EpilepsyPhase 3NCT00477295
A Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
A Phase 3 study testing Zonisamide and Carbamazepine in people with Epilepsy, run by Eisai Inc. at 79 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
This is a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study using a flexible dosing regime to allow optimal zonisamide or carbamazepine therapy for individual subjects. Assessment of eligibility will take place at the Screening Visit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Epilepsy
- What is being tested?
- Zonisamide and Carbamazepine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 583 participants
- Where
- 79 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- May 2007to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects will be eligible for the study if they meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Male or female subjects, 18 to 75 years of age inclusive.
- Subjects with untreated, newly diagnosed epilepsy having at least two well documented, unprovoked, clinically evaluated and classified partial seizures (with or without secondary generalization) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (without clear focal origin) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, of which at least one seizure occurred within three months of the Screening Visit (> one seizure within a 24 hour period will be counted as one seizure).
- Subjects will either have had no previous use of an AED, or treatment with one AED for a maximum duration of two weeks before the Randomization Visit (T1).
- Subjects have a documented electroencephalogram (EEG) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, compatible with localization-related epilepsy (to exclude primary generalized epilepsy).
- Subjects have a documented computed axial tomography (CAT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan confirming the absence of a progressive neurological lesion within 12 months of the Screening Visit.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Female subjects without childbearing potential (two years post-menopausal, bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation, complete hysterectomy) are eligible. Female subjects with childbearing potential must not be pregnant as confirmed by a negative pregnancy test at screening and randomization, must not be lactating and must be using a medically acceptable form of contraception, for the duration of the study and for one month following discontinuation of the study drug. Medically acceptable contraception is defined here as oral contraception pill with at least 50 micrograms ethinylestradiol per intake, contraceptive injections and implants, or intrauterine device in place for at least three months.
- Subjects who are able and willing to follow investigational study procedures, maintain a seizure diary, and report AEs.
- Subjects who are able and willing to give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subjects who meet any of the following exclusion criteria will not be eligible for the study:
- Subjects have a history of clinical investigations, including EEG data, that are suggestive of idiopathic generalised epilepsy as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE).
- Subjects with a history of absence, myoclonic, clonic, tonic, or atonic seizures.
- Subjects have a history of status epilepticus, and/or non-epileptic seizures (e.g., metabolic, pseudo-seizures).
- Subjects have experienced seizures relating to drugs, alcohol, acute medical illness, mental retardation, or subjects with situation-related seizures.
- Subjects have progressive encephalopathy or findings consistent with progressive CNS disease or lesion (e.g. infection, demyelination, or tumour).
Show all 19Show fewer
- Subjects have a history of a significant or currently uncontrolled disease that will interfere with the conduct of this study or the assessment of safety and efficacy of the study drug.
- Subjects have been previously treated with carbamazepine or zonisamide.
- Subjects have received an investigational drug or device in the three months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Subjects have a known hypersensitivity to sulfonamides, dibenzazepine derivatives, or tricyclic antidepressants.
- Subjects have a history of bone marrow depression, low platelet count or other blood dyscrasia.
- Subjects have a history of acute intermittent porphyria.
- Subjects have a history of renal disorder (serum creatinine level of > 135 ìmol / l (1.5 mg/dL at the Screening Visit), hepatic disorder or clinically significant abnormal liver function tests; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 times the upper normal limit.
- Subjects have a body weight of less than 40 kg.
- Subjects have a history of progressive malignancy within the previous 5 years (excluding a history of non-metastasized and adequately treated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma).
- Subjects have a history of psychiatric illness or mood disorder requiring electro-convulsive or drug therapy within the previous 6 months which is considered uncontrolled; a history of suicide attempt; alcohol or drug abuse; chronic treatment with benzodiazepines or barbiturates.
- Subjects are currently taking carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
- Subjects have a history of pancreatitis, nephrolithiasis or hypercalcuria, clinically significant laboratory or electro-cardiographic abnormalities, or uncontrolled hypertension.
- Subjects are currently taking mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or any other excluded medications.
Trial locations and contacts
79 sites in 18 countries.
