AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaPhase 3NCT00488319

Open-label Study of Flexible-dose Paliperidone ER (Extended Release) to Treat Adolescent Schizophrenia.

A Phase 3 study testing Paliperidone ER in people with Schizophrenia and Schizophrenic Disorders, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 53 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this open-label study is to evaluate the long-term (6-month) safety and tolerability of extended-release paliperidone, an atypical antipsychotic, given in flexible dosages to adolescents with schizophrenia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 17 years
What is being tested?
Paliperidone ER
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
53 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
Jun 2007to Jul 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Meets the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, otherwise physically healthy
  • Weight >=63.9 pounds (29 kg)
  • Must not be a danger to self or others and must have family support available to be maintained as outpatients
  • Responsible adult must be available to accompany the patient to the investigational site at each visit.

Who cannot join

  • Meets the DSM-IV criteria for dissociative disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, autistic disorder, or primary substance-induced psychotic disorder
  • mild, moderate, or severe mental retardation
  • History of substance dependence (including alcohol, but excluding nicotine and caffeine) according to the DSM-IV criteria in the 3 months before screening
  • pregnancy (for females)
  • History or presence of circumstances that may increase the risk of the occurrence of torsade de pointes or sudden death in association with the use of drugs that prolong the QTc interval.

Trial locations and contacts

53 sites in 11 countries.

53 sites in 11 countries

United States14 sites
  • Study site

    Cerritos, California

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio

  • Study site

    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Study site

    Lake Charles, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Study site

    Middletown, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    San Diego, California

  • Study site

    Santa Ana, California

  • Study site

    Shreveport, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia

Other trials in United States

Russia11 sites
  • Study site

    Ekaterinburg Na

  • Study site

    Kazan'

  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Moscow Russia

  • Study site

    Nizhny Novgorod

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

  • Study site

    Saratov

  • Study site

    Smolensk Region N/A

  • Study site

    Stavropol Na

  • Study site

    Tomsk Na

  • Study site

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

Poland6 sites
  • Study site

    Gdansk

  • Study site

    Lódź

  • Study site

    Poznan

  • Study site

    Sosnowiec

  • Study site

    Torun

  • Study site

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Ukraine6 sites
  • Study site

    Dnipro

  • Study site

    Hlevakha

  • Study site

    Kharkiv

  • Study site

    Kiev

  • Study site

    Odesa

  • Study site

    Simferopol

Other trials in Ukraine

India4 sites
  • Study site

    Chennai

  • Study site

    Hyderabad

  • Study site

    Mangalore

  • Study site

    Varanasi

Other trials in India

South Korea4 sites
  • Study site

    Cheonan

  • Study site

    Gyeonggi-do

  • Study site

    Kyunggi-Do

  • Study site

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

Estonia3 sites
  • Study site

    Tallinn

  • Study site

    Tartu

  • Study site

    Viljandi

Other trials in Estonia

Finland2 sites
  • Study site

    Hus

  • Study site

    Kellokoski

Other trials in Finland

Belgium1 site
  • Study site

    Antwerp

Other trials in Belgium

Bulgaria1 site
  • Study site

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Romania1 site
  • Study site

    Bucharest

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: A 6-Month, Open-Label, Single-Arm Safety Study of Flexibly Dosed Paliperidone Extended Release (1.5 - 12 mg/Day) in the Treatment of Adolescents (12 to 17 Years of Age) With Schizophrenia

The purpose of this open-label study is to evaluate the long-term (6-month) safety and tolerability of extended-release paliperidone, an atypical antipsychotic, given in flexible dosages to adolescents with schizophrenia.

