Also called Citracal
Orally for one year; dosage adjusted so that calcium intake is 1200-1400mg daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin D3 400 IU daily | Experimental | vitamin D3 400 IU daily Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal) |
| vitamin D3 800 IU daily | Experimental | vitamin D3 800 IU daily Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal) |
| vitamin D3 1600 IU daily | Experimental | vitamin D3 1600 IU daily Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal) |
| vitamin D3 2400 IU daily | Experimental | vitamin D3 2400 IU daily Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal) |
| vitamin D3 3200 IU daily | Experimental | vitamin D3 3200 IU daily Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal) |
| vitamin D3 4000 IU daily | Experimental | vitamin D3 4000 IU daily Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal) |
| vitamin D3 4800 IU daily | Experimental | vitamin D3 4800 IU daily Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal) |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | matched to vitamin D tablet Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels
Measured: Baseline, 6months,12 months
Secondary outcomes (15)
Calcium absorption
100mg calcium+ calcium45
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
Serum/urine calcium
Measured: Baseline and every 3 months
Bone markers
Measured: Baseline, and 12 months
Bone density
spine,hip,total body,lateral
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
Muscle strength
leg strength( Cybex),timed up and go,hand grip,chair stand,gait speed,quiet stance,postural stability( biodex),standing balance
Measured: Baseline,6 months,12 months
Falls
questionnaire
Measured: Baseline and every 3 months
Pulmonary function studies
FEV1
Measured: baseline and final test
Genotyping
Measured: one time
Molecular studies of peripheral leucocytes
Measured: baseline and final test
Adult Depression Score
questionnaire
Measured: baseline and 12 months
Physical Activity Scale form ( PASE)
questionnaire
Measured: baseline,6 months,12 months
sun exposure
sun exposure form and skin color evaluation by a reflective meter (SmartProbe)
Measured: baseline and every 3 months
Basic metabolic panel
Measured: baseline and every 3 months
serum 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D
Measured: baseline and 12 months
quality of life
questionnaire
Measured: baseline and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 May 2007 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2007
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionAug 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 273 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Creighton University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), University of Nebraska
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- J C Gallagher, MD, Principal investigator, Creighton University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00472823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AG0081
- Other IDs
- 1R01AG028168-01
- Acronym
- VIDOS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 10 May 2007
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gallagher JC, Kinyamu HK, Fowler SE, Dawson-Hughes B, Dalsky GP, Sherman SS. Calciotropic hormones and bone markers in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Mar;13(3):475-82. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.475.
PubMed 9525348Holick MF, Siris ES, Binkley N, Beard MK, Khan A, Katzer JT, Petruschke RA, Chen E, de Papp AE. Prevalence of Vitamin D inadequacy among postmenopausal North American women receiving osteoporosis therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jun;90(6):3215-24. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2364. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
PubMed 15797954Aloia JF, Talwar SA, Pollack S, Feuerman M, Yeh JK. Optimal vitamin D status and serum parathyroid hormone concentrations in African American women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Sep;84(3):602-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.602.
PubMed 16960175Smith LM, Gallagher JC. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on total and free 25 hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone. An analysis of two randomized controlled trials. J Intern Med. 2019 Dec;286(6):651-659. doi: 10.1111/joim.12950. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
PubMed 31215092Smith LM, Gallagher JC, Kaufmann M, Jones G. Effect of increasing doses of vitamin D on bone mineral density and serum N-terminal telopeptide in elderly women: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med. 2018 Dec;284(6):685-693. doi: 10.1111/joim.12825. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
PubMed 30137647Gallagher JC, Smith LM, Yalamanchili V. Incidence of hypercalciuria and hypercalcemia during vitamin D and calcium supplementation in older women. Menopause. 2014 Nov;21(11):1173-80. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000270.
PubMed 24937025Gallagher JC, Jindal PS, Smith LM. Vitamin D does not increase calcium absorption in young women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(5):1081-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2121.
PubMed 24166866Gallagher JC, Peacock M, Yalamanchili V, Smith LM. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in older African American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):1137-46. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3106. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
PubMed 23386641Gallagher JC, Sai A, Templin T 2nd, Smith L. Dose response to vitamin D supplementation in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):425-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00005.
PubMed 22431675
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Determination of RDA for Vitamin D in Caucasian and African American Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00472823
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VIDOS / AG0081
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Aging
- Keywords
- cholecalciferol, vitamin D deficiency, bone density, dietary calcium, hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 273 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Creighton UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), University of Nebraska
- Study start
- Apr 2007
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 May 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of several doses of vitamin D on hormones related to bone, calcium absorption, bone density and muscle strength.
