AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoporosisVIDOSNCT00472823

Vitamin D Supplementation in Older Women

A study testing Vitamin D3 and Calcium Citrate (Citracal) in people with Osteoporosis and Aging, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of several doses of vitamin D on hormones related to bone, calcium absorption, bone density and muscle strength. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 57 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Osteoporosis, Aging
What is being tested?
Vitamin D3 and Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
273 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2007to Aug 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 57 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 7 years post-menopause
  • Serum 25OHD level 5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml
  • BMI less than or equal to 40 kg/m2
  • Willing to discontinue multivitamins that contain vitamin D during the study

Who cannot join

  • Cancer (except basal cell carcinoma) or terminal illness
  • Previous hip fracture
  • Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body)
  • Uncontrolled type I diabetes or fasting blood sugar greater than 140 mg in type II
  • Kidney stones more than twice in a lifetime
  • Chronic renal failure
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Evidence of chronic liver disease, including alcoholism
  • Physical conditions such as severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, heart failure severe enough to prevent reasonable physical activity
  • Previous treatment with bisphosphonates (more that 3 months), PTH or PTH derivatives, (e.g. Teriparatide or Fluoride) in the last 6 months
  • Previous treatment within the last 6 months with calcitonin or estrogen
  • Chronic high dose corticosteroid therapy (more than 10 mg per day) for over 6 months and not within the last 6 months
  • Anticonvulsant therapy
  • High dose thiazide therapy (more than 37.5 mg)
  • 24 hour urine calcium greater than 290 mg on 2 baseline tests
  • Serum calcium exceeding upper normal limit on 2 baseline tests
  • Bone Mineral Density T-score less than -3.0 for spine or hip

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Creighton University Medical Center

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68131

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Determination of RDA for Vitamin D in Caucasian and African American Women

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of several doses of vitamin D on hormones related to bone, calcium absorption, bone density and muscle strength.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of osteoporosis is high in the United States, with about 10 million people over the age of 50 already having the disease and another 34 million at risk for developing it. Development of low-cost and effective strategies is important for preventing osteoporosis and reducing osteoporotic fractures. A simple inexpensive strategy to prevent osteoporosis is adequate nutrition with calcium and vitamin D. Serum 25OHD (25-hydroxyvitamin D) is now accepted as the objective measure of vitamin D nutrition. There is a growing understanding that serum 25OHD concentrations of at least 30-32 ng/ml are needed for optimal bone health at which serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations reach a minimum.

There are no systematic prospective dose response studies aimed at determining the optimum amount of vitamin D intake required to maintain optimum serum 25OHD levels in the population which will help in determining the estimated average requirement (EAR) and recommended dietary requirement (RDA) for vitamin D. More work to determine the RDA for vitamin D has been recommended by the Panel on Calcium and Related Nutrients of the Food and Nutrition Board. This study is aimed at filling the information gap by concentrating on the high risk group of postmenopausal women. We are testing the theory that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml will reduce serum PTH in the high risk group of vitamin D insufficient postmenopausal women with an adequate intake of calcium. We also believe that the dose of vitamin D that will achieve this level is approximately 4400IU per day, which is well above the suggested adequate intake of 400-600 ID recommended for the elderly.

In a one year double blind, randomized prospective clinical trial, we will examine the dose response effect of supplementation with different doses of vitamin D3 (400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, 4800IU/day) on the primary outcomes of serum 25OHD and PTH in 160 postmenopausal Caucasian and 160 African American women who have inadequate vitamin D levels in winter. We expect that the results from this study will add useful and important information about the RDA for vitamin D for postmenopausal women who are more susceptible to osteoporosis. The results from this study will also help in designing future clinical trials to study the effect of vitamin D, for example in preventing fractures, falls, cancer.

The main objective of the current proposal is to study the effect of increasing doses of vitamin D3 in the high risk group of postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD <20 ng/ml) in winter in presence of sufficient calcium intake, in order to determine the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) that covers 50% and the Recommended Daily allowance (RDA) covers 97.5% of population for vitamin D. We will use a serum 25OHD concentration equal >30 ng/ml and normalization of serum PTH as indicators of adequacy. We expect that the results from this proposal will add important information helpful in designing future larger clinical trials to determine the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for vitamin D in other ethnic groups and designing clinical trials on the effect of vitamin D on falls and fractures.

We hypothesize that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml with vitamin D supplements in 97 percent of the study subjects will reduce serum PTH and bone markers to premenopausal range. We postulate that the RDA of vitamin D that will achieve a serum 25OHD of ≥ 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of women during winter is approximately 4400 IU/d and the EAR dose of vitamin D is between 800-1000 IU.

