Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT00488475
Observational Trial With Enbrel
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continue to undergo rapid change. Randomized controlled trials such as the TEMPO study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- etanercept
- How many people
- 4,945 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Sep 2006to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Only patients for whom the decision has already been made to initiate treatment with Enbrel® can be enrolled in this observational trial. These patients must have a proven diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
Who cannot join
- Sepsis or risk for sepsis,
- Acute infection,
- Hypersensitivity against Etanercept
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Pfizer Investigational Site
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
About this study
Official title: A 1 Year Observational Study of the Use of Etanercept in Routine German Clinical Practice to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: a Health Economic, Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation
The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continue to undergo rapid change. Randomized controlled trials such as the TEMPO study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate. Importantly, the TEMPO study showed that patients treated with etanercept and methotrexate could reach the newer therapeutic goals of low disease activity and remission, and that the physicians, patients, and payers are no longer prepared to accept the goal of "Reduction of symptoms". RCT are important and powerful tools in assessing efficacy and safety but have their limitations in terms of generalisability. In order to assess health economics, clinical effectiveness and safety of etanercept, they need to be measured by performing observational studies of unselected patients. This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real world setting. This will include centers that would not normally take part in RCT. The study will assess treatment with etanercept with descriptive statistics of the following parameters: Health economic, Safety, Effectiveness. In addition, there was a previous study of similar design, but of only 3 months duration (101354), which will allow comparison with historical data. Since previous study, there have been a number of significant changes: Introduction of a new formulation for etanercept (Enbrel® 50mg · once weekly), Definition of early RA has been modified to short disease duration (from 3 months to 1 year).
Read the detailed description
Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- etanercept
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
etanerceptDrug
Also called Enbrel
The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labelling of Enbrel® in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis | Not described Receives: Drug: etanercept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 26
Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) consists 18 questions to assess daily activities in last 7 days. Each question is answered by the participant as "Yes, I can perform the activity without difficulty" (score assigned = 2), "Yes, but with some difficulties" (score assigned = 1) and "No or only with help" (score assigned = 0). Final FFbH score (FFbH functional capacity) is then computed according to formula: (Sum of all single scores * 100% [percent]) / (2 * number of answered questions) ranging between 0-100; higher score indicates better daily activities. FFbH functional remission is defined as FFbH functional capacity of >= 83%.
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 52
Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) consists 18 questions to assess daily activities in last 7 days. Each question is answered by the participant as "Yes, I can perform the activity without difficulty" (score assigned = 2), "Yes, but with some difficulties" (score assigned = 1) and "No or only with help" (score assigned = 0). Final FFbH score (FFbH functional capacity) is then computed according to formula: (Sum of all single scores * 100%) / (2 * number of answered questions), ranging between 0-100; higher score indicates better daily activities. FFbH functional remission is defined as FFbH functional capacity of >= 83%.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (18)
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health state profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. EQ-5D score is transformed to EQ-5D-TTO score ranging from -0.205 to 0.999; higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)
WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Healthcare Resource Utilization
Participants' utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization
Participants' duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Duration of Working Disability
Duration of working disability was assessed as number of days a participant was disable to work. Duration of work disability was considered as "0" if participant was not disable to work during period of assessment. At baseline, participants' duration of working disability during last 12 months before enrollment into the study was documented. After enrollment, participants' duration of working disability was documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and Patient global assessment of disease activity (recorded on a VAS of 0 mm [very good] to 100 mm [very bad]). Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 less than (<) 2.6 = remission, DAS28 less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to <=5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>) 5.1 = high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour. A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Remission Determined by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS 28)
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and Patient global assessment of disease activity (recorded on a VAS of 0 mm [very good] to 100 mm [very bad]). Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.
Measured: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Response Determined by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS 28)
The DAS28-based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria was used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and level of disease activity reached (final values). Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 final value <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 final values >3.2 to <=5.1 and >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 final values <=3.2 and >3.2 to <=5.1; non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 with DAS28 final values <=3.2, >3.2 to <=5.1 and >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 final values >5.1. Good and moderate responders were considered to have DAS28 response.