Detailed description
The prevalence of osteoporosis is high in the United States, with about 10 million people over the age of 50 already having the disease and another 34 million at risk for developing it. Development of low-cost and effective strategies is important for preventing osteoporosis and reducing osteoporotic fractures. A simple inexpensive strategy to prevent osteoporosis is adequate nutrition with calcium and vitamin D. Serum 25OHD (25-hydroxyvitamin D) is now accepted as the objective measure of vitamin D nutrition. There is a growing understanding that serum 25OHD concentrations of at least 30-32 ng/ml are needed for optimal bone health at which serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations reach a minimum.
There are no systematic prospective dose response studies aimed at determining the optimum amount of vitamin D intake required to maintain optimum serum 25OHD levels in the population which will help in determining the estimated average requirement (EAR) and recommended dietary requirement (RDA) for vitamin D. More work to determine the RDA for vitamin D has been recommended by the Panel on Calcium and Related Nutrients of the Food and Nutrition Board. This study is aimed at filling the information gap by concentrating on the high risk group of postmenopausal women. We are testing the theory that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml will reduce serum PTH in the high risk group of vitamin D insufficient postmenopausal women with an adequate intake of calcium. We also believe that the dose of vitamin D that will achieve this level is approximately 4400IU per day, which is well above the suggested adequate intake of 400-600 ID recommended for the elderly.
In a one year double blind, randomized prospective clinical trial, we will examine the dose response effect of supplementation with different doses of vitamin D3 (400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, 4800IU/day) on the primary outcomes of serum 25OHD and PTH in 160 postmenopausal Caucasian and 160 African American women who have inadequate vitamin D levels in winter. We expect that the results from this study will add useful and important information about the RDA for vitamin D for postmenopausal women who are more susceptible to osteoporosis. The results from this study will also help in designing future clinical trials to study the effect of vitamin D, for example in preventing fractures, falls, cancer.
The main objective of the current proposal is to study the effect of increasing doses of vitamin D3 in the high risk group of postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD <20 ng/ml) in winter in presence of sufficient calcium intake, in order to determine the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) that covers 50% and the Recommended Daily allowance (RDA) covers 97.5% of population for vitamin D. We will use a serum 25OHD concentration equal >30 ng/ml and normalization of serum PTH as indicators of adequacy. We expect that the results from this proposal will add important information helpful in designing future larger clinical trials to determine the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for vitamin D in other ethnic groups and designing clinical trials on the effect of vitamin D on falls and fractures.
We hypothesize that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml with vitamin D supplements in 97 percent of the study subjects will reduce serum PTH and bone markers to premenopausal range. We postulate that the RDA of vitamin D that will achieve a serum 25OHD of ≥ 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of women during winter is approximately 4400 IU/d and the EAR dose of vitamin D is between 800-1000 IU.
The specific aims of the proposal are,
- To examine the dose response effect of vitamin D3, 400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, and 4800 IU /d in postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD equal <20 ng/ml) in winter plus an adequate calcium intake compared to a calcium control group, on serum 25OHD and PTH levels, which constitute our primary outcome measures.
- To determine the EAR and RDA for postmenopausal women by establishing the dose of vitamin D3 that will increase serum 25OHD above 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of study subjects in winter and reduce serum PTH to the normal premenopausal range.
