Invasive Breast CancerPhase 3NCT00486668
A Study of AC Followed by a Combination of Paclitaxel Plus Trastuzumab or Lapatinib or Both Given Before Surgery to Patients With Operable HER2 Positive Invasive Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel in people with Invasive Breast Cancer, run by NSABP Foundation Inc at 110 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether breast cancer tumors respond (as measured by pathologic complete response: the absence of microscopic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the breast) to combined chemotherapy of AC(doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Invasive Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 529 participants
- Where
- 110 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2007to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female
- 18 years or older
- ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
- Primary breast tumor palpable and measures greater than or equal to 2.0 cm by physical exam
- Diagnosis of invasive adenocarcinoma made by core needle biopsy
- Breast cancer determined to be HER2-positive
Show all 19Show fewer
- LVEF assessment by MUGA scan or ECG within 3 months prior to randomization
- Blood counts must meet the following criteria:
- ANC greater than or equal to 1200/mm3
- Platelet count greater than or equal to 100,000/mm3
- Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10 g/dL
- Serum creatinine less than or equal to ULN for the lab
- Adequate hepatic function by these criteria:
- Total bilirubin less than or equal to the ULN for the lab unless the patient has a bilirubin elevation greater than ULN to 1.5 x ULN resulting from Gilbert's disease or similar syndrome due to slow conjugation of bilirubin; and
- Alkaline phosphatase less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN; and
- AST less than or equal to 1.5 x ULN for the lab.
- If skeletal pain present or alkaline phosphatase greater than ULN (but less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN), bone scan or PET scan must not demonstrate metastatic disease
- If AST or alkaline phosphatase greater than ULN , liver imaging (CT, MRI or PET scan) must not demonstrate definitive metastatic disease and the requirements in criterion for hepatic function must be met
- Able to swallow oral medications
Who cannot join
- FNA alone to diagnose the primary tumor
- Excisional biopsy or lumpectomy was performed prior to randomization
- Surgical axillary staging procedure prior to randomization. Exceptions: 1) FNA or core biopsy of an axillary node for any patient, and 2) although not recommended, a pre-neoadjuvant therapy SN biopsy for patients with clinically negative axillary nodes.
- Tumors clinically staged as T4
- Ipsilateral cN2b or cN3 disease (Patients with cN1 or cN2a disease are eligible)
- Definitive clinical or radiologic evidence of metastatic disease
Show all 33Show fewer
- Synchronous bilateral invasive breast cancer
- Requirement for chronic use of any of the medications or substances specified in the protocol
- Treatment including RT, chemotherapy, and/or targeted therapy for the currently diagnosed breast cancer prior to randomization
- Any sex hormonal therapy, e.g., birth control pills, ovarian hormone replacement therapy, etc. (These patients are eligible if therapy is discontinued prior to randomization)
- Continued therapy with any hormonal agent such as raloxifene, tamoxifen, or other SERM. (Patients are eligible only if these medications are discontinued prior to randomization)
- Prior history of breast cancer, including DCIS (Patients with a history of LCIS are eligible)
- Prior therapy with anthracyclines, taxanes, trastuzumab, or lapatinib for any malignancy
- Other malignancies unless the patient is considered to be disease-free for 5 or more years prior to randomization and is deemed by her physician to be at low risk for recurrence. Patients with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 5 years: carcinoma in situ of the cervix, carcinoma in situ of the colon, melanoma in situ, and basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Cardiac disease that would preclude the use of the drugs included in the B-41 treatment regimens. This includes but is not confined to:
- Active cardiac disease:
- angina pectoris requiring the use of anti-anginal medication;
- ventricular arrhythmias except for benign premature ventricular contractions controlled by medication;
- conduction abnormality requiring a pacemaker;
- supraventricular and nodal arrhythmias requiring a pacemaker or not controlled with medication; and
- clinically significant valvular disease.
- History of cardiac disease:
- myocardial infarction;
- congestive heart failure; or
- cardiomyopathy.
- Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as blood pressure greater than 150/90 mm/Hg on antihypertensive therapy
- History of or current symptomatic interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis or definitive evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis described on CT or chest x-ray in asymptomatic patients
- Sensory/motor neuropathy greater than or equal to grade 2, as defined by the NCI's CTCAE v3.0
- Malabsorption syndrome, ulcerative colitis, resection of the stomach or small bowel, or other disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function
- Other non-malignant systemic disease that would preclude treatment with any of the treatment regimens or would prevent required follow-up
- Conditions that would prohibit administration of corticosteroids
- Administration of any investigational agents within 30 days before randomization
- Pregnancy or lactation
Trial locations and contacts
110 sites in 3 countries.
110 sites in 3 countries
United States103 sites
Akron City Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 44304
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital
Albany, Georgia, 31701
New York Oncology Hematology PC-Albany
Albany, New York, 12206
Lehigh Valley Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18105
CCOP, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
MBCCOP, Medical College of Georgia Research Institute
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204
Franklin Square Hospital Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
CCOP, Montana Cancer Consortium
Billings, Montana, 59101
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Alamance Regional Medical Center
Burlington, North Carolina, 27215
Aultman Hospital
Canton, Ohio, 44710
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 28302
CCOP, Southeast Cancer Control Consortium
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Case Western Reserve/University Hospitals-Ireland Cancer Cntr.
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Kootenai Cancer Center
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814
Memorial Hospital
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
University of Missouri-Ellis Fischel
Columbia, Missouri, 65203
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43017
CCOP, Columbus, OH
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Geisinger Clinic
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17882-2170
CCOP, Dayton, OH
Dayton, Ohio, 45429
Decatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Kaiser Permanente-Franklin
Denver, Colorado, 80205
CCOP-Colorado Cancer Research Prog. Inc.(Administrative Only)
Denver, Colorado, 80224
CCOP, Des Moines, IA
Des Moines, Iowa, 52501
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Cancer Institute at Alexian Brothers Hospital Network
Elk Grove, Illinois, 60007
Cancer Center at Glens Falls Hospital
Glens Falls, New York, 12801
CCOP, Grand Rapids Clnical Oncology Program
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
University of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Kaiser Permanente Hawaii - Moanalua Med Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819
St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
CCOP, Kalamazoo, MI
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
CCOP, Kansas City (Administrative Only)
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
Thompson Cancer Survival Center-Dowell Springs
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Scripps Cancer Center-San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92037
Kaiser Permanente Rock Creek
Lafayette, Colorado, 80026
Michigan State University - Breslin Cancer Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
University of Kentucky Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Long Beach, California, 90801
Pacific Shores Medical Group
Long Beach, California, 90813
NortonHealtcare Inc.
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Joe Arrington Cancer Research & Treatment Center
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
CCOP, Marshfield Clinic
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Alamance Regional Medical Center - Off site Clinic
Mebane, North Carolina, 27302
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
CCOP, Metro-Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416
MBCCOP, Gulf Coast
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
West Virginia University Hospitals Inc.
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506-9162
Edward Hospital
Naperville, Illinois, 60566
Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
CCOP, Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112
Eastern Connecticut Hematology & Oncology Associates
Norwich, Connecticut, 06360
CCOP, Missouri Valley Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 74136
St. Joseph Hospital
Orange, California, 92868
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Desert Regional Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center
Palm Springs, California, 92262
Stanford University Medical Center
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital
Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26101
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141-3098
Allegheny General Hospital/Allegheny-Singer Research Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
NSABP Foundation, Inc.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Western Pennsylvania Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Edward Cancer Center Plainfield
Plainfield, Illinois, 60585
MBCCOP, Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
CCOP, William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Sutter Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95816
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Kaiser Permanente-San Diego
San Diego, California, 92120
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital
Santa Rosa, California, 95403
Mercy Hospital
Scranton, Pennsylvania, 18501