Read the detailed description

This is a 6-month, open-label study (the patient, investigator, and sponsor know the study drug and dosage being taken by the patient) of the safety and tolerability of flexible-dose (1.5 to 12mg per day), extended-release (ER) paliperidone in adolescents with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Patients who have completed study R076477PSZ3001 or who discontinued from that study because of lack of efficacy but completed a minimum of 21 days of the study may enter this study. Patients may also enter this study directly without participating in R076477PSZ3001. This study consists of a 21-day screening and washout phase (to discontinue and "wash out" any medication not allowed in the study), an open-label treatment phase of up to 26 weeks during which all patients will take oral paliperidone ER every day, and a post-treatment phase consisting of a follow-up visit completed 1 week after a patient has received the final dose of paliperidone ER. The study, including the screening and posttreatment phase, will last approximately 30 weeks. Screening and washout may be conducted while a patient is either an inpatient or an outpatient. Safety will be assessed by laboratory measurements (chemistry, liver function tests, hematology, hormone, lipid assessments, prolactin [blinded], urinalysis, and urine drug screens); body weight, height, and waist circumference measurements; ECGs; and physical examinations (including Tanner staging). The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), and Simpson Angus Rating Scale (SAS) will be used to assess extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and dyskinesias. Adverse events will be monitored including psychiatric adverse events of interest (i.e., suicide and related phenomena, homicidal ideation, depressed mood, and worsening of psychosis) that may be associated with paliperidone ER in this population. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term (6-month) safety and tolerability of paliperidone ER in adolescents with schizophrenia. As exploratory secondary aims, the study will assess the effect of paliperidone ER on the long-term symptoms of schizophrenia as measured by the changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) scores, the global improvement in severity of illness as measured by the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale, the benefits in psychological, social, and school functioning as measured by the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), the changes in multiple domains of cognitive functioning measured by the modified Measurements and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) assessment battery, and the effect on sleep as measured by the sleep Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients begin the study at 6.0 mg/day of oral paliperidone ER. If a higher dosage is needed, the dosage will be increased (in increments of 3 mg/day not more frequently than once every 5 days) to 12 mg/day. If the 6.0 mg/day dosage is not well tolerated, the dosage may be decreased (not more frequently than once every 5 days) to 3.0 mg/day or 1.5 mg/day. Patients will be dosed for up to 6 months.

Being tested
Paliperidone ER
Keywords
Schizophrenia, Adolescent, Paliperidone, Antipsychotic agents, Antipsychotic drugs, Psychosis.
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Paliperidone ERDrug

    1.5 to 12 mg tablet once daily for 6 months

Study groups in NCT00488319
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
001ExperimentalPaliperidone ER1.5 to 12 mg tablet once daily for 6 months
Receives: Drug: Paliperidone ER

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    A serious adverse event as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening (the subject was at risk of death at the time of the even; it does not refer to an event that hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe), requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: Up to 2 years

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Scores - Last Observation Carried Forward

    The PANSS is a medical scale that assesses various symptoms of schizophrenia. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The total score is the sum of all 30 PANSS items, with a range of 30 (absent) to 210 (extreme ill).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 104 or the last post-baseline assessment

  2. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Based on Marder Factors - Last Observation Carried Forward

    Neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia were assessed using the 30-item PANSS scale. PANSS scale provides a total score (sum of scores of all 30 items) and scores for 3 subscales, ie, positive (7 items), negative (7 items), and general psychopathology (16 items) subscales. Each item is scored on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Positive Factor Score (range: 8 to 56): sum of select scores from positive, negative, and general psychopathology subscales. Negative Factor Score (range: 7 to 49): sum of select scores from negative and general psychopathology subscales. Disorganized Thoughts Factor Score (range: 7 to 49): sum of select scores from positive, negative, and general psychopathology subscales. Uncontrolled Hostility/Excitement Factor Score (range: 4 to 28): sum of select scores from positive and general psychopathology subscales. Anxiety/Depression Factor Score (range: 4 to 28): sum of select scores from general psychopathology subscale. Higher scores indicate worsening.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 104 or the last post-baseline assessment

  3. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint in the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI-S) Scale - Last Observation Carried Forward

    The CGI-S rating scale is a 7-point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 is equivalent to "Normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 is equivalent to "Among the most extremely ill participants". Higher scores indicate worsening.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 104 or the last post-baseline assessment

  4. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint in the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) - Last Observation Carried Forward

    The CGAS is a 100 point rating scale which measures the psychological, social, and school functioning for children 6 to 17 years of age. The score ranges from 1 to 100, divided into 10 equal intervals to rate the impairment level of general functioning (poor to superior functioning). Higher scores denote better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 104 or the last post-baseline assessment

