AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT00486434

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Salmon Calcitonin in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

A Phase 3 study testing SMC021 Oral Calcitonin in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Nordic Bioscience A/S at 9 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this Phase III study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral salmon calcitonin in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 51 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
SMC021 Oral Calcitonin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,176 participants
Where
9 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
May 2007to Sep 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 51 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Medical history and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis

Who cannot join

  • Any other disease or medication affecting the bone or cartilage.
  • Any clinical signs or laboratory evidence diseases, which in the Investigator's opinion would preclude the participant from adhering to the Protocol or completing the trial.
  • Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 6 countries.

9 sites in 6 countries

Denmark3 sites
  • CCBR Aalborg

    Aalborg, 9000

  • CCBR Ballerup

    Ballerup Municipality, 2750

  • CCBR Vejle

    Vejle, 7100

Other trials in Denmark

Poland2 sites
  • Centrum Osteoporozy i Chorób Kostno Stawowych, ul. Waryńskiego 6/2

    Bialystok, 15-461

  • CCBR Poland

    Warsaw, 04703

Other trials in Poland

Czechia1 site
  • CCBR Czech

    Pardubice, 53002

Other trials in Czechia

Estonia1 site
  • CCBR Estonia

    Tallinn, 10128

Other trials in Estonia

Hong Kong1 site
  • CCBR Hong Kong

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

Romania1 site
  • CCBR Romania

    Bucharest, 030463

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Salmon Calcitonin in the Treatment of Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis

The purpose of this Phase III study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral salmon calcitonin in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Being tested
SMC021 Oral Calcitonin, SMC021 Placebo
Keywords
Osteoarthritis, oral salmon calcitonin, treatment, efficacy, tolerability
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SMC021 Oral CalcitoninDrug

    0.8mg SMC021 (Oral Calcitoinin) twice daily

  • SMC021 PlaceboDrug

    Placebo orally, twice daily

Study groups in NCT00486434
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorSMC021 Oral Calcitonin, 0.8 mg twice daily during 24 months
Receives: Drug: SMC021 Oral Calcitonin
2Placebo comparatorSMC021 Placebo, orally twice daily during 24 months
Receives: Drug: SMC021 Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Joint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months.

    The signal knee was chosen prior to randomization based on which knee met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The JSW is the space measured in mm between the 2 bones in the knee joint and this is assessed by x-ray. The JSW decreases with disease progression. The lower limit for participation in the trial were 2 mm JSW. There were no upper limit as long as inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. The outcome was measured as a change in JSW from baseline to month 24.

    Measured: Change from baseline to 24 months

  2. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscore in the Signal Knee

    WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the pain associated with performing each daily activity listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no pain (best), 100 is extreme pain (Worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 500. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less pain).

    Measured: Change from baseline to 24 months

  3. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Function Subscore in the Signal Knee.

    WOMAC is a self-administered set of standardized questionnaires to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The subject marks on a scale (1-100) the degree of difficulty for performing each daily function listed in the questionnaire. 0 is no difficulty (best), 100 is extreme difficulty (worst). The total function sub score for the questions are then calculated. Total possible minimum sub score is 0, maximum is 1700. The final outcome is the absolute change from baseline to 24 months. If the outcome is less that 0 there is improvement (less difficulty).

    Measured: Change from baseline to 24 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone & Cartilage Metabolism.

    The central laboratory analyzed serum CTX-I (S-Crosslaps, Elecsys) and osteocalcin as well as urine CTX-I/creatinine and CTX-II/creatinine. It was originally planned that serum CTX-II would be measured, but this was not done.

    Measured: From Baseline to Month 24

  2. Effect on Hand Osteoarthritis (OA) Assessed by X-ray & Questionnaire From Baseline to 24 Months

    To assess disease progression of OA affected joints, X-rays of both hands were performed \& assessed by two central readers (at Synarc). Hand OA was assessed by calculating total score for osteophytes, cyst erosion, \& joint space narrowing, each of which were based on sum of left and right hand X-ray analysis with possible scores of 0-66. The overall total score (possible range 0-198) was also used. Higher scores (closer to 66 or to 198 when using overall total score) imply a worse outcome. Hand analyses were based on double readings, and the mean was used in the analyses.