Puget Sound Oncology Consortium
Seattle, Washington, 98109
CCOP, Virginia Mason
Seattle, Washington, 99519
CCOP, Sioux Community Cancer consortium
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101
Sanford Cancer Center
Souix Falls, South Dakota, 57104
CCOP, Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
South Bend, Indiana, 46601
Providence Hospital - Southfield
Southfield, Michigan, 48075-9975
CCOP, Upstate Carolina
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
CCOP, Central Illinois
Springfield, Illinois, 62526
CCOP, Ozark Health Ventures LLC
Springfield, Missouri, 65804
Saint Louis UniversityHealth Sciences Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
CCOP, Heartland Cancer Research
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
CCOP, Hematology-Oncology Associates of CNY
Syracuse, New York, 13057
CCOP, Northwest
Tacoma, Washington, 83706
CCOP, Oklahoma
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
CCOP, Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Kaiser Permanente-Vallejo
Vallejo, California, 94589
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
Reading Hospital & Medical Center
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19612
Wheeling Hospital
Wheeling, West Virginia, 26003
CCOP, Wichita KS
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
CCOP, Main Line Health
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Canada6 sites
Royal Victoria Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
St. Mary's Hospital Center
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5
University of Montreal Hospital Group
Montreal, Quebec
Centre Hospitalier Affilie Universitaire De Quebec, Hospital du St-Sacrement
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Palpable and Operable HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Comparing the Combination of Trastuzumab Plus Lapatinib to Trastuzumab and to Lapatinib Administered With Weekly Paclitaxel Following AC Accompanied by Correlative Science Studies to Identify Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether breast cancer tumors respond (as measured by pathologic complete response: the absence of microscopic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the breast) to combined chemotherapy of AC(doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab or lapatinib or both given before surgery to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Trastuzumab will also be given to all patients after surgery. The study will also evaluate the toxic effects of the chemotherapy combination, including effects on the heart, and will determine survival and progression-free survival 5 years after treatment. Also, the study will look at whether there are gene expression profiles in the tumor tissue that can predict pathologic complete response.
Read the detailed description
Women with breast cancers that overexpress HER2 are at greater risk for disease progression and death than women whose tumors do not overexpress HER2. Trastuzumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of the HER2 protein blocks downstream signaling of HER2 and substantially improves the efficacy of chemotherapy in women with metastatic and early-stage HER2-positive breast cancers. Because resistance to trastuzumab eventually results in progressive disease in the metastatic setting and contributes to recurrence following adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy, it is important to develop agents other than trastuzumab that target HER2 signaling through different mechanisms of action. Lapatinib is an oral, small molecule, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2 and EGFR. Lapatinib has shown a lack of cross-resistance with trastuzumab in preclinical studies and activity in women with HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer that has progressed during trastuzumab treatment. Trastuzumab blocks the downstream signaling of HER2 by binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor. Lapatinib binds to the intracellular domains of HER2 and EGFR and prevents activation of downstream signaling pathways. Because of this different mechanism of action, lapatinib may be effective in trastuzumab-resistant disease. The study will also provide important safety information on trastuzumab and lapatinib combinations immediately following anthracycline exposure, and also provide an initial direct comparison of cardiac effects of trastuzumab and lapatinib when incorporated into a standard sequential AC followed by weekly paclitaxel (neo)adjuvant regimen.
Availability of a second agent that can interrupt HER2-signaling pathways through completely different mechanisms than those of trastuzumab offers the potential for further improvement in the management of patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Co-administration of both trastuzumab and lapatinib with chemotherapy may be important in improving outcomes in subsets of HER2-positive breast cancers. However, use of two inhibitors of the HER2 pathway will increase costs and may increase toxicity, so it will be important to identify the subsets of patients who would benefit from the dual therapy. Inhibition of HER2 with a single agent clearly is sufficient for many patients as evidenced by the results of the trastuzumab trials. Therefore, co-administration to unselected populations of women with HER2-positive breast cancers would not represent an optimal approach. Given the activity of lapatinib, it is likely that it will also be sufficiently active in inhibiting HER2-pathway activation in some patients to allow for its use as the sole inhibitor of the HER2 pathway. Different populations may also derive greater benefit from one of the HER2-blocking agents relative to the other. Identification of potential predictive factors for pathologic complete response to the combination or to either agent administered alone in neoadjuvant trials would provide important information for adjuvant trials designed to definitively address these important issues.