79 sites in 18 countries
Poland9 sites
Study site
Gdansk
Study site
Katowice
Study site
Krakow
Study site
Lodz
Study site
Lublin
Study site
Poznan
Study site
Sosnowiec
Study site
Szcecin
Study site
Warsaw
Australia8 sites
Study site
Camperdown
Study site
Clayton
Study site
Fitzroy
Study site
Flinders
Study site
Heidelberg West
Study site
Parkville
Study site
Queensland
Study site
Wellington
Spain7 sites
Study site
Alicante
Study site
Bacelona
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Málaga
Study site
Oviedo
Study site
Seville
Germany6 sites
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Bochum
Study site
Düsseldorf
Study site
Munich
Study site
Schwerin
Study site
Westerstede
Hungary6 sites
Study site
Budapest
Study site
Debrecen
Study site
Gyula
Study site
Hódmezővásárhely
Study site
Nyregyhaza
Study site
Zalaegerszeg-Pozva
India6 sites
Study site
Bangalore
Study site
Hyderabad
Study site
Koturpuram
Study site
Madurai
Study site
New Delhi
Study site
Pune
Slovakia6 sites
Study site
Bratislava
Study site
Bratslava
Study site
Brezno
Study site
Nové Zámky
Study site
Vranov nad Topľou
Study site
Žilina
Russia5 sites
Study site
Kaliningrad
Study site
Kazan'
Study site
Moscow
Study site
Saint Petersburg
Study site
Yaroslavl
France4 sites
Study site
Béthune
Study site
Dijon
Study site
Paris
Study site
Saint-Etienne
Italy4 sites
Study site
Milan
Study site
Monza
Study site
Orbassano
Study site
Rome
Serbia4 sites
Study site
Belgrade
Study site
Niš
Study site
Novi Sad
Study site
Subotica
United Kingdom3 sites
Study site
Bristol
Study site
Liverpool
Study site
Treliske
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Multi-centre, Double-blind Study, to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
This is a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study using a flexible dosing regime to allow optimal zonisamide or carbamazepine therapy for individual subjects. Assessment of eligibility will take place at the Screening Visit. The subjects will be randomized to either the carbamazepine or zonisamide arm at the Randomization Visit (T1). T1 must occur as soon as possible (and at least within 14 days) of the Screening Visit in order to optimize subject care.
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Being tested
- Zonisamide, Carbamazepine
- Keywords
- Epilepsy
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ZonisamideDrug
Also called Zonegran
Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.
CarbamazepineDrug
Week 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Zonisamide | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Zonisamide |
| Carbamazepine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Carbamazepine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance Phase
A subject achieved a 26-week seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 26 weeks while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Measured: Week 31 through Week 109
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance Period
A subject achieved a 12-month seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 12 months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Measured: Week 5 through Week 109
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the medicinal product. Adverse events were identified by: any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom or disease temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product; any new disease or exacerbation of an existing disease; any deterioration in nonprotocol-required measurements of laboratory values or other clinical test; and recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at Baseline.
Measured: Week 1 through Week 109
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of Efficacy
Lack of efficacy was evaluated by the subject and on the basis of whether zonisamide and carbamazepine gave the subject at least a 26-week seizure free rate. The subject could withdraw at any time due to lack of efficacy.
Measured: Week 1 through Week 109
Time to 6-months Seizure Freedom
A subject achieved a 6-months seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 6-months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Measured: Week 5 through Week 83
Time to 12-months Seizure Freedom
A subject achieved a 12-month seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 12-months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
Measured: Week 5 through Week 83
Change From Baseline in Total ABNAS Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
The Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Scale(ABNAS) is a subject based questionnaire to measure subjective perceived drug-related cognitive impairments. The ABNAS measured seven critical domains of cognition(tiredness/fatigue,hyperexcitability, slowing(mental and motor),memory impairment,attention disorders,impairment of motor coordination, and language disorders). The total score ranged from 0 to 72, with a higher score reflecting a high level of problems.
Measured: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Change From Baseline in Bond and Lader VAS Mood Sub-Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1
The Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is made up of 16 pairs of alternative descriptors of mood and attention at either end of a 10 cm line.
Subjects were asked to rate their feelings at the time of assessment by indicating the point on the line which best represent their mood. Each item was scored by measuring the position relative to the left hand end of the line and levels of anxiety, sedation, and dysphoria were then calculated from the combined scores of selected items. The scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a high score reflecting a high level of anxiety, sedation or dysphoria.
Measured: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Change From Baseline in QOLIE-31-P Overall Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
The Quality of Life in Epilepsy - Problems(QOLIE-31-P) was completed by the patient and contained 30 items covering seven subscales(seizure worry, overall
Quality of Life (QOL),emotional well-being,energy-fatigue, cognition,medication effects and social function) and one item covering health status. It also included seven items addressing overall distress related to each subscale, an item addressing the relative importance of each subscale topic, and an item addressing perception of overall change in QOL at the end of the study. A high score reflects a good QOL. The following scale range is a sample of 1 of the 7 of the subscales:
10 (Best possible quality of life) - 0 (Worst possible quality of life);
Rand Corporation QOLIE-31 Scoring Manual was used. The QOLIE-31 overall score is calculated by summing the product of each scale score times its weight and summing overall all scales.
Measured: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Aggregate Mental and Physical Component Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
The Short Form 36 Health and Well-Being Questionnaire (SF-36) is a 36-item generic health related QOL instrument covering the following domains: physical functioning, role-physical,bodily pain, general health, social functioning,role-emotional, mental health, and vitality. It yields a profile of eight scores, one for each domain, and physical and mental health summary measures. Each domain is described by a score ranging from 0 to 100, for a range of total possible scoes of 0-400 for physical and 0-400 for mental. An increase represents an improvement, whereas a decrease reflects a worsening.
