AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT00488475

Observational Trial With Enbrel

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continue to undergo rapid change. Randomized controlled trials such as the TEMPO study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
etanercept
How many people
4,945 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Sep 2006to Apr 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Only patients for whom the decision has already been made to initiate treatment with Enbrel® can be enrolled in this observational trial. These patients must have a proven diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis

Who cannot join

  • Sepsis or risk for sepsis,
  • Acute infection,
  • Hypersensitivity against Etanercept

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A 1 Year Observational Study of the Use of Etanercept in Routine German Clinical Practice to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: a Health Economic, Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation

The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continue to undergo rapid change. Randomized controlled trials such as the TEMPO study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate. Importantly, the TEMPO study showed that patients treated with etanercept and methotrexate could reach the newer therapeutic goals of low disease activity and remission, and that the physicians, patients, and payers are no longer prepared to accept the goal of "Reduction of symptoms". RCT are important and powerful tools in assessing efficacy and safety but have their limitations in terms of generalisability. In order to assess health economics, clinical effectiveness and safety of etanercept, they need to be measured by performing observational studies of unselected patients. This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real world setting. This will include centers that would not normally take part in RCT. The study will assess treatment with etanercept with descriptive statistics of the following parameters: Health economic, Safety, Effectiveness. In addition, there was a previous study of similar design, but of only 3 months duration (101354), which will allow comparison with historical data. Since previous study, there have been a number of significant changes: Introduction of a new formulation for etanercept (Enbrel® 50mg · once weekly), Definition of early RA has been modified to short disease duration (from 3 months to 1 year).

Read the detailed description

Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician

Being tested
etanercept
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • etanerceptDrug

    Also called Enbrel

    The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labelling of Enbrel® in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.

Study groups in NCT00488475
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with Rheumatoid ArthritisNot described
Receives: Drug: etanercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 26

    Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) consists 18 questions to assess daily activities in last 7 days. Each question is answered by the participant as "Yes, I can perform the activity without difficulty" (score assigned = 2), "Yes, but with some difficulties" (score assigned = 1) and "No or only with help" (score assigned = 0). Final FFbH score (FFbH functional capacity) is then computed according to formula: (Sum of all single scores * 100% [percent]) / (2 * number of answered questions) ranging between 0-100; higher score indicates better daily activities. FFbH functional remission is defined as FFbH functional capacity of >= 83%.

    Measured: Week 26

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 52

    Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) consists 18 questions to assess daily activities in last 7 days. Each question is answered by the participant as "Yes, I can perform the activity without difficulty" (score assigned = 2), "Yes, but with some difficulties" (score assigned = 1) and "No or only with help" (score assigned = 0). Final FFbH score (FFbH functional capacity) is then computed according to formula: (Sum of all single scores * 100%) / (2 * number of answered questions), ranging between 0-100; higher score indicates better daily activities. FFbH functional remission is defined as FFbH functional capacity of >= 83%.

    Measured: Week 52

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52

  2. Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Time Trade Off (TTO)

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health state profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. EQ-5D score is transformed to EQ-5D-TTO score ranging from -0.205 to 0.999; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52

  3. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Special Health Problems (WPAI:SHP)

    WPAI:SHP is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the amount of absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss and daily activity impairment attributable to rheumatoid arthritis for a period of 7 days prior to each visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism or reduced on-the-job effectiveness), overall work impairment (work productivity loss or absenteeism plus presenteeism) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are transformed to impairment percentages (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52

  4. Healthcare Resource Utilization

    Participants' utilization of healthcare resources was evaluated as number of events for healthcare resources utilization including: number of visits to general practitioners, visits to rheumatologist, visits to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of events for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52

  5. Duration of Healthcare Resources Utilization

    Participants' duration of healthcare resources utilization was evaluated as number of days for healthcare resources utilization including: duration of visits to general practitioners, to rheumatologist, to other medical specialists, inpatient hospitalizations, inpatient rehabilitations, inpatient follow-up treatment, outpatient rehabilitations, physiotherapy, and other healthcare utilizations. At baseline, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilizations during last 12 months before enrollment into the study were documented. After enrollment, number of days for participants' healthcare resources utilization were documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52

  6. Duration of Working Disability

    Duration of working disability was assessed as number of days a participant was disable to work. Duration of work disability was considered as "0" if participant was not disable to work during period of assessment. At baseline, participants' duration of working disability during last 12 months before enrollment into the study was documented. After enrollment, participants' duration of working disability was documented for last 6 months after previous documentation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52

  7. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and Patient global assessment of disease activity (recorded on a VAS of 0 mm [very good] to 100 mm [very bad]). Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 less than (<) 2.6 = remission, DAS28 less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than or equal to (>=) 3.2 to <=5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>) 5.1 = high disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  8. Swollen Joints Count (SJC)

    Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  9. Tender Joints Count (TJC)

    Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  10. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

    ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour. A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With Remission Determined by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS 28)

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and Patient global assessment of disease activity (recorded on a VAS of 0 mm [very good] to 100 mm [very bad]). Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28 defined remission was classified as a score of <2.6.

    Measured: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  12. Percentage of Participants With Response Determined by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS 28)

    The DAS28-based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria was used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and level of disease activity reached (final values). Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 final value <=3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 final values >3.2 to <=5.1 and >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 final values <=3.2 and >3.2 to <=5.1; non-responders: change from baseline <=0.6 with DAS28 final values <=3.2, >3.2 to <=5.1 and >5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <=1.2 with DAS28 final values >5.1. Good and moderate responders were considered to have DAS28 response.

    Measured: Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  13. Duration of Morning Stiffness

    Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes (If none was present = 0; If stiffness persisted the entire day, 999 minutes was recorded [largest value possible to document] which may also include values up to 1440 minutes [= complete day]).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  14. Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain

    Participants assessed arthritis pain using a 0 mm - 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0 mm = minimum possible pain (best) and 100 mm = maximum possible pain (worst).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  15. Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    Physician global assessment of disease activity was measured on a 0 mm to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100mm = maximum possible disease activity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  16. Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

    Patient global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm= very good to 100 mm = very bad.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  17. C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 6, 12, 26, 38, 52

  18. Fatigue Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Participants assessed their fatigue during the last 7 days using a 0 mm - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no fatigue and 100 mm = worst possible fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 26, 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jun 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2006
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionApr 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
4,945 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00488475
Sponsor's protocol ID
0881A1-102335
Other IDs
B1801121
Status last verified
Jul 2014
First submitted
18 Jun 2007
Last updated
1 Aug 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Druce KL, Aikman L, Dilleen M, Burden A, Szczypa P, Basu N. Fatigue independently predicts different work disability dimensions in etanercept-treated rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 May 29;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1598-8.

    PubMed 29843776

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Functional Remission Determined by Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH) at Week 26 (time frame: Week 26). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00488475, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in