This study will compare 3 combined chemotherapy regimens: AC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and lapatinib, AC followed by paclitaxel plus lapatinib, and AC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab given before surgery to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
- Conditions
- Invasive Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, trastuzumab, lapatinib
- Keywords
- HER2 positive breast cancer, invasive breast cancer, lapatinib, neoadjuvant, NSABP, paclitaxel, trastuzumab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
doxorubicinDrug
60 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for cycles 1-4
cyclophosphamideDrug
600 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for cycles 1-4
paclitaxelDrug
80 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for cycles 5-8
trastuzumabDrug
First dose: 4 mg/kg IV, subsequent doses: 2 mg/kg IV weekly beginning on day 1 of the first paclitaxel cycle until 1-7 days before surgery
lapatinibDrug
Group 2: 1250 mg PO daily beginning on day 1 of the first paclitaxel cycle until 1 day before surgery. Group 3: 750 mg PO daily beginning on day 1 of the first paclitaxel cycle until 1 day before surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab | Active comparator | AC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab Receives: Drug: doxorubicin; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: paclitaxel; Drug: trastuzumab |
| Group 2: AC then paclitaxel + lapatinib | Experimental | AC followed by paclitaxel plus lapatinib Receives: Drug: doxorubicin; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: paclitaxel; Drug: lapatinib |
| Group 3: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib | Experimental | AC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab plus lapatinib Receives: Drug: doxorubicin; Drug: cyclophosphamide; Drug: paclitaxel; Drug: trastuzumab; Drug: lapatinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determination of pathologic complete response (pCR), defined by the absence of microscopic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the post chemotherapy surgical breast specimen.
Measured: surgery following chemotherapy
Secondary outcomes (7)
The determination of pCR in the surgical breast and lymph node specimens following chemotherapy.
Measured: surgery following chemotherapy
Clinical tumor measurement as assessed by physical exam of the breast and lymph nodes
Measured: baseline (prior to starting protocol therapy), at the completion of AC (before starting paclitaxel and trastuzumab and/or lapatinib), and at the conclusion of the sequential regimens (prior to surgery).
Determination of cardiac toxicity as measured by the incidence of cardiac events defined as definite or probable cardiac death
Measured: two year cumulative incidence
Determination of non-cardiac toxicities as measured by frequencies of adverse events categorized using CTCAE v3.0.
Measured: through 5 years after entry
Overall survival as measured by time from randomization until death from any cause.
Measured: through 5 years after entry
Recurrence-free interval as measured by occurrence of inoperable progressive disease, or from time of surgery to occurrence of local, regional, or distant recurrence in patients with operable disease.
Measured: through 5 years after entry
In tumor tissue, a comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data with gene expression profile data to examine coordinated overexpression of amplified genes, especially in HER2 and cMYC loci.
Measured: Tissue sample collected at surgery following chemotherapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2007
- Primary completionJun 2012
- Study completionMar 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Invasive Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 529 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NSABP Foundation Inc
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Norman Wolmark, MD, Principal investigator, NSABP Foundation Inc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00486668
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NSABP B-41
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Robidoux A, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer CE Jr, Azar CA, Atkins JN, Fehrenbacher L, Bear HD, Baez-Diaz L, Sarwar S, Margolese RG, Farrar WB, Brufsky AM, Shibata HR, Bandos H, Paik S, Costantino JP, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Lapatinib as a component of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer (NSABP protocol B-41): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1183-92. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70411-X. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
PubMed 24095300Rastogi P, Tang G, Hassan S, Geyer CE Jr, Azar CA, Magrinat GC, Suga JM, Bear HD, Baez-Diaz L, Sarwar S, Boileau JF, Brufsky AM, Shibata HR, Bandos H, Paik S, Yothers G, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Long-term outcomes of dual vs single HER2-directed neoadjuvant therapy in NSABP B-41. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(2):243-252. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06881-8. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
PubMed 36944848
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Palpable and Operable HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Comparing the Combination of Trastuzumab Plus Lapatinib to Trastuzumab and to Lapatinib Administered With Weekly Paclitaxel Following AC Accompanied by Correlative Science Studies to Identify Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00486668
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NSABP B-41
- Conditions
- Invasive Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- HER2 positive breast cancer, invasive breast cancer, lapatinib, neoadjuvant, NSABP, paclitaxel, trastuzumab, doxorubicin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 529 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NSABP Foundation IncResearch network
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Jul 2007
- Primary completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether breast cancer tumors respond (as measured by pathologic complete response: the absence of microscopic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the breast) to combined chemotherapy of AC(doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab or lapatinib or both given before surgery to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Trastuzumab will also be given to all patients after surgery. The study will also evaluate the toxic effects of the chemotherapy combination, including effects on the heart, and will determine survival and progression-free survival 5 years after treatment. Also, the study will look at whether there are gene expression profiles in the tumor tissue that can predict pathologic complete response.
