Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 1/2PEPCADIIINCT00473772
DEBlue Stent vs Cypher Stent in the Treatment of Advanced Coronary Artery Disease
A Phase 1/2 study testing DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by University Hospital, Saarland at 16 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Paclitaxel-eluting SeQuent Please S stent system (DEBlue) in the treatment of stenoses in native coronary arteries with nominal stent diameters between ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.5 mm and < 24 mm in length for procedural success and preservation of vessel patency… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 643 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with stable or unstable angina or documented ischemia due to a significant lesion in a native coronary artery
- Patients eligible for coronary revascularization by means of PCI
- Intention to treat one lesion with one stent
- Patients suitable for coronary revascularization of any sort (balloon angioplasty, device-assisted balloon-angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass grafting)
- Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age
- Women of childbearing potential may not be pregnant nor have the desire to becoming pregnant during the first year following the study procedure. Hence, patients will be advised to use an adequate birth control method up to and including 9 months follow-up
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients who are mentally and linguistically able to understand the aim of the study and to show sufficient compliance in following the study protocol
- Patients must agree to undergo the 9 months angiographic follow-up
- Patients must agree to undergo the 1 and 3 year clinical follow-up
- Patient is able to verbally acknowledge an understanding of the associated risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives to therapeutic options of this trial, e.g. balloon angioplasty by means of the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon catheter in combination with the Coroflex BlueTM stent or the Sirolimus-eluting CypherTM stent. The patients, by providing informed consent, agree to these risks and benefits as stated in the patient informed consent document.
- Significant stenoses in native coronary arteries with nominal stent diameters between ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.5 mm and < 24 mm in length
Who cannot join
- Unprotected left main
- In stent restenosis
- Indication for more than one lesion to treat, even as staged procedure
- Intended bifurcational stenting
- Patients requiring chronic anticoagulation
- SVG and AG
Show all 11Show fewer
- Acute MI (STEMI, NSTEMI)
- Cardiogenic shock
- Chronic total occlusions
- Pregnancy
- Patients with stand alone balloon angioplasty, or stent deployment 6 months prior to enrolment into this study
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 8 countries.
16 sites in 8 countries
Germany8 sites
Kerckhoff-Clinic Bad Nauheim
Bad Nauheim, 61231
Kardiologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charite
Berlin, 13353
St. Johannes-Hospital
Dortmund
Medizinische Universitätsklinik III, Abt. Kardiologie und Angiologie
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover
Klinik fuer Innere Medizin III, Universitaetsklinikum des Saarlandes
Homburg / Saar, Saarland, 66421
Klinikum Ludwigshafen
Ludwigshafen
University of Rostock
Rostock
Belgium2 sites
Cardiovascular Center OLV Hospital Aalst
Aalst
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Genk
About this study
Official title: Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon in Combination With the CoroflexTM Blue Stent vs the Sirolimus Coated CypherTM Stent in the Treatment of Advanced Coronary Artery Disease
The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Paclitaxel-eluting SeQuent Please S stent system (DEBlue) in the treatment of stenoses in native coronary arteries with nominal stent diameters between ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.5 mm and < 24 mm in length for procedural success and preservation of vessel patency in comparison to the Sirolimus-eluting CypherTM stent.
Read the detailed description
The incidence of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention varies between 5 and 35% after bare metal stenting and is as high as 19% after the implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients at moderate risk. Restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia is a slow process, suggesting that therapeutic local drug administration would need to be prolonged to be beneficial. Stent-based local drug delivery provides sustained drug release using special release technologies like polymer coating. However, cell culture experiments indicate that even brief contact between vascular smooth muscle cells and lipophilic taxane compounds can inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation for a long period. In experiments in swine, intracoronary delivery of paclitaxel by contrast media or by a drug-coated balloon catheter was found to result in vascular tissue concentrations capable of producing antiproliferative effects, thus leading to a significant reduction in neointimal proliferation. In these animal studies, the most pronounced reduction of neointimal formation was seen with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent
- Keywords
- cobalt chromium stent, paclitaxel coated balloon catheter, DEBlue, drug eluting balloon
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stentDevice
DES vs. DEB with BMS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cypher Stent | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent |
| DEBlue Stent | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
late lumen loss
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
MACE
Measured: 9 months
MACE
Measured: 3 years
MACE
Measured: 30 days
Binary restenosis rate
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 May 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionOct 2008
- Study completionJan 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 643 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Saarland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- B.Braun Vascular Systems, Berlin, Germany
- Investigators
- Bruno Scheller, Principal investigator, University of Saarland - Internal Medicine III, Homburg/Saar, GermanyChristian Hamm, Principal investigator, Kerckhoff-Clinic Bad Nauheim, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00473772
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BBM-VS-54
- Acronym
- PEPCADIII
- Status last verified
- May 2014
- First submitted
- 14 May 2007
- Last updated
- 6 May 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Scheller B, Speck U, Bohm M. Prevention of restenosis: is angioplasty the answer? Heart. 2007 May;93(5):539-41. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.118059.
PubMed 17435062Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
PubMed 17101615Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Breitwieser C, Dobberstein J, Boehm M, Hamm B. Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):411-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402051248.
PubMed 16864669Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
PubMed 15302790Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U. Drug delivery by angiographic contrast media: inhibition of restenosis. Acad Radiol. 2005 May;12 Suppl 1:S14-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.02.017. No abstract available.