    The AUStralian/CANadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) questionnaire was also used for assessment of hand OA. It measures pain (5 questions), stiffness (1 question) and difficulties with daily activities (9 questions) through a visual analogue scale (0-100mm; 0 = lowest score; 100 = highest score). Lower AUSCAN scores represent a better outcome. Change (from baseline to month 24) in these scores was calculated.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 24

  3. Nature and # of AEs Monitored Continuously During Study

    Adverse events were by system organ class of all patients.

    Measured: From Baseline to Month 24

  4. Disease Progression in the Knee Evaluated by MRI.

    Disease progression in the signal knee (cartilage volume and thickness) were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRIs were performed for patients from the sites in Ballerup, Denmark, the Czech Republic, and Romania using a quality controlled low-field 0.18T C-Span scanner from Esaote dedicated to the imaging of extremities. The same solenoid coil was used for all patients at a given site.

    Measured: From Baseline to Month 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2007
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
1,176 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00486434
Sponsor's protocol ID
CSMC021C2301
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
13 Jun 2007
Last updated
26 Apr 2019

Publications

  • Hannani MT, Frederiksen P, Karsdal MA, Bager CL, Bihlet AR, Tunblad K, Oberg F, Collins JE, Kraus VB, Hunter DJ, Bacardit J, Bay-Jensen AC, Thudium CS. Therapeutic subtypes of knee osteoarthritis: differential treatment effects among predicted endotypes in past clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2026 May 7;28(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13075-026-03825-7.

    PubMed 42092979
  • Bay-Jensen AC, Mohamed K, Frederiksen P, Bihlet A, Thudium C, Henriksen K, Karsdal M. Weight loss ameliorates symptoms of osteoarthritis and is correlated with alterations in soluble bone and cartilage markers: an analysis of patient-reported outcomes and biomarkers. BMC Rheumatol. 2026 Feb 28;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41927-026-00628-w.

    PubMed 41764561
  • Bihlet AR, Bjerre-Bastos JJ, Andersen JR, Byrjalsen I, Karsdal MA, Bay-Jensen AC. Clinical and biochemical factors associated with risk of total joint replacement and radiographic progression in osteoarthritis: Data from two phase III clinical trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Dec;50(6):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 15.

    PubMed 32249039
  • Bihlet AR, Byrjalsen I, Bay-Jensen AC, Andersen JR, Christiansen C, Riis BJ, Karsdal MA. Associations between biomarkers of bone and cartilage turnover, gender, pain categories and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Sep 3;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1987-7.

    PubMed 31481084
  • Bihlet AR, Byrjalsen I, Bay-Jensen AC, Andersen JR, Christiansen C, Riis BJ, Valter I, Karsdal MA, Hochberg MC. Identification of pain categories associated with change in pain in patients receiving placebo: data from two phase 3 randomized clinical trials in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 17;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1938-5.

    PubMed 29343266
  • Karsdal MA, Byrjalsen I, Alexandersen P, Bihlet A, Andersen JR, Riis BJ, Bay-Jensen AC, Christiansen C; CSMC021C2301/2 investigators. Treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with oral salmon calcitonin: results from two phase 3 trials. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Apr;23(4):532-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.019. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

    PubMed 25582279
  • Henriksen K, Bay-Jensen AC, Christiansen C, Karsdal MA. Oral salmon calcitonin--pharmacology in osteoporosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Nov;10(11):1617-29. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.526104. Epub 2010 Oct 11.

    PubMed 20932224

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing SMC021 Oral Calcitonin in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Nordic Bioscience A/S at 9 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Denmark, Poland, Czechia, Estonia, Hong Kong and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Joint Space Width (JSW) in the Medial Tibiofemoral Knee Joint in Signal Knee Measured by X-ray After 24 Months. (time frame: Change from baseline to 24 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00486434, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in