Detailed description
Women with breast cancers that overexpress HER2 are at greater risk for disease progression and death than women whose tumors do not overexpress HER2. Trastuzumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of the HER2 protein blocks downstream signaling of HER2 and substantially improves the efficacy of chemotherapy in women with metastatic and early-stage HER2-positive breast cancers. Because resistance to trastuzumab eventually results in progressive disease in the metastatic setting and contributes to recurrence following adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy, it is important to develop agents other than trastuzumab that target HER2 signaling through different mechanisms of action. Lapatinib is an oral, small molecule, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2 and EGFR. Lapatinib has shown a lack of cross-resistance with trastuzumab in preclinical studies and activity in women with HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer that has progressed during trastuzumab treatment. Trastuzumab blocks the downstream signaling of HER2 by binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor. Lapatinib binds to the intracellular domains of HER2 and EGFR and prevents activation of downstream signaling pathways. Because of this different mechanism of action, lapatinib may be effective in trastuzumab-resistant disease. The study will also provide important safety information on trastuzumab and lapatinib combinations immediately following anthracycline exposure, and also provide an initial direct comparison of cardiac effects of trastuzumab and lapatinib when incorporated into a standard sequential AC followed by weekly paclitaxel (neo)adjuvant regimen.
Availability of a second agent that can interrupt HER2-signaling pathways through completely different mechanisms than those of trastuzumab offers the potential for further improvement in the management of patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Co-administration of both trastuzumab and lapatinib with chemotherapy may be important in improving outcomes in subsets of HER2-positive breast cancers. However, use of two inhibitors of the HER2 pathway will increase costs and may increase toxicity, so it will be important to identify the subsets of patients who would benefit from the dual therapy. Inhibition of HER2 with a single agent clearly is sufficient for many patients as evidenced by the results of the trastuzumab trials. Therefore, co-administration to unselected populations of women with HER2-positive breast cancers would not represent an optimal approach. Given the activity of lapatinib, it is likely that it will also be sufficiently active in inhibiting HER2-pathway activation in some patients to allow for its use as the sole inhibitor of the HER2 pathway. Different populations may also derive greater benefit from one of the HER2-blocking agents relative to the other. Identification of potential predictive factors for pathologic complete response to the combination or to either agent administered alone in neoadjuvant trials would provide important information for adjuvant trials designed to definitively address these important issues.
This study will compare 3 combined chemotherapy regimens: AC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and lapatinib, AC followed by paclitaxel plus lapatinib, and AC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab given before surgery to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab | Active comparator | Drug: doxorubicin, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: paclitaxel, Drug: trastuzumabAC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab |
| Group 2: AC then paclitaxel + lapatinib | Experimental | Drug: doxorubicin, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: paclitaxel, Drug: lapatinibAC followed by paclitaxel plus lapatinib |
| Group 3: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib | Experimental | Drug: doxorubicin, Drug: cyclophosphamide, Drug: paclitaxel, Drug: trastuzumab, Drug: lapatinibAC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab plus lapatinib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Female
- 18 years or older
- ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
- Primary breast tumor palpable and measures greater than or equal to 2.0 cm by physical exam
- Diagnosis of invasive adenocarcinoma made by core needle biopsy
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- FNA alone to diagnose the primary tumor
- Excisional biopsy or lumpectomy was performed prior to randomization
- Surgical axillary staging procedure prior to randomization. Exceptions: 1) FNA or core biopsy of an axillary node for any patient, and 2) although not recommended, a pre-neoadjuvant therapy SN biopsy for patients with clinically negative axillary nodes.