Measured: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Duration of Morning Stiffness
Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes (If none was present = 0; If stiffness persisted the entire day, 999 minutes was recorded [largest value possible to document] which may also include values up to 1440 minutes [= complete day]).
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Participants assessed arthritis pain using a 0 mm - 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0 mm = minimum possible pain (best) and 100 mm = maximum possible pain (worst).
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Physician global assessment of disease activity was measured on a 0 mm to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100mm = maximum possible disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Patient global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm= very good to 100 mm = very bad.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Participants assessed their fatigue during the last 7 days using a 0 mm - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue.
Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2006
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 4,945 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00488475
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0881A1-102335
- Other IDs
- B1801121
- Status last verified
- Jul 2014
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2007
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Druce KL, Aikman L, Dilleen M, Burden A, Szczypa P, Basu N. Fatigue independently predicts different work disability dimensions in etanercept-treated rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 May 29;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1598-8.
PubMed 29843776
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 1 Year Observational Study of the Use of Etanercept in Routine German Clinical Practice to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: a Health Economic, Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00488475
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0881A1-102335
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 4,945 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2006
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jun 2007 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continue to undergo rapid change. Randomized controlled trials such as the TEMPO study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate. Importantly, the TEMPO study showed that patients treated with etanercept and methotrexate could reach the newer therapeutic goals of low disease activity and remission, and that the physicians, patients, and payers are no longer prepared to accept the goal of "Reduction of symptoms". RCT are important and powerful tools in assessing efficacy and safety but have their limitations in terms of generalisability. In order to assess health economics, clinical effectiveness and safety of etanercept, they need to be measured by performing observational studies of unselected patients. This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real world setting. This will include centers that would not normally take part in RCT. The study will assess treatment with etanercept with descriptive statistics of the following parameters: Health economic, Safety, Effectiveness. In addition, there was a previous study of similar design, but of only 3 months duration (101354), which will allow comparison with historical data. Since previous study, there have been a number of significant changes: Introduction of a new formulation for etanercept (Enbrel® 50mg · once weekly), Definition of early RA has been modified to short disease duration (from 3 months to 1 year).
Detailed description
Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis | – | Drug: etanercept |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Only patients for whom the decision has already been made to initiate treatment with Enbrel® can be enrolled in this observational trial. These patients must have a proven diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Sepsis or risk for sepsis,
- Acute infection,
- Hypersensitivity against Etanercept
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| etanerceptAlso: EnbrelThe patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labelling of Enbrel® in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment. | Drug | Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) consists 18 questions to assess daily activities in last 7 days. Each question is answered by the participant as "Yes, I can perform the activity without difficulty" (score assigned = 2), "Yes, but with some difficulties" (score assigned = 1) and "No or only with help" (score assigned = 0). Final FFbH score (FFbH functional capacity) is then computed according to formula: (Sum of all single scores * 100% [percent]) / (2 * number of answered questions) ranging between 0-100; higher score indicates better daily activities. FFbH functional remission is defined as FFbH functional capacity of >= 83%.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) consists 18 questions to assess daily activities in last 7 days. Each question is answered by the participant as "Yes, I can perform the activity without difficulty" (score assigned = 2), "Yes, but with some difficulties" (score assigned = 1) and "No or only with help" (score assigned = 0). Final FFbH score (FFbH functional capacity) is then computed according to formula: (Sum of all single scores * 100%) / (2 * number of answered questions), ranging between 0-100; higher score indicates better daily activities. FFbH functional remission is defined as FFbH functional capacity of >= 83%.
18 secondary outcomes
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Healthcare Resource Utilization
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Duration of Working Disability
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Swollen Joints Count (SJC)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Tender Joints Count (TJC)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Remission Determined by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS 28)
Time frame: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Percentage of Participants With Response Determined by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS 28)
Time frame: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Duration of Morning Stiffness
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52
Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29843776Druce KL, Aikman L, Dilleen M, Burden A, Szczypa P, Basu N. Fatigue independently predicts different work disability dimensions in etanercept-treated rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 May 29;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1598-8.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Platform Study of Targeted Therapies for Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Prospective Observational Study of Filgotinib in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 1
Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability, PK/PD of Surovatamig in Adult RA or SLE Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin as an Adjunct to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 26 (time frame: Week 26). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00488475, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.