- To study the dose response effect of vitamin D3 on calcium absorption, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) serum calcium, serum bone markers, bone mineral density (BMD) and falls (only in elderly) (the secondary outcome measures)
- To establish the long term safety of these doses relating to hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria
Progress: Caucasian enrollment completed July 2008; African American enrollment completed May 2009
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| vitamin D3 400 IU daily | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3, Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)vitamin D3 400 IU daily |
| vitamin D3 800 IU daily | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3, Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)vitamin D3 800 IU daily |
| vitamin D3 1600 IU daily | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3, Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)vitamin D3 1600 IU daily |
| vitamin D3 2400 IU daily | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3, Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)vitamin D3 2400 IU daily |
| vitamin D3 3200 IU daily | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3, Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)vitamin D3 3200 IU daily |
| vitamin D3 4000 IU daily | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3, Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)vitamin D3 4000 IU daily |
| vitamin D3 4800 IU daily | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3, Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)vitamin D3 4800 IU daily |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3matched to vitamin D tablet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 57 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- At least 7 years post-menopause
- Serum 25OHD level 5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml
- BMI less than or equal to 40 kg/m2
- Willing to discontinue multivitamins that contain vitamin D during the study
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Cancer (except basal cell carcinoma) or terminal illness
- Previous hip fracture
- Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body)
- Uncontrolled type I diabetes or fasting blood sugar greater than 140 mg in type II
- Kidney stones more than twice in a lifetime
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D3Orally for one year | Dietary supplement | placebo, vitamin D3 1600 IU daily, vitamin D3 2400 IU daily, vitamin D3 3200 IU daily, vitamin D3 400 IU daily, vitamin D3 4000 IU daily, vitamin D3 4800 IU daily, vitamin D3 800 IU daily |
| Calcium Citrate (Citracal)Also: CitracalOrally for one year; dosage adjusted so that calcium intake is 1200-1400mg daily | Dietary supplement | vitamin D3 1600 IU daily, vitamin D3 2400 IU daily, vitamin D3 3200 IU daily, vitamin D3 400 IU daily, vitamin D3 4000 IU daily, vitamin D3 4800 IU daily, vitamin D3 800 IU daily |
Primary outcome
Changes in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels
Time frame: Baseline, 6months,12 months
15 secondary outcomes
Calcium absorption
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Serum/urine calcium
Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months
Bone markers
Time frame: Baseline, and 12 months
Bone density
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Muscle strength
Time frame: Baseline,6 months,12 months
Falls
Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months
Pulmonary function studies
Time frame: baseline and final test
Genotyping
Time frame: one time
Molecular studies of peripheral leucocytes
Time frame: baseline and final test
Adult Depression Score
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Physical Activity Scale form ( PASE)
Time frame: baseline,6 months,12 months
sun exposure
Time frame: baseline and every 3 months
Basic metabolic panel
Time frame: baseline and every 3 months
serum 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
quality of life
Time frame: baseline and 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2016.
- Background: PubMed 9525348Gallagher JC, Kinyamu HK, Fowler SE, Dawson-Hughes B, Dalsky GP, Sherman SS. Calciotropic hormones and bone markers in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Mar;13(3):475-82. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.475.
- Background: PubMed 15797954Holick MF, Siris ES, Binkley N, Beard MK, Khan A, Katzer JT, Petruschke RA, Chen E, de Papp AE. Prevalence of Vitamin D inadequacy among postmenopausal North American women receiving osteoporosis therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jun;90(6):3215-24. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2364. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 16960175Aloia JF, Talwar SA, Pollack S, Feuerman M, Yeh JK. Optimal vitamin D status and serum parathyroid hormone concentrations in African American women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Sep;84(3):602-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.602.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31215092Smith LM, Gallagher JC. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on total and free 25 hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone. An analysis of two randomized controlled trials. J Intern Med. 2019 Dec;286(6):651-659. doi: 10.1111/joim.12950. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30137647Smith LM, Gallagher JC, Kaufmann M, Jones G. Effect of increasing doses of vitamin D on bone mineral density and serum N-terminal telopeptide in elderly women: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med. 2018 Dec;284(6):685-693. doi: 10.1111/joim.12825. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24937025Gallagher JC, Smith LM, Yalamanchili V. Incidence of hypercalciuria and hypercalcemia during vitamin D and calcium supplementation in older women. Menopause. 2014 Nov;21(11):1173-80. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000270.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24166866Gallagher JC, Jindal PS, Smith LM. Vitamin D does not increase calcium absorption in young women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(5):1081-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2121.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23386641Gallagher JC, Peacock M, Yalamanchili V, Smith LM. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in older African American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):1137-46. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3106. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22431675Gallagher JC, Sai A, Templin T 2nd, Smith L. Dose response to vitamin D supplementation in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):425-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00005.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Impact of Osteosarcopenia on Falls, Kinesiophobia, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Osteosarcopenia, Sarcopenia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
TCM Formula vs. HMB in Pre-Frail Elders: Muscle Strength and Bone Status
Pre-Frailty, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Romosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment and Comparison of Osteoporosis Risk Factors After Stroke
Stroke, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
J C Gallagher, MD principal investigator
Creighton University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vitamin D3 and Calcium Citrate (Citracal) in people with Osteoporosis and Aging, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (time frame: Baseline, 6months,12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00472823, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2016.