PubMed 16106539Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Grossmann S, Mahnkopf D, Simon O. Inhibition of restenosis in stented porcine coronary arteries: uptake of Paclitaxel from angiographic contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2004 Mar;39(3):182-6. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000116125.96544.64.
PubMed 15076010Scheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Addition of paclitaxel to contrast media prevents restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)01056-8.
PubMed 14563585Scheller B, Speck U, Romeike B, Schmitt A, Sovak M, Bohm M, Stoll HP. Contrast media as carriers for local drug delivery. Successful inhibition of neointimal proliferation in the porcine coronary stent model. Eur Heart J. 2003 Aug;24(15):1462-7. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00317-8.
PubMed 12909076Scheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, Clauss W, Sovak M, Bohm M, Stoll HP. Acute cardiac tolerance of current contrast media and the new taxane protaxel using iopromide as carrier during porcine coronary angiography and stenting. Invest Radiol. 2002 Jan;37(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200201000-00006.
PubMed 11753151
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon in Combination With the CoroflexTM Blue Stent vs the Sirolimus Coated CypherTM Stent in the Treatment of Advanced Coronary Artery Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00473772
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PEPCADIII / BBM-VS-54
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- cobalt chromium stent, paclitaxel coated balloon catheter, DEBlue, drug eluting balloon
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 643 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, SaarlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- B.Braun Vascular Systems, Berlin, Germany
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 May 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Paclitaxel-eluting SeQuent Please S stent system (DEBlue) in the treatment of stenoses in native coronary arteries with nominal stent diameters between ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.5 mm and < 24 mm in length for procedural success and preservation of vessel patency in comparison to the Sirolimus-eluting CypherTM stent.
Detailed description
The incidence of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention varies between 5 and 35% after bare metal stenting and is as high as 19% after the implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients at moderate risk. Restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia is a slow process, suggesting that therapeutic local drug administration would need to be prolonged to be beneficial. Stent-based local drug delivery provides sustained drug release using special release technologies like polymer coating. However, cell culture experiments indicate that even brief contact between vascular smooth muscle cells and lipophilic taxane compounds can inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation for a long period. In experiments in swine, intracoronary delivery of paclitaxel by contrast media or by a drug-coated balloon catheter was found to result in vascular tissue concentrations capable of producing antiproliferative effects, thus leading to a significant reduction in neointimal proliferation. In these animal studies, the most pronounced reduction of neointimal formation was seen with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cypher Stent | Active comparator | Device: DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent |
| DEBlue Stent | Experimental | Device: DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with stable or unstable angina or documented ischemia due to a significant lesion in a native coronary artery
- Patients eligible for coronary revascularization by means of PCI
- Intention to treat one lesion with one stent
- Patients suitable for coronary revascularization of any sort (balloon angioplasty, device-assisted balloon-angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass grafting)
- Patients must be ≥ 18 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Unprotected left main
- In stent restenosis
- Indication for more than one lesion to treat, even as staged procedure
- Intended bifurcational stenting
- Patients requiring chronic anticoagulation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stentDES vs. DEB with BMS | Device | Cypher Stent, DEBlue Stent |
Primary outcome
late lumen loss
Time frame: 9 months
4 secondary outcomes
MACE
Time frame: 9 months
MACE
Time frame: 3 years
MACE
Time frame: 30 days
Binary restenosis rate
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2014.
- Background: PubMed 17435062Scheller B, Speck U, Bohm M. Prevention of restenosis: is angioplasty the answer? Heart. 2007 May;93(5):539-41. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.118059.
- Background: PubMed 17101615Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 16864669Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Breitwieser C, Dobberstein J, Boehm M, Hamm B. Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):411-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402051248.
- Background: PubMed 15302790Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
- Background: PubMed 16106539Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U. Drug delivery by angiographic contrast media: inhibition of restenosis. Acad Radiol. 2005 May;12 Suppl 1:S14-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.02.017. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15076010Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Grossmann S, Mahnkopf D, Simon O. Inhibition of restenosis in stented porcine coronary arteries: uptake of Paclitaxel from angiographic contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2004 Mar;39(3):182-6. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000116125.96544.64.
- Background: PubMed 14563585Scheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Addition of paclitaxel to contrast media prevents restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)01056-8.
- Background: PubMed 12909076Scheller B, Speck U, Romeike B, Schmitt A, Sovak M, Bohm M, Stoll HP. Contrast media as carriers for local drug delivery. Successful inhibition of neointimal proliferation in the porcine coronary stent model. Eur Heart J. 2003 Aug;24(15):1462-7. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00317-8.
- Background: PubMed 11753151Scheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, Clauss W, Sovak M, Bohm M, Stoll HP. Acute cardiac tolerance of current contrast media and the new taxane protaxel using iopromide as carrier during porcine coronary angiography and stenting. Invest Radiol. 2002 Jan;37(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200201000-00006.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruno Scheller principal investigator
University of Saarland - Internal Medicine III, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Christian Hamm principal investigator
Kerckhoff-Clinic Bad Nauheim, Germany
16 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing DEBlue stent vs. Cypher stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by University Hospital, Saarland at 16 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Germany, Belgium, Czechia, France, Netherlands and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
late lumen loss (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00473772, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2014.