Measured: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Percentage of Participants With EQ-5D Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1
The European Quality of Life Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a preference based generic health related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument which classifies health states across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain has three levels, they are (1) no problems, (2) some problems, (3) extreme problems. The percentages shown are calculated from the number of subjects at that visit with non-missing data for that score.
Measured: Week 31 through Week 83
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2007 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2007
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionJan 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Eisai Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 583 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joanna Segieth, Study director, Eisai Limited
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00477295
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E2090-E044-310
- Other IDs
- 2006-000156-40
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 21 May 2007
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Baulac M, Brodie MJ, Patten A, Segieth J, Giorgi L. Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jul;11(7):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70105-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
PubMed 22683226
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Multi-centre, Double-blind Study, to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00477295
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E2090-E044-310
- Conditions
- Epilepsy
- Keywords
- Epilepsy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 583 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2007
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Feb 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a two-arm, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study using a flexible dosing regime to allow optimal zonisamide or carbamazepine therapy for individual subjects. Assessment of eligibility will take place at the Screening Visit. The subjects will be randomized to either the carbamazepine or zonisamide arm at the Randomization Visit (T1). T1 must occur as soon as possible (and at least within 14 days) of the Screening Visit in order to optimize subject care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Zonisamide | Active comparator | Drug: Zonisamide |
| Carbamazepine | Active comparator | Drug: Carbamazepine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Subjects will be eligible for the study if they meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Male or female subjects, 18 to 75 years of age inclusive.
- Subjects with untreated, newly diagnosed epilepsy having at least two well documented, unprovoked, clinically evaluated and classified partial seizures (with or without secondary generalization) or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (without clear focal origin) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, of which at least one seizure occurred within three months of the Screening Visit (> one seizure within a 24 hour period will be counted as one seizure).
- Subjects will either have had no previous use of an AED, or treatment with one AED for a maximum duration of two weeks before the Randomization Visit (T1).
- Subjects have a documented electroencephalogram (EEG) within 12 months of the Screening Visit, compatible with localization-related epilepsy (to exclude primary generalized epilepsy).
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Subjects who meet any of the following exclusion criteria will not be eligible for the study:
- Subjects have a history of clinical investigations, including EEG data, that are suggestive of idiopathic generalised epilepsy as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE).
- Subjects with a history of absence, myoclonic, clonic, tonic, or atonic seizures.
- Subjects have a history of status epilepticus, and/or non-epileptic seizures (e.g., metabolic, pseudo-seizures).
- Subjects have experienced seizures relating to drugs, alcohol, acute medical illness, mental retardation, or subjects with situation-related seizures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ZonisamideAlso: ZonegranWeek 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase. | Drug | Zonisamide |
| CarbamazepineWeek 1 and 2 either 100mg zonisamide or 200 mg carbamazepine Week 3 and 4 either 200mg zonisamide or 4800 mg carbamazepine Week 5 and 6 either 300mg zonisamide or 600 mg carbamazepine; this dose then to be maintained unless a subject has a seizure more than two weeks post a dose increase. | Drug | Carbamazepine |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance Phase
Time frame: Week 31 through Week 109
A subject achieved a 26-week seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 26 weeks while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance Period
Time frame: Week 5 through Week 109
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 109
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 109
Time to 6-months Seizure Freedom
Time frame: Week 5 through Week 83
Time to 12-months Seizure Freedom
Time frame: Week 5 through Week 83
Change From Baseline in Total ABNAS Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Time frame: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Change From Baseline in Bond and Lader VAS Mood Sub-Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Time frame: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Change From Baseline in QOLIE-31-P Overall Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Time frame: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Aggregate Mental and Physical Component Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Time frame: Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
Percentage of Participants With EQ-5D Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1
Time frame: Week 31 through Week 83
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Dec 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22683226Baulac M, Brodie MJ, Patten A, Segieth J, Giorgi L. Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jul;11(7):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70105-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Related trials for Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of NRTX-1001 Neural Cell Therapy in Drug-Resistant Unilateral Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (EPIC (EPIlepsy Cell Therapy))
Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
RecruitingObservational study
Electrocardiographic Changes Associated With Epilepsy
ECG Changes
Recruiting
Combined CM and STN Stimulation for Motor Epilepsy
Motor Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Lily's Grace Temporal Interference
Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Characterisation of Laryngeal Evoked Potentials Induced by Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Refractory Epilepsy Patients
Refractory Epilepsy, Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joanna Segieth study director
Eisai Limited
79 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Zonisamide and Carbamazepine in people with Epilepsy, run by Eisai Inc. at 79 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 79 sites in Poland, Australia, Spain, Germany, Hungary and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Feb 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance Phase (time frame: Week 31 through Week 109). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00477295, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2015.