  5. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Motor Speed Domain Test Variable, Finger Tapping Dominant- and Non-Dominant Hand, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  6. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Attention/Working Memory Domain Test Variable Coding, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  7. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Attention/Working Memory Domain Test Variable Digit Span, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  8. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label - Cognitive Domain: Verbal Learning and Memory Domain Test Variable Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning Story - Total, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  9. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Verbal Learning and Memory Domain Test Variable California Verbal Learning Test-Total Trials, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  10. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Visual Learning and Memory Domain Test Variable, Rey Complex Figure Test - Total, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  11. Change From Open Label Baseline to Open Label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Social Cognition Domain Test Variable - Theory of Mind-Total - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  12. Change From Open Label Baseline to Open Label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Speed of Processing Domain Test Variable Trials Part A Time: Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  13. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Speed of Processing Domain Test Variable Child Color Trials Test 1 Time: Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  14. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Speed of Processing Domain Test Variable Phonetic Verbal Fluency: Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  15. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Speed of Processing Domain Test Variable Semantic Verbal Fluency, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  16. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Executive Functioning (Reasoning and Problem Solving) Domain Test Variable, Trials Part B Time, Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  17. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint - Cognitive Domain: Executive Functioning (Reasoning and Problem Solving) Domain Test Variable - Wisconsin Card Sort Test-Total Errors: Scaled - Last Observation Carried Forward

    A comprehensive neuropsychological examination that measures different domains of cognitive functioning is provided. They are either assessed as T-scores [mean=50, SD=10 range 1-100]; z-scores [mean=0, SD=1, and can be positive or negative] or scaled scores [mean=10, SD=3, and can be positive or negative]. The theory-of-mind total score is a raw score that ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores for all scales denote better performance.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  18. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint in the Sleep Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Quality of Sleep - Last Observation Carried Forward

    Sleep VAS is a self administered scale that rates the quality of sleep and daytime drowsiness. Participants make a mark on a line to represent how well they have slept in the previous 7 days ("very badly" to "very well") and how often they have felt drowsy within the previous 7 days ("not at all" to "all the time"). The score for each item ranges from 0 to 100 mm. For quality of sleep, a score of 0 indicates "Very badly" and a score of 100 indicates "Very well." For daytime drowsiness, a score of 0 indicates "Not at all" and a score of 100 indicates "All the time." Improvement of the condition is indicated by the positive change for the quality of sleep and the negative change for the daytime drowsiness.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 104 or the last post-baseline assessment

  19. Change From Open-label Baseline to Open-label Endpoint in the Sleep Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Daytime Drowsiness - Last Observation Carried Forward

    Sleep VAS is a self administered scale that rates the quality of sleep and daytime drowsiness. Participants make a mark on a line to represent how well they have slept in the previous 7 days ("very badly" to "very well") and how often they have felt drowsy within the previous 7 days ("not at all" to "all the time"). The score for each item ranges from 0 to 100 mm. For quality of sleep, a score of 0 indicates "Very badly" and a score of 100 indicates "Very well." For daytime drowsiness, a score of 0 indicates "Not at all" and a score of 100 indicates "All the time." Improvement of the condition is indicated by the positive change for the quality of sleep and the negative change for the daytime drowsiness.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 104 or the last post-baseline assessment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jun 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2007
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
400 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00488319
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR012616
Other IDs
R076477PSZ3002
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
18 Jun 2007
Last updated
10 Feb 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gopal S, Lane R, Nuamah I, Copenhaver M, Singh J, Hough D, Bach M, Savitz A. Evaluation of Potentially Prolactin-Related Adverse Events and Sexual Maturation in Adolescents with Schizophrenia Treated with Paliperidone Extended-Release (ER) for 2 Years: A Post Hoc Analysis of an Open-Label Multicenter Study. CNS Drugs. 2017 Sep;31(9):797-808. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0437-9.

    PubMed 28660406

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Paliperidone ER in people with Schizophrenia and Schizophrenic Disorders, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 53 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 53 sites in United States, Russia, Poland, Ukraine, India and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability (time frame: Up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00488319, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in