The specific aims of the proposal are,

  1. To examine the dose response effect of vitamin D3, 400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, and 4800 IU /d in postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD equal <20 ng/ml) in winter plus an adequate calcium intake compared to a calcium control group, on serum 25OHD and PTH levels, which constitute our primary outcome measures.
  2. To determine the EAR and RDA for postmenopausal women by establishing the dose of vitamin D3 that will increase serum 25OHD above 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of study subjects in winter and reduce serum PTH to the normal premenopausal range.
  3. To study the dose response effect of vitamin D3 on calcium absorption, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) serum calcium, serum bone markers, bone mineral density (BMD) and falls (only in elderly) (the secondary outcome measures)
  4. To establish the long term safety of these doses relating to hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria

Progress: Caucasian enrollment completed July 2008; African American enrollment completed May 2009

Conditions
Osteoporosis, Aging
Being tested
Vitamin D3, Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
Keywords
cholecalciferol, vitamin D deficiency, bone density, dietary calcium, hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis, Vitamin D Deficiency, Hypercalcemia, Hypercalciuria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin D3Dietary supplement

    Orally for one year

  • Calcium Citrate (Citracal)Dietary supplement

    Also called Citracal

    Orally for one year; dosage adjusted so that calcium intake is 1200-1400mg daily

Study groups in NCT00472823
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vitamin D3 400 IU dailyExperimentalvitamin D3 400 IU daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
vitamin D3 800 IU dailyExperimentalvitamin D3 800 IU daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
vitamin D3 1600 IU dailyExperimentalvitamin D3 1600 IU daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
vitamin D3 2400 IU dailyExperimentalvitamin D3 2400 IU daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
vitamin D3 3200 IU dailyExperimentalvitamin D3 3200 IU daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
vitamin D3 4000 IU dailyExperimentalvitamin D3 4000 IU daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
vitamin D3 4800 IU dailyExperimentalvitamin D3 4800 IU daily
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3; Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)
placeboPlacebo comparatormatched to vitamin D tablet
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels

    Measured: Baseline, 6months,12 months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Calcium absorption

    100mg calcium+ calcium45

    Measured: Baseline and 12 months

  2. Serum/urine calcium

    Measured: Baseline and every 3 months

  3. Bone markers

    Measured: Baseline, and 12 months

  4. Bone density

    spine,hip,total body,lateral

    Measured: Baseline and 12 months

  5. Muscle strength

    leg strength( Cybex),timed up and go,hand grip,chair stand,gait speed,quiet stance,postural stability( biodex),standing balance

    Measured: Baseline,6 months,12 months

  6. Falls

    questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline and every 3 months

  7. Pulmonary function studies

    FEV1

    Measured: baseline and final test

  8. Genotyping

    Measured: one time

  9. Molecular studies of peripheral leucocytes

    Measured: baseline and final test

  10. Adult Depression Score

    questionnaire

    Measured: baseline and 12 months

  11. Physical Activity Scale form ( PASE)

    questionnaire

    Measured: baseline,6 months,12 months

  12. sun exposure

    sun exposure form and skin color evaluation by a reflective meter (SmartProbe)

    Measured: baseline and every 3 months

  13. Basic metabolic panel

    Measured: baseline and every 3 months

  14. serum 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D

    Measured: baseline and 12 months

  15. quality of life

    questionnaire

    Measured: baseline and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2007
  3. Primary completionAug 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
273 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00472823
Sponsor's protocol ID
AG0081
Other IDs
1R01AG028168-01
Acronym
VIDOS
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
10 May 2007
Last updated
14 Mar 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gallagher JC, Kinyamu HK, Fowler SE, Dawson-Hughes B, Dalsky GP, Sherman SS. Calciotropic hormones and bone markers in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Mar;13(3):475-82. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.475.

    PubMed 9525348
  • Holick MF, Siris ES, Binkley N, Beard MK, Khan A, Katzer JT, Petruschke RA, Chen E, de Papp AE. Prevalence of Vitamin D inadequacy among postmenopausal North American women receiving osteoporosis therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jun;90(6):3215-24. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2364. Epub 2005 Mar 29.

    PubMed 15797954
  • Aloia JF, Talwar SA, Pollack S, Feuerman M, Yeh JK. Optimal vitamin D status and serum parathyroid hormone concentrations in African American women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Sep;84(3):602-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.602.

    PubMed 16960175
  • Smith LM, Gallagher JC. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on total and free 25 hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone. An analysis of two randomized controlled trials. J Intern Med. 2019 Dec;286(6):651-659. doi: 10.1111/joim.12950. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

    PubMed 31215092
  • Smith LM, Gallagher JC, Kaufmann M, Jones G. Effect of increasing doses of vitamin D on bone mineral density and serum N-terminal telopeptide in elderly women: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med. 2018 Dec;284(6):685-693. doi: 10.1111/joim.12825. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

    PubMed 30137647
  • Gallagher JC, Smith LM, Yalamanchili V. Incidence of hypercalciuria and hypercalcemia during vitamin D and calcium supplementation in older women. Menopause. 2014 Nov;21(11):1173-80. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000270.

    PubMed 24937025
  • Gallagher JC, Jindal PS, Smith LM. Vitamin D does not increase calcium absorption in young women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(5):1081-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2121.

    PubMed 24166866
  • Gallagher JC, Peacock M, Yalamanchili V, Smith LM. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in older African American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):1137-46. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3106. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

    PubMed 23386641
  • Gallagher JC, Sai A, Templin T 2nd, Smith L. Dose response to vitamin D supplementation in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):425-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00005.

    PubMed 22431675

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Vitamin D3 and Calcium Citrate (Citracal) in people with Osteoporosis and Aging, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (time frame: Baseline, 6months,12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00472823, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in