AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 2 DiabetesNCT00482768

Improving Risk Factors for Diabetes Complications in Primary Care

A study testing Practice Facilitation in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test an intervention in primary care clinics to improve three risk factors for diabetes complications: glucose control, blood pressure and cholesterol. Subjects in the study will be clinic staff and clinicians, not patients. The intervention is Practice Facilitation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Type 2 Diabetes
What is being tested?
Practice Facilitation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,493 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2007to May 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primary care practice with 5 or fewer physicians
  • The practice must have seen at least 50 patients with type 2 diabetes in the past 90 days

Who cannot join

  • Practice owned by a large vertically integrated health care system

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Texas Health Sciences Center

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229-4404

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to test an intervention in primary care clinics to improve three risk factors for diabetes complications: glucose control, blood pressure and cholesterol. Subjects in the study will be clinic staff and clinicians, not patients. The intervention is Practice Facilitation. Practice facilitation occurs when a trained facilitator meets with a team of staff and clinicians in each practice over a period of several months. Facilitation meetings create time for learning and reflection by members of the team and improves their communication so that they can adopt and implement a strategy to improve patient care

Read the detailed description

Current control of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure and lipids among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care settings is not adequate to prevent complications. Results from an NIDDK funded R34 pilot study conducted by members of this research team suggest that Practice Facilitation is feasible and may improve these risk factors. Practice facilitation occurs when a trained facilitator meets with a team of staff and clinicians in each practice over a period of several months. Facilitation meetings create time for learning and reflection by members of the team and improves their communication so that they can adopt and implement a strategy to improve patient care. The purpose of this study is to use a Practice Facilitation intervention to improve the above three risk factors among patients with type 2 diabetes in small, autonomous primary care practices. This intervention is based on complex adaptive system theory to support the selection, tailoring and implementation of one or more strategies to improve the above 3 risk factors in each intervention practice. Five strategies will be discussed during the facilitation to stimulate change in each practice: a diabetes registry, point-of-care testing of HbA1c and lipids, group clinic visits, improved decision support during the visit, and patient activation prior to each visit. The specific objectives are : 1) To evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of practice facilitation to improve risk factors for type 2 diabetes complications across a variety of primary care settings; 2) Assess the implementation of the chronic care model(CCM) in response to the intervention; 3) Examine the relationship between communication within the practice team and the implementation of the CCM model; and 4) From the perspective of the organization conducting the intervention and the primary care practice, examine the cost of implementing the intervention relative to risk factor change. The study will be a cluster randomized trial conducted in 40 primary care practices randomized to intervention or control. Data will be collected on all practices and 40 patients in each practice using a multi-method assessment process at baseline, 12 and 24 months. The intervention will be a series of 15 visits to 20 intervention practices by trained facilitators over 12 months. Primary hypotheses will be tested with 12 month outcome data. Sustainability of the intervention will be tested with 24 month data. Insights will be included in a delayed intervention conducted in control practices and evaluated in a pre-post design.

Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Being tested
Practice Facilitation
Keywords
Diabetes, type II; Primary Health Care; Outpatient Care
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Practice FacilitationBehavioural

    Clinics in the experimental arm will meet with a trained facilitator to work on change strategies that will improve risk factors for diabetes complications.

Study groups in NCT00482768
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalIntervention clinics will receive practice facilitation visits at regular intervals over a 12-month period.
Receives: Behavioral: Practice Facilitation
2No interventionControl clinics will deliver usual care for patients with diabetes.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. glycosylated hemoglobin

    Measured: 36 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. systolic blood pressure

    Measured: 36 months

  2. LDL-cholesterol

    Measured: 36 months

  3. Change in risk of coronary heart disease

    Measured: 36 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2007
  3. Primary completionApr 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,493 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00482768
Sponsor's protocol ID
R18DK075692
Other IDs
R18DK075692
Status last verified
Mar 2011
First submitted
4 Jun 2007
Last updated
19 Mar 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Culler SD, Noel PH, Arar NH, Romero RL, Palmer RF. A group randomized trial of a complexity-based organizational intervention to improve risk factors for diabetes complications in primary care settings: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2008 Mar 5;3:15. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-15.

    PubMed 18321386
  • Noel PH, Lanham HJ, Palmer RF, Leykum LK, Parchman ML. The importance of relational coordination and reciprocal learning for chronic illness care within primary care teams. Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jan-Mar;38(1):20-8. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182497262.

    PubMed 22310483
  • Bowers KW, Robertson M, Parchman ML. How inclusive leadership can help your practice adapt to change. Fam Pract Manag. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):8-11. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22335375
  • Culler SD, Parchman ML, Lozano-Romero R, Noel PH, Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Zeber JE. Cost estimates for operating a primary care practice facilitation program. Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;11(3):207-11. doi: 10.1370/afm.1496.

    PubMed 23690319
  • Mackey K, Parchman ML, Leykum LK, Lanham HJ, Noel PH, Zeber JE. Impact of the Chronic Care Model on medication adherence when patients perceive cost as a barrier. Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Jul;6(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

    PubMed 22264426
  • Arar NH, Noel PH, Leykum L, Zeber JE, Romero R, Parchman ML. Implementing quality improvement in small, autonomous primary care practices: implications for the patient-centred medical home. Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(5):289-300.

    PubMed 22186171
  • Parchman ML, Noel PH, Culler SD, Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Romero RL, Palmer RF. A randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve the delivery of chronic illness care in primary care: initial and sustained effects. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 22;8:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-93.

    PubMed 23965255
  • Noel PH, Parchman ML, Palmer RF, Romero RL, Leykum LK, Lanham HJ, Zeber JE, Bowers KW. Alignment of patient and primary care practice member perspectives of chronic illness care: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Mar 29;15:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-57.

    PubMed 24678983

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Practice Facilitation in people with Type 2 Diabetes, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

glycosylated hemoglobin (time frame: 36 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00482768, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in