- Tumors clinically staged as T4
- Ipsilateral cN2b or cN3 disease (Patients with cN1 or cN2a disease are eligible)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| doxorubicin60 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for cycles 1-4 | Drug | Group 1: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab, Group 2: AC then paclitaxel + lapatinib, Group 3: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib |
| cyclophosphamide600 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for cycles 1-4 | Drug | Group 1: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab, Group 2: AC then paclitaxel + lapatinib, Group 3: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib |
| paclitaxel80 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for cycles 5-8 | Drug | Group 1: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab, Group 2: AC then paclitaxel + lapatinib, Group 3: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib |
| trastuzumabFirst dose: 4 mg/kg IV, subsequent doses: 2 mg/kg IV weekly beginning on day 1 of the first paclitaxel cycle until 1-7 days before surgery | Drug | Group 1: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab, Group 3: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib |
| lapatinibGroup 2: 1250 mg PO daily beginning on day 1 of the first paclitaxel cycle until 1 day before surgery. Group 3: 750 mg PO daily beginning on day 1 of the first paclitaxel cycle until 1 day before surgery. | Drug | Group 2: AC then paclitaxel + lapatinib, Group 3: AC then paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib |
Primary outcome
Determination of pathologic complete response (pCR), defined by the absence of microscopic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the post chemotherapy surgical breast specimen.
Time frame: surgery following chemotherapy
7 secondary outcomes
The determination of pCR in the surgical breast and lymph node specimens following chemotherapy.
Time frame: surgery following chemotherapy
Clinical tumor measurement as assessed by physical exam of the breast and lymph nodes
Time frame: baseline (prior to starting protocol therapy), at the completion of AC (before starting paclitaxel and trastuzumab and/or lapatinib), and at the conclusion of the sequential regimens (prior to surgery).
Determination of cardiac toxicity as measured by the incidence of cardiac events defined as definite or probable cardiac death
Time frame: two year cumulative incidence
Determination of non-cardiac toxicities as measured by frequencies of adverse events categorized using CTCAE v3.0.
Time frame: through 5 years after entry
Overall survival as measured by time from randomization until death from any cause.
Time frame: through 5 years after entry
Recurrence-free interval as measured by occurrence of inoperable progressive disease, or from time of surgery to occurrence of local, regional, or distant recurrence in patients with operable disease.
Time frame: through 5 years after entry
In tumor tissue, a comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data with gene expression profile data to examine coordinated overexpression of amplified genes, especially in HER2 and cMYC loci.
Time frame: Tissue sample collected at surgery following chemotherapy
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2016.
- Background: PubMed 24095300Robidoux A, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer CE Jr, Azar CA, Atkins JN, Fehrenbacher L, Bear HD, Baez-Diaz L, Sarwar S, Margolese RG, Farrar WB, Brufsky AM, Shibata HR, Bandos H, Paik S, Costantino JP, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Lapatinib as a component of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer (NSABP protocol B-41): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Nov;14(12):1183-92. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70411-X. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36944848Rastogi P, Tang G, Hassan S, Geyer CE Jr, Azar CA, Magrinat GC, Suga JM, Bear HD, Baez-Diaz L, Sarwar S, Boileau JF, Brufsky AM, Shibata HR, Bandos H, Paik S, Yothers G, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Long-term outcomes of dual vs single HER2-directed neoadjuvant therapy in NSABP B-41. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(2):243-252. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06881-8. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Related trials for Invasive Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
BRE-04: Window of Opportunity Trial of Preoperative Low Dose Azacitidine in High-Risk Early Stage Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Invasive, Early-stage Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Negative/Low Hormone Receptor And/or HER2 POsitive Lobular Invasive Breast Carcinoma - A Real-World International Cohort Study
Lobular Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of an Individualized Vaccine to Durvalumab and Tremelimumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Invasive Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Collecting Blood Samples From Patients With and Without Cancer to Evaluate Tests for Early Cancer Detection
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Norman Wolmark, MD principal investigator
NSABP Foundation Inc
110 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel in people with Invasive Breast Cancer, run by NSABP Foundation Inc at 110 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 110 sites in United States, Canada, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determination of pathologic complete response (pCR), defined by the absence of microscopic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the post chemotherapy surgical breast specimen. (time frame: surgery following chemotherapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00486668, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2016.